PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Vallano

Publications and source records attributed to A Vallano.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Analgesics for pain after traumatic or orthopaedic surgery: what is the evidence--a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess analgesic drugs in the treatment of postoperative pain after traumatic and orthopaedic surgery (TOS). DESIGN: A systematic review of randomised clinical trials (RCTs). DATA SOURCES: Electronic PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and hand searches. STUDY SELECTION: RCTs of analgesics administered by oral, intramuscular, intravenous, subcutaneous or rectal route, were compared to other analgesics or placebo, in patients under TOS. Study design, characteristics of the study population, analgesic drugs tested, pain intensity and pain relief scores, and adverse effects were assessed. RESULTS: Ninety-two RCTs (9,596 patients) met our inclusion criteria. Forty-two (46%) were placebo-controlled, and 50 (54%) were direct comparisons between non-opioid, opioid, and/or combinations of both. Patients' mean age (SD) was 49 years (18). In most trials, gastrointestinal ulcer, liver and renal diseases were exclusion criteria. Only 30 trials (33%) were double-blind and reported standardised outcomes of pain intensity and pain relief; 19 of these were single-dose, and follow up of analgesic effects lasted no more than 12 h in 23 (77%). Globally, only nine trials (10%) were double blind, described dropouts or withdrawals, performed analysis by intention to treat, and reported the effects magnitude. CONCLUSION: Evidence from RCTs on the treatment of postoperative pain after TOS is inadequate for clinical decision making. Assessment of analgesics in pain after TOS should be based on agreed clinically relevant outcomes, in representative patients, and for longer observation periods. In addition, it should include direct comparisons between candidate drugs or their combinations and between various drug administration schedules.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed2006

Utilisation of antihyperglycaemic drugs in ten European countries: different developments and different levels.

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: The aim of this study was to compare developments in the utilisation of antihyperglycaemic drugs (AHGDs) in ten European countries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Data on the yearly utilisation of insulin and oral AHGDs were collected from public registers in Denmark, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Belgium, England, Germany, Italy, Portugal and Spain, and were expressed as defined daily doses per 1,000 inhabitants per day. RESULTS: Total AGHD utilisation increased everywhere, but at different rates and levels. Insulin utilisation doubled in England and Germany, but hardly changed in Belgium, Portugal or Italy. Sulfonylurea utilisation doubled in Spain, England and Denmark but was reduced in Germany and Sweden. Metformin utilisation increased greatly everywhere. There were two- to three-fold differences in AHGD utilisation even between neighbouring countries. In Finland, there were more users of both insulin (+120%) and oral AHGDs (+80%) than in Denmark, and the daily oral AHGD doses were higher. In Denmark and Sweden, AHGD utilisation was equal in subjects aged <45 years, but in those >or=45 years of age, both insulin and oral AHGD utilisation were twice as high in Sweden. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The ubiquitous increase in AHGD utilisation, particularly metformin, seems logical, considering the increasing prevalence of type 2 diabetes and the results of the UK Prospective Diabetes Study. However, the large differences even between neighbouring countries are more difficult to explain, and suggest different habits and attitudes in terms of screening and management of type 2 diabetes.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

Prevalence of pain in adults admitted to Catalonian hospitals: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE: To survey the prevalence of pain in patients admitted to different hospitals of Catalonia and to describe which factors are related to pain. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed in 1675 patients from fifteen hospitals in Catalonia (Spain). Clinical and demographic data, as well as the existence of pain intensity evaluations and analgesic therapy, were obtained from medical charts. Characteristics of pain were given by patients after being interviewed by trained interviewers. The main-outcome measure was the existence of pain (at the interview, in the previous 24h, at the admission and at any time after admission) that was assessed by a visual analogue scale (VAS). The relationship of prevalence of pain to patients' characteristics was carried out by means of a multiple-logistic-regression model with pain presence as the dependent variable of interest. RESULTS: A great variability in the prevalence and intensity of pain among different hospitals was observed. At the time of the interview, 48.5% (95% CI: 46.1-50.9%) of the patients had pain and the median VAS was 40mm (range: 10-100mm), and the prevalence of pain during the previous 24h was similar (47.6%; 95% CI: 45.2-50%). At admission, 26.7% (95% CI: 24.6-28.8%) of patients were in pain, whereas 62% (95% CI: 59.7-64.3%) reported having pain at some time during their stay. Pain intensity annotations were absent in 51.3% (95% CI: 47.9-54.7%) of the medical records of the patients with pain. The factors associated with pain were younger age, female gender, presence of surgery, orthopaedic surgery wards, large hospital and prescribed analgesics. CONCLUSION: A high prevalence of clinically relevant pain in in-patients was found as well as a great variability according to type of patients, clinical wards and hospitals. This study gives clear evidence of the lack of adequate management of pain in the majority of the hospitals and calls for the implementation of organisational and educational measurements that may settle this epidemic problem.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Obstacles and solutions for spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions in the hospital.

