PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Mukerjee

Publications and source records attributed to A Mukerjee.

14 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Investigation of an outbreak of Escherichia coli O157 infection caused by environmental exposure at a scout camp.

In May 2000 a scout camp was held on an agricultural showground in New Deer, Aberdeenshire. There were 337 campers at the event, comprising 233 cubs, scouts, and venture scouts, and 104 adults. The event was abandoned early because of heavy rainfall. Twenty campers who became ill between 28 May and 3 June were confirmed as having E. coli O157 infection. Preliminary investigation did not suggest a food vehicle but did indicate environmental exposure at the camp as a risk factor. Subsequent investigations supported the hypothesis that transmission of E. coli O157 was from the environment to cases by contaminated hands, either directly from hand to mouth, or via food. As a result of the investigation the Aberdeenshire Council and the Scout Association jointly prepared interim guidelines to reduce the risk of E. coli O157 infection at scout camps.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Isolated calf vein thrombosis: comparison of MR venography and conventional venography after initial sonography in symptomatic patients.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The authors performed this study to compare magnetic resonance (MR) venography and conventional venography in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the calf after sonography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sonography was performed in 595 patients who were suspected of having lower-extremity DVT. Patients with positive above-knee duplex sonograms, allergy to iodinated contrast material, renal insufficiency, or cardiac pacemakers and patients who were obese were excluded. The remaining 73 patients were asked to undergo MR venography and conventional venography. All studies were to be performed within 48 hours of the clinical diagnosis and according to standard clinical practice. Images were interpreted by radiologists who were blinded to the results of other modalities. Two separate analyses were performed: one in which conventional venography was used as the standard of reference, and one in which the presence of at least two positive studies for thrombus was considered diagnostic. RESULTS: Although 36 patients agreed to participate in the study, only 14 underwent MR venography and conventional venography within 48 hours of the clinical diagnosis. With use of any two positive studies for confirmation, acute DVT was diagnosed in three patients. Conventional venography depicted two of the three cases, whereas sonography and MR venography each depicted all three. The findings were concordant in only five of the 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Moderate discrepancy among modalities was demonstrated. This suggests radiologists should undertake comparisons among these three modalities for the detection of calf DVT. In patients with a high clinical suspicion, a second modality may be useful if the initial study is negative.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Immunotherapy of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy; a six-year follow-up study in Calcutta.

The present report, which describes management of lepromin-negative borderline leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine, is an extension of our earlier study on the treatment of lepromatous leprosy patients with low-dose Convit vaccine as an adjunct to multidrug therapy (MDT). The test Group I, consisting of 50 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients, were given low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT. The control group II consisted of 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given BCG vaccination plus MDT and 25 lepromin-negative, borderline leprosy patients given killed Mycobacterium leprae (human) vaccine plus MDT. The control group III consisted of 50 lepromin-positive, borderline leprosy patients not given any immunostimulation but given only MDT. Depending upon the lepromin unresponsiveness, the patients were given one to four inoculations of the various antileprosy vaccines and were followed up every 3 months for 2 years for clinical, bacteriological and immunological outcome. All patients belonging to the test and control groups showed clinical cure and bacteriological negativity within 2 years. However, immunologic potentiation, assessed by lepromin testing and the leukocyte migration inhibition test (LMIT), was better in the test patients receiving low-dose Convit vaccine plus MDT than in the control patients receiving BCG vaccine plus MDT or killed M. leprae vaccine plus MDT or MDT alone. But the capacity of clearance bacteria (CCB) test from the lepromin granuloma showed poor bacterial clearance in the test patients. However, there was no relapse during 6 years of follow up. Two mid-borderline (BB) patients had severe reversal reactions with lagophthalmos and wrist drop during immunotherapy despite being given low-dose Convit vaccine.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Immunotherapy of far-advanced lepromatous leprosy patients with low-dose convit vaccine along with multidrug therapy (Calcutta trial).

This report describes a promising mode of treatment of lepromin-unresponsive, far-advanced, lepromatous (LL) leprosy patients with antileprosy vaccines as an adjunct to multidrug therapy (MDT). The Trial Groups included 50 highly bacilliferous, lepromin-negative, untreated LL patients. They were given MDT for 2 years. Of them, 30 patients were administered a mixed antileprosy vaccine containing killed Mycobacterium leprae of human origin plus M. bovis BCG. The remaining 20 patients were given M. bovis BCG. Depending on the severity of lepromin unresponsiveness, they were given one to six inoculations at 3-month intervals. Another 20 similar LL patients were taken in the Control Group. They were given only MDT for 2 years. From the start of the study, all patients belonging to the Trial and Control Groups were followed every 3 months for clinical, bacteriological and immunological outcomes. Within 2 years all 50 patients of the Trial Groups and 19 of the 20 patients of the Control Group became clinically inactive and bacteriologically negative. However, the clinical cure and the falls of the bacterial and morphological indexes were much faster in those patients receiving the mixed vaccine therapy than in those patients who were given BCG plus MDT or only MDT. The immunological improvements in the patients of the Trial and Control Groups were assessed by: a) lepromin testing at the beginning of the study and at 3-month intervals and also by b) the in vitro leukocyte migration inhibition (LMI) test at both the beginning and end of the study. As the patients were given more and more vaccinations, the incidence of lepromin conversion increased, more so in the patients receiving the mixed vaccine. Thus, 63%, 15% and 5% of the patients became lepromin positive in those patients receiving the mixed vaccine, BCG, and MDT only, respectively. Lamentably, the vaccine-induced lepromin positivity was temporary and faded away within several months. At the beginning of the study, the LMI test against specific M. leprae antigen was negative in all patients of both the Trial and Control Groups. After the end of the chemo-immunotherapy schedule, the LMI test became positive in 50% and 20% of LL patients receiving the mixed vaccine and BCG, respectively. None of the Control Group could show LMI positivity after completion of the MDT schedule. These results show that treatment of LL patients with the mixed vaccine and MDT could quickly reverse the clinical course of the disease, remove immunologic anergy in some patients, and induce a rapid decrease in the bacterial load in them.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal metastases.

Sixty-six patients with spinal metastatic disease secondary to urological malignancy underwent magnetic resonance imaging. Twenty-eight patients had clinical evidence of spinal cord compression. MRI demonstrated metastatic cord compression in 16 cases, a benign cause in two cases, nerve root involvement in five cases. In seven patients MRI demonstrated spinal metastases which were not visible on plain radiographs and isotope bone scans. Nine patients had metastatic deposits involving the cauda equina and in a further 22 patients spinal metastases were an incidental finding during MRI for staging of the primary tumour. MRI is a sensitive method of imaging spinal metastases and provides a non-invasive means of assessing patients with spinal cord compression.

Humans↗