PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Martínez Castelao

Publications and source records attributed to A Martínez Castelao.

12 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Doxazosin GITS trough to peak ratio and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension in renal transplant patients.

UNLABELLED: We have studied 20 patients, 10 male, 10 female, mean age 52.5+/-10.9 years, who received a cadaver kidney transplant between June 1996 and January 1999. The patients presented with mild or moderate high BP and were treated on a maintained immunosuppression with an anti-calcineurin agent and steroids, associated or not to mycophenolate-mofetil. At baseline, a 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed. General biochemical parameters were determined and doxazosin GITS (Gastro-Intestinal Therapeutic System) in a single dose of 4 mg/d was started. Doxazosin GITS was titrated four weeks after up to 8 mg/d if the BP was greater than 140/90 mm Hg. At week 12, biochemical analysis were repeated as well as the 24-hour BP monitoring and the T/P ratio was calculated. RESULTS: The patients were divided in responders, T/P index >50%, n=10 or not-responders, T/P index <50%, n=10 patients). No differences in systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP(DBP), plasma creatinine or proteinuria were seen at base-line. DBP was lower in responders than in non-responders (P=ns). Doxazosin doses were 5.5+/-3 mg/d vs 5.8+/-3 and T/P ratio 0.70+/-0.13 vs 0.17+/-0.14, (P=.001). There were no variations in pl. t. cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose or uric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment was safe and efficient, not increasing metabolic adverse effects. Doxazosin GITS is a safe agent which can reduce cardiovascular risk. In our patients, the good T/P ratio has been associated with a best diastolic BP control. This good profile should be taken into account for 24-hour BP control in hypertensive renal transplant patients.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed2003

[Multicenter study of darbepoetin alfa in the treatment of anemia secondary to chronic renal insufficiency on dialysis].

This Spanish single-arm, multicenter, prospective clinical trial assessed the maintenance of hemoglobin concentrations (Hb) between 10-13 g/dL with unit doses of darbepoetin alfa and the safety of the treatment in dialysis patients. Eight-hundred twenty-six patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) (94% receiving haemodialysis and 6% receiving peritoneal dialysis) previously maintained on stable recombinant human erythropoietin (r-HuEPO) therapy with stable hemoglobin (Hb) concentrations (mean Hb concentration = 11.7 g/dL) were switched to darbepoetin alfa at a reduced dosing frequency for 24 weeks (a 20-week titration phase plus a 4-week treatment evaluation phase). Subjects receiving r-HuEPO two or three times weekly were switched to darbepoetin alfa once weekly, and those. who were receiving r-HuEPO once weekly were switched to darbepoetin alfa once every two weeks. The initial dose of darbepoetin alfa was determined from the r-HuEPO dose at inclusion into the study using a formula equating the peptide mass of the two molecules and rounding to the nearest available prefilled syringe dose. Overall, 86.8% of patients completed the 24-weeks of study. Changing the treatment from r-HuEPO to darbepoetin alfa and increasing the dose interval did not result in any clinically significant change in the Hb concentration. From base-line to the evaluation phase, the mean Hb fell 0.09 (95% CI, -0.2; -0.0) g/dl, with an increase of 0.19 (95% CI, 0.0;0.3) g/dL i.v. and a decrease of 0.22 (95% CI, -0.3; -0.1) g/dL s.c.). This maintenance of the mean Hb concentration was accompanied by a mean 9.8% reduction of the darbepoetin alfa dose (19.7% (95% CI, -24.9; -14.2) i.v. and 4.7% (95% CI, -8.5; -0.7) s.c. Treatment with darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated and no unexpected adverse events were reported. In conclusion, the replacement of previous r-HuEPO treatment by darbepoetin alfa in the therapy of anemia secondary to chronic renal failure in diaiyzed patients was effective, well tolerated, and decreased the frequency of dose administration compared with the previous r-HuEPO treatment. Darbepoetin alfa administered once weekly or once every two weeks maintained the baseline Hb levels whilst allowing dose reduction, which was higher in patients receiving i.v. darbepoetin alfa.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Effect of cyclosporin and tacrolimus on lipoprotein oxidation after renal transplantation].

BACKGROUND: Cyclosporin A is a lipogenic immunosuppressor that can induce posttransplant hyperlipidaemia. Oxidation of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been recognized as a major atherogenic factor. Tacrolimus seems to be less lipogenic with an apparently better cardiovascular profile than CsA. METHODS: We have studied the lipidic profile and the oxidation of HDL and LDL in 20 renal transplant patients, 12 male and 8 female, mean age 45 +/- 10 year, who where switched from CsA to tacrolimus due to CsA adverse effects. LDL were determined by ultracentrifugation. Oxidation study before and 6 months after conversion to tacrolimus was performed by adding CuSO4. RESULTS: After conversion, systolic blood pressure (BP) decreased from 154 +/- 21 to 133 +/- 21 mm Hg (p = 0.008), diastolic BP from 97 +/- 13 to 77 +/- 15 mm Hg (p = 0.016), total cholesterol from 6.08 +/- 0.9 to 5.68 +/- 1.1 mmol/l (p = 0.02), LDL-chol from 3.29 +/- 1.01 to 2.96 +/- 0.3 mmol/l (p = 0.04) and apo-B lipoprotein from 1.42 +/- 0.28 to 1.15 +/- 0.34 mg/dl (p = 0.003). The oxidation of LDL improved after conversion: the initial dienic compounds decreased from 95 +/- 20 to 63 +/- 12 umol/g and the final DC from 207 +/- 56 to 107 +/- 35 umol/g. Lag-phase increased from 33 +/- 21 to 45 +/- 17 min (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus has improved hyperlipidaemia in our cyclosporin previously treated patients and increased the resistance to oxidation of high and low-density lipoproteins.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Kidney transplantation with donors in heart block. Long-term results].

OBJECTIVES: The shortage of renal grafts has led to the search for other alternatives. The use of grafts from non-heart-beating donors (NHBD) can increase the number of transplants 8% to 20%. Clinical studies conducted by different groups, have found that the long-term graft and patient survival are not different from those of recipients of kidneys from heart-beating donors (HBCD). METHODS/RESULTS: The long-term results of a group of 52 recipients of NHBD kidneys were compared with those of 98 recipients of HBCD grafts. There were no differences in donor and recipient ages, HLA compatibility, reperfusion and cold ischemia times. There were no differences in the incidence of rejection episodes or non-functioning kidneys. Warm ischemia between 30 to 60 min or < 30 min did not influence the incidence of non-functioning kidneys. However, NHBD graft recipients had a higher incidence of acute tubular necrosis (67% versus 46%), recovers of renal function was slower, the duration of oliguria was longer and dialysis was required. The 8-year actuarial survival data were similar for both groups; 65% for the NHBD and 70% for the HBCD graft recipients. CONCLUSIONS: We can conclude that NHBDs are an important source of donor kidneys. The 12 points established by The First International Workshop on Non-Heart-Beating Donors which appear at the end of the present article are embodied in the Treaty of Maastricht regulations of organ transplantation from non-heart-beating donors.

Actuarial Analysis↗