AIM: To describe the opinions of hospital physicians concerning problems regarding the spontaneous reporting of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and ways to solve them. METHODS: A qualitative study was carried out. Fifteen focus groups were conducted among physicians working in a tertiary teaching hospital. A total of 208 physicians from different medical specialities participated. The focus group discussions were recorded by three different observers and the transcripts of each session were analysed for issues and themes emerging from the text. RESULTS: Four types of obstacles to spontaneous reporting were considered particularly important: (i) problems with the ADR(S) diagnosis; (ii) problems with the usual workload and lack of time; (iii) problems related to the organization and activities of the pharmacovigilance system; (iv) and problems related to potential conflicts. The potential solutions suggested for improving spontaneous reporting were to define the kind of ADR(S) which should be reported, to facilitate an easy contact and quick access to the hospital pharmacovigilance system, to facilitate information and support for reporting and feedback of pharmacovigilance activities. CONCLUSIONS: The perception of the different obstacles by the hospital physicians is an important factor in determining the causes of the underreporting of ADRs and addressing these obstacles could lead to an improvement in spontaneous reporting. A closer relationship between the doctors and the pharmacovigilance centre is suggested as a means of solving these problems. More information is needed to improve the spontaneous reporting of ADR(S) in specialized healthcare.

Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting Systems↗
PubMed2004

Oral antispastic drugs in nonprogressive neurologic diseases: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of oral drugs in the treatment of spasticity in patients with nonprogressive neurologic disease (NPND). METHODS: Systematic review of double-blind randomized controlled trials of antispastic oral drugs in the treatment of spasticity in NPND. DATA SOURCES: Electronic MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and hand searches. RESULTS: Twelve studies (469 patients) were included (6 on stroke, 3 on spinal cord diseases, and 3 on cerebral palsy). Tizanidine was assessed in four trials (276 patients, 142 exposed), dantrolene in four (103, 93), baclofen in three (70, 55), diazepam in two (127, 76), and gabapentin in one (28, all exposed). Most trials were of small size, of short duration, and their methodologic quality was inadequate. Ten trials were controlled with placebo and only two were direct comparisons between drugs. Efficacy outcome variables were heterogeneous. Only four reports described the magnitude of the antispastic effect. The incidence of adverse drug effects (drowsiness, sedation, and muscle weakness) was high. CONCLUSION: Evidence on the efficacy of oral antispastic drugs in NPND is weak and does not include evaluation of patients' quality of life. If any, efficacy is marginal. Adverse drug reactions were common. Better methodologic instruments are needed for the evaluation of antispastic treatment.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2004

