Biomedical subjects

A Sclafani

Publications and source records attributed to A Sclafani.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2001

Post-ingestive positive controls of ingestive behavior.

Post-ingestive negative controls of ingestive behavior are well characterized. Nutrients act in the gut to inhibit meal size by direct actions on feeding and by conditioning a satiation response to orosensory (flavor) stimuli. Accumulating evidence indicates that there are also post-ingestive positive controls of ingestion that operate by conditioning flavor preference and increased acceptance. In several experiments rats trained to consume a flavored solution paired with intragastric carbohydrate infusions significantly increased their solution intake. Drinking bout size and number, and lick rates and burst size were also increased by carbohydrate infusions. Whether intake is stimulated or inhibited by post-ingestive nutrient actions depends upon several factors, including most notably nutrient concentration. Post-ingestive positive controls need to be incorporated into theoretical models of ingestive behavior.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric fructose and glucose: differences in reinforcement potency.

Many prior conditioning studies indicate that fructose, unlike glucose, has minimal postingestive reinforcing effects. Using a new training procedure, food-restricted rats were trained in alternate 20-h/day sessions with one flavored solution (CS+F) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% fructose and another flavor (CS-) paired with IG water. In subsequent two-bottle tests they showed a robust (85%) preference for the CS+F over the CS-. A third flavor (CS+G) was then paired with IG 16% glucose, and it was strongly preferred to the CS+F. When retrained 30 min/day with new flavors paired with IG fructose, glucose, or water the rats learned only a CS+G preference. When training was extended to 20 h/day, a CS+F preference developed. New rats trained 20 h/day with two-bottle access to CS+F and CS- paired with IG fructose and water failed to acquire a CS+F preference. Other rats rapidly developed a strong preference when trained with concurrent access to CS+G and CS- paired with IG glucose and water. These data indicate that both fructose and glucose generate postingestive reinforcing signals, but that the fructose signals are weaker and/or delayed relative to those produced by glucose.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric infusion of ethanol in rats.

Sprague-Dawley rats were trained 22 h/day to associate a flavored solution [conditioned stimulus (CS+)] with intragastric infusions of 6% ethanol and another flavored solution (CS-) with water infusions. The infusions were matched to the CS intakes so that the animals determined their timing and size. In Phase 1, chow and water were available ad libitum, and both CS flavors were initially sweetened with saccharin that was then faded out. The rats displayed a preference for the CS+ over the CS- under both reinforced and extinction conditions. When food-restricted in Phase 2, the rats displayed an increased preference for the CS+. In Phase 3, the rats were fed ad libitum chow and given preference tests with the CS+ paired with ethanol infusions of increasing concentration (6%, 12%, 18%, and 24%). Their preference for the CS+ over the CS- persisted, and self-administered ethanol dose increased with concentration to 5 g/kg/day. The ethanol-based conditioned flavor preference resembled those conditioned by carbohydrate and fat infusions, suggesting that at least some of reinforcing ability of ethanol may be related to its postingestive nutritive effects.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

D1 but not D2 dopamine receptor antagonism blocks the acquisition of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions.

The effects of dopamine D1 (SCH23390) and D2 (raclopride) receptor antagonists on the acquisition and expressions of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of sucrose were investigated. Food-restricted rats were trained in one-bottle sessions to associate one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) with water infusions. Flavor preferences were then measured in two-bottle tests. In Experiment 1A, rats that received the D2 antagonist (raclopride, 200 nmol/kg; RAC group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the RAC group. All three groups displayed CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or raclopride, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. Experiment 1B obtained similar results with rats treated with 400 nmol/kg raclopride throughout training. In Experiment 2, rats that received the D1 antagonist (SCH23390, 200 nmol/kg; SCH group) throughout training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated Control rats; a saline-treated Yoked group had its intake limited to that of the SCH group. Unlike the Control and Yoked groups, the SCH group failed to prefer the CS+ to the CS- in two bottle tests. SCH23390 treatment during two-bottle testing did not block CS+ preference in the Control or Yoked groups, except at doses that greatly suppressed intake. We conclude that D1, but not D2, dopamine receptors are critically involved in the acquisition of a sucrose-conditioned flavor preference, and both receptor subtypes have a more limited role in the expression of this preference.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Conditioned flavor preference and aversion: role of the lateral hypothalamus.

