PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Templeton

Publications and source records attributed to A Templeton.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

Number of embryos for transfer following in-vitro fertilisation or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection.

BACKGROUND: The traditional reliance on the transfer of multiple embryos during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in order to maximise the chance of pregnancy, has resulted in increasing rates of multiple pregnancies. Women undergoing IVF had a 20 - fold increased risk of twins and 400 - fold increased risk of higher order pregnancies (Martin 1998). The maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality as well as national health service costs associated with multiple pregnancies is significantly high in comparison with singleton births (Luke 1992; Callahan 1994; Goldfarb 1996). Single embryo transfer is now being considered as an effective means of reducing this iatrogenic complication. This systematic review evaluates the effectiveness of elective two embryo transfer in comparison with single and more than two embryo transfer following IVF and ICSI (intra cytoplasmic sperm injection) treatment. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to determine, whether in couples who undergo IVF/ICSI: (1) the elective transfer of two embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with: (a) Single embryo transfer, (b) Three embryo transfer or (c) Four embryo transfer.(2) the elective transfer of three embryos improves the probability of livebirth compared with: (a) Single embryo transfer, or (b) Four embryo transfer, SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group's trials register (searched June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library, Issue 4, 2003), MEDLINE (1970 to 2003), EMBASE (1985 to 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched relevant conference proceedings and contacted researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS: We found no studies that compared a policy of transferring multiple embryos on one cycle versus a policy of cryo- preservation and transfer of a single embryo over multiple cycles. We also found no trials comparing transfer of two versus three embryos. Three small, poorly reported trials compared transfer of two versus one embryo in a single cycle, and one small, poorly reported trial compared transfer of two versus four embryos in a single cycle. The clinical pregnancy rate per woman/couple associated with two embryo transfer was significantly higher compared to single embryo transfer (OR 2.08, 95% CI 1.24 to 3.50; test for overall effect p = 0.006). The live birth rate per woman/couple associated with two embryo transfer was also significantly higher than that associated with single embryo transfer (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.12 to 3.22, test for overall effect p=0.02). The multiple pregnancy rate was significantly lower in women who had single embryo transfer (OR 9.97, 95% CI 2.61 to 38.19; p = 0.0008). The effectiveness of double embryo transfer versus four embryo transfer was tested in a single trial. There was no statistically significant differences in the clinical pregnancy rate (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.26 to 2.16; p=0.6), and multiple pregnancy rates (OR 0.44. 95% CI 0.10 to 1.97; p = 0.28) between the two groups. The livebirth rate in the four embryo transfer group was higher compared to the two embryo transfer group, but the results were not statistically significant (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.05; p = 0.06). REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this systematic review suggest that live birth and pregnancy rates following single embryo transfer are lower than those following double embryo transfer as are the chances of multiple pregnancy including twins. As such, it is unlikely that the conclusions are robust enough to catalyse a change in clinical practice. The studies included are limited by their small sample size, so that even large differences might be hidden. Cumulative livebirth rates are seldom reported. The data were inadequate to draw conclusions about single embryo transfer and first frozen single embryo transfer (1FZET) or subsequent single frozen embryo transfers. Until more evidence is available single embryo transfer may not be the preferred choice for all patients undergoing IVF/ICSI. Clinicians may need to individualise protocols for couples based on their risks of multiple pregnancy. A definitive pragmatic, large multi centre randomised controlled trial comparing single embryo versus double embryo transfer in terms of clinical and cost effectiveness as well as acceptability is required. The primary outcome measured should be cumulative livebirth per woman/couple.

Embryo Transfer↗
PubMed2004

Early ovarian ageing.