Medical speciality and pattern of medicines prescription.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the prescribing patterns and their quality in relation to the prescriber's medical specialty in a defined population. METHODS: The study was done on a random sample of all primary care medical prescriptions made through the social security system during 1 year in Andorra, a small European country. Number and type of prescribed medicines, prescribers' medical speciality and patients' age and gender were recorded. Medical specialties considered were General Practice, Paediatrics, Cardiology, Pneumology, Gynaecology, Ophthalmology and Other. A set of various quality indicators [World Health Organisation (WHO)/International Network for Rational Use of Drugs (INRUD) indicators and others] was used. RESULTS: The number of medicines prescribed per encounter varied depending on the prescriber's medical specialty and patient's age. Cardiologists and pneumologists tended to prescribe more medicines than other medical specialties. Patients older than 65 years received more prescriptions than younger adults, mostly at the expense of cardiovascular drugs. The contribution of the various groups and subgroups of medicines and the scores of various prescribing indicators showed wide variability across the medical specialties. CONCLUSION: Prescribing patterns and indicators of prescription quality show wide variability depending on the prescriber's medical specialty. This has important implications for priority setting in information, continuous education and research.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Impact of analgesic drug-use guidelines for the management of postoperative pain: a drug utilization study.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative pain is inadequately treated in many surgical settings. The present study evaluates the impact of analgesic drug-use guidelines in the management of postoperative pain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective drug utilization study was carried out in 3 stages in a traumatology, orthopedic and rehabilitation tertiary hospital. The first stage, aimed at describing the patterns of use of analgesic strategies in the management of postoperative pain, identified habits, practices and misconceptions regarding this therapeutic area. After this, an ad hoc representative institutional working group agreed on analgesic drug-use guidelines for the management of postoperative pain. These were then published, presented and discussed with surgeons and nurses. After the guidelines had been implemented, their impact was evaluated in terms of the analgesics used, their dosage and their administration schedule. RESULTS: 101 patients were studied before the implementation of the guidelines and 108 patients after. Patients receiving opiate analgesics during the immediate postoperative period increased from 70-94% (p < 0.05). First-choice analgesics used according to the guidelines increased from 40-89% of choices after the implementation of the guidelines (p < 0.05). Administration of analgesics at regular predetermined intervals increased from 45-58% of medical orders, but this increase was not statistically significant (p = 0.07). Prescription of analgesics at adequate doses increased from 67-87% (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Education on the treatment of postoperative pain is made up of several messages including the drug of choice and dose regimen. Prescribers seemed more receptive to a change in drug rather than issues related to the correct dose regimen. More research is needed to assess how educational activities can improve the management of postoperative pain.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Use of levofloxacin in the hospital].

Levofloxacin is a new, recently commercialized fluoroquinolone. We aimed to assess the use of levofloxacin after its inclusion in the hospital drug guide. In a prospective observational study, patients treated with levofloxacin in a university hospital were selected from July 2000 to June 2001. Using a structured questionnaire, data were recorded on patients' demographic characteristics and comorbidities, indications for levofloxacin use and previous use of other antibiotics. In addition, the adherence to the instructions for use as recommended by the antibiotic subcommittee of the hospital, and the use of other alternative antibiotics were analyzed. Ninety-seven patients were treated [mean age 67 years; range 17-93; 64 men], of whom 83 (85.6%) had comorbidity and 51 (52.6%) a possible allergy to the betalactam antibiotics. The treatment began after the use of other antibiotics in 47 (48.5%) patients. The main clinical indications were pneumonia (54; 55.7%) and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (25; 25.8%). The use of other antibiotics was possible in 56 (57.7%) patients, and levofloxacin was only used according to the recommended indications in 41 (42.3%). Levofloxacin is mainly used in the treatment of patients with respiratory infections, those who are allergic to the betalactam antibiotics and those previously treated with other antibiotics; however, in many cases, the use of other antibiotics may still be possible. As part of the antibiotic policy, it is necessary to define the indications of use for new antibiotics introduced in the hospital and surveillance studies need to be developed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2001

Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in community-acquired acute pediatric respiratory infections in Spanish emergency rooms.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the variability and appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions in community-acquired acute respiratory infections (ARI) during childhood in Spain. METHODS: A descriptive, multicenter study of variability in clinical practice was conducted by evaluating a prospective series of pediatric patients attending the emergency rooms of 11 Spanish hospitals and diagnosed with community-acquired ARI. The appropriateness of the antibiotic prescriptions was assessed by comparing our clinical practice with consensus guidelines developed for this study. RESULTS: We collected data from 6,249 ARI emergencies studied on 30 separate days. Antibiotics were prescribed in 58.7% of the ARI (bronchiolitis, 11.5%; bronchitis, 40.2%; pharyngotonsillitis, 80.9%; nonspecified ARI, 34.8%; pneumonia, 92.4%; otitis, 93.4%; sinusitis, 92.6%). The most commonly used antibiotics were amoxicillin/clavulanate (33.2%), amoxicillin (30.2%), cefuroxime axetil (8.5%) and azithromycin (6%). According to the consensus guidelines developed for this study, therapy was considered to be appropriate in 63.1% of the ARI (first choice, 52.1%; alternative choice, 11.0%) and inappropriate in 36.9%. The percentages of inappropriate prescription according to ARI groups were: bronchiolitis, 11.5%; bronchitis, 31.5%; pharyngotonsillitis, 54.8%; nonspecified ARI, 34.7%; pneumonia, 13.9%; otitis, 25.6%; and sinusitis, 22.2%. CONCLUSIONS: There is excessive use of antibiotics in acute respiratory infections that are presumably viral in origin. An important number of ARI of potentially bacterial origin are treated with antibiotics that are not sufficiently efficacious or that have a broader spectrum than necessary.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed2000

Assessment of antibiotic prescription in acute respiratory infections in adults. The Spanish Study Group on Antibiotic Treatments.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to ascertain the variability in the use of antibiotics for the treatment of acute respiratoryinfections in several hospital emergency services in Spain, as well as the appropriateness of antibiotics prescription through evaluation by a panel of experts using available scientific evidence. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was carried out in the emergency services of 10 hospitals in different Spanish regions. We chose patients diagnosed as having acute respiratory infection, aged over 14 years. Among the collected variables were: type of respiratory infection, antibiotic prescription, comorbidity, qualification of the prescribing doctor and hospital admission. The consensus conference held by a panel of experts established first choice treatment and the alternative and inappropriate use for each respiratory infection, based on the available scientific evidence. All the observed prescriptions in our study were classified according to this pattern. RESULTS: A sample of 2899 acute respiratory infections was studied (5.5% of all emergencies). Antibacterial agent treatment was prescribed in 82.6% of these, varying according to the infection between 98.5% of pneumonias and 49% of croup-influenza-common cold. The most commonly used antibiotics were amoxicillin-clavulanate and cefuroxime. The global percentage of inappropriate prescription was 40.5% (95% CI; 35.4-45.5). The prescriptions were inappropriate in 16.9% of cases of pharyngotonsillitis, 17.8% of chronic bronchitis, 26.9% of acute bronchitis, 29.3% of pneumonias, 30.8% of otitis and sinusitis and in 70.8% of croup, flu, common cold and non-specified infections. Significant variability among participating centres was observed, both in choice of antibiotics and in their degree of appropriateness. CONCLUSIONS: There is excessive use of antimicrobial drugs in acute respiratory infections, and the majority are used for viral infections. There is indiscriminate use of broad spectrum antibiotics, which are valid in some infections but clearly inappropriate in others. Similarly, there are important differences in the choice of antibiotics and their degree of appropriateness among hospitals.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

Inhaled antibiotic therapy in non-cystic fibrosis patients with bronchiectasis and chronic bronchial infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term effectiveness and safety of inhaled antibiotic treatment in non-cystic fibrosis patients with bronchiectasis and chronic infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, after standard endovenous and oral therapy for long-term control of the infection had failed. After completing a 2-week endovenous antibiotic treatment to stabilize respiratory status, 17 patients were randomly allocated to a 12-month treatment either with inhaled ceftazidime and tobramycin (group A) or a symptomatic treatment (group B). One patient from group A abandoned inhaled treatment because of bronchospasm and another from group B died before the end of the study. The remaining 15 patients, seven from group A and eight from group B, completed the study. Both groups had similar previous characteristics. The number of admissions and days of admission (mean +/- SEM) of group A [0.6 (1.5) and 13.1 (34.8)] were lower than those of group B [2.5 (2.1) and 57.9 (41.8)] (P < 0.05). Forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV1), PAO2 and PACO2 were similar in the two groups at the end of follow-up, showing a comparable decline in these parameters. There were no significant differences either in the use of oral antibiotics or in the frequency of emergence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria between groups. Microbiological studies suggested that several patients had different Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. None of the patients presented impaired renal or auditory function at the end of the study. This study suggests that long-term inhaled antibiotic therapy may be safe and lessen disease severity in non-cystic fibrosis patients with bronchiectasis and chronic bronchial infection by Pseudomonas aeruginosa which do not respond satisfactorily to antibiotics administered via other routes.

