PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Rundell

Publications and source records attributed to A Rundell.

4 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Comparison of antibody functionality using different immobilization methods.

This study investigates the influence of antibody immobilization methods on antigen capture. Adsorption and two surface chemistries, an aminosilane chemistry and a common heterobifunctional crosslinker (N-gamma-maleimidobutyryloxy-succinimide ester, GMBS), were compared and evaluated for their ability to immobilize antibodies and capture antigen. The role of protein A as an orienting protein scaffold component in each of these techniques was also evaluated. Through experimentation it was determined that the GMBS technique immobilized the highest amount of antibody and minimized nonspecific binding. For all techniques, the most functional antibodies were found to be those immobilized with protein A. Interestingly, the aminosilane technique demonstrated the highest antigen capture with antibody alone but also exhibited the highest level of nonspecific binding.

Algorithms↗
PubMed1998

The humoral immune response to Haemophilus influenzae type b: a mathematical model based on T-zone and germinal center B-cell dynamics.

Through careful mapping of the physiology of the T-zone and GC B-blast dynamics to a mathematical representation of the cell processes including proliferation, migration, differentiation, and cell death, a mathematical model is constructed to capture the dominant nominal primary, late follicular, and secondary humoral response to Haemophilus influenzae Type b. This model explicitly incorporates the dynamics of memory B-cells, T-zone and GC B-dynamics, IgM and IgG antibodies, avidity maturation, and IC presentation by FDCs into a coherent framework. This paper describes the relevant immunology, the pertinent physiological assumptions, the developed model, and the parameter identification procedure. The model parameters were found using a parameter identification procedure that capitalizes on the timing and interactions of certain dominant physiological attributes. Simulation results and validation tests indicate that the model reflects not only a nominal primary and secondary humoral immune response but also the tertiary and T-independent responses. The model shows robustness to variations in infection dosage, bacterial growth rate (virulence of the strain), and onset-timing of the secondary response. The utility of this model in studying the humoral immune response is demonstrated through suggested physiological assumptions, mechanisms, and rates to be eventually clinically evaluated as well as insights into vaccination design. The model and parameter identification techniques are easily adapted to other diseases which primarily evoke a humoral immune response.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗
PubMed1993

Gene therapy by intramuscular injection of plasmid DNA: studies on firefly luciferase gene expression in mice.

Direct injection of nonviral, covalently closed circular plasmid DNA into muscle results in expression of the DNA in myofiber cells. We have examined the expression of firefly luciferase DNA constructs injected into adult murine skeletal muscle. Considerable variation in luciferase enzyme expression was noted among constructs with different regulatory elements, among different batches of the same DNA construct, and among similar transfection experiments performed at different times. This variation was minimized by using single batches of plasmid DNA and by performing comparable sets of experiments concurrently. A quantitative experimental protocol was defined for comparing various aspects of the transfection process. We report that a luciferase construct containing the human cytomegalovirus immediate-early gene promoter plus intron A (a construct termed "p-CMVint-lux") showed the highest expression among several constructs tested. Dose-response and time course analyses of p-CMVint-lux DNA injections showed that maximal luciferase expression was achieved with 25 micrograms of DNA at 7-14 days post-injection. Selected manipulations of the transfection process were examined for their influence on luciferase expression. Variations in the rate of DNA injection, needle size, injection volume, and vehicle temperature had no significant effect on luciferase expression. The presence of endotoxin, cationic peptide, muscle stimulants or relaxants, vasoconstrictors, metal chelators, or lysosomal lytic reagents had no significant effect on expression. However, linearization of the DNA, injection of the DNA in water rather than saline, or inclusion of a DNA intercalating agent nearly abolished luciferase expression. And finally, increasing the injection dose by giving multiple injections over a 10-day period increased expression proportionally to the number of injections.

Amino Acid Sequence↗