Observations from reproductive biology, epidemiology, and clinical assisted reproduction support the hypothesis that the time interval between the onset of accelerated decline of the ovarian reserve and the menopause is more or less fixed. Thus, it is estimated that women who become menopausal by the age of 45 may have experienced an accelerated decline of their fertility before the age of 32. Up to 10% of women in the general population may fall into this category, which has been described as "early ovarian ageing". Because of the long latent phase and predictable natural history, this condition is suitable for screening. High-risk groups include, women with a family history of early menopause. IVF has provided a model for the development of ovarian reserve tests, some of which appear promising as potential screening tools for the detection of early ovarian ageing in asymptomatic women in the general population.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases.

We assessed the effectiveness, safety and factors that affected the outcome of midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy at 13-21 weeks gestation. Of the 1002 women, 3 took mifepristone and decided to continue with the pregnancy, with 999 women being compliant with the regimen. Of these, 2 women aborted prior to administration of misoprostol and 970 (97.1%) aborted successfully within five doses of misoprostol. Surgical intervention was necessary to complete the abortion process in 81 (8.1%) women. Women with no previous pregnancy (p = 0.02), no previous live birth (p = 0.0001) and gestations 17-21 weeks (p = 0.001) required more prostaglandin. Younger women (p = 0.0001) and women with a previous live birth (p = 0.001) were more likely to have a successful abortion. The induction abortion interval was significantly longer with increasing gestation [95% confidence interval (CI) difference in means: -2.52 to -0.89, p = 0.0001], increasing age (p = 0.0001) and no previous live birth (95% CI difference in means: -0.25 to -1.01, p = 0.0001). Surgical intervention was more likely to be required with increasing age (p = 0.008). Mifepristone in combination with misoprostol is a safe and effective regimen for midtrimester medical abortion with younger women and those with a previous live birth more likely to have a successful abortion.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2004

Mifepristone versus the Yuzpe regimen (PC4) for emergency contraception.

OBJECTIVE: To compare side effects, women's acceptance and satisfaction with mifepristone (100 mg) versus the Yuzpe regimen for emergency contraception (EC). METHODS: A total of 1000 women requesting EC within 72 h of unprotected intercourse were randomized to receive mifepristone 100 mg or the standard Yuzpe regimen. Outcome measures included patient acceptability and satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 620 (62%) questionnaires were returned, 64% in the mifepristone group and 60% in the Yuzpe group. Mifepristone was better tolerated than the Yuzpe regimen. The rates of nausea (P<0.0001), abdominal pain (P=0.001), tiredness (P<0.0001), lethargy (P=0.001), hot flushes (P<0.0001) and dizziness (P<0.0001) were all significantly higher in women given the Yuzpe regimen compared to those who received mifepristone. Of these 94% and 80% in the mifepristone and Yuzpe groups, respectively, were satisfied with treatment (P<0.0001). Of women in the mifepristone group, 56% (181/321) had used the Yuzpe regimen of EC in the past and of these, 93.6% (161/172) indicated they would use mifepristone in the future. A total of four women in the Yuzpe group had mifepristone in the past and all four said they would use mifepristone in the future. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone has high patient acceptability and few side effects compared to the standard Yuzpe regimen for EC.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Women's perceptions of decision-making about hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To explore women's views of decision-making relating to hysterectomy. DESIGN: Structured questionnaire and in-depth interview surveys. SETTING: A teaching hospital and a district general hospital in northeast Scotland. SAMPLE: Women scheduled for hysterectomy for benign menstrual problems. METHODS: Pre-operative questionnaires were sent to a consecutive sample of women booked for hysterectomy. A purposive sample was interviewed post-operatively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's experiences of, and satisfaction with, information provision, communication and decision-making processes; the relationship between views of decision-making processes and decisions made. RESULTS: One hundred and four women (66%) returned questionnaires. Most responded positively to structured questions about the process by which the decision to have a hysterectomy was reached. Almost all (97%) reported satisfaction with the decision made. Twenty women were interviewed post-operatively. A number, including some who had responded positively on the questionnaire, described aspects of the decision-making process that were suboptimal. Women's perceptions of the decision-making process, including the way their doctors communicated with them, did impinge on their views of the course of action selected. Some women had residual doubts about the appropriateness of hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: In a significant minority of women, there are important shortcomings in current patterns of information provision and communication relating to decision-making. These are unlikely to be picked up by conventional structured patient feedback surveys. Further efforts are required to ensure that women are adequately informed and involved in decisions about gynaecological treatments.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

Vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel versus tablet in the induction of labour at term--a retrospective analysis.

