Pemetrexed: mRNA expression of the target genes TS, GARFT and DHFR correlates with the in vitro chemosensitivity of human solid tumors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A R Hanauske.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the naphthalamide agent, LU 79553, was performed to determine its safety profile, maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for phase II studies. LU 79553 was given intravenously (i.v.) every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid cancers (an extended cohort of patients also received the drug every 6 weeks). 59 patients were enrolled into the study (50 patients in the 3-weekly schedule and 9 patients in the 6-weekly schedule). Dose levels studied ranged from 10 mg/m(2) to 160 mg/m(2). Neuro-muscular toxicity was identified as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). This muscular toxicity was observed after administrating total doses of 160-450 mg/m(2) (median 330 mg/m(2)). Non-DLTs consisted of diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting, fatigue and local venous phlebitis. The major haematological toxicities observed were anaemia and neutropenia (and were mainly observed at the two highest dose levels). The proposed dose for phase II studies using the 3-weekly regimen is 100 mg/m(2)/course (60 min infusion in 500 ml normal saline), but a close clinical follow-up of the patients for neuromuscular toxicity is mandatory. Prolongation of the treatment interval to 6 weeks, based upon the long half-life of the drug in the plasma and tissue, observed during this study, seemed not to be feasible in this heavily pretreated group of patients.
Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in a broad phase II program of lurtotecan (GI147211), a novel camptothecin derived topoisomerase I inhibitor, to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population, to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters and to investigate relationships with clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was applied during course one, which involved two sampling time-points. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) and volume of distribution. In total, samples were collected of 109 (63%) of 173 patients. Pharmacokinetic-dynamic evaluation could be carried out successfully in 85 (78%) of the sampled patients. CL of lurtotecan showed substantial variability (mean 87 +/- 28 L/h) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I studies where full pharmacokinetic curves were used. Residual variability in the population estimate of CL was 9.9%. No significant relationships were observed between exposure parameters and toxicity nor likelihood of tumor response, however the latter relationship may well have been obscured by the heterogeneity of the studied population. Prospective implementation of large scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and important to establish whether interpatient variability in drug exposure is a major determinant of toxicity or activity.
PURPOSE: A single-agent dose-escalating phase I and pharmacokinetic study on the farnesyl transferase inhibitor SCH 66336 was performed to determine the safety profile, maximum-tolerated dose, and recommended dose for phase II studies. Plasma and urine pharmacokinetics were determined. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SCH 66336 was given orally bid without interruption to patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed solid tumors. Routine antiemetics were not prescribed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled onto the study. Dose levels studied were 25, 50, 100, 200, 400, and 300 mg bid. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1 and 15. At 400 mg bid, the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) consisted of grade 4 vomiting, grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, and the combination of grade 3 anorexia and diarrhea with reversible grade 3 plasma creatinine elevation. After dose reduction, at 300 mg bid, the DLTs consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 neurocortical toxicity, and the combination of grade 3 fatigue with grade 2 nausea and diarrhea. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 200 mg bid, which was found feasible for prolonged periods of time. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed a greater than dose-proportional increase in drug exposure and peak plasma concentrations, with increased parameters at day 15 compared with day 1, indicating some accumulation on multiple dosing. Plasma half-life ranged from 4 to 11 hours and seemed to increase with increasing doses. Steady-state plasma concentrations were attained at days 7 through 14. A large volume of distribution at steady-state indicated extensive distribution outside the plasma compartment. CONCLUSION: SCH 66336 can be administered safely using a continuous oral bid dosing regimen. The recommended dose for phase II studies using this regimen is 200 mg bid.
