PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Leplege

Publications and source records attributed to A Leplege.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Double-blind placebo-controlled trial of oral dehydroepiandrosterone in patients with advanced HIV disease.

OBJECTIVE: Plasma levels of dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) decrease with the progression of HIV disease. Here, we report on the efficacy and safety of the oral administration of DHEA as replacement therapy, in patients with advanced HIV disease, in a trial that was primarily aimed at assessing quality of life. DESIGN: The trial was randomized and double-blind. Thirty-two patients were allocated to either DHEA 50 mg per day for 4 months (n = 14) or a matching placebo (n = 18). Clinical data, virological and immunological surrogate markers of HIV infection, plasma levels of DHEA-S and the Medical Outcomes Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV) quality of life scale were recorded every month. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 40 +/- 11 years. The mean CD4 cell count at baseline was 32.5 +/- 32.4 x 10(6)/l. The mean DHEA-S plasma level at baseline was 5.23 +/- 0.76 micromol/l. No side-effects related to DHEA occurred during the study. A statistically significant increase in the levels of DHEA-S was observed in the treated group throughout the study (P < 0.01). A significant improvement in the Mental Health and Health Distress dimension of MOS-HIV was observed in the DHEA treated group; P = 0.001 and 0.004, respectively. No change in CD4 cell counts was seen during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of DHEA in patients with advanced HIV infection results in improved mental function scores as assessed by the MOS-HIV quality of life scale.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the Quality of Life Questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Working Party for Quality of Life of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis.

Vertebral fractures may be minor or lead to pain, decreased physical function, immobility, social isolation and depression, which together contribute to quality of life. A Working Party of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis has developed a specific questionnaire for patients with vertebral fractures. This questionnaire, QUALEFFO, includes questions in the domains pain, physical function, social function, general health perception and mental function. QUALEFFO was validated in a multicenter study in seven countries. The study was done in 159 patients aged 55-80 years with clinical osteoporosis, i.e., back pain and other complaints with at least one vertebral fracture and lumbar bone mineral density T-score <-1. Patients with a recent vertebral fracture were excluded because of unstable disease. Controls were age- and sex-matched, and did not have chronic back pain or vertebral fractures. Subjects with conditions exerting a major influence on quality of life were excluded. The QUALEFFO was administered twice within 4 weeks and compared with a generic questionnaire, the Short Form 36 of the Medical Outcomes Study (SF-36). Standard spinal radiographs were made for assessment of vertebral height. Seven questions were removed from the analysis because of low response rate, linguistic ambiguities or redundancy. The 41 remaining questions were analyzed for repeatability, internal consistency and the capacity to discriminate between patients with vertebral fractures and controls. Comparison with the SF-36 was performed within similar domains by conditional logistic regression and by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The repeatability of QUALEFFO was good (kappa statistics 0.54-0.90) and 26 of 41 questions had a kappa score >/=0.70. The internal consistency of the five domains was adequate, with Crohnbach alpha around 0.80. All except five questions discriminated significantly between patients and controls. The median scores of QUALEFFO were significantly higher in patients with vertebral fractures than in controls in all five domain (p<0. 001), which is consistent with decreased quality of life in patients with osteoporosis. Spinal radiographs were assessed using the McCloskey-Kanis algorithm. According to this, 124 patients (78%) had vertebral fractures of >/=3 SD severity, in contrast with 7 controls (4%). Significant correlations existed between scores of similar domains of QUALEFFO and the SF-36, especially for pain, physical function and mental function. All five domains within each questionnaire discriminated significantly between fracture cases and controls. The odds ratios for pain and social function were greater for QUALEFFO, while general health perception was more discriminating using the SF-36. The ROC curve analysis of QUALEFFO indicated that all five domains were significantly predictive of vertebral fractures. When comparing similar domains of the two questionnaires, QUALEFFO domains demonstrated significantly better performance for pain, physical function and social function. The QUALEFFO total score and SF-36 physical composite score showed similar performance. In conclusion, QUALEFFO is repeatable, coherent and discriminates well between patients with vertebral fractures and control subjects. The results of this study confirm the decreased quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Cross-validation of item selection and scoring for the SF-12 Health Survey in nine countries: results from the IQOLA Project. International Quality of Life Assessment.

