Biomedical subjects

A Markham

Publications and source records attributed to A Markham.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2004

BDNF increases rat brain mitochondrial respiratory coupling at complex I, but not complex II.

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) governs both the selective survival of neurons during development and the experience-based regulation of synaptic strength throughout life. BDNF produced a concentration-dependent increase in the respiratory control index (RCI, a measure of the efficiency of respiratory coupling, ATP synthesis and organelle integrity) of rat brain mitochondria. This effect was mediated via a MAP kinase pathway and highly specific for oxidation of glutamate plus malate (complex I) by brain mitochondria. The oxidation by brain mitochondria of the complex II substrate succinate was unaffected by BDNF. The failure of BDNF to modify respiratory activity associated with mitochondrial preparations isolated from rat liver indicates that the actions of the neurotrophin are tissue specific. BDNF also increased the RCI values associated with Ca2+ -induced respiration to a similar extent. This is the first demonstration that BDNF, in addition to modifying neuronal plasticity, can modify brain metabolism and the efficiency of oxygen utilization. The finding that neurotrophins can alter mitochondrial oxidative efficiency has important implications for neurodegenerative and psychiatric diseases.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Identification of a new Leu354Pro mutation responsible for factor XIII deficiency.

We report a new homozygous CTG-->CCG (Leu-->Pro) mutation at codon 354 in the factor XIIIA gene of a patient suffering from FXIII deficiency. Leu354 lies in a pocket within the core domain of the FXIIIA molecule, with its side chain pointing into the structure of the barrel 1 domain. Replacement of leucine with a proline residue gives rise to steric hindrance between the proline ring and the surrounding residues, and rearrangement of these residues would be necessary for proline to be accommodated at this position. Using PCR-RFLP, we have demonstrated the absence of this mutation from 220 normal alleles. Together, these data suggest that Leu354Pro is likely to be the disease-causing mutation in this factor XIII deficient family.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

Inhaled salmeterol: a review of its efficacy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

UNLABELLED: Inhaled salmeterol is a long-acting, selective beta2-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilator. The drug has been compared with placebo, ipratropium bromide and oral theophylline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in randomised, clinical trials. Inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily produced significant improvement in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), equivalent to that obtained with inhaled ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily and greater than that obtained with placebo or oral theophylline in randomised trials. Use of as-needed salbutamol (albuterol) was significantly reduced during treatment with inhaled salmeterol or ipratropium bromide compared with placebo or oral theophylline. The time to first COPD exacerbation was significantly longer during 12 weeks of treatment with inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily than ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily. Compared with baseline and placebo, patients treated for 16 weeks with salmeterol 50 microg (but not 100 microg) twice daily reported significant improvement in total St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores. Similarly, more patients treated with inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily or ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily experienced an increase of > or = 10 points in Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) scores, the minimum clinically significant increment. Compared with placebo, inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily alone, or concurrent with ipratropium bromide 40 microg 4 times daily improved lung function and reduced symptoms in patients with stable COPD in a 12-week, randomised, double-blind study. Clinically meaningful improvement in CRQ scores was documented in significantly more patients treated with the combination of the 2 drugs than either salmeterol monotherapy or placebo. Inhaled salmeterol 50 microg twice daily plus oral theophylline had additive effects on lung function, increased the proportion of symptom-free days and decreased requirements for as-needed salbutamol compared with either agent alone according to a pooled analysis of 2 multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies. CONCLUSION: When used at the optimal dosage, 50 microg twice daily, salmeterol provides symptomatic relief and improves lung function and health-related quality of life in patients with COPD. Available evidence suggests that the drug is as effective as ipratropium bromide and more effective than oral theophylline in patients with COPD. Moreover salmeterol has additive effects when used in combination with inhaled ipratropium bromide or oral theophylline. These qualities make the drug suitable for first-line use in patients with COPD who require regular bronchodilator therapy to manage symptoms.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2000

Antagonists and the purinergic nerve hypothesis: 2, 2'-pyridylisatogen tosylate (PIT), an allosteric modulator of P2Y receptors. A retrospective on a quarter century of progress.