The doxorubicin analogue MEN-10755 has been identified as a compound with promising antitumour activity based on structure-activity studies of a new series of anthracycline disaccharides. The high antitumour activity of MEN-10755 in human tumour xenografts, including doxorubicin-resistant xenografts, and its unique pharmacological and biological properties made this novel disaccharide analogue an interesting candidate for clinical evaluation. Two pharmacokinetic phase I studies with different dosing schedules were performed in adults with solid refractory malignancies. The pharmacokinetics of MEN-10755 were studied after a 15-min i.v. infusion given once every 3 weeks or once every week for 3 weeks followed by 1 week rest. Plasma and urine levels of MEN-10755 were measured by HPLC with fluorescent detection. It was possible to combine the pharmacokinetic results of the two studies because there was no accumulation of MEN-10755 before the next infusion of MEN-10755 in the weekly study with 1 week rest. The administered dose levels on day 1 in this study were all in the lower range from the 3-weekly study. The postinfusion plasma kinetics of MEN-10755 were best described by a triexponential model. The plasma peak levels (Cmax) of MEN-10755 showed a linear relationship with the administered dose. Peak plasma MEN-10755 levels ranged between 474 and 21,587 microg/l. The mean elimination half-life (T(1/2gamma)) was 20.7+/-9.0 h. The AUC(0-infinity) was proportional to the administered dose. The mean plasma clearance of MEN-10755 was 6.0+/-2.2 l/h per m2 with a mean volume of distribution (Vss) of 95.6+/-43.4 l/m2. The mean renal excretion of unchanged drug within 24 h was 4.3+/-1.8%. Compared to epirubicin and doxorubicin, the pharmacokinetics of MEN-10755 were characterized by an approximately twofold shorter terminal half-life, a much lower total plasma clearance and a much smaller volume of distribution.
A phase II study was performed to evaluate 1-(2-tetrahydrofuryl)-5-fluorouracil and uracil (UFT) and leucovorin as first-line chemotherapy in European patients with advanced gastric cancer. From 38 patients, 25 were evaluable for response and 36 for toxicity. Patients received UFT at 300 mg/m(2)/day for 28 days, every 35 days and leucovorin at 90 mg/day on an identical schedule. Overall response rate was 10.5% (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.7-22.5%) in intent-to-treat analysis and 16% (95% CI: 5.7-33%) in evaluable patients. Grade 3-4 common toxicity criteria (CTC) toxicities were diarrhoea (28%; 10/36), nausea (11%; 4/36), vomiting (8%; 3/36) and asthenia (11%; 4/36). 23 patients in 44% (42/96) of the courses had to skip days of treatment due to toxicity or to non-compliance. In conclusion, UFT+leucovorin has a definitive, but low, efficacy in advanced gastric cancer patients. Toxicities were mainly gastrointestinal and treatment needs to be withheld if grade 2 diarrhoea occurs.
N4-octadecyl-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (NOAC) is a new lipophilic derivative of 1-beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine (ara-C) with potent antitumor activity against leukemias and solid tumors. In this study the activity of NOAC against freshly explanted clonogenic cells from human tumors was determined and compared with conventional antitumor agents. NOAC was used in two liposomal preparations, a stable lyophilized and a freshly prepared liquid formulation. Both formulations inhibited tumor colony formation equally in a concentration-dependent fashion in both short- (1 h) and long-term (21-28 d) exposure experiments. NOAC (100 microM, long-term exposure) had a significantly better activity compared to the clinically used drugs cisplatin, doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, mitomycin C and etoposide. The comparison of NOAC with ara-C in the long-term exposure experiment showed that ara-C was more effective at 4 and 10 microM, whereas at 1 and 100 microM there was no difference between the two drugs. NOAC was less toxic in a hematopoietic stem cell assay than ara-C and doxorubicin by factors ranging from 2.5 to 200, indicating that this drug is well tolerated at high doses. The antitumor activity of NOAC (NSC 685096) was confirmed by the NCI in vitro drug screening program where the drug was found to be active against several types of human tumors. Further development of NOAC in phase II studies is warranted.
Population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis was prospectively integrated in the clinical phase II programme of EO9 to determine the population pharmacokinetic profile in a larger population of patients, to estimate individual patient pharmacokinetic parameters, and to investigate relationships between drug exposure and clinical outcome. A sparse sampling method was developed, which involved three sampling times, and was implemented during course 1. A Bayesian algorithm was used to estimate individual pharmacokinetic parameters, in particular total plasma clearance (CL) of EO9 and area under the curve (AUC). In total, samples were collected of 85 (65%) of the patients. Pharmacokinetic evaluation was successful in 61 (72%) of the sampled patients. CL of EO9 showed substantial variability (median 5.08 l/min; range 2.67-6.42) and was of the same magnitude as in the phase I study where full pharmacokinetic profiles were used. No significant relationships were noticed between exposure parameters and safety, but overall limited toxicity was observed. No tumor responses were documented. Prospective implementation of large-scale population pharmacokinetic-dynamic analysis is feasible and may generate important findings, in particular when tumor responses and relevant toxicity are observed.