Our aim in this retrospective analysis was to compare labour outcomes between 145 consecutive women with unfavourable cervices, who received prostaglandin E2 vaginal gel (1-2 mg) for labour induction over a 3-month period, and 149 women receiving a prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablet (3 mg) over the following 3 months. Our results showed that cervical dilatation in the gel group was significantly more than in the tablet group at transfer to labour ward [4 cm (SD 2.5 cm) versus 3.3 cm (SD 2 cm), mean difference -0.7, 95% CI -1.2 to -0.2, P=0.01), with fewer women requiring oxytocin augmentation, but this was not statistically significant (41.4% versus 50%, RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.7-1.1). There were no significant differences in the mode of delivery in the number delivering vaginally within 24 hours of the induction (60.4% in the gel group versus 56.2% in the tablet group, RR1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4), in the number of doses of PGE2 administered, or in the neonatal outcomes between the two groups. In conclusion, there were no significant differences in labour or neonatal outcomes between prostaglandin E2 gel or tablet use in the induction of labour in this retrospective analysis.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2004

A randomised comparison of oral misoprostol and vaginal prostaglandin E2 tablets in labour induction at term.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 100 microg of oral misoprostol with 3 mg prostaglandin E2 vaginal tablets in term labour induction. DESIGN: A non-blinded, randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary level, teaching Scottish Hospital. POPULATION: Two hundred women at term with indications for labour induction and modified Bishop's cervical score of less than 8. METHODS: The women were randomly allocated to receive either 100 microg of misoprostol orally (which could be repeated 4 hourly to a maximum of five doses if indicated), or a 3 mg tablet of prostaglandin E2 vaginally (which could be repeated in 6 hours, according to routine departmental protocol). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The number delivering vaginally within 24 hours of the induction. RESULTS: Seventy-five women delivered vaginally in the misoprostol group and 73 in the PGE2 group. Of these, 50.7% in the misoprostol group and 54.8% in the PGE2 group delivered within 24 hours of the induction (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.3). More women in the misoprostol group were given oxytocin, but this was not statistically significant (60%vs 47%, RR 1.3, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.7). Two women in the misoprostol group had uterine hyperstimulation. The neonatal outcomes were not significantly different in the two groups. There was a pound 1100 saving on direct drug costs in the misoprostol group. CONCLUSIONS: Oral misoprostol (100 microg) has similar efficacy to vaginal PGE2 tablets, and may be an option to consider for term labour induction.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2004

Analgesia requirements and predictors of analgesia use for women undergoing medical abortion up to 22 weeks of gestation.

OBJECTIVE: To assess analgesia use and the predictors for requiring analgesia in women undergoing medical abortion at all gestations up to 22 weeks. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Scotland. POPULATION: Consecutive women undergoing medical abortion under the terms of the 1967 Abortion Act. METHODS: Analgesia requirements and characteristics of women undergoing abortion were analysed using logistic regression. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The effect of age, gestation, reproductive history, route and dose of misoprostol administration on analgesia requirements. RESULTS: Of the total 4343 women included in this review, 3139 women (72%) required analgesia. Of these, 3054 women (97%) used oral analgesia, 75 women (2.4%) used opiates while 10 women (0.3%) had diclofenac sodium given rectally. There was no significant difference in analgesia use whether women used the vaginal or sublingual route of misoprostol administration. Logistic regression showed a significant positive association with gestation at termination (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.12), number of misoprostol doses used (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.51) and induction to abortion interval (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.03-1.12) and a negative association with the age of women undergoing abortion (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99) and previous live birth (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.33-0.56). CONCLUSIONS: Analgesia requirement was significantly higher in women of younger age, higher gestation, longer induction to abortion interval and with increased number of misoprostol doses used while women with previous live birth were significantly less likely to use analgesia.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2003

A pilot study of mifepristone in combination with sublingual or vaginal misoprostol for medical termination of pregnancy up to 63 days gestation.