2,2'-Pyridylisatogen tosylate (PIT) is a selective antagonist of P2Y responses in smooth muscle and does not antagonise the effects of adenosine. Responses to purinergic nerve stimulation are resistant to PIT. PIT is an allosteric modulator of responses to ATP in recombinant P2Y(1) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes with potentiation of ATP at low concentrations (0.1-10 microM) and antagonism at higher ones (>10 microM). A radioligand binding profile showed that PIT did not interact with any other receptors, with the exception of low affinity for the adenosine A(1) receptor (pK(i), 5.3). The compound recognises purine sites and then may cause irreversible binding to sulfhydryl groups following prolonged incubation or high concentrations. PIT is a potent spin trapper.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗

PubMed2000

Felodipine/metoprolol: a review of the fixed dose controlled release formulation in the management of essential hypertension.

The main objective of fixed dose combination therapy for hypertension is to improve blood pressure (BP) control with lower, better tolerated dosages of 2 antihypertensives rather than higher dosages of a single agent. Felodipine and metoprolol lower BP via different, but complementary, mechanisms and controlled release formulations of these 2 drugs are available as a fixed dose combination, felodipine/metoprolol. In clinical trials in patients with hypertension, felodipine/metoprolol was significantly more effective than placebo and the respective monotherapies administered at the same dosages. Mean BP was reduced to < 155/90 mm Hg in patients treated with combination therapy and controlled in approximately 70% of patients. In one study that titrated dosages to effect, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than felodipine or metoprolol monotherapy recipients required dosage increases to achieve BP control (45 vs 60 and 67%, respectively). Data from double blind comparative studies show that the antihypertensive efficacy of felodipine/metoprolol 5 to 10/50 to 100 mg/day is significantly greater than that of enalapril monotherapy or captopril plus hydrochlorothiazide and equivalent to nifedipine/atenolol and amlodipine. In comparisons with enalapril, fewer felodipine/metoprolol than enalapril recipients required dosage titration to achieve BP control. Compared with amlodipine, felodipine/metoprolol significantly reduced mean 24-hour average BP (8.9/5.5 vs 14.4/9.5 mm Hg after 6 weeks; p < 0.001). Both treatments preserved diurnal rhythm. Long term follow-up studies show that the antihypertensive effect of felodipine/metoprolol occurs mostly during the first month of treatment with small additional decreases in BP being observed in the second and third months, and a relatively constant effect thereafter. According to a validated questionnaire, quality of life was relatively similar during 12 weeks treatment with felodipine/metoprolol, enalapril or placebo. In a retrospective pharmacoeconomic analysis conducted in Sweden, felodipine/metoprolol was more cost effective than enalapril as initial treatment for hypertension. Peripheral oedema, headache and flushing were the most commonly reported adverse events with felodipine/metoprolol and felodipine monotherapy, whereas dizziness, fatigue, headache and respiratory infection were more frequent with metoprolol monotherapy. Dose-dependent adverse events such as oedema may occur less often in patients taking lower dosages in combination than in those taking higher dosages of felodipine monotherapy. Thus, patients with hypertension treated with felodipine/metoprolol experience greater control of BP, with less need for dosage titration, than those treated with felodipine, metoprolol or enalapril monotherapy. Importantly this greater efficacy does not appear to be associated with a higher incidence of adverse events relative to monotherapy. Additionally, in short term studies felodipine/metoprolol had a similar (minimal) effect on QOL to enalapril monotherapy but was more cost effective.

Drug Therapy, Combination↗

PubMed2000

Azimilide.

