PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A O'Cathain

Publications and source records attributed to A O'Cathain.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Telephone triage, expert systems and clinical expertise.

This paper reports on a qualitative study of the use of an expert system developed for the British telephone triage service NHS Direct. This system, known as CAS, is designed to standardise and control the interaction between NHS Direct nurses and callers. The paper shows, however, that in practice the nurses use CAS in a range of ways and, in so doing, privilege their own expertise and deliver an individualised service. The paper concludes by arguing that NHS Direct management's policy of using CAS as a means of standardising service delivery will achieve only limited success due not only to the professional ideology of nursing but also to the fact that rule-based expert systems capture only part of what 'experts' do.

England↗

Rationing in the emergency department: the good, the bad, and the unacceptable.

OBJECTIVES: Waiting times in emergency departments (EDs) are an important government priority. Although substantial efforts are currently being made to reduce waiting times, little attention has been paid to the patients' view. We used qualitative methods to explore patients' perspectives on waiting times and other approaches to rationing and prioritisation. METHODS: Face to face, in depth, qualitative interviews (n = 11) explored how patients valued waiting times for non-urgent ED care. The framework approach (identifying a thematic framework through repeated re-reading) was used to analyse transcripts. RESULTS: Interviewees found some forms of rationing and prioritisation acceptable. They expected rationing by delay, but required explanations or information on the reason for their wait. They valued prioritisation by triage (rationing by selection) and thought that this role could be expanded for the re-direction of non-urgent patients elsewhere (rationing by deflection). Interviewees were mainly unwilling or unable to engage in prioritisation of different types of patients, openly prioritising only those with obvious clinical need, and children. However, some interviewees were willing to ration implicitly, labelling some attenders as inappropriate, such as those causing a nuisance. Others felt it was unacceptable to blame "inappropriate" attenders, as their attendance may relate to lack of information or awareness of service use. Explicit rationing between services was not acceptable, although some believed there were more important priorities for NHS resources than ED waiting times. Interviewees disagreed with the hypothetical notion of paying to be seen more quickly in the ED (rationing by charging). CONCLUSIONS: Interviewees expected to wait and accepted the need for prioritisation, although they were reluctant to engage in judgements regarding prioritisation. They supported the re-direction of patients with certain non-urgent complaints. However, they perceived a need for more explanation and information about their wait, the system, and alternative services.

Adult↗

The impact of a general practice co-operative on accident and emergency services, patient satisfaction and GP satisfaction.

BACKGROUND: The advent of general practice co-operatives represented a fundamental change in the delivery and organization of out-of-hours services. Concerns have been voiced that co-operatives might impact adversely on workload in accident and emergency (A&E) departments. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of establishing a general practice co-operative on use of A&E services, patient satisfaction and GP satisfaction. METHODS: A controlled before and after study of a GP co-operative in Sheffield, UK was carried out. A postal questionnaire was sent to 26 911 people, 13 442 before and 13 469 after the opening of the co-operative, to determine service use, in particular A&E attendance, in the previous 4 weeks. Patient satisfaction was assessed through structured interviews with 653 patients. GP satisfaction was assessed using a postal survey of all 98 Sheffield practices 2 years after the opening of the co-operative. RESULTS: There was no change in the use of A&E services, odds ratio = 1.08 (95% confidence interval 0.60-1.94). There was no change in patient satisfaction overall, mean difference 0.02 (-0.32 to 0.36). Sixty-seven per cent of doctors in member practices were much more satisfied with out-of-hours duty compared with 10% in non-member practices (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: General practice co-operatives have been successful in achieving their policy objectives, improving GP morale without jeopardizing patient satisfaction or impacting adversely on A&E services.

Delivery of Health Care↗

NHS Direct: consistency of triage outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the consistency of triage outcomes by nurses using four types of computerised decision support software in NHS Direct. METHODS: 119 scenarios were constructed based on calls to ambulance services that had been assigned the lowest priority category by the emergency medical dispatch systems in use. These scenarios were presented to nurses working in four NHS Direct call centres using different computerised decision support software, including the NHS Clinical Assessment System. RESULTS: The overall level of agreement between the nurses using the four systems was "fair" rather than "moderate" or "good" (kappa=0.375, 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.41). For example, the proportion of calls triaged to accident and emergency departments varied from 22% (26 of 119) to 44% (53 of 119). Between 21% (25 of 119) and 31% (37 of 119) of these low priority ambulance calls were triaged back to the 999 ambulance service. No system had both high sensitivity and specificity for referral to accident and emergency services. CONCLUSIONS: There were large differences in outcome between nurses using different software systems to triage the same calls. If the variation is primarily attributable to the software then standardising on a single system will obviously eliminate this. As the calls were originally made to ambulance services and given the lowest priority, this study also suggests that if, in the future, ambulance services pass such calls to NHS Direct then at least a fifth of these may be passed back unless greater sensitivity in the selection of calls can be achieved.

