PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A M R New

Publications and source records attributed to A M R New.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

Cementing techniques in hip resurfacing.

The subject of the cementing technique in hip resurfacing has been poorly studied to date. The hip resurfacing prosthesis is unique in the family of cemented prostheses because the cement mantle is blind (hidden underneath the implant) and is radiographically obscured. This presents an immediate challenge to the surgeon at the time of surgery, but also has a longer-term implication in terms of lack of post-operative clinical observation. This should be compared with total hip replacement or total knee replacement where the cement mantle can at least be partially observed both intra- and post-operatively. With this in mind, the objective of this review is, firstly, to understand the cement mantles typically achieved in current clinical practice and, secondly, to identify those factors affecting the cement mantle and to consolidate them into an improved and reproducible cementing technique. The outcome of this work shows that the low-viscosity technique can commonly lead to excessive cement penetration in the proximal femoral head and an incompletely seated component, whereas a more consistent controlled cement mantle can be achieved with a high-viscosity cementing technique. Consequently, it is recommended that a high-viscosity technique should be used to minimize the build-up of excessive cement, to reduce the temperature created by the exothermic polymerization, and to help to ensure correct seating of the prosthesis. A combination of these factors is potentially critical to the clinical success of some articular surface replacement (ASR) procedures. It is important to note that we specifically studied the DePuy ASR system; therefore only the general principles (and not the specifics) of the cementing technique may apply to other resurfacing prostheses, because of differences in internal geometry, clearance, and surgical technique.

Adhesiveness↗

Effect of bone material properties on the initial stability of a cementless hip stem: a finite element study.

In previous finite element studies of cementless hip stems reported in the literature, the effect of bone quality on the initial micromotion and interface bone strain has been rarely reported. In this study, the effect of varying cortical and cancellous bone modulus on initial stem micromotion and interface bone strain was examined and the potential consequence of these changes on bone ingrowth and implant migration was reported. A finite element (FE) model of a total hip replacement (THR) was created and the Young's moduli of cortical and cancellous bone were systematically varied to study the relative effect of the quality of both types of bone on the initial stability of a cementless THR. It was found that the initial micromotion and interface bone strain in a THR was significantly affected by the overall stiffness of the femur. In other words, both the reduction of the modulus of cortical and cancellous bone caused an increase in the initial micromotion and interface bone strain. This suggests that for FE studies to be truly predictive, a range of bone quality must be examined to study the performance envelope of a particular stem and to allow comparison with clinical results.

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip↗

Effect of hip stem taper on cement stresses.

The aim of this study was to use finite element models to investigate the effect of the design of the taper of polished, collarless, total hip replacement femoral components on stresses in the cement mantle surrounding the component. A single-taper prosthesis, double-taper prosthesis, and triple-taper prosthesis were compared. Peak stresses and stress distributions in the cement mantle were found to be a function of taper design, although the differences between designs were minor. Using a probability of failure technique based on the initial cement stress distribution, a triple-taper prosthesis was predicted to cause less cement mantle damage (0.15% of the volume of the cement mantle failing after 20 million loading cycles) than a double-taper prosthesis (0.74%) or a single-taper prosthesis (1.50%). Further research is required to confirm this finding.

Bone Cements↗