Groups of 27 inpatients with moderate or severe postoperative, fracture, or somatic pain were given single oral doses of propoxyphene napsylate (P), fenoprofen calcium (F), combinations of P and F, aspirin, or placebo. The increasing rank order for effectiveness, with doses in milligrams, was placebo, P50, aspirin 650, F600, F50, P50 + F50, F200, P50 + F600, P50 + F200, P200 + F50, P200, P200 + F200, and P200 + F600. The overall analgesic response to propoxyphene in this dose range (50 to 200 mg) increased linearly with increasing doses. The fenoprofen response also increased in proportion to the dose up to 200 mg; the overall response to 600 mg was not significantly different from that to 200 mg. Propoxyphene napsylate and fenoprofen calcium had additive analgesic effects. There were no drug-related adverse reports.

Aspirin↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Long-term hypnotic efficacy and safety of triazolam and flurazepam.

Both triazolam and flurazepam are effective hypnotics when administered nightly for 12 consecutive weeks. However, at the dosages tested, 0.6 mg triazolam had a significantly faster onset of activity than 30 mg flurazepam. Long-term administration of either treatment did not influence the patient's capability to recognize the difference between active drug and placebo. This supports the conclusion that there was no tolerance development on either treatment. There were no deleterious effects attributable to either treatment as measured by the 35-Item Hopkins Symptom Checklist or by physical examinations, laboratory tests, ECGs, and ophthalmologic examinations. Side effects occurred more often on flurazepam than on triazolam, and the number of patients experiencing side effects was significantly higher in the flurazepam group. Drowsiness and grogginess were reported most frequently on both treatments, and the number of patients reporting drowsiness or grogginess was also significantly higher in the flurazepam group.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Hypnotic activity of diphenhydramine, methapyrilene, and placebo.

In a double-blind controlled study, an oral dose of diphenhydramine hydrochloride (12.5, 25, or 50 mg), methapyrilene fumarate (36, 72, or 144 mg), or placebo was administered to 1295 post-partum patients if they complained of, or anticipated, a sleep problem. Hypnotic activity was assessed clinically by subjective and objective techniques. Methapyrilene and diphenhydramine, at all doses, were found to be effective hypnotics in comparison to placebo, based on sleep latency, sleep duration, awakening in the night, global evaluation, and morning alertness. Increasing the dose of these drugs, in the range studied, produced a minimal increase in effectiveness.

Aminopyridines↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Quantitative differences in aspirin analgesia in three models of clinical pain.

An analysis was made of data from over 4000 postepisiotomy, uterine cramping, and postsurgical patients complaining of moderate or severe pain. They had received 325, 650, or 1300 mg aspirin or placebo while they were subjects in 10 analgesic clinical trials. On the average, for the same verbally expressed pain intensity level and the same treatment, more relief was obtained by a patient with uterine cramping than one with episiotomy pain, who in turn obtained more relief than a patient with surgical pain. A new mathematical model which characterizes the probability that an analgesic provides complete relief as a function of dose, severity of pain intensity, and pain etiology is developed. The model utilizes the data itself to estimate the numerical score corresponding to verbal pain intensities. The results indicate that the numerical score quantifying severe surgical pain is 1.4 times greater than the score for severe episiotomy pain, which in turn is 3.2 times greater than the score for severe uterine cramping. Clinical trials must be designed to take these differences into account. Also, clinicians must be cognizant of such differences when choosing among drugs and dosages for patients with different pain intensity and etiology.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A comparative oral analgesic study of indoprofen, aspirin, and placebo in postpartum pain.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and adverse effect liability of single oral doses of indoprofen, 50 mg, 100 mg, and 200 mg, compared with aspirin, 300 mg and 600 mg, and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe postpartum pain. Two hundred-ten patients entered a randomized, double-blind, parallel group study and were evaluated over a six-hour period by a single nurse-observer. There was a significant imbalance in the distribution of pain types across treatments that compromises the interpretation of the results. In addition to analyzing the data from all patients, the subsets with episiotomy/cesarean section pain and uterine cramp pain were examined separately. The latter group had too few patients to permit distinction between drugs. The 100 mg and 200 mg doses of indoprofen were significantly (P less than or equal to .05) more effective than placebo for many variables including the following summary values: sum of pain intensity difference (SPID), sum of hourly relief values (TOTPAR), and % SPID for all patients as well as in the subset of patients with episiotomy/cesarean section pain. Aspirin, 600 mg, was also significantly more effective than placebo for many of the same measures of analgesia in the episiotomy/cesarean section subset. Pairwise differences were also seen between placebo and aspirin, 300 mg, but on fewer variables. Indoprofen, 100 mg, was significantly more effective than aspirin, 600 mg, at hour 6 for pain intensity difference (PID) in the episiotomy/cesarean section subset. The effect of indoprofen appeared to plateau above 100 mg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

A double-blind, parallel comparison of ketoprofen, aspirin, and placebo in patients with postpartum pain.

Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of single oral doses of ketoprofen 25, 50, and 100 mg compared with aspirin 650 mg and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe postepisiotomy, uterine cramping, or cesarean section pain. One hundred and fifty-six patients participated in a randomized, double-blind, stratified, parallel-group study. They were observed over a six-hour period by one nurse-observer. Several of the standard summary measures of analgesia were derived from the interview data, including the sum of pain intensity differences (SPID) and the sum of the hourly relief values (TOTAL). The study showed significant differences between aspirin and placebo for four-hour SPID and several other parameters and between ketoprofen at all dose levels and placebo for the four- and six-hour SPID and many other parameters. The two higher doses of ketoprofen were significantly more effective than aspirin as as assessed by the four- and six-hour SPID, TOTAL, and other summary measures. The low dose of ketoprofen, although not significantly different from aspirin for SPID and TOTAL, showed a significantly faster onset of relief and had a better global rating. This study suggests that 50 mg of ketoprofen may be the clinical dose of choice as an analgesic. There were no adverse effects reported.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Analgesic effect of graded doses of flurbiprofen in post-episiotomy pain.

Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of flurbiprofen 25, 50 and 100 mg, aspirin 600 mg, and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe post-episiotomy pain. One hundred and fifty-two evaluable patients completed a randomized, double-blind, stratified, parallel groups study. They were observed over a six hour period by one nurse-observer. Based upon each of the summary efficacy measures SPID, TOTAL and PEAK % and most of the hourly direct measures of pain intensity and pain relief, each of the four active treatments were statistically superior to placebo. Flurbiprofen 25 mg appeared to be slightly less effective than aspirin 600 mg, but the differences were not statistically significant. Flurbiprofen 50 and 100 mg were quite similar and were significantly more effective than aspirin 600 mg and flurbiprofen 25 mg. There were no observed or reported adverse effects.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Analgesic effects of oral propiram fumarate, codeine sulfate and placebo in postoperative pain.

Our purpose was to evaluate the analgesic efficacy and safety of single oral doses of propiram fumarate 50 mg, codeine sulfate 60 mg and placebo in the relief of moderate to severe postoperative pain. One hundred and twenty patients completed a randomized, double-blind, single-dose, stratified, parallel-groups trial and were observed for either 4 or 6 hours. Based upon each of the summary efficacy measures--SPID, % SPID and TOTAL--propiram and codeine were approximately equally effective and both were statistically superior to placebo. Propiram was significantly more effective than codeine at hour 5 for Pain Intensity Difference. Two adverse effects were attributed to propiram. Propiram fumarate 50 mg is an effective oral analgesic similar to codeine sulfate 60 mg, with the possibility of a longer duration of action.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

An analytic approach to quantifying pain scores.

Statistical problems in clinical trials frequently involve fitting regression lines when the underlying data are categorical or ordinal response variables. Usually an ad hoc a priori quantification is used to assign values to these ordinal responses. For pain intensity data collected in analgesic trials, the usual approach is to set none equal to 0, mild equal to 1, moderate equal to 2, and severe equal to 3. While this scheme has been generally accepted, on the basis that for similar clinical trials reasonably similar results are obtained by different investigators, concern exists that the distances between pain scores are probably not equal. A method is presented for quantifying categorical responses so that the resulting scores maximize the simultaneous fit of the dose-response regression lines. The optimal scores derived by this technique may then be used in a bioassay analysis to estimate the relative potency of 2 compounds. As illustrative examples, this method was applied to data from 2 clinical trials and the results were compared to the usual method.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of fixed and adjustable window width and level settings in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to assess the utility of allowing free adjustment of window width and level in comparison with the use of a fixed lung window in the CT evaluation of diffuse lung disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six radiologists each judged 36 cases (28 diffuse lung disease and 8 normal) using a standardized form. In half of the sessions, images were viewed in a fixed lung window (level = -500 HU; width = 2,000 HU). In the other sessions, the observer was able to adjust the window and level freely while viewing the images. Each case was seen twice in separate sessions: once in a fixed lung window and once with window width and level adjusted by the reader. A variety of diagnostic features were evaluated using a 5 point scale. These included visibility of fine lung structures, abnormalities of the lung parenchyma, and overall evaluation of the lung. RESULTS: The visibility of lung structures was not improved with adjustable window settings. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed fixed windows to be superior to adjustable windows for overall evaluation of the cases [fixed A(z) = 0.90, adjustable A(z) = 0.84, p < 0.05, jackknife method]. Time to rate each case was increased by 15% with window width and level adjustment. CONCLUSION: Free adjustment of window width and level produced no improvement in reader performance over that achieved with fixed window width and level.

Humans↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Onset and duration of analgesia of diclofenac potassium in the treatment of postepisiotomy pain.

A double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study was performed to compare the analgesic efficacy of diclofenac potassium (25, 50, or 100 mg) with that of aspirin (650 mg), or placebo. Two hundred fifty-five inpatients with severe postepisiotomy pain were randomly assigned to receive a single oral dose of one of the four active treatments or placebo. Analgesia was assessed over an 8-hour period. Treatments were compared on the basis of standard scales for pain intensity and relief and a number of derived variables based on these data, as well as two global ratings of the study medication. All active treatments were effective analgesics statistically superior to placebo for many hourly and summary measures, including the global ratings. Diclofenac potassium (50 and 100 mg) was statistically significantly superior to aspirin at half-hour and for many other hourly scores from hour 3 on. The 4- and 8-hour sum of the pain intensity difference and total pain relief scores reflected the superiority of diclofenac potassium to aspirin. In addition, the 100-mg dose was significantly more efficacious than the 25-mg dose of diclofenac potassium. The probability of obtaining onset was significantly better for all active treatments than for placebo; however, the median onset times were similar for all treatments. The duration of effect, as measured by mean pain intensity difference and relief scores, was better for diclofenac potassium than aspirin, and these differences were significant for the 50- and 100-mg doses. The probability of pain returning to baseline was significantly less for the diclofenac groups than for placebo or aspirin groups. In addition, significantly fewer patients treated with diclofenac (25, 50, or 100 mg) or aspirin (650 mg) required remedication during the 8-hour study period as compared with those treated with placebo. Diclofenac potassium is an effective analgesic in the range of aspirin (650 mg) at the 25-mg dose and superior in efficacy and longer lasting than aspirin at the 50- and 100-mg doses. The onset of analgesia was similar for aspirin and diclofenac potassium.

Adult↗