Food-restricted rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the lateral hypothalamus (LH) and sham controls were trained to associate flavored solutions with positive or negative postingestive consequences. The LH rats learned to prefer a flavor that was paired with concurrent intragastric infusions of maltodextrin. Unlike controls, the LH rats failed to learn a preference for a flavor paired with delayed maltodextrin infusions and showed an attenuated preference for a flavor paired with concurrent fat infusions. The LH rats did not differ from controls in learning to avoid flavors paired with concurrent or delayed infusions of lithium chloride. These data indicate that the LH is not essential for all types of flavor-postingestive consequence conditioning but is critical for learning to associate flavors with delayed nutrient feedback.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Parabrachial nucleus lesions block taste and attenuate flavor preference and aversion conditioning in rats.

Rats with ibotenic acid lesions of the parabrachial nucleus (PBN) failed to learn a taste aversion induced by lithium chloride (LiCl) toxicosis. The same rats also did not learn to prefer a taste that was paired with intragastric (IG) carbohydrate infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The PBN-lesioned rats did learn to prefer a flavor (odor + taste) paired with the IG carbohydrate infusions over a different flavor paired with IG water. The PBN-lesioned rats also learned to avoid a flavor paired with IG LiCl infusions during 22 hr/day trials. The flavor preference and aversion, however, were less pronounced than those displayed by control rats. These data indicate that the PBN is essential for forming orosensory-viscerosensory associations when taste is the primary cue but is less critical when more complex flavor cues are available.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

Psychobiology of food preferences.

Investigations with laboratory animals can reveal much about the basic psychobiological determinants of food preference and diet-induced overeating. When offered a choice of foods, rats typically prefer high-fat and/or high-sugar food items over their nutritionally balanced chow diet. In addition, they may increase their total energy intake by 20-40% and consequently develop mild to moderate obesity. The role of flavor and postingestive nutritional actions on the preference for and overconsumption of fat- and sugar-rich foods has been questioned. To evaluate flavor and nutritional effects independently, recent studies have used self-regulated intragastric feeding paradigms. The results indicate that enhancing the flavor of food can significantly increase energy intake when nutrient composition is held constant. Similarly, changes in nutrient composition (ie fat-carbohydrate ratio) can significantly influence energy intake when flavor is held constant. In addition, postingestive nutrient actions can significantly alter flavor preferences through a conditioning process as function of nutrient type and concentration. Thus, food preferences and overeating result from interactions between the orosensory and nutritional properties of food.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Naltrexone fails to block the acquisition or expression of a flavor preference conditioned by intragastric carbohydrate infusions.

The effects of naltrexone on the expression and acquisition of flavor preferences conditioned by the postingestive actions of carbohydrates were investigated. Food-restricted rats (Experiment 1) were given one-bottle training with one flavored saccharin solution (CS+) paired with intragastric (IG) infusions of 16% sucrose, and another flavored saccharin solution (CS-) paired with water infusions. In two-bottle tests CS+ was preferred to CS-, and naltrexone (1.0-5.0 mg/kg) reduced total intake but not CS+ preference. In Experiment 2 food-restricted rats that received naltrexone (0.1 or 1.0 mg/kg; NTX group) throughout one-bottle training consumed less CS+ and CS- than did saline-treated control rats. Yet, the NTX and control groups displayed similar CS+ preferences during two-bottle tests when treated with saline or naltrexone (0.1-5.0 mg/kg). In Experiment 3, rats were trained to accept more CS+ than CS- in one-bottle tests. Naltrexone (0.1-2.5 mg/kg) reduced the one-bottle intakes of both solutions, and the rats continued to consume more CS+ than CS-. We conclude that the opioid system modulates the consumption of flavored solutions, but is not critically involved in the acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by IG carbohydrate.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Role of D(1) and D(2) dopamine receptors in the acquisition and expression of flavor-preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats.

