PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Mellanová

Publications and source records attributed to A Mellanová.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

[Case-mix classification in post-acute and long-term care. Validation of Resource Utilization Groups III (RUG-III) in the Czech Republic].

BACKGROUND: Czech facilities for non-acute, continuing care provide care for very heterogeneous group of residents with different clinical characteristics, care needs and resource use. The rate based funding of LTC doesn't reflect patient case-mix. Therefore, a case mix system RUG based on per diem resource use is being used abroad for rational and fair LTC funding. METHODS: The validity of RUG-III has been evaluated and its use for financing of LTC and geriatric care in CR examined. In a sample of 1162 residents from 18 institutions patients were assigned to one of 44 RUG-III groups regarding their clinical characteristics. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance with individual care time per patient per day as independent and RUG-III groups as dependent variables. Weighted means for each group (case-mix indexes, CMI) were calculated. RESULTS: The RUG-III system achieved 59% variance explanation of total per diem costs of nursing and therapy/rehabilitation care and meets criteria of clinical validity. The CMIs for individual groups span from 0.39 to 2.70 i.e. differences in resource use between groups were sevenfold. Resource use within groups was relatively homogeneous. CONCLUSIONS: The RUG-III represent a suitable case-mix system for nonacute institutional care in the Czech health care. Besides its use for payment incentives, RUG-III can be used in facility management, quality assurance process and for comparative analyses on national and international level.

Aged↗

[Urinary and fecal incontinence in geriatric facilities in the Czech Republic].

BACKGROUND: Incontinence represents one of the common problems in long-term care geriatric facilities and nursing homes. However, in the Czech Republic data on prevalence, severity and incontinence-associated factors for nursing home residents are not available. The aim of the study was to report the prevalence of urinary (UI) and bowel incontinence (BI) in different geriatric facilities and to identify factors positively associated with incontinence. METHODS AND RESULTS: In a sample of 1162 residents of 18 long-term care facilities UI has been found in 684 residents (63.3%). Health and social care facilities did not differ significantly (60.7 vs 65.6%). Of the incontinent 294 residents (27.2%) suffered from permanent/daily incontinence, 390 (36.1%) from occasional transitory UI. Prevalence of BI reached 54.4%, as well as double incontinence (45.9%). Cognitive impairment, self-care ADL and/or mobility dependency and bed rest are factors significantly associated with UI (for all P < 0.001). However, age, gender and urinary tract infection did not reach the statistical significance (P = 0.280-0.069). Risk adjustment/stratification for UI revealed the prevalence of 33.0% in the low risk group. In the high risk group (high ADL dependency and severe cognitive impairment) the prevalence came up to 96.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Our study presents the first results focused on incontinence problem in long-term care geriatric institutions in the Czech Republic. High prevalence of this condition makes incontinence an important medical, nursing and economical yet neglected problem.

Aged↗