Azimilide is a potassium channel antagonist that, in contrast to existing class III antiarrhythmic agents, blocks both the rapidly (I(Kr)) and slowly (I(Ks)) activating components of the delayed rectifier potassium current. In animal and clinical studies, azimilide prolonged repolarisation by increasing the action potential duration and effective refractory period. In animal models, azimilide was effective in terminating both atrial and ventricular arrhythmias. Azimilide also demonstrated antifibrillatory efficacy in a canine model of sudden cardiac death. In patients with a history of atrial fibrillation/flutter, oral azimilide controlled arrhythmias more effectively than placebo in a 6-month randomised double-blind study. At a dosage of 125 mg once daily, azimilide significantly increased the time to first symptomatic recurrence of atrial fibrillation/flutter. However, no significant difference between placebo and azimilide was found in another study. Oral azimilide 100 mg once daily demonstrated clinically significant treatment effects in patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia. In clinical trials, azimilide was generally well tolerated and headache was the most commonly occurring adverse event. Azimilide is associated with a low incidence of proarrhythmic events, such as torsades de pointes, and few serious adverse events have been reported.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed2000

Levobupivacaine: a review of its pharmacology and use as a local anaesthetic.

UNLABELLED: Based on findings that the cardiotoxicity infrequently observed with racemic bupivacaine shows enantioselectivity, i.e. it is more pronounced with the R(+)-enantiomer, the S(-)-enantiomer (levobupivacaine) has been developed for clinical use as a long acting local anaesthetic. The majority of in vitro, in vivo and human pharmacodynamic studies of nerve block indicate that levobupivacaine has similar potency to bupivacaine. However, levobupivacaine had a lower risk of cardiovascular and CNS toxicity than bupivacaine in animal studies. In human volunteers, levobupivacaine had less of a negative inotropic effect and, at intravenous doses >75 mg, produced less prolongation of the QTc interval than bupivacaine. Fewer changes indicative of CNS depression on EEG were evident with levobupivacaine. Levobupivacaine is long acting with a dose-dependent duration of anaesthesia. The onset of action is < or = 15 minutes with various anaesthetic techniques. In studies of surgical anaesthesia in adults, levobupivacaine provided sensory block for up to 9 hours after epidural administration of < or = 202.5 mg, 6.5 hours after intrathecal 15 mg, and 17 hours after brachial plexus block with 2 mg/kg. Randomised, double-blind clinical studies established that the anaesthetic and/or analgesic effects of levobupivacaine were largely similar to those of bupivacaine at the same dose. Sensory block tended to be longer with levobupivacaine than bupivacaine, amounting to a difference of 23 to 45 minutes with epidural administration and approximately 2 hours with peripheral nerve block. With epidural administration, levobupivacaine produced less prolonged motor block than sensory block. This differential was not seen with peripheral nerve block. Conditions satisfactory for surgery and good pain management were achieved by use of local infiltration or peribulbar administration of levobupivacaine. Levobupivacaine was generally as effective as bupivacaine for pain management during labour, and was effective for the management of postoperative pain, especially when combined with clonidine, morphine or fentanyl. The tolerability profiles of levobupivacaine and bupivacaine were very similar in clinical trials. No clinically significant ECG abnormalities or serious CNS events occurred with the doses used. The most common adverse event associated with levobupivacaine treatment was hypotension (31%). CONCLUSIONS: Levobupivacaine is a long acting local anaesthetic with a clinical profile closely resembling that of bupivacaine. However, current preclinical safety and toxicity data show an advantage for levobupivacaine over bupivacaine. Clinical data comparing levobupivacaine with ropivacaine are needed before the role of the drug can be fully established. Excluding pharmacoeconomic considerations, levobupivacaine is an appropriate choice for use in place of bupivacaine.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Linezolid.

Linezolid is an oxazolidinone antibacterial agent that acts by inhibiting the initiation of bacterial protein synthesis. Cross-resistance between linezolid and other inhibitors of protein synthesis has not been demonstrated. Linezolid has a wide spectrum of activity against gram-positive organisms including methicillin-resistant staphylococci, penicillin-resistant pneumococci and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis and E. faecium. Anerobes such as Clostridium spp., Peptostreptococcus spp. and Prevotella spp. are also susceptible to linezolid. Linezolid is bacteriostatic against most susceptible organisms but displays bactericidal activity against some strains of pneumococci, Bacteroides fragilis and C. perfringens. In clinical trials involving hospitalised patients with skin/soft tissue infections (predominantly S. aureus), intravenous/oral linezolid (up to 1250 mg mg/day) produced clinical success in >83% of individuals. In patients with community-acquired pneumonia, success rates were >94%. Preliminary clinical data also indicate that twice daily intravenous/oral linezolid 600 mg is as effective as intravenous vancomycin 1 g in the treatment of patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia and in those with infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci. Moreover, linezolid 600 mg twice daily produced >85% clinical/microbiological cure in vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infections. Linezolid is generally well tolerated and gastrointestinal disturbances are the most commonly occurring adverse events. No clinical evidence of adverse reactions as a result of monoamine oxidase inhibition has been reported.