The present study examined the effects of D(1) and D(2) antagonists on flavor-preference conditioning by the sweet taste of sucrose. All sessions were conducted under sham-feeding conditions to minimize post-ingestive influences. The rats were trained in alternating, one-bottle sessions to sham-feed a 16% sucrose solution containing one novel flavor (CS+) and a less-preferred 0.2% saccharin solution containing a different flavor (CS-). Three groups of food-restricted rats were treated with either vehicle (control group), the D(1) antagonist, SCH23390 (200 nmol/kg), or the D(2) antagonist, raclopride (200 nmol/kg) during one-bottle training. A fourth group (yoked group) was vehicle-treated and its training intakes were matched to that of the D(1) and D(2) drug groups. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in mixed 8% sucrose+0.1% saccharin solutions following systemic doses of 0, 200, or 800 nmol/kg of either the D(1) or D(2) antagonists. All groups significantly preferred the CS+ flavor in vehicle tests, although the preferences were weaker in the D(1), D(2), and yoked groups compared to the control group. All groups selectively reduced their CS+ intakes when treated with either D(1) or D(2) antagonists during two-bottle testing, and the CS+ preference was blocked at the higher doses. These data show that D(1) and D(2) receptor antagonists block the expression of a sucrose-conditioned preference, but produces substantially lesser effects upon the acquisition of this form of flavor conditioning.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of dopamine receptor antagonists.

Opioid and dopamine systems are both implicated in the response to sweet solutions. Our laboratory previously reported that the opioid antagonist, naltrexone, reduced the intake of sweet solutions, yet had little or no effect on sucrose-conditioned flavor preferences in sham-feeding rats. The present study examined the role of dopamine D(1) and D(2) receptors in the expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of sucrose. All sessions were conducted under sham-feeding conditions to minimize postingestive influences. Training was accomplished by adding a novel flavor (CS+) to a 16% sucrose solution, a different flavor (CS-) to a less-preferred 0.2% saccharin solution in alternating, one-bottle sessions. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in mixed sucrose (8%)-saccharin (0.1%) solutions following systemic doses of 0, 50, 200, 400, or 800 nmol/kg of the D(2) antagonist, raclopride (Experiment 1) or the D(1) antagonist, SCH23390 (Experiment 2) under either food-restricted or unrestricted conditions. Rats significantly preferred the CS+ solutions in vehicle tests, and displayed equipotent and dose-dependent reductions in total intake and CS+ preference following either D(1) or D(2) receptor antagonism. Similar results were obtained with SCH23390 and raclopride in Experiment 3 conducted with water-restricted rats. These data indicate that dopaminergic D(1) and D(2) receptors play pivotal and functionally equivalent roles in the expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of sucrose.

Animals↗

PubMed2000

Pharmacology of sucrose-reinforced place-preference conditioning: effects of naltrexone.

Two experiments investigated the role of the opioid system in sucrose-reinforced conditioned place preferences (CPPs) in rats. Experiment 1 examined the effects of a general opioid antagonist, naltrexone, on the expression of a CPP acquired in the absence of the drug. Subjects were trained to associate one compartment of a two-compartment chamber with sucrose and the other compartment with water. Rats displayed a preference for the sucrose-associated compartment in a choice test without sugar or water available following vehicle saline treatment. Naltrexone doses of 2.5 and 5.0 mg/kg reduced this preference for the sucrose-associated compartment. Experiment 2 examined the effects of naltrexone on the acquisition as well as the expression of CPPS. Different groups of rats received daily injections of either saline, 0.1, 1.0, or 5.0 mg/kg of naltrexone prior to each training session, and then these groups were given a choice test for the CPP after saline or naltrexone injections. Although naltrexone treatment attenuated the expression of CPPs in each group relative to saline treatment, there were no group differences during these tests in the magnitude of the preferences. Moreover, all groups displayed equal acquisition of CPPs despite the fact that naltrexone dose dependently decreased sucrose intake during the training phase. Together, the results indicate that the opioid system modulates the expression but not the acquisition of sucrose-reinforced CPPs.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Miglitol (BAY m 1099) treatment of diabetic hypothalamic-dietary obese rats improves islet response to glucose.

