Biomedical subjects

A Sohla

Publications and source records attributed to A Sohla.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed1988

Internal cardiac defibrillation: single and sequential pulses and a variety of lead orientations.

A sequential pulse system for internal cardiac defibrillation incorporating catheter and patch electrodes with two current pathways has been shown to reduce defibrillation threshold in comparison to the single pulse technique. The relative advantage of the sequential pulse over the single pulse technique with other lead systems is not known. We compared defibrillation thresholds using sequential and single pulses delivered to a variety of lead orientations with the same electrode surface areas, when possible. Defibrillation threshold totals determined in halothane-anesthetized open-chest pigs averaged: For the single pulse shock passed between (1) superior vena cava (SVC) and left ventricular apical patch (LVA), 27.2 +/- 9.1 joules (J) and (2) LV epicardial patch (LVE) to right ventricular epicardial (RVE) patch leads, 16.5 +/- 2.1 J; and for the sequential pulse shock with two pulses passed between: (1) the SVC to RV intracavitary apex (RVA) and a quadripolar catheter in the coronary sinus to the RVA, 11.6 +/- 1.0 J; (2) the SVC to LVA and the LVE to RVE, 9.6 +/- 1.3 J and (3) the SVC to RVA and the LVE to RVA, 8.9 +/- 0.4 J. Defibrillation thresholds for sequential pulse shocks were all significantly lower than either of the defibrillation thresholds for single pulse shocks (p less than 0.001). We conclude that the sequential pulse system provides a substantial reduction in defibrillation threshold over the single pulse regardless of the lead system when the surface area and pulse characteristics are controlled. Sequential pulse technique may be valuable in the design of an implantable automatic defibrillator.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Internal ventricular defibrillation with sequential pulse countershock in pigs: comparison with single pulses and effects of pulse separation.

We compared single to sequential pulse shocks with different pulse separations on internal cardiac defibrillation by using a catheter and plaque electrodes in open-chest halothane-anesthetized pigs. Ten seconds after fibrillation onset, defibrillation was attempted using trapezoidal pulses of 65% tilt, approximately 5 ms duration and fixed outputs from 1.0 to 50 joules (J). With single pulses, minimum defibrillation energy for the catheter alone was 2.4 +/- 0.3 J/kg (mean +/- standard error) and 2.1 +/- 0.2 J/kg for the catheter tip to plaque configuration. With sequential pulse shocks, the first pulse delivered via the catheter and the second pulse from the catheter tip to the plaque electrode, the energy necessary for defibrillation was dependent on the separation time between the two pulses (2.0 +/- 0.2, 1.5 +/- 0.2, 0.9 +/- 0.1, 1.3 +/- 0.3, 0.6 +/- 0.2, and 1.2 +/- 0.2 J/kg at 100, 10, 1, 0.5, 0.2, and 0.1 ms, respectively). Further, at the 0.2 ms separation, 100% of the animals could be defibrillated with less than 2.0 J/kg (35 J total). We conclude that sequential pulse defibrillation provides a significant improvement over single pulse defibrillation. The optimum separation between the sequential pulses in this study was 0.2 ms.

Animals↗

PubMed1986

Defibrillation with the sequential pulse technique: reproducibility with repeated shocks.

The development of the automatic implantable defibrillator has created the need to assess the effects of interventions on defibrillation success. However, first it is important to determine the spontaneous variability of defibrillation threshold (DFT) over time. We repeatedly determined DFT over a maximum of 2-1/2 hours in open-chested, halothane-anesthetized pigs. Ten seconds after induction of fibrillation, defibrillation was attempted by passing a sequential pulse shock through an indwelling catheter and patch electrodes. Ninety-seven fibrillation episodes (FEs) were induced in eight pigs, with a maximum of 30 shocks in an animal. DFT remained stable and fitted a flat least-squares regression equation (y = 6.35 + 0.0055x, where x is the ventricular FE number and y is the DFT, r = 0.0115, p = NS). The mean DFT over time for the eight animals was 7.6 +/- 1.9 J (range 4.8 to 16.3 J). The inter-animal variability for DFT was 3.7 J and the mean intra-animal DFT variability over time was 3.6 +/- 2.3 J (range 0 to 6.8 J). We conclude that, using our methodology, DFT is reproducible and consistent over at least 2 hours. This model provides the basis to assess the effects of acute interventions on the ability to defibrillate.

Anesthesia, Inhalation↗

PubMed1986

Internal cardiac defibrillation threshold: effects of acute ischemia.

The influence of myocardial ischemia on defibrillation success was studied using two different lead orientations in halothane-anesthetized pigs. Ischemia was induced by ligating the left anterior descending artery in its distal third. Controls had loosely tied ligatures placed around the artery at the same site. Ventricular fibrillation was induced by electrical stimulation 30 minutes after coronary artery ligation. Defibrillation used a single truncated pulse of approximately 6 ms duration passed to either: a transvenous electrode catheter (Medtronic, 6880) with the cathode in the apex of the right ventricle and the anode in the superior vena cava-atrial junction region, or the cathode in the apex of the right ventricle and a mesh plaque on the epicardium of the basal lateral left ventricle as anode. Ten seconds after the onset of ventricular fibrillation, defibrillation was attempted with increasing incremental energies until defibrillation was achieved. Fibrillation episodes were repeated at 15-minute intervals until the minimum first shock was successful in defibrillating the animal (i.e., defibrillation threshold). The number of animals successfully defibrillated with a minimum energy above or below 30 J was not different between normal and ischemic animals for either electrode configuration (i.e., 3 out of 20 vs 1 out of 13 for the catheter and 5 out of 6 vs 6 out of 7 for the epicardial plaque, respectively). Also, the cumulative percent success as a function of defibrillation energy was similar in both the normal and ischemic groups. There was a significant reduction in the minimum energy necessary for defibrillation when passing current between the right ventricular apex and the left ventricular epicardial plaque. The present results indicate that, despite differences in lead orientations, acute ischemia in the anesthetized pig does not appear to influence defibrillation success.

Animals↗