Acetamides↗

PubMed2000

Montelukast: a review of its therapeutic potential in persistent asthma.

Montelukast is a cysteinyl leukotriene receptor antagonist used to treat persistent asthma in patients aged > or = 6 years. The drug has a rapid onset of action. Improvements in lung function and reductions in as-needed beta2-agonist usage are apparent within 1 day of initiating montelukast treatment in adults and adolescents (aged > or = 15 years treated with 10 mg/day) or children (aged 6 to 14 years treated with 5 mg/day) with persistent asthma as shown in clinical trials. In two 12-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies in adults and adolescents aged > or = 15 years with persistent asthma [forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) = 50 to 85% predicted] there was significantly (p < 0.05) greater improvement in FEV1, symptom scores, peak expiratory flow (PEF), as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts and health-related quality of life (QOL) in patients treated with montelukast 10 mg/day than in recipients of placebo. Improvements were significantly greater in patients treated with inhaled beclomethasone 400 microg/day than in recipients of montelukast 10 mg/day in 1 of these studies. Nonetheless, 42% of montelukast recipients experienced > or = 11% improvement in FEV1, the median improvement in this parameter in beclomethasone-treated patients. In an 8-week multicentre, randomised, double-blind, study in children aged 6 to 14 years with persistent asthma (FEV1 50 to 85% predicted), montelukast 5 mg/day produced significantly greater improvements in FEV1, clinic PEF, as-needed beta2-agonist use, peripheral eosinophil counts, asthma exacerbations and QOL scores than placebo. The combination of montelukast 10 mg/day plus inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily provided significantly better asthma control than inhaled beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily in adults with poorly controlled asthma (mean FEV1 = 72% predicted) despite 4 weeks treatment with inhaled beclomethasone. Patients receiving the combination experienced significant improvements in FEV1 and morning PEF, significant reductions in daytime symptom scores, as-needed beta2 agonist usage and night-time awakenings with asthma, and had significantly lower peripheral blood eosinophil counts after 16 weeks in this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Among adults (FEV1 > or = 70%) treated with montelukast 10 mg/day for 12 weeks, inhaled corticosteroid dosages were titrated downward by 47% (vs 30% in placebo recipients), 40% of patients were tapered off of inhaled corticosteroids (vs 29%), and significantly fewer patients (16 vs 30%) experienced failed corticosteroid rescues in a multicentre, randomised, double-blind study. During clinical studies, the frequency of adverse events in montelukast-treated adults, adolescents and children was similar to that in placebo recipients. In conclusion, montelukast is well tolerated and effective in adults and children aged > or = 6 years with persistent asthma including those with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction and/or aspirin sensitivity. Furthermore, montelukast has glucocorticoid sparing properties. Hence, montelukast, as monotherapy in patients with mild persistent asthma, or as an adjunct to inhaled corticosteroids is useful across a broad spectrum of patients with persistent asthma.

Acetates↗

PubMed2000

Prolonged-release mesalazine: a review of its therapeutic potential in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease.

