PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A S Rosén

Publications and source records attributed to A S Rosén.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

Acceptability of abortion methods.

This chapter has reported the findings of acceptability of prostaglandin pessaries compared with vacuum aspiration as methods for inducing abortion in a very early stage of pregnancy. Acceptability has been defined by the WHO as the degree with which a treatment method has attributes that make it perceived by a user or potential user to be consonant with his or her own sense of well-being and therefore will be used or preferred. The acceptability of the medical and surgical procedures for inducing abortion was studied in Swedish abortion patients using a pre- and post-abortion design for obtaining observations. Methods used included interview schedules, questionnaires, rating scales and attitude measuring techniques. Patients consenting to take part in the acceptability study had agreed to be randomly assigned to prostaglandin treatment, given at the clinic or self-administered by the patient at home, or to vacuum aspiration. A high degree of acceptability for the prostaglandin treatment was obtained in this group of patients who had applied for an abortion very soon after one missed menstrual period. This was indicated from the finding that the very high preference for this procedure remained unchanged in the group randomly assigned to it. Other measures of attitudes to prostaglandin treatment also indicated the unchanged positive attitude. There was a significant change in the attitude to vacuum aspiration among those assigned to this treatment, indicating that post-abortion it was more acceptable to these patients. However, 30% of them would still prefer the prostaglandin treatment, especially self-administered, in the event of another abortion. There were consistent and significant relationships found between the degree of negative emotional arousal before and after abortion and preference for the medical or surgical procedure and also the amount of complaints after abortion. Those patients who pre-abortion had preferred the self-administered procedure were, regardless of which treatment they had been assigned to, those who were least emotionally upset both before and after the treatment and also complained the least. This chapter also reported on findings of how acceptable the medical and surgical procedures can be inferred to be from comparisons of preferences and attitude measures obtained from abortion patients before treatment and from women in the same age group (who would not exclude an abortion if pregnant) in samples from outside the clinical setting. In the non-patient groups about half the subjects would prefer the medical alternative.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1984

Randomized comparison of prostaglandin treatment in hospital or at home with vacuum aspiration for termination of early pregnancy.

In the present study the efficacy and the acceptability of vaginal administration of a prostaglandin E analogue (9-deoxo-16, 16-dimethyl-9-methylene-PGE2) in hospital or at home were randomly compared with vacuum aspiration for termination of very early pregnancy. Prerequisites for acceptance of the patients were a normal pregnancy, a duration of amenorrhea of 49 days or less, at least one previous full-term pregnancy, and a healthy status. Fifty-three patients fulfilled these criteria and adhered to the protocol. Seventeen patients were treated with prostaglandin at home, 18 with prostaglandin in the hospital (9-methylene-PGE2, 50 to 60 mg twice at 6-hour intervals), and 18 with vacuum aspiration. Each patient was interviewed twice by a trained female psychologist before the treatment and two weeks after. Both the surgical and the nonsurgical methods (at home and in the hospital) were found to be equally effective in terms of frequency of complete abortion. Prostaglandin therapy was associated with a higher frequency of gastrointestinal side effects, pain, and a longer duration of bleeding than was the surgical procedure. The acceptability study showed that prostaglandin treatment was positively received. The patients who were treated with prostaglandin remained very positive after the abortion; a majority of these patients intended to use the same procedure in case of a repeated abortion, and would also recommend the treatment to a relative or a friend. The results of the present study indicate that termination of early pregnancy by a medical method, even if self-administered, is an acceptable procedure at least in selected patients. Further efforts to improve the treatment seem therefore justified.

16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2↗
PubMed1979

Acceptability of a nonsurgical method to terminate very early pregnancy in comparison to vacuum aspiration.

Seventy-seven patients applying for abortion during early pregnancy consented to be treated by prostaglandin vaginal suppositories or vacuum aspiration by Kahrman catheter in a random design. They also consented to participate in an acceptability study of the two procedures. Attitude and preference measures were obtained by interviewing and rating scales on three occasions: before assignment to abortion procedure, immediately after treatment, and two weeks later. The first 30 patients with complete abortion by either procedure participated in the acceptability study. Both treatments were positively evaluated but perceived to have very different characteristics. The preference for the method used for own treatment increased in both groups. Before treatment 1/3 of the patients in each group had a positive attitude to a self-administered method to induce abortion outside clinics. This proportion increased significantly after treatment but only in the group that received prostaglandin by the vaginal route.

Abortion, Induced↗