OBJECTIVE: The well-absorbed alpha-glucosidase inhibitor, miglitol (BAY m 1099), was included in the diets of hypothalamic-dietary obese diabetic rats to investigate its ability to improve glycemia and thereby reverse glucotoxic effects on islet secretory response. RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Female rats received bilateral electrolytic lesions of the ventromedial hypothalamus and were fed high-fat, sucrose-supplemented diets until hyperinsulinemia and hyperglycemia were observed after 3 hours of food deprivation (nonfed). Diabetic animals were assigned to miglitol-treated (40 mg/100 g of diet) or untreated groups for 3 weeks; pancreatic islets were isolated for incubation experiments. RESULTS: No differences in food intake, body weights, or nonfed plasma glucose or insulin levels were seen between treated and untreated diabetic rats. Islets isolated from untreated diabetic rats showed elevated basal insulin release and no insulin secretory response to an elevation in glucose concentration. In contrast, islets obtained from miglitol-treated rats showed more normal basal release and a significant insulin secretory response to glucose. Incubation of islets, obtained from normal control rats or untreated diabetic rats, in media containing miglitol at levels estimated to exist in plasma of treated rats had no effect on islet insulin secretory responses to glucose. DISCUSSION: Islet secretory response was improved despite continued hyperglycemia and severe insulin resistance. Miglitol treatment may improve islet sensitivity to glucose either through effects on islet metabolism requiring prolonged exposure or by improvement in postmeal glycemia, despite persistent hyperglycemia.

1-Deoxynojirimycin↗

PubMed1999

Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric nutrient infusions in rats fed chow or a cafeteria diet.

Numerous studies demonstrate that chow-fed rats learn to prefer flavors that are associated with the postingestive effects of nutrients. The rats>> limited dietary experience (i.e. only lab chow) may have facilitated preference learning because of the novelty of the training stimuli. This possibility was investigated by comparing nutrient conditioning in rats fed chow or a varied "cafeteria" diet. Rats in Experiment 1 were trained during alternate sessions (30 min/day) to drink two different flavors paired with concurrent intragastric infusions of 16% Polycose or water. Both diet groups displayed similarly strong preferences (89%) for and increased acceptance of the Polycose-paired flavor. A more demanding learning task was used in Experiment 2: new flavors were paired with delayed (15 min) infusions of Polycose or water. The chow and cafeteria groups both showed reduced, but comparable (78%, 77%) preferences for the Polycose-paired flavor. In Experiment 3, new flavors were paired with concurrent infusions of 7.1% corn oil or water. Again, the cafeteria and chow groups developed similar preferences for the nutrient-paired flavor (85%, 78%). Also, both groups preferred the Polycose-paired flavor of Experiment 1 to the oil-paired flavor of Experiment 3 (76%, 78%). These results indicate that dietary variety does not interfere with nutrient-conditioned flavor preference learning in rats.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Flavor preferences conditioned by high-fat versus high-carbohydrate diets vary as a function of session length.

