PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Vølund

Publications and source records attributed to A Vølund.

57 records · Page 4Linked to original sources

Removal of t-butyl and t-butoxycarbonyl protecting groups with trifluoroacetic acid. Mechanisms, biproduct formation and evaluation of scavengers.

The trifluoroacetic acid-mediated removal of t-butyl groups in protected amino acids leads to the formation of t-butyl trifluoroacetate. This t-butyl ester alkylates in trifluoroacetic acid methionine and tryptophan. The t-butyl trifluoroacetate ester can be destroyed by scavengers commonly employed for t-butyl cations, and the reaction rates of the scavengers with the ester are used in the evaluation of scavengers. Scavengers of sulphide structure react with t-butyl trifluoroacetate to form sulphonium compounds, which possess alkylating properties. In the presence of a scavenger during acidolysis, the trifluoroacetic acid and the scavenger will compete in reacting with the t-butyl cations. Kinetic studies show comparable reaction rates with thiophenol as scavenger. The usefulness of adding scavengers to trifluoroacetic acid in deblocking reactions is due to the removal of t-butyl trifluoroacetate in addition to the removal of t-butyl cations. Isobutene reacts with trifluoroacetic acid and yields t-butyl trifluoroacetate. The reaction reaches an equilibrium displaced in favour of the ester at room temperature. Hence no isobutene can be expected to escape during a deblocking reaction in trifluoroacetic acid.

Alkylation↗

Application of the four-parameter logistic model to bioassay: comparison with slope ratio and parallel line models.

Bioassays with a quantitative response showing a sigmoid log-dose relationship can be analysed by fitting a non-linear dose-response model directly to the data. It is demonstrated that the four-parameter logistic model, previously applied to immunoassay (Healy 1972), is applicable to the free fat cell bioassay of insulin (Moody, Stan, Stan and Gliemann 1974). It is shown that the standard slope ratio and parallel line models for bioassay can be considered as approximations to the logistic in the extreme dose regions, while the parallel line model can be expected to fit in the middle region. The full statistical analysis of the four-parameter logistic model applied to a general assay design is described. An APL computer program has been developed to facilitate the calculations, which include non-linear curve-fitting, tests of goodness of fit and parallelity, as well as point and interval estimates of the relative potency. Examples of free fat cell bioassays of insulin that have been analysed according to these methods are given. Efficient estimation of the potency calls for concentrating the doses in the region with the steepest slope of the dose-response curve. With respect to testing the parallelity and to allow for assay-to-assay variability and unpredictable potencies, it may be preferable to use an assay design with doses distributed over a wide range and to apply a dose-response model which, like the four-parameter logistic, is capable of fitting over the whole feasible dose range.

Biological Assay↗

Comparison of the sensitivities of the Buehler test and the guinea pig maximization test for predictive testing of contact allergy.

International test guidelines, such as the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) guideline #406, recommend 2 guinea pig methods for testing of the contact allergenic potential of chemicals: the Guinea Pig Maximization Test (GPMT) and the Buehler test. Previous comparisons between the methods suggested that the Buehler test was less sensitive than the GPMT although modified Buehler test protocols were used. Parallel GPMT and Buehler tests were conducted according to OECD guideline #406 using a multiple-dose design and test results were analysed using a standard logistic dose-response model. To compare the sensitivity of the 2 test procedures the test conditions were kept identical and the following chemicals with a range of sensitization potentials were tested: chloraniline, chlorhexidine, eugenol, formaldehyde, mercaptobenzothiazole and neomycin sulphate. Formaldehyde and neomycin sulphate were strong sensitizers in both tests. Mercaptobenzothiazole, eugenol and chloraniline were all strong sensitizers in the GPMT, eugenol and mercaptobenzothiazole were negative in the Buehler test and equivocal results were obtained with chloraniline. Chlorhexidine was negative in the GPMT and equivocal responses were obtained with the Buehler test. Higher induction concentrations were needed to show allergenicity in the Buehler test and for some allergens the Buehler test protocol was not sensitive enough to demonstrate allergenic potential.

Allergens↗