Data from general population surveys (n = 1483 to 9151) in nine European countries (Denmark, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain, Sweden, and the United Kingdom) were analyzed to cross-validate the selection of questionnaire items for the SF-12 Health Survey and scoring algorithms for 12-item physical and mental component summary measures. In each country, multiple regression methods were used to select 12 SF-36 items that best reproduced the physical and mental health summary scores for the SF-36 Health Survey. Summary scores then were estimated with 12 items in three ways: using standard (U.S.-derived) SF-12 items and scoring algorithms; standard items and country-specific scoring; and country-specific sets of 12 items and scoring. Replication of the 36-item summary measures by the 12-item summary measures was then evaluated through comparison of mean scores and the strength of product-moment correlations. Product-moment correlations between SF-36 summary measures and SF-12 summary measures (standard and country-specific) were very high, ranging from 0.94-0.96 and 0.94-0.97 for the physical and mental summary measures, respectively. Mean 36-item summary measures and comparable 12-item summary measures were within 0.0 to 1.5 points (median = 0.5 points) in each country and were comparable across age groups. Because of the high degree of correspondence between summary physical and mental health measures estimated using the SF-12 and SF-36, it appears that the SF-12 will prove to be a practical alternative to the SF-36 in these countries, for purposes of large group comparisons in which the focus is on overall physical and mental health outcomes.

Cross-Cultural Comparison↗
PubMed1996

Quality of life after open-heart surgery in patients over 75 years old.

In a postal study we used the Nottingham Health Profile questionnaire to assess the quality of life of elderly survivors of open-heart surgery. From January 1984 to October 1993, 146 patients over 75 years of age underwent open-heart surgery in the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery at Beasançon (France). Eleven patients (7. 5%) died in the immediate post-operative course. Patients' mean follow-up was 3.4 +/- 2.4 years. Fourteen patients died during follow-up. One hundred and four completed Nottingham Health Profile questionnaires were returned. Five per cent of the patients lived in an old people's home. Six per cent of the patients were unable to walk at all. One patient out of five felt isolated. Fifteen per cent of the patients were in constant pain. Half of the patients took sleeping pills. Conversely, 87% of the patients felt an improvement after surgery. Sixty-two per cent continued to drive. Ninety-seven patients (92%) did at least one of the following three activities: watched television, listened to the radio, read books or magazines. Fifty-eight patients (56%) walked on a regular basis. The different types of pathology, of surgical procedures and whether or not a pacemaker was implanted during the post-operative course were not reflected in the quality of life (QOL) scores. After cardiac surgery, most of the patients were physically autonomous and related to their exterior world.

Aged↗
PubMed1994

[Development and validation of a quality of life scale associated with health status, specific for benign hypertrophy of the prostate and including a sexuality evaluation scale].

In order to develop a quality of life scale related to the state of health, specific for benign prostatic hypertrophy, a group of French specialists constructed a self-administered questionnaire, designed to complete the usual evaluations of the efficacy and safety of new medical treatments for this disease. This questionnaire was well accepted, reliable, clinically valid and sensitive to clinical changes occurring in a given patient. It includes questions concerning sexuality. An abbreviated form of the questionnaire was then developed in order to obtain a tool suitable for use in daily practice, in combination with the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPPS).

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Critical review of measures of quality of life in schizophrenia].

UNLABELLED: In order to provide clinicians, researchers, program evaluators and administrators with current information on the assessment of humanistic outcomes of services for schizophrenic patients, a literature review is performed in which references to quality of life (QOL) assessment were made in the context of schizophrenia. Measures are summarized according to purpose, content, psychometric properties. Fifteen QOL instruments are summarized and reflect considerable variability on the relevant criteria: 11 are developed for persons with severe and persistent mental illnesses and used among populations including a major part of schizophrenic patients; 3 are specific QOL measures for schizophrenic patients; 1 is a generic QOL instrument used among psychotic patients. Given that none of these QOL measures has been widely used or accepted as a standard, the choice of a measure must rest on the investigator's particular purpose and needs. CONCLUSION: There is a clear need for a QOL instrument that is specific for schizophrenia, given its high prevalence and chronic nature. The lack of information related to responsiveness of these scales stresses the problems of their inclusion in clinical trials. Scales that have been used in studies of schizophrenia were nearly all developed in the United States and the relevance of their content must be questioned. Rather than relying on the literature or experts to determine those needs that are important to patients with schizophrenia, the content of the instrument should be derived from qualitative interviews with patients who are at different stages of their illness. Moreover, the questionnaire should be self-administered.

Humans↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Psychiatric emergency and somatic disorders].

The authors made a survey in the setting of the Ste Anne hospital Emergency outpatient clinic to determine the incidence of somatic troubles in mental patients during a crisis situation. 1,000 patients were examined during a 24 day period. More than half of somatic problems had not been addressed to priori to Psychiatric consultation. More over, during those psycho-organic troubles, no precise information had been made available in half of the patient population. In 3% of cases, hospitalization could not continue in a psychiatric setting, which points to both the difficulty in assessing the medical capacity of psychiatric institutions ("secteurs") and acceptance of mental patients by the general medical hospital.

Adult↗