PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

A Mellgren

Publications and source records attributed to A Mellgren.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Electromyography of the external anal sphincter: comparison between needle and surface electrodes.

PURPOSE: Electromyography of the external anal sphincter is frequently used when investigating patients with defecation disorders. Investigations are often performed using an invasive technique by perineal insertion of a needle or wire electrode. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether surface electromyography, with electrodes applied to the perineal skin, is a reliable method in the diagnosis of paradoxical anal sphincter reaction. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with defecation disorders participated in the present study. They were investigated with electromyography of the external anal sphincter using surface and needle electrodes. RESULTS: In 65 of 71 (92 percent) patients the electromyography recording showed the same result during straining using surface electrodes when compared with needle electrodes. Twenty-two of these 65 patients had paradoxical anal sphincter reaction, and 43 patients had decreased electromyography activity. In 6 of 71 (8 percent) patients the electromyography recording showed a different pattern during straining using surface electrodes when compared with needle electrodes. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrates a good correlation between surface electrodes applied to the perineal skin and concentric needle electrodes in the diagnosis of paradoxical anal sphincter reaction. Noninvasive electromyography recordings of the external anal sphincter are often preferred in the diagnosis of paradoxical anal sphincter reaction.

Anal Canal

Effect of delivery on anal sphincter morphology and function.

PURPOSE: Anal sphincter injury is a serious complication of childbirth, which may result in persistent anal incontinence. Occult injuries, visualized with endoanal ultrasonography, have previously been reported in up to 35 percent of females in a British study. The aim of the present study was to study anal sphincter morphology and function before and after delivery in primiparous females in the United States. METHODS: Thirty-eight primiparous patients (mean age, 31 years) were evaluated with endoanal ultrasonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency during pregnancy and after delivery. Bowel function before and after delivery was recorded according to set questionnaires. Cesarean section was performed in three patients. RESULTS: Clinical sphincter tears, requiring primary repair, occurred in 15 percent of the patients. After delivery endoanal ultrasonography revealed disruptions in the external anal sphincter in six patients, but no patient had disruption in the internal anal sphincter. One patient had slight scarring in the external sphincter. Of the seven patients with pathologic findings at endoanal ultrasonography, the left pudendal latency increased after delivery (P < 0.05), and manometric results were reduced. Three of these seven patients had a third-degree or fourth-degree tear during delivery. All investigations were normal in the three patients who underwent cesarean section. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates a significant frequency of sphincter injuries (20 percent) after vaginal delivery. Obstetricians should be aware of this risk and explicitly inquire about incontinence symptoms at follow-up after delivery.

Adult

Long-term cost of fecal incontinence secondary to obstetric injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Anal incontinence is eight times more frequent in females than in males because of injuries sustained at childbirth. The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term costs associated with anal incontinence related to obstetric injuries. METHODS: Sixty-three patients with anal incontinence caused by obstetric sphincter injuries answered questionnaires regarding previous treatments, symptoms, and use of protective products. Of the patients, 31 were treated surgically, 11 with biofeedback, 6 with a combination of surgery and biofeedback, and 15 conservatively. Treatments and their respective costs were obtained from patient records, patient questionnaires, billing database, and Health Care Financing Administration's 1996 inpatient database. Costs were expressed in 1996 dollars. RESULTS: The mean incontinence score changed from 26 at evaluation to 16 at follow-up (P < 0.001). The average cost per patient was $17,166. Evaluation and follow-up charges totaled $65,412, and physiologic assessment accounted for 64 percent of these costs. Treatment charges totaled $559,341, and physician charges accounted for 18 percent of these charges. CONCLUSIONS: Fecal incontinence after childbirth results in substantial economic costs, and treatment is not always successful. New treatment modalities, such as artificial bowel sphincter or dynamic graciloplasty, should be assessed to determine their cost-effectiveness.

Adult

Whole gut transit is prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To find out if there are changes in transit time after Ripstein rectopexy and whether measurement of whole gut transit time preoperatively can predict postoperative constipation. DESIGN: Prospective open study. SETTING: Teaching hospital, Sweden. SUBJECTS: 30 patients undergoing Ripstein rectopexy for rectal prolapse (n = 17) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 13). METHODS: Whole-gut transit studies and recording of symptoms of constipation preoperatively and postoperatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Constipation and retention of markers. RESULTS: Significantly more markers were retained in postoperative compared with preoperative transit studies (p < 0.001). Constipation mainly presented as emptying difficulties and there was no increase in the total number of patients who reported emptying difficulties postoperatively. There was a weak but significant correlation between retention of markers preoperatively and postoperative emptying difficulties (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Whole gut transit was prolonged after Ripstein rectopexy. Preoperative retention of markers indicated an increased risk of postoperative constipation.

