PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Pierson

Publications and source records attributed to A Pierson.

40 records · Page 3Linked to original sources

[Translation and validation of the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS Social Anhedonia Scale, M.L. Eckblad, L.J. Chapman et al., 1982). Study of the internal and concurrent validity in 126 normal subjects].

The Revised Social Anhedonia Scale (SAS) with 40 items (Eckblad et al., 1982) which studies the social dimension of anhedonia has been validated in the United-States (Mishlove & Chapman, 1985). However, no french translation and validation of this scale has been made to date. This work presents the french translation of the Social Anhedonia Scale and its validation. After a back-translation and final adjustment, it has been submitted to a sample of 126 control subjects from the general population. Furthermore, they were asked to fill two other scales: the Chapman Physical Anhedonia (PAS) with 61 items and the Fawcett Pleasure Scale (36 items), both of them exploring the subjects answer in terms of anhedonia/hedonia towards social, sensorial and/or physical experiences. The internal validity has been determined on the one hand by the Cronbach alpha coefficient which showed a strong unidimensional characteristic (0.80) and the other hand by the correlation of each item with the total score using the point biserial coefficient which ranged from .204 to .559. The concurrent validation has been determined by the Pearson correlation coefficient between the french version of social anhedonia scale and the french version of physical anhedonia scale. The values were .42, p = .001. Furthermore, this two scales are significant inversely correled to the french version of the pleasure scale: r = -.22, p = .0125 for the first, and r = -.26, p = .0027 for the second. The internal and concurrent validity of the french version of the revised social anhedonia scale should allow to improve our understanding of anhedonia in psychiatry and psychopathology.

Adolescent↗

[Validation of the French version of the Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS, Snaith et al. 1995). Determination of the statistical parameters in 208 normal subjects and 103 hospitalized patients presenting with depression or schizophrenia].

The aim of the study is to explore the validity and the reliability of the French version of the SHAPS in two groups of subjects. 208 healthy students and 103 inpatients meeting the RDC criteria for schizophrenia or depression filled out the French versions of the SHAPS and the revised Physical Anhedonia Scale of Chapman and Chapman. The internal consistency of the SHAPS was measured in each group using first the Kuder Richardson coefficient (point biserial) between the items and the total score. The concurrent validity was studied using the Pearson correlation coefficient between the SHAPS and the PAS in each group. The predictive validity was determined by the comparison of the SHAPS score between the two groups. The reliability was studied using a test-retest in a sub-group (n = 32) extracted of the control group. The values of the KR 20 in the healthy and psychiatric groups were respectively 0.47 and 0.80. The mean of the correlations between the items and the total score were respectively 0.35 and 0.52. The values of the correlations between the SHAPS and the PAS were respectively in the normal and psychiatric groups 0.39 (p < 0.001) and 0.34 (p < 0.001). Psychiatric subjects had a higher score (m = 2.33, sd = 2.68) on the SHAPS than the normals (m = 0.89, sd = 1.18) [F (1,303) = 12.26, p = 0.0005]. The test-retest showed a correlation of 0.56 (p < 0.01) between the two passations of the SHAPS. The metrological parameters of the SHAPS were discussed as well as the utility of that scale compared to the PAS.

Adult↗