[Homotransplantation of the aortic valve].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to A Sugitani.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Gastro-esophageal reflux disease is a common disorder which sometimes requires surgical treatment. Until recently, surgical treatment was the only alternative for severe complications of reflux. During the past 5 years endoscopic treatments for reflux have been reported from several medical centers. These new approaches may herald a new era for the treatment of reflux complications. However, at this time they are purely experimental approaches. Since physiologic antireflux mechanisms involve the muscles of the proximal gastric cardia as well as those of the lower esophageal sphincter, it is not surprising that endoscopic treatments have been directed at these two areas. However, the first endoscopic attempts at reflux control were directed at the lower esophagus sphincter. The most recent efforts at endoscopic control have been aimed at the proximal stomach, based on the concept that scarification beneath the lower end of the esophagus reduces the amount or frequency of reflux. Neither of these latter approaches has been reported in human patients. Since all endoscopic approaches are potentially dangerous, we recommend the adoption of a rigorous protocol for all human application. A possible protocol for this purpose is described herein; the authors will provide data analysis for any cohort of patients receiving endoscopic therapy, and will provide the results of all endoscopic treatments to any serious investigators.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
BACKGROUND: Despite recent progress in diagnosis and therapy, the clinical course of patients with pancreatic carcinoma remains dismal. There have been several approaches to improve the clinical course of patients with pancreatic carcinoma, namely: (i) detection of small pancreatic carcinoma; (ii) radical resection with retroperitoneal clearance and portal vein resection; (iii) multidisciplinary therapy including chemoradiation; and so forth. METHODS: In this series, eight Japanese patients with small pancreatic carcinoma measuring less than 2 cm in diameter (including two with non-invasive carcinoma and one with minimally invasive carcinoma) and 53 with larger pancreatic carcinoma were reviewed to find the diagnostic and therapeutic clues to improve the clinical course of patients with pancreatic carcinoma. RESULTS: Lymphatic (ly) and perineural (pn) permeation was significantly more frequent and extensive in the 53 patients with large pancreatic carcinoma than in the eight with small pancreatic carcinoma (ly 0/1/2/3:3/24/18/8 versus 5/2/1/0, P = 0.0284; pn 011/2/3:4/29/14/6 versus 3/2/3/0, P = 0.0491). The surgical margin was affected by malignant cells in 18 (34%) of the 53 patients with large carcinoma but none (0%) of the eight with small carcinoma (P = 0.0004). The comprehensive stage was significantly earlier in the eight with small carcinoma than in the 53 with large carcinoma (comprehensive stage I/II/II/IV:4/0/3/1 versus 0/3/26/24, P < 0.0001). Comprehensive curability of the eight small carcinoma cases was significantly higher than that of the 53 large carcinoma cases (comprehensive curability A/B/C:5/3/0 versus 9/5/39; P = 0.0003). 1-year and 3-year cumulative survival rates of the eight patients with small carcinoma were 100% and 82%, whereas those of the 53 with large carcinoma were 51% and 17%, respectively (P = 0.0207). However, the eight small carcinoma cases already showed frequent invasion to the vascular (v), lymphatic (ly) and perineural (pn) structure [v(+): 3/8, ly(+): 5/8, pn(+):5 /8] and lymph node metastasis (n) [n(+): 3/8]. Out of the eight small pancreatic carcinomas, one minimally invasive carcinoma and two non-invasive carcinomas showed no vascular, lymphatic or perineural invasion or lymph node metastasis. All the three patients have been doing well 19, 32 and 44 months after the operation. The diagnostic clues in the three patients were dilatation of the main pancreatic duct in one and of the branch duct in the other two. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that surgical resection frequently cures patients with small pancreatic carcinoma but more effective adjuvant therapy should be developed to control lymphatic permeation, venous invasion or perineural infiltration in surgical resection of large pancreatic carcinoma. The supreme goal is to detect non-invasive or minimally invasive pancreatic carcinoma with a dilatation of the main or branch pancreatic duct as a diagnostic aid.