PubMed HealthSearch

Biomedical subjects

A Opazo Saez

Publications and source records attributed to A Opazo Saez.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and airway smooth muscle in the guinea pig.

We examined the role of airway smooth muscle (ASM) as a determinant of the site and extent of methacholine (MCh)-induced airway narrowing in anesthetized and mechanically ventilated guinea pigs. The sites of airway narrowing and ASM were determined in animals (n = 4) bronchoconstricted to 75, 60, 40, or 15% of the maximal lung resistance (RL,max) induced by aerosolized MCh and compared with a saline-challenged animal. The median luminal area of each animal was significantly inversely correlated to the percentage of RL,max (r = -0.95; P < 0.01). However, there was no correlation between the degree of narrowing of any given airway and the quantity of ASM of any given airway. The relationship between the amount of ASM and responsiveness to MCh was studied in different animals (n = 13). The range of the concentration of MCh required to reach 50% of RL,max (EC50) varied by 254-fold, but the RL,max had only a 3.6-fold range. There was no correlation between RL,max and ASM. However, there was a correlation between the log EC50 and ASM (r = -0.541; P<0.05) in intraparenchymal cartilaginous airways. In conclusion, morphometric measurements of airway narrowing are correlated with pulmonary resistance. Variability in the quantity of ASM does not appear to be a determinant of the heterogeneity of airway narrowing or of maximal bronchoconstriction among normal guinea pigs. However, the sensitivity to MCh is associated with differences in the amount of ASM in intraparenchymal cartilaginous airways.

Airway Resistance

Lung structure and function in cigarette smokers.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking produces an inflammatory response in the airways of everyone but only 15-20% of smokers develop airways obstruction. The present study concerns the relative importance of peripheral airways inflammation and the emphysematous destruction of the parenchymal support of the airways in the pathogenesis of this obstruction. METHODS: A total of 407 patients with a diagnosis of lung tumour performed pulmonary function tests a day or two before a lung or lobar resection. The specimens were fixed in inflation and analysed at the gross and microscopic level to determine the extent and severity of the emphysematous process, the number of alveoli supporting the outer walls of the airways, and the average distance between alveolar walls. The severity of the inflammatory process in the respiratory and nonrespiratory bronchioles was also assessed using a previously established grading system. RESULTS: The lung function test showed that a decline in FEV1 was associated with an increase in residual volume and a decrease in the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide and a reduction in the lung maximum elastic recoil pressure. The prevalence of grossly visible emphysema increased as FEV1 declined, but the extent and severity of these lesions and the number of alveoli supporting the outer walls of the peripheral airways was similar at all levels of FEV1. The system used to grade inflammatory response in the peripheral airways failed to identify a specific defect responsible for the physiological abnormalities. CONCLUSION: The reduction in FEV1 associated with chronic cigarette smoking can be partially explained by loss of lung elastic recoil pressure which reduces the force driving air out of the lung. This loss of elastic recoil pressure is attributed to microscopic enlargement of the air spaces rather than to grossly visible emphysema. The exact nature of the lesions responsible for the peripheral airways obstruction remains to be identified.

Aged