PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Richard Palmer

Publications and source records attributed to A Richard Palmer.

9 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Symmetry breaking and the evolution of development.

Because of its simplicity, the binary-switch nature of left-right asymmetry permits meaningful comparisons among many different organisms. Phylogenetic analyses of asymmetry variation, inheritance, and molecular mechanisms reveal unexpected insights into how development evolves. First, directional asymmetry, an evolutionary novelty, arose from nonheritable origins almost as often as from mutations, implying that genetic assimilation ("phenotype precedes genotype") is a common mode of evolution. Second, the molecular pathway directing hearts leftward-the nodal cascade-varies considerably among vertebrates (homology of form does not require homology of development) and was possibly co-opted from a preexisting asymmetrical chordate organ system. Finally, declining frequencies of spontaneous asymmetry reversal throughout vertebrate evolution suggest that heart development has become more canalized.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Reproduction: widespread cloning in echinoderm larvae.

Asexual reproduction by free-living invertebrate larvae is a rare and enigmatic phenomenon and, although it is known to occur in sea stars and brittle stars, it has not been detected in other echinoderms despite more than a century of intensive study. Here we describe spontaneous larval cloning in three species from two more echinoderm classes: a sea cucumber (Holothuroidea), a sand dollar and a sea urchin (Echinoidea). Larval cloning may therefore be an ancient ability of echinoderms and possibly of deutero-stomes - the group that includes echinoderms, acorn worms, sea squirts and vertebrates.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Feeding in flow extremes: dependence of cirrus form on wave-exposure in four barnacle species.

Wave-exposure influences the form of many organisms. Curiously, the impact of flow extremes on feeding structures has received little attention. Barnacles extend feather-like legs to feed, and prior work revealed a highly precise association between leg length and water velocity in one species. To assess the generality of this flow-dependence, we quantified variation in four leg traits (ramus length, ramus diameter, seta length, and intersetal spacing) in four intertidal barnacles (Balanus glandula, Chthamalus dalli, Semibalanus cariosus, Pollicipes polymerus) over a wave-exposure gradient in the North-Eastern Pacific. All species exhibited a negative allometric relation between leg length and body mass. Proportionally longer feeding legs may permit smaller barnacles to avoid lower flow and particle flux associated with boundary layers. Although coefficients of allometry did not vary with wave-exposure, form differences among wave-exposures were substantial. Depending on the species, acorn barnacles of the same size from protected shores had feeding legs that were 37-80% longer and 18-25% thinner, and setae that were 36-50% longer and up to 25% more closely spaced, than those from exposed shores. Differences were less pronounced for the gooseneck barnacle, P. polymerus. Moreover, in situ water velocity explained an impressive percentage of overall leg-length variation: 92% in B. glandula, 67% in C. dalli, 91% in S. cariosus, and 92% in P. polymerus. Clearly, both size and shape of barnacle feeding legs respond to local flow conditions. This response appears widespread--across two orders of thoracican barnacles, Pedunculata and Sessilia, and two superfamilies of acorn barnacles (Balanoidea and Chthamaloidea)--and likely adaptive. Longer rami and setae would yield a larger feeding area in low flow, whereas shorter, stouter rami with shorter setae would be less vulnerable to damage in high flow. Finally, the proportionally most variable species was abundant in the widest range of habitats, suggesting that increased plasticity may permit a wider niche breadth.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2002

Chimpanzee right-handedness reconsidered: Evaluating the evidence with funnel plots.

Evidence for population-level right-handedness in nonhuman primates seems inconsistent and contradictory, and many hypotheses have been advanced to account for this volatility. Funnel plots (scatter plots of percent right-hand use vs. sample size) offer a straightforward graphical technique for assessing: 1) the strength and consistency of handedness, 2) whether variability is consistent with normal sampling variation, and 3) how likely reports of statistically significant handedness might have arisen due to chance (i.e., type I error). They are informative for both within- and among-population variation. Reexamination of within-population variation from a detailed and widely cited study reporting significant population-level right-handedness in 140 individual captive chimpanzees (Hopkins [1994] Dev. Psychobiol. 27:395-407) revealed several puzzling patterns: 1) funnel plots showed higher percent right-hand use among individuals for which fewer observations were recorded, 2) when individuals with fewer than 25 observations were excluded, statistical support for population-level right-handedness either became marginal (P = 0.043, when computed as average percent use of the right hand) or disappeared (P = 0.62, when computed as proportion of individuals using the right hand more than the left, whether they did so significantly or not), and 3) the proportion of statistically ambilateral chimpanzees actually increased with increasing number of observations per individual, rather than decreased as would be expected for true population-level right-handedness. In addition, funnel plots of among-population variation from an earlier meta-analysis (McGrew and Marchant [1997] Yrbk. Phys. Anthropol. 40:201-232) suggested that the four reports of significant right-handedness, out of 37 estimates from 14 studies, were likely those that achieved statistical significance simply due to chance. Funnel plots, and the more refined statistical tests they suggest, confirm that the current evidence for population-level right-handedness in chimpanzees remains equivocal.

Animals↗