PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A O Shar

Publications and source records attributed to A O Shar.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Extent of Barrett's metaplasia: a prospective study of the serial change in area of Barrett's measured by quantitative endoscopic imaging.

BACKGROUND: An accurate determination of the extent of Barrett's metaplasia is critical to the study of its natural history and response to therapy. Our hypothesis is that area calculations offer advantages over length estimates of Barrett's. METHODS: Changes in both measures and estimates of progression or regression between two endoscopies in 17 patients were compared. Area was calculated using a computer image analysis technique. RESULTS: Although there was no significant difference in length correlation versus area correlation between endoscopies (r = 0.90 vs 0.99), the mean change in absolute length (1.4 +/- 0.2 cm) was greater than the change in area (4.5 +/- 1.4 cm2, equivalent to a length of 0.67 +/- 0.2 cm, p = 0.001). The percent change in absolute length (26.9%) was greater than the change in area (16%, p = 0.001). Discordance of estimates of progression or regression between area and length was found in nine patients. The image technique detected no change in the area of squamous islands. CONCLUSIONS: Imaging analysis can precisely measure the extent of Barrett's including squamous islands. Area showed little change, whereas measures of length were more varied. Computer based image analysis provides a more precise estimate of interval change of Barrett's.

Adolescent↗

Quantitative endoscopy: precise computerized measurement of metaplastic epithelial surface area in Barrett's esophagus.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The inability to precisely measure the area of Barrett's metaplasia has impaired the study of its natural history and response to therapy. This study used a novel computer program that creates two-dimensional maps of the esophagus allowing for calculation of the area of Barrett's metaplasia. METHODS: Endoscopic photographs of Barrett's models and patients were obtained by independent endoscopists. The program transformed the photographs into maps, and the area of Barrett's metaplasia was calculated. RESULTS: Using models, calculated areas correlated with actual areas (r = 0.96) with an overall error of 5.2%. Color, size, shape, diameter of the model, or endoscopist's experience did not affect the accuracy. Accuracy did improve by decreasing the interval between photographs from 4 cm (10.0% error) to 2 cm (4.8% error). In patients, area calculations from maps created by independent technicians correlated precisely (r = 0.99) at 1-cm (n = 22) and 2-cm (n = 40) intervals. Independent endoscopists correlated precisely in producing photographs for map construction (r = 0.99; n = 20). CONCLUSIONS: This novel computer technology produces two-dimensional maps of Barrett's metaplasia that can be used to accurately calculate area. Minimal interobserver variability in obtaining photographs is found.

Adult↗