UNLABELLED: Prolonged-release mesalazine (Pentasa) consists of ethylcellulose-coated microgranules from which mesalazine (known in the US as mesalamine) is released in the small and large intestine in a diffusion-dependent manner. Dose-dependent improvements in clinical and endoscopic parameters have been reported with prolonged-release mesalazine 2 and 4 g/day in clinical trials in patients with mild to moderately active ulcerative colitis. Induction of clinical and endoscopic remission was achieved in more patients receiving a daily dosage of 4 g/day than in those receiving placebo. In patients with ulcerative colitis in remission, prolonged-release mesalazine is effective in reducing the rate of relapse. Higher dosages tend to be more effective, and a 12-month remission rate of 64% has been reported for patients treated with a 4 g daily dosage of this formulation. Comparative data indicate that prolonged-release mesalazine has similar efficacy in maintaining remission to molar equivalent doses of sulfasalazine. Data from a study in patients with mild to moderately active Crohn's disease indicates that higher dosages (4 g/day) of prolonged-release mesalazine are more effective than placebo in reducing disease activity. After 16 weeks' treatment, 64% of patients receiving a 4 g/day dosage experienced clinical improvement and 43% attained remission. In studies of patients in remission of Crohn's disease, the formulation appears to be more effective in preventing relapse in patients with isolated small bowel disease than in those with colonic involvement. The tolerability profile of oral prolonged-release mesalazine is similar to that of placebo and the incidence of adverse events does not appear to be dose-related. Nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, abdominal pain and dyspepsia occur most frequently, although their incidence is low. Reports of nephrotoxicity during prolonged-release mesalazine treatment are rare. CONCLUSIONS: Oral prolonged-release mesalazine is effective for maintenance and induction of remission of mild to moderately active colitis, both in patients with distal disease and in those with pancolitis. The formulation has similar efficacy to that of equimolar concentrations of sulfasalazine. Prolonged-release mesalazine also appears to be effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease, and maintenance therapy is of particular value in patients with isolated small bowel involvement. Evidence suggests that higher dosages (3 to 4 g/day) of prolonged-release mesalazine have additional therapeutic benefits over lower dosages in patients with inflammatory bowel disease without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Irbesartan: an updated review of its use in cardiovascular disorders.

Irbesartan interrupts the renin-angiotensin system via selective blockade of the angiotensin II subtype 1 receptor; the latter being responsible for the pressor related effects of angiotensin II. As treatment for mild to moderate hypertension, irbesartan 150 mg/day controlled diastolic BP in 56% of patients according to pooled data from several phase III studies and 77% of patients in a large phase IV study. in comparative trials, irbesartan was significantly more effective than losartan and valsartan as treatment for mild to moderate essential hypertension and as effective as enalapril or atenolol. Results from many studies show an additive antihypertensive effect when hydrochlorothiazide is added to irbesartan monotherapy. The drug also induces statistically significant regression of left ventricular mass in patients with hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy, and preliminary evidence suggests it has beneficial haemodynamic effects in patients with heart failure. Irbesartan is very well tolerated, exhibiting an adverse event profile similar to that seen with placebo in comparative trials. In conclusion, although the role of irbesartan as a treatment for heart failure is little clearer than it was 2 years ago, the place of the drug in the management of hypertension is now better established. There is evidence to suggest the drug may have a role as initial therapy for hypertension, although formal recommendation in management guidelines will almost certainly not occur until long term morbidity and mortality benefits are established.

Angiotensin II↗

PubMed2000

Infliximab: a review of its use in the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

UNLABELLED: Infliximab is a chimaeric monoclonal antibody to human tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNFalpha). It binds to both soluble and transmembrane forms of TNFalpha at picomolar concentrations in vitro. Secondary to inhibition of TNFalpha, infliximab reduces serum levels of inflammatory mediators and vascular endothelial growth factor, decreases the expression of chemokines in the synovial tissue and reduces lymphocyte migration into the joints of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. In 2 multicentre randomised double-blind trials conducted over 26 and 30 weeks, infliximab plus methotrexate was significantly more effective than placebo plus methotrexate according to American College of Rheumatology response criteria in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. A substantial response to infliximab-containing regimens was evident within 2 weeks. Extension phases of these studies indicate sustained clinical efficacy for up to 54 weeks. Of considerable importance are preliminary 1-year radiographic findings that show zero median progression of joint damage in infliximab plus methotrexate recipients compared with a 7 to 8% deterioration in placebo plus methotrexate recipients. Headache, nausea, upper respiratory tract infection and infusion-related reactions are the most commonly reported adverse events with infliximab. Serious events occurred in 4.4% of infliximab versus 1.8% of placebo recipients. In the largest clinical trial, 2 patients died from disseminated infection and 3 developed new or recurrent malignancies, although the exact relationship between infliximab and these events is unknown. To date, 2 patients with rheumatoid arthritis have developed drug-induced lupus. About 10% of patients may develop antibodies to infliximab, although the clinical significance of these is presently unknown. CONCLUSION: Infliximab represents an important advance in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, with tolerability concerns raised by early studies having been eased somewhat by more recent data in larger patient numbers. If preliminary results indicating that infliximab is able to arrest joint destruction in patients with rheumatoid arthritis are corroborated, the drug will likely become an integral component of future management strategies for this difficult-to-treat condition.

