Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A M Gilchrist.
A case of multiple ileal duplications presenting with gastrointestinal bleeding is described. Technetium-99m Pertechnetate scintigraphy in conjunction with barium studies provided the initial clue and accurately localised the abnormality pre-operatively.
The authors present a simplified radiographic classification of non-Hodgkin lymphoma involving the small intestine. The classification system is based on radiographic findings in 22 pathologically proved cases of lymphoma involving the small bowel and consists of three major forms: primary, lymphoma complicating celiac disease, and mesenteric nodal. In this series, small bowel lymphoma was evenly distributed in the jejunum and ileum. The most common radiographic patterns were circumferential lesion (seven cases), cavitary lesion (four cases), and mesenteric nodal disease invading the small bowel (seven cases). Obstructive symptoms were usually encountered with the mesenteric nodal form. Lymphoma complicating celiac disease was typified by multiple, thickened, nodular folds involving a segment of proximal small intestine.
A retrospective study was made of 100 consecutive dedicated per-oral small bowel examinations. 33% of the studies were abnormal, of which almost half were due to Crohn's disease. When grouped according to clinical suspicion, 73.5% of those studies with a high index of clinical suspicion were abnormal. In the abnormal group a correct diagnosis was made in 90%, with two false positives. In the normal group a correct diagnosis was made in 91%, with no false negatives. It is suggested that the dedicated small bowel series offers a justifiable and practical alternative to other techniques such as intubation and direct infusion of contrast medium into the small bowel, or enteroclysis.
A blinded, retrospective study was performed to determine the role of double-contrast esophagography in diagnosing Barrett's esophagus. The study group consisted of 200 patients who had double-contrast esophagrams and endoscopy because of severe reflux symptoms. The radiographs were reviewed by two gastrointestinal radiologists who had no knowledge of the endoscopic findings. Patients were classified as being at high risk for Barrett's esophagus if the radiographs revealed a high stricture or ulcer or a reticular mucosal pattern; at moderate risk if the radiographs revealed a distal peptic stricture and/or reflux esophagitis; and at low risk if none of the aforementioned findings were present. When these radiologic criteria were used, 10 patients (5%) were thought to be at high risk, 73 (37%) at moderate risk, and 117 (58%) at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Endoscopic correlation revealed biopsy-proved Barrett's mucosa in nine (90%) of 10 patients at high risk, in 12 (16%) of 73 at moderate risk, and in only one (1%) of 117 at low risk for Barrett's esophagus. Thus, endoscopy is clearly indicated for patients in the high-risk group. Because of the lower prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in the moderate-risk group, clinical judgment should be used in deciding when to perform endoscopy in these patients. However, most patients were in the low-risk group, and the prevalence of Barrett's esophagus was so low in this group that endoscopy does not appear to be warranted. Thus, the major value of double-contrast esophagography is its ability to separate patients into high-, moderate-, and low-risk groups for Barrett's esophagus to determine the relative need for endoscopy and biopsy.
In a review of 52 oesophageal scintigrams carried out in 46 patients with a variety of oesophageal problems, there was no correlation between the results of this test and the findings in other tests of oesophageal function, or between the scintigram results and the patients' symptoms, with the possible exception of regurgitation. We conclude that the test is of little value.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The clinical and radiological features of acute large-bowel pseudo-obstruction occurring in 13 patients over a 7-year period are reviewed. Clinical features included atypical signs and symptoms of large-bowel obstruction and serious concomitant illness, including trauma in 10. The predominant radiological features were gross colonic dilatation, scant fluid levels, a gradual transition to collapsed bowel and a normal gas and faecal pattern in the rectum. Correct diagnosis was established by plain film and/or barium enema examination in the majority of cases (nine out of the 13). In the remaining four cases the diagnosis was made at laparotomy, although review of the radiographs suggested that the correct diagnosis could have been made pre-operatively in three. Instant barium enema is recommended in doubtful cases to rule out distal obstruction. Prompt recognition of the condition, with daily monitoring and conservative management, should eliminate unnecessary surgery and minimise the risk of caecal perforation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.