Pemetrexed disodium (ALIMTA), "pemetrexed") is a novel, multi-targeted antifolate that has demonstrated promising clinical activity in a wide variety of solid tumors, including non-small cell lung, breast, mesothelioma, colorectal, pancreatic, gastric, bladder, cervix, and head and neck. Pemetrexed inhibits multiple folate-dependent enzymes involved in both purine and pyrimidine synthesis including thymidylate synthase, dihydrofolate reductase, glycinamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase, and aminoimidazole carboxamide ribonucleotide formyltransferase. As a single agent, pemetrexed exhibits a moderate toxicity profile at a dose of 500 mg/m(2) by 10-minute infusion once every 21 days with myelosuppression being the dose-limiting toxicity. Folic acid added to the diet in preclinical studies reduced toxicities while maintaining antitumor activity. Based on this observation and clinical toxicities, folic acid and vitamin B(12) dietary supplementation has been recently introduced into all ongoing trials. Studies combining pemetrexed with other active chemotherapeutic agents demonstrate that these combination therapies may become important treatment regimens in a variety of cancer types. Currently, pemetrexed phase III trials are ongoing in mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer with future trials planned to explore this unique multitargeted antifolate.
PURPOSE: In a phase II trial, the activity of carzelesin, a cyclopropylpyrroloindole prodrug analog, was assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Carzelesin was used as second- or third-line chemotherapy in patients with breast, ovarian, head and neck cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and as first-line chemotherapy in patients with colorectal and gastric cancer and melanoma. The drug was given as a bolus infusion at a 4-weekly dose of 150 microg/m2. A total of 140 patients were entered and a total of 285 courses were administered. RESULTS: In general, the compound was well tolerated. Myelotoxicity was the most common toxicity. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia was observed in 18.6% of the courses, neutropenia in 20.3%, thrombocytopenia in 16.2% and anemia in 8.7%. Double nadirs were seen in a total of 41 courses for neutrophils, in 40 for leukocytes and in 3 for platelets. Non-hematological toxicity was very mild. Only one partial response in a patient with melanoma was seen. CONCLUSIONS: At this dose and schedule carzelesin did not yield activity in the types of tumors studied.
BACKGROUND: GI147211, a 10,11-ethylenedioxy substituted analogue of camptothecin (CPT), was brought into clinical development because of its higher water solubility and greater potency as compared to topotecan (TPT). The antitumor activity of GI147211 as second-line therapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) was assessed after stratification of patients in refractory (no response to initial treatment or relapse within three months from last cycle) and chemosensitive (relapse more than three months from last cycle). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-seven patients were entered in the study and sixty-two were evaluable for response, twenty-eight in the refractory and thirty-four in the chemosensitive group. All patients had received 1 line of chemotherapy; radiation had also been given in 29 cases, 6 in the refractory and 23 in the chemosensitive group. GI147211 was administered at 1.2 mg/m2/day as 30-min infusion for five consecutive days every three weeks. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 16.6% (11 of 66 patients; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 8.5%-27.5%), 10.3% (3 of 29 patients; 95% CI: 2.2%-27%) in the refractory and 21.1% (8 of 37 patients; 95% CI: 9.5%-37%) in the chemosensitive group. Only partial responses (PR) were observed with a median duration of PR of 4.8 months (5.7 months in the refractory and 5.2 in the chemosensitive group). Hematological toxicity consisted mainly of neutropenia (grades 3-4 in 25% of cycles) and thrombocytopenia (grades 3-4 in 23% of cycles); non-hematological toxicity was mild to moderate and consisted of nausea (22% of cycles), vomiting (11%), malaise (34%). CONCLUSIONS: At the dose and schedule tested GI147211 is an active new agent for second-line treatment of SCLC; the antitumor activity and toxicity profile are comparable to those observed with TPT which remains the leading CPT analogue for salvage treatment. Interest has been renewed in the clinical development of GI147211 by preclinical data with the liposomal formulation showing an increased therapeutic index.