Adolescent

Anal incontinence after vaginal delivery: a prospective study in primiparous women.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and degree of anal incontinence after vaginal delivery among primiparous women and to define associated risk factors. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Karolinska Institutet, Danderyd Hospital, Sweden, a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Three hundred and forty-nine primiparous women. METHODS: Questionnaires distributed within the first days after delivery and re-distributed five and nine months postpartum. Analysis of delivery records. RESULTS: Eighty percent of the women answered all questionnaires. At five months postpartum, 2% of the women had symptoms of faecal incontinence and 25% had symptoms of involuntary flatus. At nine months postpartum, 1% of the women had symptoms of faecal incontinence and 26% had symptoms of involuntary flatus. The majority of the women had infrequent symptoms and a decrease in severity was noted at nine months. Symptoms of incontinence were more common in women who sustained a sphincter tear at delivery. Risk factors for incontinence at five months included maternal age, duration of the second stage of labour, instrumental vaginal delivery, and clinically diagnosed sphincter tear at delivery. Development of incontinence at nine months was associated with maternal age and clinically diagnosed sphincter tear at delivery. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that infrequent involuntary flatus is a common symptom after vaginal delivery in primiparous women. These symptoms of involuntary flatus frequently improved and only a few women suffered from frank faecal incontinence. Factors associated with an increased risk of anal incontinence and sphincter tears should be considered during delivery.

Adult

Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair.

OBJECTIVE: To determine risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter tears and to evaluate symptomatic outcome of primary repair. METHODS: Obstetric-procedure, maternal, and fetal data were registered in 845 consecutive vaginally delivered women. Risk factors for anal sphincter tears were calculated by multiple logistic regression. All 808 Swedish-speaking women who delivered vaginally were included in a questionnaire study regarding anal incontinence in relation to the delivery. Questionnaires were distributed within the first few days postpartum, and at 5 and 9 months postpartum. RESULTS: Six percent of the women had a clinically detected sphincter tear at delivery. Sphincter tears were associated with nulliparity (odds ratio [OR] 9.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.6, 26.2), postmaturity (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.0, 6.2), fundal pressure (OR 4.6 95% CI 2.3, 7.9), midline episiotomy (OR 5.5 95% CI 1.4,18.7), and fetal weight in intervals of 250 g (OR 1.3 95% CI 1.1, 1.6). Fifty-four percent of women with repaired sphincter tears suffered from fecal or gas incontinence or both at 5 months and 41% at 9 months. Most of the symptoms were infrequent and mild. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for sphincter tear were identified. Sphincter tear at vaginal delivery is a serious complication, and it is frequently associated with anal incontinence. Special attention should be directed toward risk factors for this complication. Symptoms of anal incontinence should explicitly be sought at follow-up after delivery.

Adult

Perineal body measurement improves evaluation of anterior sphincter lesions during endoanal ultrasonography.

UNLABELLED: Endoanal ultrasonography has become an important tool in the evaluation of patients with anal incontinence. However, the extent of anterior defects is sometimes difficult to quantitate during endoanal ultrasonography. PURPOSE: This study was designed to evaluate perineal body measurement during endoanal ultrasonography in assessing patients with obstetric anal sphincter injuries. METHODS: Forty-two patients with anal incontinence because of obstetric sphincter injuries and 13 asymptomatic subjects were investigated with endoanal ultrasonography. Sphincter muscle thickness, sphincter defects, and perineal body were measured. Perineal body measurement was performed by inserting a finger, held gently against the posterior vaginal wall, into the vagina and measuring the distance between the inner surface of the internal sphincter and the ultrasonographic reflection of the finger. RESULTS: All patients had anterior sphincter lesions of varying extent. Mean size of internal sphincter lesions was 146 degrees, and mean size of external sphincter lesions was 107 degrees (P < 0.001). Perineal body measurement was performed without difficulty in all patients and subjects. Perineal body measurement (mean +/- standard deviation) was 6 +/- 2 mm in patients and 12 +/- 3 mm in asymptomatic subjects (P < 0.001). Ninety-three percent of patients had perineal body measurement < or = 10 mm, and 70 percent of asymptomatic subjects had perineal body measurement > 10 mm. Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in 74 percent of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Digital delineation of the perineal body during endoanal ultrasonography improved the visualization of sphincter lesions in the majority of patients. Perineal body measurement is performed without difficulty and is a good predictor of anterior sphincter lesions. Use of this technique improves visualization of sphincter lesions.

