PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Vegeto

Publications and source records attributed to A Vegeto.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1992

Advantages of cyclosporine as sole immunosuppressive agent in children with transplanted kidneys.

A prospective study of intentional stopping of steroids 6 months after transplantation was done with 29 pediatric renal transplant recipients with a mean age of 10.4 +/- 3.4 years. Immunosuppression consisted of cyclosporine and methylprednisolone. We stopped giving MP to 24 children: to twenty after six months, four after 11-20 months. "Crude graft survival" was 97% during a mean follow-up of 36.7 +/- 15 months. The rejection rate was 48% during the first 6 months and 29% in the period after stopping MP. At present, 20/24 children (83%) have remained on CsA alone (18 patients) or CsA and azathioprine (2 patients) during a mean follow-up of 30 +/- 17 months. CsA nephrotoxicity occurred in 20.6% of patients, gum hypertrophy in 45%, hypertrichosis in 24%, and neurological symptoms in two patients (6.8%). Linear growth significantly improved after stopping MP: mean catch-up growth for prepuberal children 1.38 height standard deviation score (HSDS) and for pubertal children 1.6 HSDS. Bone age did not increase more rapidly than chronologic age. Weight/height index (W/HI) also improved. There was also a significant reduction in the use of antihypertensive drugs. Calculated glomerular filtration rate was decreased, though not significantly, after stopping MP. Thus, when graft survival is good, stopping corticosteroids corrects the major handicap of children with irreversible uremia--the poor linear growth--and improves the W/HI and control of arterial pressure. Longer follow-up periods are necessary to exclude significant worsening of renal function and an increased incidence of chronic rejection after stopping the steroid.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1991

A randomized prospective trial comparing cyclosporine monotherapy with triple-drug therapy in renal transplantation.

In a prospective trial 151 recipients of renal transplants were randomly assigned to treatment with CsA alone (74 patients) and to low dose of AZA, prednisolone, and CsA (77 patients). At two years, graft survival was 84% for the monotherapy and 90% for the triple therapy. This difference was not statistically significant. The number of rejection episodes was similar in the two groups, but the severity of rejection was significantly worse among the patients on monotherapy. More kidneys were lost because of rejection (6 versus 3), and a higher number of methylprednisolone pulses was used for treating rejection (5.2 +/- 2.3 versus 4.3 +/- 2.9; P = 0.0077). CsA nephrotoxicity episodes were more frequent among patients on monotherapy (23 versus 7; P less than 0.02). Infectious episodes were equally distributed between the two groups. Creatinine clearance was poorer in the monotherapy-treated patients at the third month (42 +/- 16 ml/min versus 48 +/- 15 ml/min; P = 0.02), but no differences were observed between the two groups since the sixth month after transplantation. Many patients on monotherapy required changes in maintenance therapy. In fact, one patient was switched to conventional immunosuppression because of Cremophor-induced anaphylaxis. Another patient who developed Kaposi's sarcoma 4 months after surgery was switched to steroids alone. Excluding 5 patients who lost their grafts a few days after transplantation, only 30 of 74 patients (40%) could be kept without steroids. We conclude that both the therapeutic protocols can give good results in renal allotransplantation; however, monotherapy could create some problems in keeping the balance between drug toxicity and significant immunosuppression. On the contrary, triple therapy is easier to handle, especially in the early posttransplant period when the differential diagnosis between acute rejection and CsA-related nephrotoxicity can be difficult even for a skilled clinician.

Adult↗
PubMed1990

Prolactin, thymulin and zinc in chronic hemodialysis: effect of renal transplant.

The interrelationships between PRL, thymulin and Zn, were studied in 25 patients with chronic renal failure (CRF) undergoing kidney transplantation and immunosuppressed with cyclosporine A (CsA). The possible role of serum PRL levels in predicting allograft rejection was also investigated. Before the kidney transplant serum PRL levels were significantly higher than in normals (mean +/- SE, 28.3 +/- 7.1 vs 7.5 +/- 0.6 micrograms/l, p less than 0.001) and their response to TRH (200 micrograms iv) was impaired (mean delta % at peak, 45.4 +/- 9.5 vs + 641 +/- 47.5, p less than 0.001). After kidney transplantation a dramatic decrease in serum PRL concentrations was observed in all patients, followed by a slight upward trend in the following two weeks, while TRH test administered on 3rd, 7th and 14th day, induced a progressive increase in serum PRL responses (delta % at peak, 201 +/- 43.3, 220 +/- 37.1 and 305 +/- 15.5, respectively). No difference in serum PRL patterns was observed between patients with (8 cases) and without (17 cases) clinical features and kidney fine needle biopsies suggestive of rejection. Basal serum Zn levels of patients with CRF (18.1 +/- 0.6 mumol/l) were similar to those observed in normals (17.7 +/- 0.2 mumol/l) and without any correlation with serum PRL levels. A decrement in serum Zn was recorded during CsA infusion and on the first day after the surgery, followed by a slight and slow upward trend. Basal serum thymulin titers were low [2.92 +/- 0.18 (1/log2)], were further reduced after CsA infusion [1.68 +/- 0.15 (1/log2)] and returned to the pretransplant levels in the two weeks after grafting.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