Of the total women included in the study, 96 women chose to receive misoprostol 600 microg sublingually while 53 women received misoprostol 800 microg vaginally 36-48 h after receiving mifepristone 200 mg. Complete abortion occurred in 93 women (98.9%) in the sublingual and 51 women (96.2%) in the vaginal group (p = 0.27). The mean induction-to-abortion interval was 3.2 h (SD = 1.4) in the sublingual and 4.1 h (SD = 1.5) in the vaginal group (p = 0.02). The mean gestation at abortion in weeks was 7.1 (SD = 1.0) in the sublingual and 7.7 (SD = 1.3) in the vaginal group (p = 0.003). Women in the sublingual group experienced more vomiting (p = 0.03), diarrhea (p = 0.02) and unpleasant taste in their mouth (p = 0.0001) while those in the vaginal group experienced more headache (p = 0.002). Of women in the sublingual group, 77% were satisfied with the route of misoprostol administration compared to 68% in the vaginal group (p = 0.25). These findings now need to be assessed in the context of a randomized controlled trial.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2003

An audit of the management of induced abortion in England and Wales.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of care provided to women undergoing induced abortion. METHODS: The design was a single round audit questionnaire aimed at the providers of abortion services throughout England and Wales (NHS hospitals, clinics under NHS, agency agreements and private units. The levels of care were assessed against agreed audit criteria. RESULTS: Responses were received from 240 (74%) of the 324 units providing abortion care in England and Wales. These units undertook 80% of the 176,000 termination procedures. Generally standards of care were appropriate, but there were clear areas for improvement including choice of method, infection screening, and delays in referral. A number of unnecessary investigations were still evident, including cross-matching, while lower doses and alternative drug regimens might reduce costs. Only half of the units audited procedures and complications. CONCLUSIONS: This audit was carried out prior to the publication of the RCOG evidence-based guideline and a further round of audit to assess the impact of the guideline should now be considered.

Abortion Applicants↗
PubMed2003

Early ovarian ageing: a hypothesis. Detection and clinical relevance.

An important scientific breakthrough of the 20th century, IVF helped open new horizons in medicine, such as pre-implantation genetic diagnosis and embryonic stem-cell therapy. A further contribution of assisted reproduction technology has been the better understanding of reproductive ageing. Data from IVF cycles suggest that there is a fixed time-interval between accelerated decline of fertility and the menopause. This leads to the hypothesis that a significant proportion of asymptomatic women in the early thirties may be at risk of early onset of subfertility. IVF provides a model for the development of ovarian reserve tests, some of which appear promising as potential screening tools for early ovarian ageing in the general population.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

In vitro fertilisation for unexplained subfertility.