Adult↗

Use of evidence based leaflets to promote informed choice in maternity care: randomised controlled trial in everyday practice.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of leaflets on promoting informed choice in women using maternity services. DESIGN: Cluster trial, with maternity units randomised to use leaflets (intervention units) or offer usual care (control units). Data collected through postal questionnaires. SETTING: 13 maternity units in Wales. PARTICIPANTS: Four separate samples of women using maternity services. Antenatal samples: women reaching 28 weeks' gestation before (n=1386) and after (n=1778) the intervention. Postnatal samples: women at eight weeks after delivery before (n=1741) and after (n=1547) the intervention. INTERVENTION: Provision of 10 pairs of Informed Choice leaflets for service users and midwives and a training session for staff in their use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in the proportion of women who reported exercising informed choice. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: changes in women's knowledge; satisfaction with information, choice, and discussion; and possible consequences of informed choice. RESULTS: There was no change in the proportion of women who reported that they exercised informed choice in the intervention units compared with the control units for either antenatal or postnatal women. There was a small increase in satisfaction with information in the antenatal samples in the intervention units compared with the control units (odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval 1.05 to 1.88). Only three quarters of women in the intervention units reported being given at least one of the leaflets, indicating problems with the implementation of the intervention. CONCLUSION: In everyday practice, evidence based leaflets were not effective in promoting informed choice in women using maternity services.

Attitude to Health↗

NHS Direct and nurses--opportunity or monotony?

NHS Direct, the 24-hour telephone helpline providing information and advice about health problems, is available throughout England and Wales. It was envisaged as a nurse-led service presenting a new opportunity for the nursing profession. Free text comments from a postal survey of NHS Direct nurses revealed that a large proportion of nurses were happy with working in NHS Direct, and that it presented some nurses with the opportunity of a new and challenging role. However, a minority found the work monotonous and felt that NHS Direct is likely to face the challenge of staff retention.

Career Choice↗

The acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the acceptability of an emergency medical dispatch (EMD) system to people who call 999 to request an ambulance. METHODS: Postal questionnaires to two systematic random samples of approximately 500 named callers to one ambulance service before, and one year after, the introduction of EMD. RESULTS: The response rate was 72% (355 of 493) before, and 63% (297 of 466) after, EMD. There was a reduction, from 81% (284 of 349) to 70% (200 of 286), in the proportion of callers who found all the questions asked by the call taker relevant, although this did not adversely affect the proportion of callers who were very satisfied with the 999 call, which increased from 78% (268 of 345) to 86% (247 of 287). The proportion of callers who reported receiving first aid advice increased from 7% (23 of 323) to 43% (117 of 272) and general information from 13% (41 of 315) to 58% (157 of 269). Satisfaction levels with the amount of advice given increased, while satisfaction with response times remained stable at 76% (254 of 320) very satisfied before and 78% (217 of 279) after EMD. The proportion of respondents very satisfied with the service in general increased from 71% (238 of 336) to 79% (220 of 277). There was evidence in respondents' written comments of two potential problems with EMD from the caller's viewpoint. Firstly, some callers were advised to take actions that were subsequently not needed; secondly, a small number of callers felt that the ambulance crew did not treat the situation as seriously as they would have liked. CONCLUSIONS: Introducing EMD increases the amount of first aid and general advice given to callers, and satisfaction with these aspects of the service, while maintaining satisfaction with response times. Overall satisfaction with the service increased. However, some changes may be needed to prevent a small amount of dissatisfaction directly associated with EMD.

Ambulances↗

Impact of NHS Direct on other services: the characteristics and origins of its nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the NHS Direct nurse workforce and estimate the impact of NHS Direct on the staffing of other NHS nursing specialties. METHOD: A postal survey of NHS Direct nurses in all 17 NHS Direct call centres operating in June 2000. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (682 of 920). In the three months immediately before joining NHS Direct, 20% (134 of 682, 95% confidence intervals 17% to 23%) of respondents had not been working in the NHS. Of the 540 who came from NHS nursing posts, one fifth had come from an accident and emergency department or minor injury unit (110 of 540), and one in seven from practice nursing (75 of 540). One in ten (65 of 681) nurses said that previous illness, injury, or disability had been an important reason for deciding to join NHS Direct. Sixty two per cent (404 of 649) of nurses felt their job satisfaction and work environment had improved since joining NHS Direct. CONCLUSION: The NHS Direct nurse workforce currently constitutes a small proportion (about 0.5%) of all qualified nurses in the NHS, although it recruits relatively experienced and well qualified nurses more heavily from some specialties, such as accident and emergency nursing, than others. However, its overall impact on staffing in any one specialty is likely to be small. NHS Direct has succeeded in providing employment for some nurses who might otherwise be unable to continue in nursing because of disability.

