PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A T Turrisi

Publications and source records attributed to A T Turrisi.

61 records · Page 4Linked to original sources
PubMed1986

Human pharmacokinetics of WR-2721.

The pharmacokinetic properties of WR-2721 were investigated in 13 cancer patients given a 150 mg/M2 intravenous bolus dose of the drug. An average plasma clearance value of 2.17 L/min was obtained. Very little of the drug or the two metabolites, WR-1065 and WR-33278, were excreted in urine obtained after the blood collection schedule. Plasma concentrations of WR-2721 decreased by 94% within 6 minutes of drug administration. The mean value of 6.44 L obtained for the steady-state volume of distribution indicates that the extravascular space occupied by the drug is small. These observations suggest that in human cancer patients, WR-2721 is rapidly taken up by tissues and converted to metabolites.

Amifostine↗
PubMed1986

Final report of the phase I trial of single-dose WR-2721 [S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid].

Two hundred one patients were entered in a single-dose phase I trial of WR-2721 [S-2-(3-aminopropylamino)ethylphosphorothioic acid]. Major toxic effects included emesis and hypotension. The observed minor toxic effects were somnolence and sneezing. Two infusion schedules were tested: long-infusion time, which fixed the rate, but varied total time; and short-infusion time, which varied the rate, but fixed the time to 15 minutes. Emesis was significantly influenced by infusion time; the long schedule caused a 57% incidence whereas the short schedule caused only a 28% incidence. Within the long-infusion group, higher-dose patients and women were more likely to vomit. Although only 15% of the entire group had hypotension, the long-infusion schedule had a hypotension incidence of 23%; the short schedule had an incidence of only 3% (P less than 0.0005). Within the long-infusion group, dose and tumor site significantly influenced the incidence of hypotension. No factors were associated with these toxic effects in the short-infusion schedule. However, certain toxic effects were too infrequent to detect significant differences. For future trials we recommend 740 mg/m2 infused in 15 minutes. With this schedule, vomiting was seen in 25% of infusions and hypotension was seen in only one of 68 infusions. To date, no delayed toxic effects have been detected in any organ system, and the trial resulted in no toxic deaths.

Adult↗
PubMed1984

Toxicity of WR-2721 administered in single and multiple doses.

Two hundred forty-three patients have received WR-2721 in Phase I-II studies. Separate studies were conducted in which patients with advanced malignancies received WR-2721 before single or multiple doses of radiotherapy or in single doses prior to cyclophosphamide, nitrogen mustard or cis-platinum. Single doses were escalated from 25 to 1330 mg/m2. An Acceptable Tolerated Dose (ATD) of 740 mg/m2 infused in 15 minutes has been established and is currently used in Phase II studies. Significant persistent hypotension (greater than 20 torr systolic) as a dose-limiting toxicity has occurred in 5% of patients in the single dose study. Fifty-five patients have been entered in the multiple dose trial. Dose levels of 340 mg/m2, four times a week for three weeks, and 250 mg/m2, four times a week for six weeks have been reached. There were five idiosynchratic reactions (fever, chills, rash, hypotension), one of which was severe. Some patients withdrew from the multiple dose study because of vomiting after each injection, or fear. No deaths nor any long-term untoward effects were observed. There is no suggestion of tumor protection.

Amifostine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Ten-year follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group 8269: a phase II trial of concomitant cisplatin-etoposide and daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer.

PURPOSE: To report the long-term follow-up of Southwest Oncology Group-8269, a phase II North American cooperative group trial of concurrent cisplatin, etoposide, vincristine (PEV), and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for limited small-cell lung cancer (L-SCLC). METHODS: 114 eligible patients from 47 institutions enrolled between April, 1985 and March 1986. Patients had documented L-SCLC. Induction chemotherapy consisted of three cycles of PEV. TRT was administered at 1.8 Gy/fraction in 25 daily fractions to a total dose of 45 Gy, to begin concomitantly. Consolidative chemotherapy included two cycles of vincristine, methotrexate, etoposide, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was concurrent with the 3rd cycle of chemotherapy. The PCI dose was 30 Gy in 15 fractions of 2 Gy/fraction. RESULTS: As of May 2000, 5 of 114 remain alive and progression-free with a minimum follow-up interval of 13.2 years, as of May 2000. The median follow-up interval is 14.2 years. Thirty eight patients died of causes other than SCLC and five patients are still alive and progression-free. Of the remaining 71 patients dying of SCLC, local failure (LF) occurred in 24% (17 patients), distant metastasis (DM) occurred in 35% (25 patients), simultaneous LF and DM occurred in 25% (18 patients), and was indeterminate in 16% (11 patients). Thus, LF was a component of failure in 49%. Twenty patients had the CNS as the initial site of failure. Eleven patients (10%) developed fatal second primary cancers, including two with acute myelogenous leukemia, two with squamous cell lung cancer, one each with breast, pancreas, prostate, renal cell, and myelodysplasia. One patient developed both a melanoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. CONCLUSION: There are long-term survivors with concomitant TRT and PEV. LF and DM are common. Pattern of failure suggests needs to improve local and systemic control.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cisplatin-etoposide based chemoradiation treatment for limited small cell lung cancer: the current situation.

Although the role of thoracic radiotherapy in limited small cell lung cancer has been established by two meta-analyses, optimization of radiotherapy with chemotherapy requires a full understanding of the chemotherapeutics used and the factors involved in administration of thoracic radiotherapy. The Cisplatin-Etoposide (PE) combination has replaced the cyclophosphamide or doxorubicin as the combination of choice, but it isn't clear whether the addition of the other agents add to benefit or toxicity. New agents continue to be sought to improve systemic failure. This paper focuses on the radiotherapy variables: dose, volume, fractionation, temporal sequencing, and variety of methods of combining the modalities are discussed. Results of a variety of pilot studies using thoracic radiotherapy and the PE combination are discussed. A randomized trial of accelerated radiotherapy versus standard fractionation has been completed within the past year, but results are not yet available. Further trials are warranted to improve integration of modalities in order to increase survival and reduce local and systemic failure without increasing untoward effects.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