PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A S Lennox

Publications and source records attributed to A S Lennox.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Eliciting the smoker's agenda: implications for policy and practice.

Existing health promotion messages and advice on smoking cessation focus upon the negative aspects of continuing to smoke and contrast these to the benefits of giving up. Benefits of cessation are invariably linked to reduced risks of illness and disease with the process of cessation framed as a largely positive and certainly a health enhancing one. In this paper we present an analysis of data from a cross-sectional, exploratory study in the city of Aberdeen, Scotland, undertaken with 54 people, aged 18-44, who are or have been smokers. The multiple and often contradictory agendas of everyday life, smoking and health are explored. Participants spoke of the dangers of smoking and the potential benefits of giving up as these are considered by health promotion and medical research. However, many smokers experienced a number of benefits from smoking (such as socialising with others and breaks from boredom), and health and social problems with the process of cessation (for example, weight gain, stress, colds, flu). Participants appeared to query the validity of the risks of continuing to smoke and yet indicate a range of health and social difficulties in giving up. The authors assert that an acknowledgement of the attractive, pleasurable aspects of smoking may be seen as unacceptable and irresponsible but this could well provide an opportunity to relate to the everyday and multiple practices of smoking and smokers themselves as illuminated by this research.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Cost effectiveness of computer tailored and non-tailored smoking cessation letters in general practice: randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To develop and evaluate, in a primary care setting, a computerised system for generating tailored letters about smoking cessation. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Six general practices in Aberdeen, Scotland. PARTICIPANTS: 2553 smokers aged 17 to 65. INTERVENTIONS: All participants received a questionnaire asking about their smoking. Participants subsequently received either a computer tailored or a non-tailored, standard letter on smoking cessation, or no letter. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of validated abstinence at six months; change in intention to stop smoking in the next six months. RESULTS: The validated cessation rate at six months was 3.5% (30/857) (95% confidence interval 2.3% to 4.7%) for the tailored letter group, 4.4% (37/846) (3.0% to 5.8%) for the non-tailored letter group, and 2.6% (22/850) (1.5% to 3.7%) for the control (no letter) group. After adjustment for significant covariates, the cessation rate was 66% greater (-4% to 186%; P=0.07) in the non-tailored letter group than that in the no letter group. Among participants who smoked <20 cigarettes per day, the cessation rate in the non-tailored letter group was 87% greater (0% to 246%; P=0.05) than that in the no letter group. Among heavy smokers who did not quit, a 76% higher rate of positive shift in "stage of change" (intention to quit within a particular period of time) was seen compared with those who received no letter (11% to 180%; P=0.02). The increase in cost for each additional quitter in the non-tailored letter group compared with the no letter group was pound 89. CONCLUSIONS: In a large general practice, a brief non-tailored letter effectively increased cessation rates among smokers. A tailored letter was not effective in increasing cessation rates but promoted shift in movement towards cessation ("stage of change") in heavy smokers. As a pragmatic tool to encourage cessation of smoking, a mass mailing of non-tailored letters from general practices is more cost effective than computer tailored letters or no letters.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1998

Training pharmacists and pharmacy assistants in the stage-of-change model of smoking cessation: a randomised controlled trial in Scotland.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a training workshop for community pharmacy personnel to improve their counselling in smoking cessation based on the stage-of-change model. DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial of community pharmacies and pharmacy customers. SETTING: All 76 non-city community pharmacies registered in Grampian, Scotland, were invited to participate. Sixty-two pharmacies (82%) were recruited. SUBJECTS: All the intervention pharmacy personnel were invited to attend the training; 40 pharmacists and 54 assistants attended. A total of 492 customers who smoked (224 intervention, 268 controls) were recruited during the 12-month recruitment period (overall recruitment rate 63%). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The perceptions of customers and pharmacy personnel of the pharmacy support and self-reported smoking cessation rates for the two groups of customers at one, four, and nine months. RESULTS: The intervention customer respondents were significantly more likely to have discussed stopping smoking with pharmacy personnel, 85% (113) compared with 62% (99) of the controls (p < 0.001). The former also rated their discussion more highly; 34% (45) of the intervention customers compared with 16% (25) of the controls rated it as "very useful" (p = 0.048). Assuming non-responders had lapsed, one-month point prevalence of abstinence was claimed by 30% of intervention customers and 24% of controls (p = 0.12); four months' continuous abstinence was claimed by 16% of intervention customers and 11% of controls (p = 0.094); and nine months' continuous abstinence was claimed by 12% of intervention customers and 7% of controls (p = 0.089). These trends in outcome were not affected by potential confounders (sex, age, socioeconomic status, nicotine dependence, and type of nicotine replacement product used) or adjustment for clustering. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was associated with increased and more highly rated counselling, and a trend toward higher smoking cessation rates, indicating that community pharmacy personnel have the potential to make a significant contribution to national smoking cessation targets.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1994

Factors associated with outcome in unaided smoking cessation, and a comparison of those who have never tried to stop with those who have.

AIM: This survey set out to determine the factors associated with outcome of unaided smoking cessation attempts and to compare the characteristics of smokers who had tried to stop with those who had never tried. METHOD: A postal questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 2000 adults in Aberdeen, Scotland. Those respondents who smoked or who were ex-smokers were sent a second questionnaire. The outcome measure for success in trying to stop smoking was abstinence for more than four months. RESULTS: Light and heavy smokers were more successful at smoking cessation than moderate smokers. Those who succeeded perceived that they had more social support than failures, and were more likely to have 'simply just stopped'. They were less likely to have used nicotine gum or to believe that smoking was harmful. Those who failed experienced more withdrawal symptoms, and were more likely to be tempted by the presence of others smoking. Eleven per cent of smokers had never tried to stop. These smokers were older and more dependent than those who had tried to stop. They were less likely to acknowledge the health risks of smoking or to conform to social pressures, but were more likely to consider stopping for financial reasons alone. CONCLUSION: Heavily dependent smokers may fare better in unaided cessation than the results of clinic-based research suggest. For those who have tried to stop, increasing motivation and social support, and minimizing withdrawal symptoms, may be more productive than further emphasis on health risks. Motivating smokers who have not previously tried to stop may involve more emphasis on the health risks of smoking and the health benefits of stopping, as well as on other non-financial benefits of stopping such as social acceptability. Fiscal measures may be particularly effective in motivating this group of smokers to try to stop.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Determinants of outcome in smoking cessation.

A large amount of research has been conducted into the factors which influence outcome in attempts to stop smoking. This article reviews the literature in two main areas: first, the effects of patient characteristics on outcome, and secondly, the effectiveness of various primary care interventions. The practical implications of this research for primary care interventions to help people stop smoking are explored.

Attitude to Health↗