PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A S Buck

Publications and source records attributed to A S Buck.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in out-of-hospital settings: a Consensus Panel report.

In 1997 the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in out-of-hospital settings. The following report represents the Consensus Panel's best assessment of requirements for a healthy and effective out-of-hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into 5 categories: managing critical data and information; developing and recommending policies and procedures; intervening directly to prevent infections; educating and training of health care workers, patients, and nonmedical caregivers; and resources. The Consensus Panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Allied Health Personnel↗

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in out-of-hospital settings: a consensus panel report. Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

In 1997 the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in out-of-hospital settings. The following report represents the Consensus Panel's best assessment of requirements for a healthy and effective out-of-hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into 5 categories: managing critical data and information; developing and recommending policies and procedures; intervening directly to prevent infections; educating and training of health care workers, patients, and nonmedical caregivers; and resources. The Consensus Panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Healthcare Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Aftercare↗

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in hospitals: A consensus panel report. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

The scientific basis for claims of efficacy of nosocomial infection surveillance and control programs was established by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control project. Subsequent analyses have demonstrated nosocomial infection prevention and control programs to be not only clinically effective but also cost-effective. Although governmental and professional organizations have developed a wide variety of useful recommendations and guidelines for infection control, and apart from general guidance provided by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, there are surprisingly few recommendations on infrastructure and essential activities for infection control and epidemiology programs. In April 1996, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in hospitals. The following report represents the consensus panel's best assessment of needs for a healthy and effective hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into eight categories: managing critical data and information; setting and recommending policies and procedures; compliance with regulations, guidelines, and accreditation requirements; employee health; direct intervention to prevent transmission of infectious diseases; education and training of healthcare workers; personnel resources; and nonpersonnel resources. The consensus panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Accreditation↗

Requirements for infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology in hospitals: a consensus panel report. Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America.

The scientific basis for claims of efficacy of nosocomial infection surveillance and control programs was established by the Study on the Efficacy of Nosocomial Infection Control project. Subsequent analyses have demonstrated nosocomial infection prevention and control programs to be not only clinically effective but also cost-effective. Although governmental and professional organizations have developed a wide variety of useful recommendations and guidelines for infection control, and apart from general guidance provided by the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations, there are surprisingly few recommendations on infrastructure and essential activities for infection control and epidemiology programs. In April 1996, the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America established a consensus panel to develop recommendations for optimal infrastructure and essential activities of infection control and epidemiology programs in hospitals. The following report represents the consensus panel's best assessment of needs for a healthy and effective hospital-based infection control and epidemiology program. The recommendations fall into eight categories: managing critical data and information; setting and recommending policies and procedures; compliance with regulations, guidelines, and accreditation requirements; employee health; direct intervention to prevent transmission of infectious diseases; education and training of healthcare workers; personnel resources; and nonpersonnel resources. The consensus panel used an evidence-based approach and categorized recommendations according to modifications of the scheme developed by the Clinical Affairs Committee of the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee.

Accreditation↗

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia in a child with the CHIME neuroectodermal dysplasia syndrome.

The "CHIME" syndrome (MIM#280000) is a rare neuroectodermal disorder comprised of Colobomas of the eye, Heart defects, Ichthyosiform dermatosis, Mental retardation, and Ear defects. We report on the sixth child with this syndrome and the first of these to develop acute lymphoblastic leukemia at age 4 1/2 years. Her major problems included a migratory ichthyosiform dermatosis, multiple skin infections and infestations, bilateral retinal coloboma, developmental delay, seizures, infantile macrosomia, facial anomalies, a duplicated renal collecting system, and conductive hearing loss. Histologic examination of the skin demonstrated findings of an epidermal nevus with deep rete pegs, hyperkeratosis, and a markedly increased granular layer. The cause of the CHIME syndrome is unknown, but the disorder is easily recognized because of the striking phenotype. The diagnosis is important to make because of the potential for associated congenital heart disease, neurologic compromise, possible autosomal recessive inheritance, and possible association with malignancy.