Intragastric (i.g.) infusions of fat and carbohydrate condition flavor preferences in rats, but different results have been obtained in studies using pure and mixed nutrient infusions. This experiment compared the preference conditioning effects of mixed high-carbohydrate (HC) and high-fat (HF) diet infusions during short-term and long-term sessions. In Experiment 1 food-deprived rats were given one flavored saccharin solution (CS+HC) paired with i.g. infusions of an HC liquid diet, a second flavor (CS+HF) paired with HF diet infusions, and a third flavor (CS-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sessions. In subsequent two-bottle tests (30 min/day), the rats preferred both CS+s to the CS- and preferred the CS+HC to the CS+HF. In Experiment 2, the same rats were trained and tested with the CSs and paired infusions during 22 h/day sessions with chow available ad lib. Both CS+s were again preferred to the CS-, but now the CS+HF was preferred to the CS+HC. When given additional 30-min choice sessions in Experiment 3 the rats showed no reliable preference for the CS+HC versus CS+HF under food-deprived or ad lib conditions. In Experiment 4, the rats were given 22-h CS+HC versus CS+HF choice sessions every other day. They showed no reliable CS preference during the first 30 min of each session, but reliably preferred the CS+HF during the remaining 21.5 h. These findings indicate that previously reported differences in preferences conditioned by pure versus mixed nutrient infusions are due to training procedures (session length, deprivation state) rather than to the type of nutrient infusions per se. The rats displayed different CS+HF versus CS+HC preferences as a function of test duration even after being given both short- and long-term training. Thus, short-term choice tests do not always predict the long-term intakes and preferences for high-fat and high-carbohydrate foods.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Differential reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric fat and carbohydrate infusions in rats.

Food intake and preferences are modulated by the postingestive satiating and reinforcing actions of nutrients. This experiment compared the feeding effects of isocaloric intragastric (i.g.) carbohydrate (maltodextrin) and fat (corn oil) infusions in food-restricted rats fed low-fat (12% fat kcal) or high-fat (48% fat kcal) diets. In Experiment 1, the rats were given one flavored saccharin solution (CS+C) paired with i.g. carbohydrate infusions, a second flavor (CS+F) paired with i.g. fat infusions, and a third flavor (CS-) paired with i.g. water infusions during 30-min one-bottle training sessions. In subsequent two-bottle tests, the rats preferred both CS+s to the CS- (68-83%) and the CS+C to the CS+F (68-70%). In Experiment 2, the feeding inhibitory effects of the nutrient infusions on an ongoing meal (satiation test) or a subsequent meal (satiety test) were compared. The intake of a palatable Polycose+saccharin solution was suppressed by a concurrent carbohydrate infusion but not by a fat infusion. Also, i.g. carbohydrate preloads suppressed the intake of a subsequent (30-180 min) mixed carbohydrate+fat test meal more than did i.g. fat preloads. The satiety effects of the fat preloads were more pronounced in rats fed the low-fat diet than in rats fed the high-fat maintenance diet. Diet composition did not reliably influence the preference conditioning and satiation effects of the nutrient infusions. These results confirm prior reports that fat is less satiating than carbohydrate, and further demonstrate that i.g. carbohydrate infusions condition a stronger flavor preference than fat infusions.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1999

Conditioned flavor avoidance, preference, and indifference produced by intragastric infusions of galactose, glucose, and fructose in rats.

The postingestive reinforcing and satiating effects of intragastric (i.g.) infusions of 16% galactose, glucose, and fructose were compared in adult female rats. In Experiment 1, food-restricted rats were trained to drink (30 min/day) flavored solutions (the CS+Gal and CS+Glu) paired with intragastric (i.g.) infusions of galactose and glucose; other flavors (the CS-) were paired with IG water infusions. In subsequent choice tests, the rats strongly preferred (91%) the CS+Glu to the CS-, but avoided the CS+Gal (21%) in favor of the CS-. In Experiment 2, the rats were trained with a CS+Fru paired with i.g. fructose infusions and a CS- paired with i.g. water. In the choice test they consumed similar amounts of CS+Fru and CS- (CS+Fru preference = 51%). In other choice tests they preferred the CS+Glu (>80%) to CS+Fru and CS+Gal, and the CS+Fru (81%) to CS+Gal. Satiation tests were performed in Experiment 3 by adapting the rats to drink a 3% sugar + 0.2% saccharin solution paired with i.g. water infusions (30 min/day). On different test days 16% sugar instead of water was infused. IG galactose, glucose, and fructose produced comparable reductions in sugar+saccharin intake in the first test session. These findings demonstrate that, while the three sugars had similar satiating effects, they differed substantially in their postingestive flavor conditioning effects. The glucose and fructose results confirm prior data indicating that only glucose generates potent postingestive reinforcing stimuli. The galactose-induced flavor avoidance indicates that this sugar has a negative postingestive consequence. This may be due to the slow and incomplete hepatic metabolism of this sugar in adult rats. Conceivably, galactose intolerance may contribute to the lactose avoidance in adult animals.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMed1999

Pharmacology of flavor preference conditioning in sham-feeding rats: effects of naltrexone.

