Biomedical subjects

A Morsnowski

Publications and source records attributed to A Morsnowski.

3 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Parkinsonian action tremor: interference with object manipulation and lacking levodopa response.

It has been postulated that Parkinsonian action tremor is distinct from classical resting tremor and that it may contribute to a loss of manual dexterity in Parkinson's disease. We analyzed pinch grip coordination in 20 patients with Parkinson's disease. An object with and without an additional 500 g weight was grasped, lifted and held for a short time with opposed thumb and index finger. Force sensors recorded the force exerted by both fingers. Spectral analysis of the force traces was performed. Transition times between grasping and lifting the object were measured. 18 age matched normal volunteers served as a control group. While holding the object, there were force oscillations in the 3.5-6.5 Hz band indicating (reemerging) classical Parkinsonian tremor in 65% of the patients. This was reduced to 15-20% under levodopa. Oscillations in the 6-15 Hz band were found in 30% (50% with weight) of the patients, remaining unchanged under levodopa, and in 10% (20% with weight) of the normal controls. During lift initiation, 6-15 Hz oscillations were found in all patients and the majority of controls. The band power was positively correlated with the movement transition times in the severely akinetic patients and was significantly higher than in controls. It remained unchanged under levodopa. Our data confirm that Parkinsonian action tremor activated during complex voluntary movements is distinct from classical resting tremor. It does not show a clear levodopa response but affects dextrous movement coordination when associated with clinically severe overall akinesia.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus in Parkinson's disease: evaluation of active electrode contacts.

BACKGROUND: The subthalamic nucleus is the preferred target for deep brain stimulation in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease. The site of permanent stimulation is the subject of ongoing debate, as stimulation both within and adjacent to the subthalamic nucleus may be effective. OBJECTIVE: To assess the position of active electrode contacts in relation to the dorsal margin of the subthalamic nucleus as determined by intraoperative microrecordings and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: In 25 patients suffering from severe levodopa sensitive parkinsonism, deep brain stimulating electrodes (n = 49) were implanted following mapping of the subthalamic nucleus by microrecording and microstimulation along five parallel tracks. Postoperative stereotactic radiography and fusion of pre- and postoperative MRI studies were used to determine the stereotactic position relative to the midcommissural point of the most effective electrode contacts selected for permanent stimulation (n = 49). Intraoperative microrecordings were analysed retrospectively to define the dorsal margin of the subthalamic nucleus. In cases where the dorsal margin could be defined in at least three microrecording tracks (n = 37) it was correlated with the position of the active contact using an algorithm developed for direct three dimensional comparisons. RESULTS: Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus resulted in marked improvement in levodopa sensitive parkinsonian symptoms and levodopa induced dyskinesias, with significant improvement in UPDRS III scores. In several instances, projection of the electrode artefacts onto the T2 weighted MRI visualised subthalamic nucleus of individual patients suggested that the electrodes had passed through the subthalamic nucleus. When the actual position of active electrode contacts (n = 35) was correlated with the dorsal margin of the subthalamic nucleus as defined neurophysiologically, most contacts were located either in proximity (+/- 1.0 mm) to the dorsal border of the subthalamic nucleus (32.4%) or further dorsal within the subthalamic region (37.8%). The other active contacts (29.7%) were detected within the dorsal (sensorimotor) subthalamic nucleus. The average position of all active contacts (n = 49) was 12.8 mm (+/- 1.0) lateral, 1.9 mm (+/- 1.4) posterior, and 1.6 mm (+/- 2.1) ventral to the midcommissural point. CONCLUSIONS: Subthalamic nucleus stimulation appears to be most effective in the border area between the upper subthalamic nucleus (sensorimotor part) and the subthalamic area containing the zona incerta, fields of Forel, and subthalamic nucleus projections.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in Parkinson's disease: correlation of active electrode contacts with intraoperative microrecordings.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The most effective site for subthalamic nucleus (STN) stimulation has remained unclear. The position of active contacts relative to the dorsal margin of the STN was determined. METHODS: Electrodes (n = 49) were implanted following STN mapping by microrecording and microstimulation along five tracks (n = 25 patients). The stereotactic position of active contacts was determined and correlated with microrecordings using an algorithm for direct three-dimensional comparisons (n = 37). RESULTS: Most active contacts were detected within +/-1.0 mm from the dorsal margin of the STN as defined by microrecording (32.4%) or farther dorsal in the subthalamic area (37.8%), and only 29.7% were localized to the STN proper. This was consistent with the average stereotactic coordinates of the active contacts in these three groups. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the dorsal border area of the STN is the most effective target. Besides the dorsolateral STN (sensorimotor part) this may include projections from/to STN, the zona incerta, and pallidofugal projections in the fields of Forel.

Electric Stimulation Therapy↗