PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A L Sazanova

Publications and source records attributed to A L Sazanova.

13 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2007

Expression of positional candidates for shell thickness in the chicken.

Expression of 12 positional candidates for QTL affecting shell thickness at 53 wk of lay age (ST53) was investigated by real-time PCR in the distal part of chicken oviducts (uterus) with a forming eggshell. In the local chicken breed Green-legged Partridgenous, the complete cDNA CR523443 (ChEST985k21) was downregulated with ratio of means 0.49 (P < or = 0.01) in the group with low ST53 (248.6 +/- 16.62 microm) relative to the group with the highest ST53 (372.4 +/- 2.07 microm). Expression of this gene was highly correlated (0.85, P < or = 0.01) with shell thickness. No significant difference in expression between the 2 groups with thick (378.4 +/- 3.65 microm) and thin (227.8 +/- 8.99 microm) shell and no significant correlation of expression level with ST53 were detected in Rhode Island Red, which could be explained by strict selection to egg quality traits, including optimal shell thickness in this commercial layer breed. These data suggested that CR523443 was a candidate gene for QTL ST53 in the chicken.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Gene expression profiling of hereditary exencephaly in chickens.

In this preliminary study, differentially expressed genes were investigated in cranial tissues from chickens with hereditary exencephaly using cDNA microarrays containing 1,152 genes and expressed sequence tags (ESTs). Genes showing twofold or greater differences at P < 0.05 between affected and normal cranial cells were considered to be candidates for hereditary exencephaly in chicken. Eighteen ESTs (11 known genes/homologues) were upregulated and 108 ESTs (51 known genes/homologues) were downregulated. The EST AL584231 (ROS006C9), orthologous to human MTHFD1, a known candidate gene for human neural tube defects (NTDs), was expressed at the same level both in normal and affected chicken cranial tissues. ESTs AL584253 (ROS006F7, thioredoxin reductase 1) and AL585511 (ROS024H9, thioredoxin), both involved in NTD pathogenic pathways in mice, were downregulated and had mean ratios of 0.41 and 0.04 for expression in affected vs. normal cells respectively. Expression differences of these two ESTs were confirmed by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. These data indicate that ESTs AL584253 and AL585511 are candidates for hereditary exencephaly in chickens.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Chromosomal localization of seven HSA3q13-->q23 NotI linking clones on chicken microchromosomes: orthology of GGA14 and GGA15 to a gene-rich region of HSA3.

Double-color fluorescence in situ hybridization was performed on chicken chromosomes using seven unique clones from the human chromosome 3-specific NotI linking libraries. Six of them (NL1-097, NL2-092, NL2-230, NLM-007, NLM-118, and NLM-196) were located on the same chicken microchromosome and NL1-290 on another. Two chicken microchromosome GGA15-specific BAC clones, JE024F14 containing the IGVPS gene and JE020G17 containing the ALDH1A1 gene, were cytogenetically mapped to the same microchromosome that carried the six NotI linking clones, allowing identification of this chromosome as GGA15. Two GGA14-specific clones, JE027C23 and JE014E08 containing the HBA gene cluster, were co-localized on the same microchromosome as NL1-290, suggesting that this chromosome was GGA14. The results indicated that the human chromosomal region HSA3q13-->q23 is likely to be orthologous to GGA15 and GGA14. The breakpoint of evolutionary conservation of human and chicken chromosomes was detected on HSA3q13.3-->q23 between NL1-290, on the one hand, and six other NotI clones, on the other hand. Considering the available chicken-human comparative mapping data, another breakpoint appears to exist between the above NotI loci and four other genes, TFRC, EIF4A2, SKIL and DHX36 located on HSA3q24-->qter and GGA9. Based on human sequences within the NotI clones, localization of the six new chicken coding sequences orthologous to the human/rodent genes was suggested to be on GGA15 and one on GGA14. Microchromosomal location of seven NotI clones from the HSA3q21 T-band region can be considered as evidence in support of our hypothesis about the functional analogy of mammalian T-bands and avian microchromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

[Comparative compositional mapping of chicken and quail chromosomes].

