PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Laxamana

Publications and source records attributed to A Laxamana.

2 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1995

Long-term results of anterior resection using the double-stapling technique.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to determine the anastomotic leak rate, local recurrence rate, and survival of patients undergoing anterior resection with the double-stapling technique for rectal cancer. METHODS: Between 1981 and 1992, 189 patients underwent a curative (166) or palliative (23) anterior resection using the double-stapling technique. A chart review was performed, and follow-up information was obtained from the patient or family physician. Follow-up was complete in 186 patients (98 percent). RESULTS: There were five (2.6 percent) stapler-related complications, of which two patients required a defunctioning colostomy. Postoperative mortality was 1.6 percent, and clinical leak rate was 7.3 percent. Clinical leak rate was significantly higher in patients with lesions in the lower third (20 percent) compared with those in the middle and upper thirds (9 and 1 percent, respectively; P < 0.05). After a mean follow-up of 32 +/- 29 months, local recurrence rate was 9.1 percent but was significantly higher in patients more than 65 years old (14 vs. 1 percent; P < 0.005) and in patients with resection margins less than 2.0 cm (17 vs. 5.5 percent; P < 0.05). Five-year survival was 78 percent. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior resection performed with the double-stapling technique has an acceptable clinical leak rate, local recurrence rate, and survival rate. However, the clinical leak rate appears to be increased in patients with low tumors and, therefore, a defunctioning colostomy should be considered. Resection margins of more than 2 cm are necessary.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

Randomized controlled trials in surgery.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to determine the number of randomized controlled trials (RCT) performed by surgeons, published in surgical journals, or comprising a surgical arm and to assess their characteristics and overall quality. METHODS: RCT in general surgery (including gastrointestinal, breast, surgical oncology, vascular, critical care, and trauma) published in 1990 were retrieved by MEDLINE and analyzed to determine the funding agency, type of therapy, area of surgery, journal published, country of origin, number of centers, and whether a surgeon was the principal author. The completeness of the MEDLINE search was compared to a manual search of the literature. All RCT were assessed with Chalmers' qualitative score. RESULTS: MEDLINE retrieved 202 surgical RCT (46% of those retrieved by a manual search) with a mean score of 0.40 +/- 0.13. However, surgical RCT were performed by surgeons in only one third of trials, compared surgical therapies in only one quarter of trials, and were published in surgical journals in less than one third of trials. Only 22% of surgical RCT were funded by peer reviewed granting agencies. The strongest variables determining the quality of surgical RCT were the type of therapy tested (p = 0.0001), the type of journal published (p = 0.006), and the area of general surgery (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Although surgical RCT are being performed, there are a relatively low proportion and standard of RCT performed by surgeons as the principal author, published in surgical journals, and comparing surgical therapies. This may reflect a lack of expertise by surgeons in clinical trials, lack of funding for surgical trials, methodologic problems peculiar to surgical trials, or a need for adoption of other research designs to assess surgical therapies.

Authorship↗