Antibodies, Monoclonal↗

PubMed2000

Metoprolol: a review of its use in chronic heart failure.

UNLABELLED: Metoprolol, a relatively selective beta1-blocker, is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and possesses weak membrane stabilising activity. The drug has an established role in the management of essential hypertension and angina pectoris, and more recently, in patients with chronic heart failure. The effects of metoprolol controlled-release/extended-release (CR/XL) in patients with stable, predominantly mild to moderate (NYHA functional class II to III) chronic heart failure have been evaluated in the large Metoprolol CR/XL Randomised Intervention Trial in Congestive Heart Failure (MERIT-HF) trial and the much smaller Randomized Evaluation of Strategies for Left Ventricular Dysfunction (RESOLVD) pilot study. Treatment with metoprolol CR/XL was initiated at a low dosage of 12.5 to 25 mg once daily and gradually increased at 2-weekly intervals until the target dosage (200 mg once daily) or maximal tolerated dosage had been attained in patients receiving standard therapy for heart failure. At 12 months, metoprolol CR/XL was associated with a 34% reduction in relative risk of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic heart failure due to ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy in the MERIT-HF trial. The incidence of sudden death and death due to progressive heart failure were both significantly decreased with metoprolol CR/XL. Similarly, a trend towards decreased mortality in the metoprolol CR/XL group compared with placebo was observed in the RESOLVD trial. Data from small numbers of patients with severe (NYHA functional class IV) heart failure indicate that metoprolol CR/XL is effective in this subset of patients. However, no firm conclusions can yet be drawn. Improvement from baseline values in NYHA functional class, exercise capacity and some measures of quality of life with metoprolol CR/XL or immediate-release metoprolol were significantly greater than those with placebo. The drug is well tolerated when treatment is initiated in low dosages and gradually increased at intervals of 1 to 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Metoprolol CR/XL effectively decreases mortality and improves clinical status in patients with stable mild to moderate (NYHA functional class II or III) chronic heart failure due to left ventricular systolic dysfunction, and the drug is effective in patients with ischaemic or dilated cardiomyopathy. Although limited data indicate that metoprolol CR/XL is effective in patients with severe (NYHA functional class IV) chronic heart failure, more data are needed to confirm these findings. Treatment with metoprolol CR/XL significantly reduced the incidence of sudden death and death due to progressive heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗

PubMed2000

Nicorandil. An updated review of its use in ischaemic heart disease with emphasis on its cardioprotective effects.