Adult↗

Impact of NHS direct on demand for immediate care: observational study.

OBJECTIVES: To quantify the impact of NHS Direct on the use of accident and emergency, ambulance, and general practitioner cooperative services. DESIGN: Observational study of trends in use of NHS Direct and other immediate care services over 24 months spanning introduction of NHS Direct. SETTING: Three areas in England in first wave of introduction of NHS Direct, and six nearby general practitioner cooperatives as controls. SUBJECTS: All contacts with these immediate care services. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Changes in trends in use after introduction of NHS Direct. RESULTS: NHS Direct received about 68 500 calls from a population of 1.3 million in its first year of operation, of which 72% were out of hours and 22% about a child aged under 5 years. Changes in trends in use of accident and emergency departments and ambulance services after introduction of NHS Direct were small and non-significant. Changes in trends in use of general practitioner cooperatives were also small but significant, from an increase of 2.0% a month before introduction of NHS Direct to -0.8% afterwards (relative change -2. 9% (95% confidence interval -4.2% to -1.5%)). This reduction in trend was significant both for calls handled by telephone advice alone and for those resulting in direct contact with a doctor. In contrast, the six control cooperatives showed no evidence of change in trend; an increase of 0.8% a month before NHS Direct and 0.9% after (relative change 0.1% (-0.9% to 1.1%)). CONCLUSION: In its first year NHS Direct did not reduce the pressure on NHS immediate care services, although it may have restrained increasing demand on one important part-general practitioners' out of hours services.

Emergency Service, Hospital↗

Shifting services from secondary to primary care: stakeholders' views of the barriers.

OBJECTIVES: To identify the barriers to shifting services from secondary to primary care perceived by the involved stakeholders. METHODS: Forty-five semi-structured interviews with stakeholders from primary care, acute and community hospitals, purchasers (health authorities) and other agencies involved in two contrasting initiatives to shift services. RESULTS: Stakeholders perceived similar barriers in the two initiatives: disinvesting from existing providers; lack of information on activity and costs; uncertainty over the quality of the proposed alternative service; concern about an increasing workload in primary care; diversity of views within primary care; difficulties in communication between the many agencies involved; and lack of leadership by purchasers. CONCLUSIONS: Service shifts which involve disinvestment from existing providers and collaboration between agencies with different views and interests will inevitably face a range of barriers. Attempts to shift services by disinvesting from secondary care are likely to encounter the greatest difficulties. Attempts to shift without concomitant disinvestment may also be slow because of the difficulties of multi-agency collaboration. Frustration will be reduced if those involved have a realistic understanding of the difficulties rather than being surprised and overwhelmed by them.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

General practice based physiotherapy: its use and effect on referrals to hospital orthopaedics and rheumatology outpatient departments.

BACKGROUND: In November 1992, a pilot scheme was established in Doncaster to provide an on-site physiotherapy service in six non-fundholding general practices covering a population of approximately 44,000 people. AIM: The aim of the pilot scheme was to transfer a hospital-based physiotherapy service, to which general practitioners had direct access, to a primary care setting and to reduce referrals to an orthopaedics outpatient department. METHOD: Use of physiotherapy services and referrals to orthopaedics and rheumatology before and during the first year of the scheme were monitored. Comparisons were made with data over the same time periods for general practices that were not in the scheme. The location of management of patients referred to physiotherapy was monitored for an eight-month period during the scheme. RESULTS: In the first year the scheme had a utilization rate of 31 per 1000 patients in the participating practices, representing a 164% increase over the hospital-based physiotherapy utilization rate for the year prior to the scheme. Eight per cent of physiotherapy patients received hospital-based treatment during the scheme. Changes in hospital outpatient referral rates attributable to the scheme were reductions of 8% to the orthopaedics department and 17% to the rheumatology department. CONCLUSION: The increase in the use of the physiotherapy service was possibly caused, in part, by general practitioners sending patients to on-site physiotherapy who previously would have been referred to orthopaedics and, largely, by an increase in the treatment of patients who previously would not have been referred to hospital. Physiotherapy based in general practice can be a substitute for hospital-based physiotherapy and can contribute to a reduction in referrals to orthopaedics and rheumatology outpatient departments. However, it can result in an increase in use of physiotherapy services.

Family Practice↗

Evaluation of a Hospital at Home scheme for the early discharge of patients with fractured neck of femur.

