Biomedical subjects

A L Winkworth

Publications and source records attributed to A L Winkworth.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Efficacy of speech pathology management for chronic cough: a randomised placebo controlled trial of treatment efficacy.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough that persists despite medical treatment may respond to speech pathology intervention, but the efficacy of such treatment has not been investigated in prospective randomised trials. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of a speech pathology intervention programme for chronic cough. METHODS: A single blind, randomised, placebo controlled trial was conducted in 87 patients with chronic cough that persisted despite medical treatment. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either a specifically designed speech pathology intervention or a placebo intervention. Participants in both groups attended four intervention sessions with a qualified speech pathologist. RESULTS: Participants in the treatment group had a significant reduction in cough (8.9 to 4.6, p<0.001), breathing (7.9 to 4.7, p<0.001), voice (7.3 to 4.6, p<0.001) upper airway (8.9 to 5.9, p<0.001) symptom scores and limitation (2.3 to 1.6, p<0.001) ratings following intervention. There was also a significant reduction in breathing (6.8 to 5.6, p = 0.047), cough (7.6 to 6.3, p = 0.014), and limitation (2.3 to 2.0, p = 0.038) scores in the placebo group, but the degree of improvement was significantly less than in the treatment group (p<0.01). Clinical judgement of outcome indicated successful ratings in 88% of participants in the treatment group compared with 14% in the placebo group (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Speech pathology is an effective management intervention for chronic cough which may be a viable alternative for patients who do not respond to medical treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

Speech breathing and the Lombard effect.

Respiratory measurements were made using linearized magnetometers placed antero-posteriorly over the rib cages and abdomens of five healthy young women. Background noise was introduced over headphones simultaneously as "babble" presented binaurally at 55 dB ("moderate noise") and 70 dB ("high noise"). Speech during oral reading and spontaneous monologue was transduced with a microphone positioned near the lips, from which a speaking intensity signal (dBA) was derived. Subjects were instructed to speak during the noise conditions, but no instruction was given to alter speaking intensity. Compared with a "no noise" condition, the speaking intensities of all the subjects increased significantly for both speech tasks in the moderate and high noise conditions, thereby replicating the well-documented Lombard effect. No consistent trend of lung volume change was observed, in contrast to the linear increases in speech intensity as the noise level increased. For the higher speech intensities during the moderate and high noise conditions both initiation and termination lung volumes either increased or decreased. These preliminary findings suggest that when speech intensity is increased following the introduction of noise via headphones rather than by specific instruction to speak more loudly, speakers employ variable lung volume strategies for intensity control.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Breathing patterns during spontaneous speech.

Lung volumes, speech intensity, the linguistic location of inspirations, and the variability of each, were studied during spontaneous speech in 6 healthy young women over 7 to 10 sessions each, using respiratory inductance plethysmography. Although average lung volume levels were within the vital capacity range previously reported for speech (Hixon, Goldman, & Mead, 1973), significant inter- and intrasubject variability was observed. This variability was considerable for some subjects (average initiation lung volume varying between 42 and 63% VC over the sessions) and relatively small for others (between 47 and 53% VC). Some of the lung volume variation was associated with changes in mood state, examined by self-report questionnaire at each measurement occasion. Linguistic factors were important influences in the lung volume variation. The majority of breaths in the conversations and monologues preceded structural (clause) boundaries. The volume of air inspired preutterance was found to be linked to the length of the ensuing breath group in each of our 6 subjects, as longer breath groups, spanning up to seven clauses in the spontaneous speech, were anticipated by inspiring to a higher lung volume. The subjects used a comfortable speaking intensity range, which varied for different individuals and sessions over 4 to 18 dB. Increases in speech intensity within individual ranges were not associated with increased lung volumes. The data provide novel insight into associations between physiological and linguistic factors in the control of speech breathing, and are suggestive of the existence of neural planning of the respiratory system, in anticipation of the demands of the utterance.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Variability and consistency in speech breathing during reading: lung volumes, speech intensity, and linguistic factors.

Lung volumes during reading and associated factors such as speech intensity and linguistic influences were studied in six healthy young women over 7 to 10 sessions, using respiratory inductive plethysmography. Intrasubject variability of lung volumes over the sessions was almost as great as the intersubject variability. Some of the intrasubject variability was associated with natural variations of speech intensity within a "comfortable loudness" range. The lung volume variability during reading is contrasted with high degrees of both inter- and intrasubject consistency in the location of inspirations, which occurred almost exclusively at grammatically appropriate places in the texts (paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase boundaries). Within each reading passage, lung volumes were significantly increased for (a) louder utterances, (b) inspirations at sentence and paragraph boundaries compared to inspirations at other locations within sentences, (c) longer utterances compared to shorter utterances, and (d) initial breaths compared to final breaths. The implications of these findings for the neural control of breathing during speech are considered.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Inspiratory speech as a management option for spastic dysphonia. Case study.

A case study is reported of a subject who has used inspiratory speech (IS) for 6 years as a means of overcoming the communication problems of long-standing adductor spastic dysphonia (ASD). The subject was studied to confirm his use of IS, determine the mechanisms of its production, investigate its effects on ventilatory gas exchange, and confirm that it was perceptually preferable to ASD expiratory speech (ES). Results showed that the production and control of a high laryngeal resistance to airflow were necessary for usable IS. Voice quality was quantitatively and perceptually poor; however, the improved fluency and absence of phonatory spasm made IS the preferred speaking mode for both the listener and the speaker. Transcutaneous measurements of the partial pressures of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the subject's blood were made during extended speaking periods. These measurements indicated that ventilation was unchanged during IS, and that ventilation during ES was similar to the "hyperventilation" state of normal speakers. The reasons for the absence of phonatory spasm during IS are discussed, and the possibility of its use as a noninvasive management option for other ASD sufferers is addressed.

Airway Resistance↗