BACKGROUND: In vitro fertilisation (IVF) is now a widely accepted treatment for unexplained infertility (RCOG 1998). However, with estimated livebirth rates per cycle varying between 13% and 28%, it's effectiveness has not been rigorously evaluated in comparison with other treatments. With increasing awareness of the role of expectant management and less invasive procedures such as intrauterine insemination, concerns about multiple complications and costs associated with IVF, it is extremely important to evaluate the effectiveness of IVF against other treatment options in couples with unexplained infertility. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review is to determine, in the context of unexplained infertility, whether IVF improves the probability of livebirth compared with 1. expectant management 2. clomiphene citrate (CC) 3. intra uterine insemination (IUI) alone 4. IUI with controlled ovarian stimulation and 5. Gamete IntraFallopian Transfer (GIFT). SEARCH STRATEGY: RCTs were identified using the search strategies developed for the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group. See Review group for more information. SELECTION CRITERIA: Only randomised controlled trials were included. Livebirth rate per woman was the primary outcome of interest. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed eligibility and quality of trials. MAIN RESULTS: Nine randomised controlled trials were identified. In two we could not extract data separately for unexplained infertility cases, two were non-randomised, one reported no valid rates (included in the review and not in the meta-analysis), leaving four trials for analysis. One trial compared two different interventions (IVF versus IUI with or without ovarian stimulation) and one study compared three interventions (IVF versus IUI with ovarian stimulation and GIFT). The number of trials assessing the effectiveness of IVF with the other treatments were as follows: IVF versus expectant management (one), IVF versus IUI (one), IVF versus IUI with ovarian stimulation (two) and IVF versus GIFT (three). Livebirth rate per woman was reported in two studies and three studies determined clinical pregnancy rate per woman. Multiple pregnancy rate was reported in three trials. Two studies reported ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) as an outcome measure. There were no comparative data for clomiphene citrate, and no comparative data on livebirth rates for expectant management or GIFT. There was no evidence of a difference in livebirth rates between IVF and IUI either without (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.23 to 1.1) or with (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.42 to 1.8) ovarian stimulation. There was no evidence of a difference in clinical pregnancy rates between IVF and expectant management. There was no significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rates between IVF and GIFT (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.92). There was no evidence of a difference in the multiple pregnancy rates between IVF and either IUI with ovarian stimulation (OR 1.59, 95% CI 0.68 to 3.70) or GIFT (OR 0.47, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.58). Clinical heterogeneity was present among the studies included. However, there was no evidence of statistical heterogeneity, which allowed the studies to be combined for statistical analysis. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Any effect of IVF relative to expectant management, clomiphene citrate, IUI with or without ovarian stimulation and GIFT in terms of livebirth rates for couples with unexplained subfertility remains unknown. The studies included are limited by their small sample size, so that even large differences might be hidden. Livebirth rates are seldom reported. Adverse effects such as multiple pregnancies and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome have also not been reported in most studies. Larger trials with adequate power are warranted to establish the effectiveness of IVF in these women. Future trials should not only report rates per woman /couple but also include adverse effects and costs of the treatments compared as outcomes. Factors that have a major effect on these outcomes such as fertility treatment, female partner's age, duration of infertility and previous pregnancy history should also be considered.

Female↗
PubMed2002

New considerations for the pathogenesis of endometriosis.

OBJECTIVES: To review the available evidence regarding the immunological, epidemiological and other factors involved in the pathogenesis of endometriosis. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: Endometriosis remains a poorly-understood disease of unknown etiology and pathogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to suggest that alterations in the immune response, whether genetically transmitted or environmentally induced, predispose women to the ectopic implantation of endometrial cells transported into the peritoneal cavity by way of retrograde menstruation. This predisposition may exist because of an impaired peritoneal clearing of endometrial cells and fragments or because of pathological angiogenesis.