The community health services in Southern Derbyshire, in conjunction with an acute hospital, established a pilot scheme for the early discharge of fractured neck of femur patients from hospital to their own homes. The scheme was evaluated by prospectively comparing a group of patients using Hospital at Home (HAH) and a group receiving hospital care only. The main outcomes measured were the proportion of hospital admissions for fractured neck of femur using HAH, length of stay, patient satisfaction, general health status at discharge as measured by the Nottingham Health Profile, and three-month mortality and readmission rates. Costs were calculated based on prices charged by providers of the services. In the first year of the scheme, 76 (18 per cent) of the 432 hospital admissions for fractured neck of femur fitted the selection criteria and agreed to admission to HAH. Thirty-four patients were identified who were suitable for HAH but not admitted to it. The comparison of the 76 HAH patients and 34 hospital patients revealed that HAH patients were discharged from hospital an average of 7 days earlier; patients in both groups were satisfied with the care they received; the general health status of the two groups at discharge was similar, with the exception that HAH patients had better emotional health on discharge from care; the three-month mortality rate was similar in both groups (5 per cent); the readmission rate for HAH patients appeared higher than for hospital patients but this difference was not statistically significant (15.8 per cent versus 8.8 per cent, Fisher's exact test, p = 0.187).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Aged↗

Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care.

OBJECTIVES: To test the acceptability, validity, and reliability of the short form 36 health survey questionnaire (SF-36) and to compare it with the Nottingham health profile. DESIGN: Postal survey using a questionnaire booklet together with a letter from the general practitioner. Non-respondents received two reminders at two week intervals. The SF-36 questionnaire was retested on a subsample of respondents two weeks after the first mailing. SETTING: Two general practices in Sheffield. PATIENTS: 1980 patients aged 16-74 years randomly selected from the two practice lists. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Scores for each health dimension on the SF-36 questionnaire and the Nottingham health profile. Response to questions on recent use of health services and sociodemographic characteristics. RESULTS: The response rate for the SF-36 questionnaire was high (83%) and the rate of completion for each dimension was over 95%. Considerable evidence was found for the reliability of the SF-36 (Cronbach's alpha greater than 0.85, reliability coefficient greater than 0.75 for all dimensions except social functioning) and for construct validity in terms of distinguishing between groups with expected health differences. The SF-36 was able to detect low levels of ill health in patients who had scored 0 (good health) on the Nottingham health profile. CONCLUSIONS: The SF-36 is a promising new instrument for measuring health perception in a general population. It is easy to use, acceptable to patients, and fulfils stringent criteria of reliability and validity. Its use in other contexts and with different disease groups requires further research.

Adolescent↗

Cost effectiveness of minor surgery in general practice: a prospective comparison with hospital practice.

The cost effectiveness of general practitioners undertaking minor surgery in their practices was determined in a prospective comparison of patients having minor surgery undertaken in five general practices over a 12 week period in 1989, and in the departments of dermatology and general surgery in Rotherham District General Hospital over a contemporaneous eight week period. There were no differences between the settings in the reported rates of wound infection or other complications and only one general practice patient was subsequently referred to hospital for specialist treatment. General practitioners sent a smaller proportion of specimens to a histopathology laboratory than hospital doctors (61% versus 90%, P less than 0.001); incorrectly diagnosed a larger proportion of malignant conditions as benign (10% versus 1%, P less than 0.05) and inadequately excised 5% of lesions where this never happened in hospital (difference not significant). General practice patients had shorter waiting times between referral and treatment, spent less time and money attending for treatment and more of them were satisfied with their treatment. The cost of a procedure undertaken in general practice was less than in hospital--pounds 33.53 versus pounds 45.54 for the excision of a lesion and pounds 3.00 versus pounds 3.22 for cryotherapy of a wart (1989-90 prices). Performing minor surgery in general practice would seem cost effective compared with a hospital setting. However, the risk of general practitioners inadequately excising a malignancy and not sending it to a histopathology laboratory must be addressed and the conclusion regarding cost effectiveness only applies where general practice is a substitute for the hospital setting and not an additional activity.

Case-Control Studies↗

Epidemiology of babies dying at different ages from the sudden infant death syndrome.

An analysis of data from the United Kingdom multicentre study of postneonatal mortality has been made to assess whether there are causally distinct groups of babies dying from the Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS), and to develop explicit risk factor profiles for the subgroups. The 303 SIDS babies in the multicentre study were divided into four subgroups by age at death: weeks 1-7, 8-15, 16-23, and 24 or more weeks. Contrasts between these subgroups with respect to 28 epidemiological characteristics and to pathology findings were investigated. Significant contrasts in the number of previous pregnancies, duration of the 2nd stage of labour, gestational length, family finances and repair of housing were found. Overall, very strong evidence of epidemiological differences was found (chi 2(9) = 29.3, p less than 0.001), and of contrasts in the nature and degree of any acquired terminal disease. It is concluded that there are different causes of SIDS with different distributions according to age at death.

Age Factors↗