Adult

Preoperative electrophysiologic assessment cannot predict continence after rectopexy.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate preoperative electrophysiologic assessment for prediction of anal continence after rectopexy. METHODS: Forty-three patients with rectal prolapse (n = 26) or internal rectal intussusception (n = 17) underwent concentric-needle electromyography, fiber density determination by single-fiber electromyography of the external anal sphincter, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency evaluation before Ripstein rectopexy. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and postoperatively. RESULTS: Anal continence was improved after rectopexy, both in patients with rectal prolapse (P = 0.06) and in those with internal rectal intussusception (P = 0.003). Abnormal results were registered in one or several aspects of the electrophysiologic assessment in 31 (72 percent) of the patients. However, functional outcome with respect to continence was not predicted by preoperative electromyography or pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment results. CONCLUSION: Electrophysiologic examinations in the preoperative assessment of patients with rectal prolapse and internal rectal intussusception do not predict continence after the Ripstein rectopexy. The routine use of electrophysiologic assessment requires further definition.

Action Potentials

Paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume.

PURPOSE: Paradoxical sphincter reaction is frequently found in constipated patients but sometimes also in incontinent patients and in asymptomatic subjects. Its significance in defecation disorders has, therefore, been debated. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether paradoxical sphincter reaction is influenced by rectal filling volume. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients with defecation disorders and paradoxical sphincter reaction shown by electromyography were reinvestigated with an extended electromyographic investigation while in the lying position and while in the sitting position, with 50-ml, 100-ml, and 150-ml water-filled rectal balloons. RESULTS: All 18 patients showing paradoxical sphincter reaction in the first investigation also showed the reaction at the second investigation in the lying position with a 0-ml volume of rectal contents. In the sitting position, with a volume of 150 ml of rectal contents, the increase in electromyographic activity disappeared in seven patients (39 percent) and no longer showed paradoxical sphincter reaction. Electromyography showed decreased activity in one patient and unchanged activity in six patients during straining. A closing reflex was seen after completed straining in all of these seven patients. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that paradoxical sphincter reaction diagnosed by electromyography is influenced by the rectal filling volume and might diminish when the rectum is filled with contents. The conventional electrophysiologic technique in the diagnosis of paradoxical sphincter reaction might, therefore, overdiagnose this condition.

Adult

Rectocele is associated with paradoxical anal sphincter reaction.

Rectocele is a frequent finding in constipated patients. However, constipation is not always relieved by rectocele repair, which may be due to other overlooked reasons for constipation. The study was designed to investigate patients with rectocele, in order to elucidate concomitant colorectal disorders and their association with rectocele. One hundred and twelve female patients suffering from severe constipation and rectal emptying difficulties were investigated using defecography, electrophysiology, anorectal manometry and colon transit time. Fifty-six patients with rectocele demonstrated by defecography were compared with 56 patients without rectocele, but with other abnormal findings at defecography. The frequency of paradoxical anal sphincter reaction (PSR) was higher in patients with rectocele (60%) than in patients without rectocele (24%). The present study supports an association between rectocele and PSR. We suggest that constipated patients with a rectocele should be investigated thoroughly before rectocele repair is considered. Further studies on the effect of biofeedback training in patients with rectocele and PSR are indicated.

Adult

Peritoneocele and enterocele. Formation and transformation during rectal evacuation as studied by means of defaeco-peritoneography.

PURPOSE: To study, by means of defaeco-peritoneography, the formation and transformation of the peritoneocele, with and without an enterocele, during rectal evacuation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty-six patients with a peritoneocele at defaeco-peritoneography were selected for the study, and examined at three different stages: 1) at the start with a contrast-filled rectum; 2) at maximum straining; and 3) at rest after rectal evacuation. RESULTS: Fourteen patients had a peritoneocele at the start. These peritoneoceles were largest at maximum straining and were all still present at rest after rectal evacuation. In 32 patients defaeco-peritoneography was regarded as normal at the start. At maximum straining these patients developed a peritoneocele and 20 of these were still present after rectal evacuation. No enterocele was seen at the start. At maximum straining 21 patients developed an enterocele and 15 of these were still present after rectal evacuation. Liquid in varying amounts was found in the peritoneoceles. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that peritoneoceles were present at different stages of the defaeco-peritoneographic investigations. Peritoneoceles were most frequent and largest at maximum straining. An enterocele was present in half of the peritoneoceles at maximum straining, but never at the start. Liquid was often present in the peritoneoceles.

Adult

Internal rectal intussusception seldom develops into total rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: This study was designed to analyze how often internal rectal intussusception develops into total rectal prolapse. METHODS: Repeated investigations with defecography were performed in 312 patients because of persisting symptoms. In 79 patients who had a rectal intussusception at the first defecography, results of the second defecography and the patients' records were studied. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients had not undergone any surgical treatment of rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse between the first and second defecographies. One of these patients had a rectal prolapse at the second defecography, and another developed a clinical prolapse after the second defecography. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that the risk of developing a rectal prolapse in patients with rectal intussusception is small. This risk should, therefore, not be used as an indication for surgery.