Choristoma↗
PubMed2002

Prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease by the control of C. trachomatis infection.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if there is evidence to indicate that screening for Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) is an effective intervention in the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). METHODS: A systematic review was made of the literature to assess the effectiveness of screening asymptomatic young women for lower genital tract infection with C. trachomatis in the prevention of PID and its major sequelae tubal infertility and ectopic pregnancy. RESULTS: There is considerable literature describing screening for lower genital tract infection with C. trachomatis, but only two randomized controlled trials, two ecological studies and one case-controlled trial were identified. These studies were graded and the evidence pooled. The suggestion that screening for chlamydia is an effective intervention in the prevention of PID is supported by Grade 2 evidence (level B recommendation). However, there are large gaps in the literature. Only small numbers of women have been studied and the follow-up periods are short. The studies have been conducted using mainly culture of cervical swabs to diagnose chlamydial infection and not the more recent nucleic acid based tests. The risk of a woman developing PID following detection of lower tract infection with C. trachomatis is still uncertain. CONCLUSIONS: There is evidence to support a level B recommendation that screening for chlamydia using culture is effective in preventing PID in the short term. Further randomized controlled trials are required to assess screening using nucleic acid based tests and involving longer follow-up periods.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the active management of term prelabour rupture of membranes with oral misoprostol with conservative management for 24 hours followed by induction with oxytocin or prostaglandin E(2) (PGE(2)) gel. DESIGN: A non-blinded randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Induction and labour wards, Aberdeen Maternity Hospital. POPULATION: Sixty-one women with confirmed prelabour rupture of the membranes at > or =36 weeks of gestation. METHODS: The women were randomised to 50 microg of oral misoprostol repeated every 4 hours, if required, to a maximum of five doses (active group), or to induction of labour with PGE(2) gel or oxytocin only if not in spontaneous labour 24 hours after prelabour rupture of membranes (conservative group). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of women in active labour within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes, preference of women for any one particular method of management in any subsequent pregnancy with prelabour rupture of membranes. RESULTS: 93.3% of the active group and 54.8% of the conservative group were in spontaneous labour within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes (RR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4). Of those achieving a vaginal delivery, 72% of the active group did so within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes as compared with 26.9% of the conservative group (RR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4 to 5.3, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the neonatal or maternal outcomes. In the active group, 78% felt they would have the same method of induction as compared with 40% in the conservative group (RR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.3, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Active management with oral misoprostol resulted in more women going into labour and delivering within 24 hours of the prelabour rupture of membranes with no increase in maternal or neonatal complications. Women tended to view active management of prelabour rupture of membranes more positively. Oral misoprostol might be an option to consider in those wishing active management.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2002

Aspirin dilemma. Remodelling the hypothesis from a fertility perspective.

Many clinical trials in obstetrics have failed to demonstrate improved outcomes with low-dose aspirin. This is not entirely surprising as prescribing aspirin for compromised tissue perfusion without insight into underlying pathology inevitably leads to suboptimal outcomes. We argue that a mismatch between the aspirin dose and the underlying pathology of altered tissue perfusion is the key factor to this failure. Based on this groundwork, we address the question of how best to optimize the dose of aspirin for use in fertility management, by providing examples from the assisted conception and recurrent miscarriage settings.

Abortion, Habitual↗
PubMed2002

Cost effectiveness of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a review of published studies.

OBJECTIVE: Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis in the lower genital tract may contribute to the prevention of pelvic inflammatory disease in women. The purpose of this review was to critically appraise, and summarise studies of the cost effectiveness of screening for C trachomatis. METHODS: A literature search was conducted on Medline and in Health Star from 1990-2000. Keywords were C trachomatis, screening, cost effectiveness. Bibliographies of reviewed articles were also searched. The population studied was asymptomatic sexually active women under 30 years of age in a primary care setting. The intervention assessed was screening for lower genital tract infection with C trachomatis and the outcomes studied were cases of C trachomatis detected, cases of PID prevented, and associated costs. Studies were assessed using the Drummond criteria for economic evaluations. They were assessed qualitatively as they were too heterogeneous to allow quantitative analysis. RESULTS: 10 studies were included. All were modelled scenarios and all found screening to be more cost effective than simply testing symptomatic women, although all were based on probabilities that were assumed. Six of the studies focused on DNA based testing, three of them using urine. The models showed screening to be cost effective at prevalences of 3.1-10.0%, and cost saving (overtesting symptomatic women) at a prevalence as low as 1.1%, if age was used as a selection factor and DNA based tests were used in urine samples. CONCLUSIONS: At the prevalence of infection expected in the target population, all studies suggest screening is cost effective. However, the assumptions used in the models have been difficult to confirm and there is a need for more data, particularly on the risk of complications in women with asymptomatic lower tract infection.

Chlamydia Infections↗