PURPOSE: To investigate the side effects, determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and study the pharmacokinetics of S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine-based antineoplastic agent consisting of the fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug tegafur combined with two modulators, 5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine and potassium oxonate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received S-1 bid for 28 days, followed by 1 week of rest. 5-FU pharmacokinetics were investigated after a single initial dose of S-1 during the first 24 hours and weekly thereafter. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients received S-1 at the four consecutive dose levels of 25, 45, 35, and 40 mg/m(2). The MTD was initially found at 45 mg/m(2), with diarrhea as the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Diarrhea was also the DLT at the dose of 40 mg/m(2), which was the MTD for patients exposed to extensive prior chemotherapy. Other toxicities were generally mild. Two patients had a reduction of more than 50% in tumor dimension. Plasma pharmacokinetics of 5-FU were linear; at the highest S-1 dose level, 5-FU plasma peak concentrations reached 1 to 2 micromol/L, and the half-life of 5-FU was 3 to 4 hours. A statistically significant relationship was observed between the severity of diarrhea and pharmacokinetic parameters of 5-FU. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of S-1 in chemotherapy-naive or minimally chemotherapy-exposed patients is 40 mg/m(2) bid on 28 consecutive days, every 5 weeks. In heavily pretreated patients, the recommended dose is 35 mg/m(2) bid. Phase II trials are warranted in tumors known to be responsive to 5-FU treatment.
A single-agent dose-escalating Phase I and pharmacological study of the polyamine synthesis inhibitor SAM 486A was performed. A dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy was studied. Fifty patients were entered into the study. Dose levels studied were 1.25, 2.5, 5, 8, 16, 32, 48, 70, 110, 170, 270, and 325 mg/m2/week. Pharmacokinetic sampling was done on day 1, and trough samples were taken weekly during the first treatment cycle. Pharmacodynamic sampling was done on days 1 and 22. At 325 mg/m2/week, dose-limiting toxicity was seen (one patient each with grade 4 febrile neutropenia, grade 3 neurotoxicity, and grade 3 hypotension with syncope and T-wave inversions on electrocardiogram). The recommended dose for further testing was set at 270 mg/m2/week. Infusion time was increased from 10 to 180 min due to facial paresthesias and flushing and somnolence. Drug exposure increased linearly with dose. Mean +/- SD t1,2 at 70-325 mg/m2 doses was 61.4+/-26.2 h, with a large volume of distribution at steady state. In peripheral blood leukocytes, a clear relationship between dose and inhibitory effect on S-adenosylmethionine decarboxylase or changes in intracellular polyamine pools was not recorded. SAM 486A can be administered safely using a dosing regimen of four weekly infusions followed by 2 weeks off therapy. The recommended dose for Phase II studies using this regimen is 270 mg/m2/week.
E91 (17 beta-[N-[N'-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-nitrosocarbamoyl]-L-alanyl]-5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone) (CNC-ala-DHT) is a newly synthesised alkylating compound consisting of N-[N'-(2-chloroethyl)-N'-nitrosocarbamoyl]-L-alanine (CNC-ala) as the alkylating moiety and of 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) as a steroid carrier molecule. We studied the antitumour activity of E91 (final concentrations: 0.1, 1, 10 and 30 mumol/l) against freshly explanted human tumours, using an in vitro soft agar cloning system. A total of 54 tumour samples was evaluated using 1 h-exposure and 51 tumour specimens were studied using a continuous exposure for 21-28 days. In addition, the compound's activity was compared with other clinically used anticancer agents. After short-term exposure, 49 of 53 evaluable specimens (92%) had adequate colony formation, as compared with 49 of 50 (98%) after long-term exposure. After short-term exposure, E91 exhibited only marginal antitumour activity. However, in long-term exposure experiments, E91 had marked and concentration-dependent antitumour activity (P < 0.001). At concentrations of > 10 mumol/l, E91 was as active as the other clinically used antineoplastic agents and at 30 mumol/l, E91 was significantly more active than 5-fluorouracil (P = 0.041). E91 showed activity against a wide spectrum of tumour types. The highest activity was observed against colorectal carcinomas (3/4 tumour specimens inhibited at 30 mumol/l). Sensitivity was also high remarkable in breast cancer specimens with 3/6 specimens inhibited at 30 mumol/l. In vitro myelotoxicity was less than that of doxorubicin. At 30 mumol/l, E91 induced a reduction of colony forming units-granulocyte macrophage (CFU-GM) to only 53% of control and of CFU-GEMM to 20% of control. We conclude that because of broad activity and reduced myelotoxicity further clinical development of E91 appears warranted.