Administration, Oral

Pelvic anatomy and pathology is influenced by distention of the rectum: defecoperitoneography before and after rectal filling with contrast medium.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate how distention of the rectum with contrast medium at defecoperitoneography affected pelvic anatomy, i.e., position, form, and size, of organs and pouch of Douglas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six female patients with a peritoneocele at defecoperitoneography were selected for the present study. Radiographs taken at the start, before, and after filling the rectum with contrast medium were compared. RESULTS: There was an obvious change in the position of the organs in the pelvis when the rectum was distended with contrast medium. The peritoneocele disappeared completely in 19 of the patients and was reduced in size in the remaining 7 patients, and the enterocele disappeared completely in 13 patients. The small bowel and vaginal portion of the uterus moved cranially. CONCLUSIONS: A distended rectum may conceal existing pathology, such as peritoneocele and enterocele, at defecoperitoneography. Defecoperitoneography should, therefore, include a radiograph before the rectum is filled. This radiograph shows the habitual anatomy of the patient in the sitting position and may demonstrate pathologic findings.

Adult

Defaeco-peritoneography in the diagnosis of rectal intussusception and rectal prolapse.

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the use of defaeco-peritoneography in diagnosing rectal intussusception as distinct from mucosal folds in the rectum, and rectal prolapse as distinct from mucosal prolapse. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with defaecation disorders were examined by means of defaeco-peritoneography. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients had rectal intussusception and 7 patients had rectal prolapse at defaeco-peritoneography. All these patients had a rectal peritoneocele in the serosal ring-pocket of the rectal intussusception or in the rectal prolapse. Twenty-seven patients had neither rectal intussusception nor rectal prolapse and none of these patients had a rectal peritoneocele. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that only patients with a rectal intussusception or rectal prolapse have a rectal peritoneocele. Defaeco-peritoneography therefore offers correct diagnosis of rectal intussusception as distinct from mucosal folds in the rectum, and of rectal prolapse as distinct from mucosal prolapse.

Barium Sulfate

Peritoneocele: visualization with defecography and peritoneography performed simultaneously.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of simultaneous defecography and peritoneography (defecoperitoneography) in patients with an unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space noted at defecography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-two patients with unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space noted at defecography were studied with defecoperitoneography. Defecoperitoneography was a combination of defecography and peritoneography with water-soluble contrast medium administered intraperitoneally. RESULTS: The outline and movements of the peritoneum and alterations in the pelvic peritoneal cavity could be visualized with defecoperitoneography during the dynamic act of defecation. Unexplained widening of the rectovaginal space was completely due to a peritoneocele in 14 patients and partially due to a peritoneocele in six patients. In two patients, there was no peritoneocele. Only nine of 22 patients had bowel in the unexplained widening (enterocele). Three patients had a rectal peritoneocele; six, a septal peritoneocele; one, a vaginal peritoneocele; and 10, a combination of these findings. CONCLUSION: Visualization of the pelvic floor with defecoperitoneography is improved compared with visualization with defecography alone.

Adult

Continence is improved after the Ripstein rectopexy. Different mechanizms in rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception?

PURPOSE: This study was undertaken to evaluate anal manometric changes after Ripstein's operation for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception and to study the clinical outcome following the operation, with special reference to anal incontinence. METHODS: Forty-two patients with rectal prolapse or rectal intussusception were subjected to anorectal manometry preoperatively and seven days and six months postoperatively. A detailed history was obtained from each patient preoperatively and six months postoperatively. RESULTS: Preoperatively, patients with rectal intussusception had higher maximum resting pressure (MRP) (52+/- 23 mmHg) than patients with rectal prolapse (34 +/- 20 mmHg; P < 0.01). In the group of patients with rectal prolapse, there was a postoperative increase in MRP after six months (P < 0.001) but not after seven days. Maximum squeeze pressure (MSP) did not increase. Neither MRP nor MSP increased postoperatively in patients with internal rectal procidentia. Continence was improved postoperatively both in patients with rectal prolapse (P < 0.01) and rectal intussusception (P < 0.01). There was no postoperative increase in rectal emptying difficulties. CONCLUSION: Ripstein's operation often improved anal continence in patients with rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception. This improvement was accompanied by increased MRP in patients with rectal prolapse, indicating recovery of internal anal sphincter function. No postoperative increase in MRP was found in patinets with rectal intussusception. This suggests an alternate mechanism of improvement in patients with rectal intussusception.

Adult