PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A M W Alings

Publications and source records attributed to A M W Alings.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

LDL-C goal attainment with the addition of ezetimibe to ongoing simvastatin treatment in coronary heart disease patients with hypercholesterolemia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the addition of ezetimibe or placebo to on-going simvastatin treatment on attaining the LDL-C treatment target of </= 2.60 mmol/L (100 mg/dL) in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients with hypercholesterolemia. METHODS: Patients with documented CHD were recruited if they were on a stable dose of simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg for at least 6 weeks, had LDL-C > 2.60 mmol/L and </= 4.20 mmol/L (> 100 mg/dL and </= 160 mg/dL), triglycerides </= 4.00 mmol/L (355 mg/dL) and hepatic transaminases and creatine kinase </= 50% above the upper limit of normal. After a 4-week placebo and diet run-in period, eligible patients were randomized to a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparative study with ezetimibe 10mg co-administered with on-going simvastatin 10mg or 20 mg (n = 208) versus placebo to match ezetimibe co-administered with simvastatin 10mg or 20mg for 6 weeks (n = 210). RESULTS: When ezetimibe was added to on-going simvastatin therapy, a significantly greater percentage of patients attained the LDL-C target of </= 2.60 mmol/L after 6 weeks of treatment compared to placebo added to on-going simvastatin (80.4% vs. 17.4%, respectively;p </= 0.001). When co-administered with on-going simvastatin therapy, mean percentage reduction in LDL-C from baseline was significantly larger in the ezetimibe group compared to placebo (27.1% vs. 4.1%, respectively; p </= 0.001). The co-administration of ezetimibe or placebo to on-going simvastatin treatment was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe co-administered with on-going simvastatin 10 mg or 20 mg treatment enabled more CHD patients with hypercholesterolemia to attain the LDL-C treatment target of </= 2.60 mmol/L.

Administration, Oral↗

Meningococcal pericarditis and tamponade.

We report the case of a 37-year-old female with a complex manifestation of serogroup C meningococcal disease. The patient presented with symptoms and signs of pneumonia, sepsis and diffuse intravascular coagulation. Moreover, she suffered from a culture-proven pyogenic pericarditis that deteriorated into cardiac tamponade. Immediate pericardiocentesis was successful and eventually the patient recovered.

Adult↗

Implantable defibrillator therapy.

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is the most important cause of death in the industrialised world. Treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD), however, proved disappointing in preventing SCD. From drugs with electrophysiological properties, only treatment with beta-blockers has been shown to improve clinical outcome. This lack of efficiency of AADs heralded a new era of secondary and primary prevention trials, comparing implantable cardioverterdefibrillator (ICD) with drug therapy. Three large randomised secondary prevention trials were conducted in patients with prior myocardial infarction who where resuscitated from VT or VF. Meta-analysis of these three studies show consistent ICD benefit. This ICD benefit is also observed in three large randomised primary prevention trials in patients with a prior myocardial infarction and left ventricular dysfunction. The beneficial effect of ICD therapy proves to be significantly more pronounced in patients with the lowest left ventricular ejection fraction (26-30%). In patients with nonischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy and low ejection fractions, however, currently the only evidence-based indication for ICD implantation is secondary prevention.

Anti-Arrhythmia Agents↗