Nicorandil is a drug with both nitrate-like and ATP-sensitive potassium-channel (K+ ATP) activating properties. By virtue of this dual mechanism of action, the drug acts as a balanced coronary and peripheral vasodilator and reduces both preload and afterload. The K+ ATP channel has been shown to be involved in the phenomenon of myocardial preconditioning, and studies in animal models of ischaemia-reperfusion-induced myocardial stunning or infarction indicate that nicorandil has cardio-protective effects. Studies in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have shown that the administration of nicorandil reduces ST-segment elevation during ischaemia. Nicorandil significantly improved the results of exercise tolerance tests versus baseline in patients with stable effort angina pectoris in early noncomparative trials. The drug also improved the results of exercise tolerance tests relative to placebo in early randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. In randomised, double-blind comparative studies in patients with angina pectoris, nicorandil has demonstrated equivalent efficacy, as measured by exercise tolerance testing, to isosorbide di- and mononitrate, metoprolol, propranolol, atenolol, diltiazem, amlodipine and nifedipine. The effects of nicorandil on various aspects of myocardial recovery from ischaemic damage caused by acute myocardial infarction have been investigated in the short term. Regional left ventricular (LV) wall motion, a marker of myocardial function, was significantly improved in nicorandil recipients relative to control. The main adverse event associated with nicorandil as treatment for angina pectoris is headache. This can be minimised by commencing nicorandil at a low dose in patients prone to headache. There have been infrequent case reports of mouth ulcers in patients receiving nicorandil; causality has not been conclusively established, but product prescribing information indicates that an alternative treatment should be considered if persistent aphthous or severe mouth ulceration occurs. Thus, nicorandil remains a useful background therapy for patients with angina pectoris. The drug has also demonstrated potential cardioprotective effects when used as part of an intervention strategy directly after acute myocardial infarction in high-risk patients. Further large scale longer term studies of nicorandil in this latter indication are awaited with interest.

Angina Pectoris↗

PubMed2000

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination: a review of its use in persistent asthma.

UNLABELLED: The long-acting beta2-agonist salmeterol and the corticosteroid fluticasone propionate are available as a combination inhalation device for the treatment of persistent asthma. Well designed studies in adults, adolescents and children aged > or =4 years, demonstrate that combined salmetero/fluticasone propionate 50/100, 50/250 and 50/500 microg administered via a dry powder inhaler (DPI) is clinically equivalent to concurrent delivery of the same dosages of the 2 drugs via separate DPIs. In adults and adolescents, combined salmeterol/fluticasone 50/100 and 50/250 microg twice daily produced rapid improvements in lung function that were consistently greater than those in patients receiving monotherapy twice daily salmeterol 50 microg, fluticasone propionate 100 or 250 microg or placebo in 2 well designed studies. Recipients of the combination had a significantly greater probability of completing 12 weeks of treatment than patients receiving monotherapy or placebo. The combination also produced significant improvements between baseline and end-point in all secondary outcome variables (morning and evening peak expiratory flow, daytime symptom scores, days and nights without asthma symptoms and requirements for as-needed beta-agonists) and health-related quality of life (QOL). Combination therapy was superior to monotherapy with salmeterol and placebo for all outcomes in both studies, and was superior to fluticasone propionate 100 microg for all but 1 outcome (nights without awakenings) in 1 study. Similar results were obtained in patients who had previously been using short acting beta2-agonists alone. Combined twice daily salmeterolfluticasone propionate 50/100 and 50/250 microg produced greater improvements in lung function than inhaled budesonide at higher dosages than fluticasone propionate in the combination. Combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/250 microg produced similar improvements in lung function to concurrent budesonide 800 microg plus formoterol 12 microg when given twice daily for 12 weeks. In another 12-week trial, combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate 50/100 microg was more effective than oral montelukast 10 mg/day plus fluticasone propionate 100 microg twice daily in patients with suboptimally controlled asthma. Salmeterol/fluticasone is more cost effective than monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. The most frequent adverse events associated with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate are headache, throat irritation, hoarseness and candidiasis. CONCLUSION: Combined salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is as effective as the 2 drugs given concurrently via separate inhalers and significantly more effective than either drug given alone at the same nominal dosage. The combination is also significantly more effective than montelukast plus fluticasone propionate or monotherapy with inhaled budesonide. Furthermore, the combination is more cost effective than inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2000

Inhaled salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination. A pharmacoeconomic review of its use in the management of asthma.

