PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A M Derrington

Publications and source records attributed to A M Derrington.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Behaviour of marmoset monkeys in a T-maze: comparison with rats and macaque monkeys on a spatial delayed non-match to sample task.

The marmoset ( Callithrix jacchus) is a small New World monkey that is increasingly being used in a laboratory setting. A previous set of studies has provided a direct comparison between the performance of rats and macaque monkeys on a spatial delayed non-match to sample task in a T-maze (Murray et al. 1989, Experimental Brain Research 74:173-186; Markowska et al. 1989, Experimental Brain Research 74:187-201). In the current experiment we replicated these studies using the marmoset. This allowed for a comparison of the behavioural performance of the marmoset with both rats and macaque monkeys. Marmosets performed well at the task, performing better than macaques, and at a similar level to rats. A closer analysis of the data from the present experiment suggests that marmosets spontaneously alternated in the T-maze, a strategy often adopted by rats, but not by macaques in the T-maze.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

The effect of stimulus height on visual discrimination in horses.

This study investigated the effect of stimulus height on the ability of horses to learn a simple visual discrimination task. Eight horses were trained to perform a two-choice, black/white discrimination with stimuli presented at one of two heights: ground level or at a height of 70 cm from the ground. The height at which the stimuli were presented was alternated from one session to the next. All trials within a single session were presented at the same height. The criterion for learning was four consecutive sessions of 70% correct responses. Performance was found to be better when stimuli were presented at ground level with respect to the number of trials taken to reach the criterion (P < 0.05), percentage of correct first choices (P < 0.01), and repeated errors made (P < 0.01). Thus, training horses to carry out tasks of visual discrimination could be enhanced by placing the stimuli on the ground. In addition, the results of the present study suggest that the visual appearance of ground surfaces is an important factor in both horse management and training.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Vision: can colour contribute to motion?

Whether colour patterns that have no luminance variation can evoke the perception of visual motion has long been a controversial issue. Recent studies using new and old techniques have now provided compelling evidence that colour can indeed contribute to motion perception.

Color↗
PubMed2000

Motion of contrast-modulated gratings is analysed by different mechanisms at low and at high contrasts.

We used a pedestal test [Lu & Sperling (1995a). Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722] to determine whether motion discrimination of contrast-modulated gratings has different properties at low contrast (4.5%) and at high contrast (45%). The amplitude-modulated gratings consisted of a 5 c/deg static carrier modulated by a moving 1 c/deg contrast envelope. We found that when contrast is low direction discrimination for contrast-modulated gratings is vulnerable to pedestals and becomes impossible at about 4 Hz. At high contrast contrast-modulated gratings are unaffected by pedestals and modulation sensitivity in a motion direction-discrimination task remains high up to 12 Hz. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that separate mechanisms analyse motion of contrast-modulated gratings at low and at high contrast; at low contrast motion analysis is based on feature tracking, whereas at high contrast, contrast-modulated gratings are analysed by spatio-temporal filters.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed2000

Slow discrimination of contrast-defined expansion patterns.

We compared observers' performance in the same complex motion discrimination task using stimuli defined by luminance or by contrast. They were asked to discriminate between a centred expansion pattern, constructed from four patches of outwards motion, and a distorted expansion pattern, constructed with one patch containing inwards motion and three patches containing outwards motion. We measured performance versus duration and found that for luminance-defined patterns, observers were able to discriminate correctly between these patterns in 75% of trials when the stimulus duration was 200 ms. For contrast-defined patterns, observers required over 2 s to reach this level of performance. Observers did not require such long durations to discriminate correctly between the contrast-defined expansion patterns when the patterns contained fewer patches or when the distorted patterns contained more patches of inwards motion. This suggests that observers performed the task by searching for a patch that contained a pattern moving inwards. There was no such effect on performance with the luminance-defined patterns. These results also suggest that contrast-defined patterns are processed too slowly to provide an input to specialised optic flow detectors that guide navigation in real time. Further, the differences in performance may be due to processing delays from sequential processing of the contrast-defined local motion signals.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1999

Second-order motion discrimination by feature-tracking.

When a plaid pattern (the sum of two high spatial frequency gratings oriented +/- 84 degrees from vertical) jumps horizontally by 3/8 of its spatial period its contrast envelope, a second-order pattern, moves in the opposite direction to its luminance waveform. Observers report that the pattern moves in the direction of the contrast envelope when the jumps are repeated at intervals of more than 125 ms and in the direction of the luminance profile when they are repeated at longer intervals. When a pedestal [Lu, Z.-L. & Sperling, G. (1995). Vision Research, 35, 2697-2722] is added to the moving plaid a higher contrast is required to see motion of the contrast envelope but not to see the motion of the luminance profile, suggesting that the motion of the contrast envelope is sensed by a mechanism that tracks features. Static plaids with different spatial parameters from the moving pattern are less effective at raising the contrast required to see the motion of the contrast envelope and simple gratings of low or high spatial frequency are almost completely ineffective, suggesting that the feature-tracking mechanism is selective for the type of pattern being tracked and rejects distortion products and zero-crossings.