The distribution of various isochore families on mitotic chromosomes of domestic chicken and Japanese quail was studied by the method of fluorescence in situ DNA--DNA hybridization (FISH). DNA of various isochore families was shown to be distributed irregularly and similarly on chromosomes of domestic chicken and Japanese quail. The GC-rich isochore families (H2, H3, and H4) hybridized mainly to microchromosomes and a majority of macrochromosome telomeric regions. In chicken, an intense fluorescence was also in a structural heterochromatin region of the Z chromosome long arm. In some regions of the quail macrochromosome arms, hybridization was also with isochore families H3 and H4. On macrochromosomes of both species, the pattern of hybridization with isochores of the H2 and H3 families resembled R-banding. The light isochores (L1 and L2 families) are mostly detected within macrochromosome internal regions corresponding to G bands, whereas microchromosomes lack light isochores. Although mammalian and avian karyotypes differ significantly in organization, the isochore distribution in genomes of these two lineages of the warm-blooded animals is similar in principle. On macrochromosomes of the two avian species studied, a pattern of isochore distribution resembled that of mammalian chromosomes. The main specific feature of the avian genome, a great number of microchromosomes (about 30% of the genome), determines a compositional specialization of the latter. This suggests the existence of not only structural but also functional compartmentalization of the avian genome.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Compositional mapping of chicken chromosomes and identification of the gene-richest regions.

'Compositional chromosomal mapping', namely the assessment of the GC level of chromosomal bands, led to the identification, in the human chromosomes, of the GC-richest H3+ bands and of the GC-poorest L1+ bands, which were so called on the basis of the isochore family predominantly present in the bands. The isochore organization of the avian genome is very similar to those of most mammals, the only difference being the presence of an additional, GC-richest, H4 isochore family. In contrast, the avian karyotypes are very different from those of mammals, being characterized, in most species, by few macrochromosomes and by a large number of microchromosomes. The 'compositional mapping' of chicken mitotic and meiotic chromosomes by in-situ hybridization of isochore families showed that the chicken GC-richest isochores are localized not only on a large number of microchromosomes but also on almost all telomeric bands of macrochromosomes. On the other hand, the GC-poorest isochores are generally localized on the internal regions of macrochromosomes and are almost absent in microchromosomes. Thus, the distinct localization of the GC-richest and the GC-poorest bands observed on human chromosomes appears to be a general feature of chromosomes from warm-blooded vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed1996

[Mapping the chicken genome: problems and perspectives].

Various molecular methods are now used to map the chicken genome, including chromosome scraping, flow cytofluorimetry, zonal centrifugation, construction of chromosome-specific libraries, genetic analysis with polymorphic DNA markers, and in situ hybridization. Two main drawbacks are characteristic of existing maps of chicken chromosomes. First, classic genetic maps (i.e., linkage groups of genes for morphological, physiological, and biochemical characters), physical maps of chromosomes, and new genetic maps constructed on the basis of polymorphic DNA markers (RFLP, RAPD, VNTR, SSR, and CR1-PCR) do not coordinate with one another. Second, a relatively low number of genes is present in classic genetic maps and physical chromosome maps. Application of cytogenetic methods to chromosome mapping in birds is limited because of some specific features characteristic of the organization of avian genomes. For the same reason, studying the location and expression of avian genes is very important. Since mammalian and avian genomes differ in structure, revealing their possible common functional characteristics will provide for a better understanding of the general mechanisms that control biologically important characters in higher animals.

Animals↗
PubMed1995

[Localization of various DNA sequences on the mitotic chromosomes of the chicken].

The chromosomal localization of the chicken transferrin receptor gene, as well as sequences that were homologous to the viral oncogene v-fos and the human gene families ZFY and SRY were determined by the method of nonisotopic DNA-DNA in situ hybridization. A correspondence was revealed between the Comptonian linkage group 10 and chromosome 1. A common origin of avian chromosome Z and mammalian chromosome Y is hypothesized.

Animals↗