Undiagnosed HIV infection in acute care hospitals.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A L Avins.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the prescribing patterns and predictors of physician choice in the selection of intravenous thrombolytic therapy for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Survey of a random sample of 250 California cardiologists between July 1989 and February 1990. RESULTS: The adjusted response rate was 66%. For a patient presenting within 30 minutes after the onset of an uncomplicated acute anterior-wall myocardial infarction, 98% of respondents reported that they would prescribe a thrombolytic agent, 79% chose tissue plasminogen activator, and 21% chose streptokinase. Users of tissue plasminogen activator were nine times more likely than streptokinase users to perceive tissue plasminogen activator as superior for early coronary artery recanalization, although most users of tissue plasminogen activator and streptokinase perceived no difference between the two agents for improvement in ejection fraction and mortality. Estimates of side effects did not distinguish the two groups. Users of streptokinase were eight times more likely to practice in a health maintenance organization than were users of tissue plasminogen. For a self-paying patient, 36% of users of tissue plasminogen activator said that they would switch to streptokinase, and 27% would switch for a patient insured by Medicaid. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that physicians place great emphasis on surrogate end points. Physicians vary in their willingness to use more expensive therapies over cheaper alternatives, even when their perceptions of the relative risks and benefits are similar. The patient's insurance status and the provider's practice setting may exert an important influence on doctors' clinical choices.
Epidemiologic studies involving HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) antibody testing create ethical dilemmas, particularly about notifying asymptomatic seropositive subjects. Four study designs address this problem: mandatory notification, optional notification, anonymous testing, and blind testing. No single design consistently optimizes the trade-off between valid and ethical research. Each strategy differs substantially from the others in its effect on response rates, bias, ability to perform longitudinal studies, numbers of subjects who learn their test results, and the number of subjects counseled about HIV risk reduction. Both local institutional review boards and potential subjects of study (and their sexual partners) should participate in decisions regarding the conduct of sensitive AIDS (acquired immunodeficiency syndrome) research.
The three-decade long controversy surrounding the status of triglycerides as an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease is presented. The studies that reported an association and the clinical trials of cholesterol-lowering medications are examined. Because of the inconsistency between the observational findings and the consistently negative clinical trial findings, treatment of isolated hypertriglyceridemia cannot be recommended at present.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.