PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Umile

Publications and source records attributed to A Umile.

11 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

The response of two different dosages of beclometasone dipropionate suspension for nebulization versus a standard dose of beclometasone dipropionate via a metered-dose inhaler on bronchoprovocation testing in adults with asthma.

The objective of this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study was to compare the pharmacodynamic effects and safety of beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) given by nebulization or metered-dose inhalation in adult patients with asthma. Following a 1-week run-in period, 40 patients, aged 18-60 years, with intermittent bronchial asthma were randomized to one of four treatment groups for 3 weeks (n = 10 in each group): beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) suspension for nebulization 1,600 microg day(-1) b.i.d. via a nebulizer, BDP suspension for nebulization 3,200 microg day(-1) b.i.d. via a nebulizer, BDP 800 microg day(-1) b.i.d. via a metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer, or placebo. At study end, comparable effects were reported for all active treatment groups on the primary pharmacodynamic endpoint of FEV1 in response to methacholine bronchial provocation testing, with a statistically significant improvement shown in the BDP 3,200 microg day(-1) suspension for nebulization group compared with pre-treatment for other parameters, including FEV1 and peak expiratory flow rates. All treatments were comparable. All treatments were equally well tolerated. No significant effects on cortisol levels were reported in any of the treatment groups.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

[Inhaled corticosteroid therapy in mild and moderate persistent asthma. Acceptability of a new inhalation system: the jet].

The objectives of this study were to assess the acceptability and efficacy of Jet (a metered dose inhaler with a 100 ml chamber giving 250 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate per puff) in patients with mild to moderate asthma using a dose-for-dose schedule in substitution for their standard metered dose inhaler with or without an inhalation chamber. An open trial was conducted over 5 weeks in 356 asthma patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids at a mean 914 +/- 198 micrograms/24 h dose. beta 2-agonists were used by all patients, either systematically (prescription) or as needed. Prior to the study, 27% of the patients used a standard metered dose inhaler with a large-volume inhalation chamber and 73% used a standard metered dose inhaler alone. The rate of nocturnal, early morning, and diurnal symptoms and cough decreased by 31.4, 33.4, 46.9, and 37.0% respectively and the variability of peak expiratory flow rate fell from 2 +/- 0.08% to 0.9 +/- 0.02% in the group using the metered dose inhaler with the chamber and from 1.3 +/- 0.04 to 0.5 +/- 0.01% in the group using the standard metered dose inhaler. The investigators determined that treatment efficacy was good or excellent in 94.8%. These findings should be confirmed by studies comparing Jet directly with other inhalation chamber systems or with standard metered dose inhalers. For 97.5% of the patients, it was easy to learn to use Jet and 88.2% of the patients felt no discomfort when using Jet; 64.8% of the patients stated they experienced clinical improvement. At the end of the trial, 77.9% of the patients (76.3% of those who used the inhalation chamber during the study and 78.4% of those who used the metered dose inhaler alone) stated they preferred Jet over their prior system.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Holding chambers for pMDI use.

Spacer devices for pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI) are needed to slow down the aerosol jet and hence to reduce oropharyngeal deposition as well as to overcome coordination problems. A new spacer, JET (Chiesi, Italy), which is less cumbersome to carry, was tested on five healthy volunteers. They inhaled with a slow inspiratory vital capacity maneuver 2 x 100 micrograms doses of the beta 2-agonist salbutamol, labelled with 99mTc, via a pMDI (Butovent, Chiesi) with and without the new JET spacer. The percentage of total delivered activity to the lungs increased with the JET from 14.3 +/- 4.5% to 22.3 +/- 4.1%, while the extrapulmonary deposition (oropharynx and stomach) was reduced from 39.8 +/- 12.2% to 11.0 +/- 3.4%. These results show that the optimal application of the JET can improve therapeutic efficacy by reducing extrapulmonary drug deposition while increasing the drug delivery to the lungs. Use of holding chambers as reservoirs should be avoided as well as frequent cleaning of the spacer.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1994

Evaluation of piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin, piroxicam, paracetamol and placebo in post-operative oral surgery pain.

Two hundred ninety-eight patients with post-operative pain after the surgical removal of an impacted third molar were randomly assigned, on a double-blind basis, to receive a single oral dose of piroxicam 20 mg, or piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin equivalent to 20 mg piroxicam, or paracetamol 500 mg, or placebo. Using a semi-quantitative self-rating scale, patients rated their pain and its relief at 30-min intervals for the first 2 h, and then hourly for 4 h after treatment administration. All active medications were reported to be significantly superior to placebo. The three active drugs were comparable for the degree of analgesia up to the third hour, after which the effect of paracetamol decreased significantly as compared to piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin and piroxicam. Piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin and paracetamol were more rapid than piroxicam in inducing analgesia. The tolerability for the active drugs was comparable to that for placebo.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1993

[Analgesic efficacy and the tolerance for piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin compared to piroxicam, paracetamol and placebo in the treatment of postextraction dental pain].