Relatively little is known about the neurochemical and pharmacological mechanisms involved in flavor preference learning. The present study examined the ability of the opioid antagonist, naltrexone to alter the acquisition and expression of flavor preferences conditioned by the sweet taste of sucrose. This was accomplished by adding a novel flavor (the CS+) to a sucrose solution, and a different flavor (the CS-) to a less-preferred saccharin solution. Rats were trained to drink these solutions with an open gastric fistula (sham-feeding), which minimized postingestive actions. Food-restricted (Experiments 1 and 2A) and ad lib-fed (Experiment 2B) rats were given either limited (Experiment 1) or unlimited (Experiment 2) access to the CS+ and CS- solutions during one-bottle training. Preferences were assessed in two-bottle tests (with the CS+ and CS- flavors presented in mixed sucrose-saccharin solutions) following vehicle or naltrexone (0.1-10 mg/kg, SC) treatment. The rats displayed significant CS+ preferences following vehicle, particularly after unlimited access training. In four of five experiments, naltrexone significantly reduced total intakes during the two-bottle, sham-feeding tests. Except for one instance, however, the drug failed to block the preference for the CS+ flavor over the CS- flavor. The effects of naltrexone (0.1 mg/kg) on the acquisition of flavor preferences were studied in sham-feeding rats under limited (Experiment 3A) and unlimited (Experiment 3B) training access conditions. Rats treated with naltrexone during training displayed similar CS+ preferences as did saline-treated rats, even though they consumed less CS+ during training. The naltrexone-trained rats also displayed smaller reductions in total or CS+ intakes than did saline-trained rats when all rats were treated with a 2.5 mg/kg dose of naltrexone during testing. As in previous studies, these results show that naltrexone significantly reduces the intake of sweet solutions, yet it has little or no effect on the acquisition or expression of flavor preferences conditioned by sucrose in sham-feeding rats.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Galactose consumption induces conditioned flavor avoidance in rats.

Recent findings revealed that intragastric infusions of galactose conditioned a flavor avoidance in adult rats. To determine whether the galactose-conditioned avoidance was due to the infusion procedure, we investigated the flavor conditioning effect of orally consumed galactose. Food-restricted rats drank a flavored galactose solution, a flavored fructose solution and a flavored saccharin solution in separate one-bottle training sessions; grape, cherry and orange flavors were used. Because fructose is sweeter than galactose, saccharin was added to the galactose solution to increase its palatability. Pre- and posttraining preferences for the galactose and fructose solutions were evaluated in two-bottle choice tests. Also, preferences for the sugar-paired flavors were evaluated in two-bottle tests with the flavors presented in saccharin. In Experiment 1, rats were trained with flavored 80 g/L fructose, 80 g/L galactose + 2 g/L saccharin, and 2 g/L saccharin solutions (20 mL/d). Their preference for the flavored galactose solution changed (P < 0.01) from 76% (pretraining) to 19% (posttraining). The rats also avoided (P < 0.05) the flavor paired with the galactose solution in choice tests with the fructose-paired flavor and the saccharin-paired flavor. Similar pre- to posttraining preference reversals were obtained in Experiments 2 and 3, which used 20 g/L galactose and fructose solutions, and 20 g/L galactose and fructose solutions mixed with 20 g/L glucose, respectively. These findings, together with the intragastric infusion data, demonstrate that galactose has aversive postingestive consequences in adult rats even at low concentrations (20 g/L). Unlike lactose intolerance, which is due to intestinal malabsorption, this galactose-induced flavor avoidance is presumably due to the slow and incomplete postabsorptive metabolism of galactose.

Animals↗