PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Ruston

Publications and source records attributed to A Ruston.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Accessing emergency care at the time of a heart attack: why people do not dial 999 for an ambulance.

Coronary heart disease (CHD) is the most important cause of death in the UK. Evidence suggests that between 5,000 and 10,000 deaths per year could be prevented if thrombolytic therapy were to be administered within 12 hours of the onset of symptoms of a heart attack. As part of the requirements of the National Service Framework for CHD, health authorities will be expected to produce detailed plans and protocols which describe pre-hospital service care models. Included in these will be public education campaigns aimed at encouraging people to call 999 for an ambulance in the event of symptoms suggestive of a heart attack. The aim of this study was to explore lay decision-making at the time of a cardiac event and address the question of why people do not call 999 for an ambulance. A sample of 43 patients, admitted to two district general hospitals who had survived a cardiac event, and 21 relatives or bystanders who were present at the time of the event, were interviewed. The interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed verbatim and analysed using the constant comparative method. There was variation in who made the decision to call for medical help and even after the decision was made, delays occurred due to interaction between patients and relatives or bystanders. An ambulance was called by informants in only two cases, two drove or were driven to hospital, 34 asked the general practitioner (GP) to call and five visited the GP at the surgery. Factors influencing these actions included a perception that GP services were faster and more accessible than ambulance services, misconceptions about the seriousness of the situation, misconceptions about the correct 'procedure' or way to access emergency services and a range of personal and contextual factors. The data suggest that public campaigns to encourage people to call 999 for an ambulance in the event of symptoms of a heart attack may be ineffective unless they address lay understandings and concerns about accessing emergency services.

Decision Making↗

Patients' action during their cardiac event: qualitative study exploring differences and modifiable factors.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the circumstances and factors that explain variations in response to a cardiac event and to identify potentially modifiable factors. DESIGN: Qualitative analysis of semistructured, face to face interviews with patients admitted to two district hospitals for a cardiac event and with other people present at the time of the event. Patients were divided into three groups according to the length of delay between onset of symptoms and calling for medical help. SUBJECTS: 43 patients and 21 other people present at the time of the cardiac event. Patients were divided into three groups according to the length of time between onset of symptoms and seeking medical help: non-delayers (< 4 h; n = 21), delayers (4-12 h; n = 12), and extended delayers (> 12 h; n = 10). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Decision making process, strategies for dealing with symptoms, and perception of risk and of heart attacks before the event according to delay in seeking help. RESULTS: The illness and help seeking behaviour of informants had several components, including warning, interpretation, preliminary action, re-evaluation, and final action stages. The length of each stage was variable and depended on the extent to which informants mobilised and integrated resources into a strategy to bring their symptoms under control. There were obvious differences in informants' knowledge of the symptoms that they associated with a heart attack before the event. Non-delayers described a wider range of symptoms before their heart attack and twice as many (13) considered themselves to be potentially at risk of a heart attack compared with the other two groups. For most informants the heart attack differed considerably from their concept of a heart attack. CONCLUSION: The most critical factor influencing the time between onset of symptoms and calling for professional medical help is that patients and others recognise their symptoms as cardiac in origin. This study suggests that various points of intervention in the decision making process could assist symptom recognition and therefore faster access to effective treatment.

Age Factors↗

Pulmonary disease and smoking: a case for health promotion.

Emphasis on smoking cessation for patients with chest diseases, especially those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), is not new, but the latest guidelines from the British Thoracic Society highlight the necessity of helping patients to stop smoking. Health professionals do not seem ready to take on this role. Smoking cessation needs to become a priority of health promotion for all patients with COPD. A recent training needs assessment underlined the fact that training and support for those undertaking this role require urgent attention.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