Child, Preschool↗

The Department of Defense Civilian External Peer Review Program: an interim report.

During a 2-year period (December 1987-December 1989), 165 Department of Defense (DoD) military hospitals world-wide provided 71,800 cases with 83,197 reviews for quality of care evaluations by the Civilian External Peer Review Program (CEPRP). The majority (78,246 of 79,896) of completed peer review determinations (97.9%) generated agreement with care and documentation. It is concluded that health care in military treatment facilities is of high quality, meeting and generally exceeding accepted standards of care. It is also concluded that the DoD CEPRP offers conceptual and practical experience to guide the further evolution and integration of clinical peer review and quality improvement activities.

Hospital Mortality↗

Defining quality in health care.

The difficulty and importance of developing and implementing a definition of quality in health care is discussed. Some current definitions are considered, and a recommended definition of quality health care is presented.

Hospitals↗

The evolution of an operative registry--a commentary.

The Operative Registry, also known as DA Form 4108, constitutes the basic, geographically focused, sequential log of operative activities for any given Army Medical Treatment Facility. The information provided for the Registry, with specific refinements, constitutes an essential data base for quality assurance and utilization review. The experience at Madigan Army Medical Center in developing the structure and function of this computerized data base is summarized.

Hospitals, Military↗

Renal carbuncle: comparison between surgical open drainage and closed percutaneous drainage.

This article represents a retrospective study of 12 patients with renal carbuncle treated at the combined urological services of The Mason Clinic in Seattle, Washington, and Madigan Army Medical Center in Tacoma, Washington. All patients were initially treated with antibiotics. Two recovered without further treatment. Of the 10 patients who failed to respond, 2 underwent nephrectomy for nonfunctioning kidneys, 4 underwent closed percutaneous drainage, and 4 underwent surgical open drainage. All patients treated with open surgical drainage recovered and retained functioning kidneys. Of the 4 patients who underwent closed percutaneous drainage, 2 failed to respond and required subsequent emergency nephrectomy because of sepsis. The authors believe that renal exploration and open drainage should be the initial definitive mode of surgical treatment of renal carbuncle in those patients who fail antibiotic therapy alone.

Abscess↗

Unilateral ureteral obstruction secondary to sarcoidosis.

An episode of unilateral ureteral obstruction secondary to sarcoidosis is described. Corticosteroid treatment resulted in prompt and complete resolution of the obstruction and associated lymphadenopathy. We believe this represents the first reported case of ureteral obstruction secondary to sarcoidosis.

Adult↗

Evaluation and treatment of dyssynergic bladder neck obstruction. Is synchronous pressure-flow cystourethrography necessary?

Eighteen male patients underwent unilateral bladder neck incision for relief of bladder neck obstruction. The presence of obstruction was determined by clinical symptoms, residual urine, and uroflowmetry only. The decision to perform bladder neck incision was based on the typical endoscopic appearance of the prostatic urethra and bladder neck. Sixteen of 18 patients (89 per cent) had normal postoperative uroflowmetry. Subjectively, all patients judged themselves improved by the procedure. In those patients who are judged to be obstructed by clinical symptoms and uroflowmetry, dyssynergic bladder neck obstruction may be diagnosed by classic endoscopic findings rather than the routine use of synchronous pressure-flow cystourethrography.

Adult↗

Stage A prostatic carcinoma and repeat transurethral resection: a reappraisal 5 years later.

The treatment of patients with stage A prostatic carcinoma demands precise pathological review. In an attempt to evaluate these patients thoroughly earlier reports from our institution recommended repeat transurethral biopsy. Recent studies have reaffirmed the benign nature of stage A1 disease. To examine the efficacy of this procedure a referee pathologist reviewed 8 years of experience with patients with stage A prostatic carcinoma from our institution. Clinical followup was more than 5 years in most cases. Of the 40 patients who underwent repeat transurethral biopsy the tumor in 38 remained stage A1 pathologically. While 1 patient died of the tumor the the remainder are without clinical disease. This low incidence of upstaging does not support the routine use of repeat resections.

Aged↗