Cost estimates from developed countries indicate that asthma accounts for up to 2% of the economic cost of all diseases. A large proportion of asthma-related costs are attributable to poor asthma control. Treatment strategies which improve clinical outcomes in patients with asthma, therefore, have the potential for significant economic benefits, and it is important to evaluate new asthma therapies for cost effectiveness. Several studies have established that salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combined in a single dry powder inhalation device are at least as effective as a combination of the 2 drugs administered via separate dry powder inhalers and more effective than monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Importantly, pharmacoeconomic analysis of several of these studies show that the salmeterol/fluticasone propionate combination is cost effective relative to monotherapy with fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Although the total cost of asthma management tended to be slightly higher with salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with inhaled corticosteroid monotherapy, in most cases mean cost-effectiveness ratios were lower (i.e. more favourable) for salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than either fluticasone propionate or budesonide. Cost effectiveness was assessed according to 3 end-points: successfully treated weeks, symptom-free days and episode-free days. Mean cost-effectiveness ratios consistently favoured salmeterol/fluticasone propionate over the comparator drug for the end-point successfully treated weeks, and in most cases the other 2 end-points also favoured the combination product over the comparator. In a further study, salmeterol/fluticasone was also less costly than therapy with formoterol and budesonide administered via 2 separate inhalers. Studies of health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire indicate that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate produces clinically meaningful improvements in overall HR-QOL relative to salmeterol monotherapy or placebo. Improvements in overall HR-QOL were statistically significantly greater for salmeterol/fluticasone propionate than with fluticasone propionate or budesonide alone, although the differences between treatments did not exceed the threshold for clinical significance. In conclusion, short term cost-effectiveness data show that salmeterol/fluticasone propionate is more cost effective than the inhaled corticosteroids budesonide and fluticasone propionate alone. The combination product also appears to improve HR-QOL relative to placebo or salmeterol alone.

Albuterol↗

PubMed1999

Loss-of-function mutations in the cathepsin C gene result in periodontal disease and palmoplantar keratosis.

Papillon-Lefèvre syndrome, or keratosis palmoplantaris with periodontopathia (PLS, MIM 245000), is an autosomal recessive disorder that is mainly ascertained by dentists because of the severe periodontitis that afflicts patients. Both the deciduous and permanent dentitions are affected, resulting in premature tooth loss. Palmoplantar keratosis, varying from mild psoriasiform scaly skin to overt hyperkeratosis, typically develops within the first three years of life. Keratosis also affects other sites such as elbows and knees. Most PLS patients display both periodontitis and hyperkeratosis. Some patients have only palmoplantar keratosis or periodontitis, and in rare individuals the periodontitis is mild and of late onset. The PLS locus has been mapped to chromosome 11q14-q21 (refs 7, 8, 9). Using homozygosity mapping in eight small consanguineous families, we have narrowed the candidate region to a 1.2-cM interval between D11S4082 and D11S931. The gene (CTSC) encoding the lysosomal protease cathepsin C (or dipeptidyl aminopeptidase I) lies within this interval. We defined the genomic structure of CTSC and found mutations in all eight families. In two of these families we used a functional assay to demonstrate an almost total loss of cathepsin C activity in PLS patients and reduced activity in obligate carriers.

Aggressive Periodontitis↗

PubMed1999

Cilostazol.

Cilostazol is an antiplatelet agent with vasodilating properties that has been used in the treatment of patients with peripheral ischaemia such as intermittent claudication. The drug inhibits platelet aggregation induced by ADP, collagen and arachidonic acid. Unlike aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid), cilostazol inhibits both primary and secondary aggregation. It also acts as a vascular vasodilator by inhibiting calcium-induced contractions while having no direct effect on contractile proteins. In double-blind randomised trials, patients with intermittent claudication receiving cilostazol showed significant improvements versus placebo in terms of time to initial pain and maximal walking or absolute claudication distance; these findings were confirmed by cilostazol patients' positive responses on subscales measuring physical functioning and quality of life. In a 24-week randomised double-blind trial in patients with intermittent claudication, cilostazol 100mg twice daily produced significant improvements in pain-free and maximum walking distances, compared with pentoxifylline (oxpentifylline) 400mg 3 times daily and placebo. Cilostazol has been well tolerated, with the most common adverse events being headache, diarrhoea, abnormal stools and dizziness.

Cilostazol↗