Contrast Sensitivity↗
PubMed1996

Rapid colour-specific detection of motion in human vision.

The human visual system is much better at analysing the motion of luminance (black and white) patterns than it is at analysing the motion of colour patterns, especially if the pattern is presented very briefly or moves rapidly. We report here that observers reliably distinguish the direction of motion of a colour pattern presented for only 17 milliseconds, provided that the contrast is several times the threshold value (the contrast needed to detect the presence of the pattern). A control experiment, in which a static luminance 'mask' is added to the moving colour pattern, proves that discrimination of the direction of motion of these brief stimuli is colour-specific. The mask drastically impairs discrimination of the direction of motion of a luminance pattern, but it has little effect on a colour pattern. We conclude that the human visual system contains colour-specific motion-detection mechanisms that are capable of analysing very brief signals.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1996

What is the denominator for contrast normalisation?

The perceived speed of 1 c/deg sinusoidal gratings of contrast 0.02 was measured in the presence of high contrast (0.50) 1 c/deg sinusoidal gratings (called modifiers). The modifiers drifted or were counterphase modulated at various temporal frequencies. The presence of a modifier with temporal frequencies (0 and 3 Hz) lower than the low contrast moving grating decreased its perceived speed while the presence of modifiers with higher temporal frequencies (8, 12 and 16 Hz) increased its perceived speed. A modifier of the same temporal frequency (6 Hz) as the standard grating had no effect upon the perceived speed of the low contrast gratings. Moving modifiers are more effective than counterphase flickering modifiers in biasing the perceived speed of low contrast gratings if they move in the same direction as the test grating and less effective if they move in the opposite direction. Finally, a modifier presented in an annulus surrounding the test grating is more effective than a modifier presented in a circular patch above or below the test grating in raising the perceived speed of low contrast gratings. This suggests that perceived speed depends on the ratio of low and high temporal frequency signals averaged over a significant area of the visual field.

Humans↗
PubMed1995

Refraction, aliasing, and the absence of motion reversals in peripheral vision.

Reversals in perceived direction of motion of a grating when its spatial frequency exceeds half that of the sampling mosaic provide a potential tool for estimating sampling frequency in peripheral retina. We used two-alternative forced-choice tasks to measure performance of three observers detecting or discriminating direction of motion of high contrast horizontal or vertical sinusoidal luminance gratings presented either 20 or 40 deg from the fovea along the horizontal meridian. A foveal target at a comfortable viewing distance aided fixation and accommodation. A Maxwellian view optometer with 3 mm artificial pupil was used to correct the refraction of the peripheral grating, which was presented in a circular patch, 1.8 deg in diameter, in a surround of similar colour and mean luminance (47.5 cd.m-2). The refractive correction at each eccentricity was measured by recording the aerial image of a point after a double pass through the eye. The highest frequency which can reliably be detected (7-14 c/deg at 20 deg, 5.5-7.5 c/deg at 40 deg) depends critically on refraction. Refraction differs by up to 5 D from the fovea to periphery, and by up to 6 D from horizontal to vertical. Direction discrimination performance shows no consistent reversals, and depends less on refraction. It falls to chance at frequencies as low as one-third of the highest that can be detected. Gratings which can be detected but whose direction of motion cannot be discriminated appear as irregular speckle patterns whose direction of motion varies from trial to trial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1994

Implications of motion detection for early non-linearities.

Analysis of motion may be accomplished using the spatiotemporal variations produced when a spatially varying luminance waveform moves across linear receptive fields. Moving contrast-modulated patterns which consist of coarse-scale spatial variations in the contrast of fine-scale luminance patterns cannot be analysed in this way. The human visual system can analyse the motion of contrast-modulated patterns and this suggests it may contain mechanisms that use non-linear transformations. Non-linear transformation of contrast-modulated patterns would give rise to a component (a distortion product) that varies on the same spatial scale as the contrast variation; this can be analysed to extract motion. Is the non-linearity simply an inherent part of the transduction process or is it a characteristic of a mechanism specialized for the analysis of the motion of such patterns? Comparisons of the spatial and temporal limitations of motion discrimination using luminance and contrast-modulated patterns suggest that the mechanisms which analyse the two types of patterns are different, although recent physiological evidence suggests that they may have common elements.

Animals↗
PubMed1994

Motion of chromatic stimuli: first-order or second-order?