Administration, Inhalation↗
PubMed1999

Management of postoperative pain in abdominal surgery in Spain. A multicentre drug utilization study.

AIMS: Postoperative pain is common in hospital-admitted patients. Its management is determined by different therapeutic traditions and by the attitudes of health professionals in each hospital. The aim of this study was to describe the patterns of prescription and administration of analgesic drugs used for postoperative pain after abdominal surgery in Spanish hospitals, to know the prevalence and the severity of postoperative pain, and to determine the extent of variability in the management of postoperative pain among the participating centres. METHODS: The study was a multicentre descriptive cross-sectional drug utilization study in 12 Spanish hospitals. The subjects were an unselected sample of consecutive patients undergoing abdominal surgery, admitted between October 1994 and January 1995. For each patient, information about the surgical procedure and the use of analgesics was prospectively collected. The severity of postoperative pain was assessed during the first day after surgery by means of a six-category (none, mild, moderate, severe, very severe, and unbearable) rating scale and a visual analogue scale (VAS). RESULTS: Nine hundred and ninety-three patients (547 men) were included. The most common surgical procedures were inguinal hernia repair (315, 32%), cholecystectomy (268, 27%), appendectomy (140, 14%), bowel resection (137, 14%), and gastric surgery (58, 6%). Fifty-nine percent of patients (587) received nonopioid analgesics only, 9% (89) received opioid analgesics only, and 27% (263) received both opioid and nonopioid analgesics. The most frequently administered drugs were metamizole (667 patients) and pethidine (213 patients). Although in the majority of medical orders the administration of analgesics was scheduled at regular time intervals, the majority of actual doses were given 'as-needed'. The average administered daily doses of all analgesics were lower than those prescribed. Thirty-eight percent (371/967) of patients rated their maximum pain on the first day as severe to unbearable. Wide interhospital variability was recorded in the surgical procedures which had been performed, in the analgesics used, and also in the pain scores referred by patients. The percentage of patients in each centre who suffered severe to unbearable pain varied from 22 to 67%. CONCLUSIONS: In Spain many patients still suffer severe pain after abdominal surgery, and this seems to be due to an inadequate use of analgesics. Wide interhospital variability in the management of postoperative pain and in its prevalence was also recorded.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

[Multicenter study of the variability and adequacy of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in adults].

We performed a study to evaluate the variability and adequacy of prescribing antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in 10 Spanish hospitals. We studied 452 patients with CAP. Initial empirical administration of antibiotics was prescribed in 90.7% of the cases, 82.5% as monotherapy. Macrolides and third and second generation cephalosporins were the most widely used groups of antibiotics. Penicillin and amoxicillin were only prescribed in 1. 7% of the patients. A significant variability between hospitals was observed. Reference patterns for the use of antibiotics in CAP were devised by a panel of experts. According to the recommendations of this panel, 29% of the total prescriptions were not adequate, with this percentage reaching 65% in outpatients older than 65 years or with comorbidity. This was mainly due to the fact that monotherapy with erythromycin, which was considered inadequate, was the most widely prescribed treatment.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Multicenter study of the variability and adequacy of antimicrobial therapy for community-acquired pneumonia in adults]

We performed a study to evaluate the variability and adequacy of prescribing antibiotics in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in 10 Spanish hospitals. We studied 452 patients with CAP. Initial empirical administration of antibiotics was prescribed in 90.7% of the cases, 82.5% as monotherapy. Macrolides and third and second generation cephalosporins were the most widely used groups of antibiotics. Penicillin and amoxicillin were only prescribed in 1.7% of the patients. A significant variability between hospitals was observed. Reference patterns for the use of antibiotics in CAP were devised by a panel of experts. According to the recommendations of this panel, 29% of the total prescriptions were not adequate, with this percentage reaching 65% in outpatients older than 65 years or with comorbidity. This was mainly due to the fact that monotherapy with erythromycin, which was considered inadequate, was the most widely prescribed treatment.

Journal Article↗