INTRODUCTION: Acute postoperative pain is a common experience in oral surgery practice. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are quite effective against mild to moderate pain and they are generally better suited in ambulatory outpatients than narcotic analgesics. The analgesic activity of piroxicam, a well known NSAID has been documented in many pain states. Piroxicam can be administered once daily because of its long half-life, but its absorption in the gastrointestinal tract is slow as it is its onset of action. Piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin (PBCD) is a new formulation of piroxicam which is the product of supermolecular encapsulation of piroxicam with the cyclic oligosaccharide beta-cyclodextrin. PBCD is absorbed much faster than standard piroxicam, and its action as an analgesic is consequently more rapid. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and the rapidity of action of piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin in comparison with standard piroxicam, paracetamol and placebo following surgical extraction of impacted third molars. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study population was composed of 32 patients of both sexes and in good health. To be included into the study, patients must have had third molar removal resulting in acute post-surgical pain of at least moderate intensity. The patients were then randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups. PBCD 20 mg tablets; piroxicam 20 mg capsules; paracetamol 500 mg tablets, or placebo. The study was conducted according to a double-blind, double-dummy design. Pain intensity and pain relief were recorded at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4 hours after a single dose of the study drugs, by means of a Keele-type rating scale. Rescue analgesics were not allowed before one and a half hour after taking the study drugs. A global evaluation of study drugs was expressed by patients at the end of the observation period. RESULTS: Treatment groups were homogeneous for demographic characteristics of the patients and for pain intensity at the time of medication with study drugs. All patients who received placebo requested supplemental analgesics, while none of the patients treated with the active drugs needed rescue analgesics. PBCD and paracetamol were comparable for their analgesic effect, while the time lag before a significant reduction of pain intensity with piroxicam was longer. Piroxicam and PBCD were superior to paracetamol because they showed a substantial analgesic effect through the 4-hour study duration, while paracetamol did not induce a complete relief from pain. DISCUSSION: One of the most commonly utilized model for the evaluation of analgesics is the third molar extraction pain. Our study clearly differentiated between active drugs and placebo. Furthermore, while PBCD and paracetamol showed a rapid effect, piroxicam was slow in inducing pain relief. The analgesic and anti-inflammatory activity of PBCD and piroxicam brought about the resolution of pain and inflammation consequent to the dental extraction. Paracetamol, a pure analgesic, was not equally active and pain persisted, even if at a low grade, throughout the observation period; probably this was due to local inflammation and edema. The results of our study appear to confirm the pharmacokinetic data on PBCD, which showed that therapeutic blood levels are reached faster with PBCD than with the standard piroxicam formulation. This results should be confirmed in studies with an adequate number of patients.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1991

Piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin: effects on gastrointestinal blood loss and gastric mucosal appearance in healthy men.

Thirty-six healthy men aged 20-31 years took part in a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study to compare the effects of repeated doses of piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin, piroxicam and placebo on faecal blood loss and the endoscopic appearances of gastric and duodenal mucosa. After an initial endoscopy, subjects received on day 0 autologous erythrocytes labelled with 51Cr. Complete daily faecal collections were then made from days 6 to 12. From days 13 to 40, subjects received daily by mouth either piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin (containing 20 mg piroxicam), piroxicam 20 mg, or placebo. Complete faecal collections were made daily from days 13 to 41; blood samples for red-cell 51Cr activity were taken weekly. Endoscopy was repeated 16-20 h after the last dose of medication. Faecal blood loss was calculated from 51Cr activity of blood and faeces. Compliance with medication was confirmed by blood sampling on days 20, 27 and 34. General tolerability of the medication was good, although 1 subject was withdrawn from piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin and 1 from piroxicam treatment because of abdominal pain. There were no clinically significant changes in haematology, biochemistry or urinalysis results in any subject. Endoscopic appearances deteriorated moderately in 3 subjects receiving piroxicam and 3 receiving piroxicam-beta-cyclodextrin, but did not deteriorate in any subject receiving placebo. There was a trend for cumulative blood loss to be higher for piroxicam than for the other treatments in the last 12 days of dosing.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1981

The effects of captopril on blood pressure in essential hypertensive patients with low or normal plasma renin activity. Interference with autonomic nervous system.

Captopril was administered to 12 essential hypertensive patients with low or normal plasma renin activity in order to evaluate its effectiveness in decreasing blood pressure and to determine whether the inhibition of converting enzyme could interfere with sympathetic neural activity. Captopril, at the doses of 150-450 mg/die, normalized blood pressure in 5 patients (responders) and had no effect on 7 patients (non responders). A significant decrease in heart rate was observed in all patients. Captopril failed to significantly increase plasma renin activity in all patients. Supine plasma levels of catecholamines were significantly higher in responders compared with non responders and decreased significantly after treatment with captopril. The physiological study we performed on all patients suggests an overall integrity of the baroreceptor reflex arc and vascular reactivity to stress before as well as after treatment with captopril. On the contrary, the bradycardia induced by diving test was significantly greater after treatment than before therapy. These findings suggest that the antihypertensive effect of converting enzyme inhibition may be partly due to interference with sympathetic neural activity. Moreover captopril seems to exert an important effect on parasympathetic activity irrespective of blood pressure changes.

Adult↗