This paper measures the minimum velocity required to discriminate the direction of motion (the lower threshold of motion--LTM) for patterns which consisted of spatial variations in luminance, chromaticity or luminance contrast in an attempt to distinguish between the underlying directionally-selective mechanisms. The characteristics of these patterns can be defined as first-order/Fourier stimuli (luminance and chromatic gratings) or second-order/non-Fourier stimuli (contrast gratings or "beats"). Measurements for each pattern were made at durations ranging from 0.015 to 0.96 sec and at contrasts of 0.5 log units above detection threshold and 1.5 log units above the threshold for detecting the stationary pattern. Observers were able to discriminate the direction of motion in luminance gratings and high contrast chromatic gratings at all durations above 0.015 sec. The direction of motion of beats and low contrast chromatic gratings was indiscriminable until they had been presented for at least 0.12 sec. This was taken to indicate the existence of a fast-acting and a slow-acting system dealing with the first- and second-order patterns respectively. When defined on this basis, the chromatic stimulus acts as a first-order (luminance) pattern at high contrasts and a second-order (beat) pattern at low contrasts.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1994

The analysis of motion of two-dimensional patterns: do Fourier components provide the first stage?

Human observers were required to report the direction of motion of simple two-dimensional (2-D) "plaid" patterns made by adding together two sinusoidal gratings of identical contrast (0.5 or 1.5 log units above threshold), spatial frequency (1 or 5 c/deg) and orthogonal orientations (horizontal and vertical, or +/- 45 deg). The patterns were made to move either by moving both gratings at the same speed (pattern motion) or by moving one component with the other stationary (component motion). In one task (direction discrimination) the observer knew the axis of motion, and was required to discriminate the direction of motion along that axis in a temporal two-alternative forced-choice paradigm; in the other task (direction identification) the observer did not know the axis of motion and was required to identify the direction of motion and the axis of motion. In both tasks the discrimination of pattern motion was consistently better than the discrimination of component motion, contrary to the predictions of the "two-stage" model of motion analysis, in which it is assumed that the motion of a 2-D pattern is calculated from the 1-D motions of its Fourier components. The variation in direction discrimination of pattern motion with speed did not have the form predicted under the assumption that the direction of motion of the pattern could be discriminated using the motion of either of its two component gratings. Finally, an elaborated version of the Adelson and Movshon [(1982) Nature, 300, 523-525] two-stage model, in which noise affects the two stages fails to predict the performance in identifying the pattern motion of the plaid pattern, except for 1 c/deg low contrast plaids. These results suggest that when 2-D patterns contain moderately high contrasts or high spatial frequencies observers may use other attributes, instead of, or in addition to Fourier components, to analyse their 2-D motion.

Discrimination, Psychological↗
PubMed1994

Speed, spatial-frequency, and temporal-frequency comparisons in luminance and colour gratings.

The perceived speed, temporal frequency, and spatial frequency of matched colour and luminance gratings were compared in separate experiments. The large factor by which colour gratings are perceived to be slower moving than matched luminance gratings cannot be explained by systematic differences in the perceived spatial frequency or in the perceived temporal frequency of the two types of grating.

Color Perception↗
PubMed1993

Errors in direction-of-motion discrimination with dichoptically viewed stimuli.

At durations shorter than about 150 msec, a complex grating comprising a static 1-c/deg grating and a moving 3-c/deg grating is perceived as moving in the direction opposite that of the physical direction of motion. Here the phenomenon is further examined by measuring the perceived direction of motion of the fused images of a 1-c/deg grating presented to one eye and a moving 3-c/deg grating presented to the other. The strength of the illusion is almost unaffected by dichoptic presentation. This observation is consistent with the hypothesis that perceived motion is a consequence of the way the visual system integrates signals arising from different detectors tuned to the two component gratings.

Humans↗
PubMed1993

Discriminating the direction of second-order motion at short stimulus durations.

We measured the ability of human observers to discriminate the direction of motion of different spatial patterns presented for durations ranging from 0.021 to 0.67 sec. The patterns were: (1) a vertical grating (spatial frequency 0.93 c/deg at 5% contrast); (2) a "beat" pattern made by adding vertical gratings of 6.3 and 5.4 c/deg both at 5% contrast moving in opposite directions (this pattern appears as a horizontally moving, 0.93 c/deg "beat"; i.e. spatial variation in the contrast of a stationary vertical grating of 5.8 c/deg); and (3) a "plaid" pattern made by adding gratings of 5.9 c/deg orientated +/- 81 deg from vertical (this pattern can also be expressed as a horizontally moving 1.9 c/deg beat in a horizontal grating of 5.8 c/deg). The direction of motion of the grating and the plaid pattern were discriminable at all durations tested. The direction of motion of the beat could only be discriminated at durations above approx. 200 msec. We suggest that this is a consequence of the fact that the moving beat is only visible to second-order mechanisms, and that second-order mechanisms for the analysis of motion operate more slowly than first-order mechanisms.

Discrimination, Psychological↗