The Milan clinical trial with cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. A three-year follow-up.

Between February and November 1983, 108 recipients of cadaveric renal transplants entered a randomized multicenter trial and were treated either with cyclosporine (CsA) and prednisone (n = 55) or with conventional treatment based on azathioprine (Aza) and glucocorticoids (n = 53). The graft survival probability at 3 years was 76% for CsA patients and 48% for Aza patients (P less than 0.001). The cumulative number of acute rejections was significantly lower in the CsA group (32 vs. 104, P less than 0.001). Incidence of early posttransplant anuria was similar in both groups and did not affect renal function after three years. Nephrotoxicity in CsA patients, when present, was handled by reducing the dose of CsA, but in 12/55 patients a change to conventional therapy was thought to be necessary. However, in this group of 12, one patient lost the allograft because of irreversible rejection and one patient died 14 months later because of an infection. Mean creatinine clearance after three years was significantly lower in the CsA patients (54.7 +/- 2.6 ml/min) than in Aza patients, (67.2 +/- 4.9 ml/min, P less than 0.05). Considering only patients with grafts functioning after three years and still on the original randomized therapy, the mean creatinine clearance was similarly and significantly decreased from 1 to 3 years in both groups. There were no significant differences in occurrence of severe infections. Side effects such as hypertension, hypertrichosis, tremor and gum hyperplasia were more frequent in CsA patients.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1988

A randomized trial comparing triple-drug and double-drug therapy in renal transplantation.

A controlled trial was carried out in 86 cadaveric and 14 living haploidentical renal transplant recipients to compare the effects of low doses of cyclosporine (CsA), azathioprine (Aza) and steroids with those of higher doses of CsA plus steroids. Patients were followed for 12-26 months after transplantation. The actuarial 2-year patient and graft survival rate was 100% for living-donor transplants. In cadaver renal transplants the 2-year patient survival rate was 100% for patients assigned to the triple regimen and 93% for those allocated to the double regimen. The actuarial 2-year cadaver graft survival rates were 86% and 90.6%, respectively. There were significantly more patients who had severe infections (P less than 0.05), particularly interstitial pneumonia (P less than 0.005), in the double-therapy group. On the other hand, there were more patients who rejected and more patients with severe rejections; more pulses of steroids were also required for patients on the triple regimen, although these differences were not significant. The mean trough blood levels of cyclosporine at the various times were about half as high in patients on triple therapy. There were no differences between the two groups in creatinine clearance at any time. A control renal biopsy, taken from patients with stable renal function after 6-12 months, showed only mild abnormalities. The lesions were semiquantitatively assessed. There was a higher score for interstitial infiltrate in patients on triple therapy (P less than 0.05). On the other hand, the incidence and the mean score of interstitial fibrosis were greater in patients on double therapy, although these differences were not significant. Thus, although similar results were obtained with both regimens, at the doses we used double therapy seems to have more powerful immunosuppressive effects and may prevent rejection, either acute or chronic, better. However, it might expose the patient to a greater risk of infection and of cyclosporine-related nephrotoxicity than triple therapy.

Acute Kidney Injury↗
PubMed1985

Controlled trial of two different methylprednisolone doses in cadaveric renal transplantation.

In a controlled trial the effects of two different methylprednisolone (MP) schedules were studied in 100 cadaver kidney adult recipients followed for 18-46 months. Group A patients were given 160 mg/day i.v. for 3 days, then oral MP (0.8 mg/kg/day), which was tapered by 4 mg/week to a maintenance dose of 16 mg/day up to the 6th month. Group B patients were given 80 mg/day i.v. for 3 days followed by 0.4 mg/kg/day oral MP; the dose was reduced by 2 mg/week to 16 mg/day. In both groups, the dose was further reduced bimonthly to a final dose of 8 mg/day. No significant differences were evidenced between the two groups in patients and kidney survival or in the incidence of complications. The number of patients with at least one rejection episode was significantly higher in the lower dose group.

Adult↗