BACKGROUND: Docetaxel and cisplatin are among the most active antitumor agents in head and neck cancer, and phase I studies found the combination of the two drugs to be feasible. The EORTC ECSG performed a multicenter phase II study in patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck to evaluate the antitumor efficacy and toxicity of this combination. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligibility criteria included written informed consent, a WHO performance status < 2, life expectancy of > 12 weeks, and adequate bone marrow, liver and renal function. Neoadjuvant pretreatment with cisplatin-based chemotherapy or prior radiotherapy were allowed. Patients were ineligible if pretreated with taxoids, had CNS involvement, concurrent malignancy, peripheral neuropathy, or no measurable disease. Treatment consisted of docetaxel 100 mg/m2 (one-hour i.v. infusion), followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 (three-hour i.v. infusion), repeated every three weeks. Supportive care included hydration, 5HT3-antagonists, and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Forty-four patients (median age 55 years, range 35-76) entered the trial; 41 patients were eligible, 164 cycles of treatment were evaluable for toxicity, and 31 patients for response. Fourteen patients had undergone prior surgery, 15 had received radiotherapy, and five had had chemotherapy. A median number of four treatment cycles (range 1-6) was given. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities were common, but hypersensitivity reactions and fluid retention were very infrequent due to corticosteroid prophylaxis. Four patients were taken off the study due to toxicity, and one toxic death occurred due to pneumonia. Among 41 eligible patients, objective responses as confirmed by independent review included six complete remissions and 16 partial remissions, resulting in an overall response rate of 53.7% (95% confidence interval: 37.4%-69.3%). Responses occurred in locally advanced, recurrent and metastatic disease, both in pre- and non-pretreated patients. Of 22 evaluable, non-pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease, five achieved complete responses, and 14 partial responses. Observed among nine evaluable pretreated patients with locally advanced or metastatic head and neck cancer were one complete response and two partial responses. CONCLUSION: The combination of docetaxel and cisplatin is feasible and active in locally advanced, recurrent, and metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.
PURPOSE: Multitargeted antifolate (MTA; LY231514) has broad preclinical antitumor activity and inhibits a variety of intracellular enzymes involved in the folate pathways. This study was designed to (1) determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), and pharmacokinetics of MTA combined with cisplatin; (2) determine a recommended dose for phase II studies; and (3) collect anecdotal information on the antitumor activity of MTA combined with cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with solid tumors received MTA intravenously over 10 minutes and cisplatin over 2 hours once every 21 days. In cohort 1, both agents were administered on day 1 starting with MTA 300 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60 mg/m(2). In cohort 2, MTA (500 or 600 mg/m(2)) was administered on day 1, followed by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) on day 2. RESULTS: In cohort 1, 40 assessable patients received 159 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2)/cisplatin 100 mg/m(2). DLTs were reversible leukopenia/neutropenia and delayed fatigue. Hydration before cisplatin therapy did not influence MTA pharmacokinetics. Eleven objective remissions included one complete response in a patient with relapsed squamous cell head and neck carcinoma, and partial responses in four of ten patients with epithelial pleural mesothelioma. In cohort 2, 11 assessable patients received 23 courses of treatment. The MTD was MTA 600 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 75 mg/m(2). DLTs were neutropenic sepsis, diarrhea, and skin toxicity. Two patients died of treatment-related complications during the study. Two patients had objective remissions (one mesothelioma patient, one colon cancer patient). CONCLUSION: The combination of MTA and cisplatin is clinically active, and administering both agents on day 1 is superior to a split schedule. Further development of this combination for mesothelioma is warranted.
Locally advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach still carries a poor prognosis, with 5-year survival rates of < 15%. Palliative chemotherapeutic regimens for this disease are largely 5-FU-based. We have investigated the clinical activity of an oral combination of uracil and tegafur (UFT) with calcium folinate (Orzel), in patients with measurable metastatic disease. Thirty-six patients received a total of 94 courses of daily UFT 300 mg/m2 plus calcium folinate 90 mg for 28 consecutive days followed by a 7-day rest. Planned treatment doses were maintained in 83% of all evaluable courses. Main toxicities included diarrhea (21 patients) and nausea and vomiting (20 patients). Other side effects were asthenia, malaise, stomatitis, and myelosuppression. At present, 26 patients are evaluable for response. Of these, one achieved a complete response and three achieved partial remissions. In addition, six patients reached stable disease, yielding an overall response rate of 27%. We conclude that the combination of UFT and calcium folinate is a feasible outpatient regimen that warrants further clinical evaluation.