PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A Zoppi

Publications and source records attributed to A Zoppi.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1997

Effect of a westward transmeridian flight on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in normotensive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a westward transmeridian flight over six time zones (from Milan to New York) on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in normotensive individuals. METHODS: Eighteen normotensive subjects (blood pressure < 140/90 mmHg), 11 men and seven women, of mean age 38.3 years, were studied. On the day of travel they underwent 26 h noninvasive ABPM (started at 1100 h); the take-off time was 1200 h and the landing time was 8 h later, at 1400 h New York time (2000 h Italian time). Subjects were requested not to sleep until 2300 h and to get up at 0700 h the following morning. The results were compared with those of a 26 h ABPM performed in Italy the week before during which they slept from 2300 h to 0700 h. RESULTS: During the flight blood pressure and heart rate did not change compared with values during the corresponding time interval of the control day. After the landing, during the New York afternoon and evening (corresponding to the Italian sleeping time), blood pressure and heart rate remained unchanged, whereas during the night they decreased significantly, although their drop was less pronounced than that during the control day. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the decrease in blood pressure during sleep is the result of sleep itself rather than of the actual time of day.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Fixed combination of benazepril and low-dose amlodipine in the treatment of mild to moderate essential hypertension: evaluation by 24-hour noninvasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring.

The antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a fixed combination of benazepril (10 mg) and low-dose amlodipine (2.5 mg) were assessed in 24 patients (mean age, 43.9 years) with uncomplicated mild to moderate essential hypertension [supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or = 95 and < or = 120 mm Hg)]. After 2 weeks of washout taking placebo, patients were randomized to receive the fixed combination or placebo, both administered once daily for 3 weeks, according to a double-blind, crossover design. Patients were checked at the end of the washout period and every 3 weeks thereafter. At each visit, 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed by a noninvasive device (Spacelabs 90207); casual BP (by mercury sphygmomanometer), heart rate (HR), and body weight also were measured. The fixed combination significantly reduced systolic (SBP) and DBP values throughout the 24 h as compared with placebo, without affecting the normal BP circadian variability. The antihypertensive effect of the fixed combination could be observed to a similar extent during the day and night and was still significant 24 h after dosing. HR and body weight were not affected by the treatment. The fixed combination of benazepril 10 mg/amlodipine 2.5 mg was well tolerated, and no patient withdrew from the study because of side effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Combined therapy with benazepril and amlodipine in the treatment of hypertension inadequately controlled by an ACE inhibitor alone.

In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of the combination of benazepril, 10 mg, and amlodipine, 2.5 or 5 mg once daily, compared with benazepril, 10 mg, monotherapy in patients with hypertension inadequately controlled with angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)-inhibitor monotherapy. After a 2-week placebo and 4-week single-blind benazepril, 10 mg once daily, run-in period, 448 patients, 213 men and 235 women, aged 24-73 years (mean, 55 years), with mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) > or =95 and < or =120 mm Hg at the end of the benazepril run-in period, were randomized to receive one of the following treatments once daily for 8 weeks: (a) benazepril, 10 mg, plus placebo (BZ10); (b) benazepril, 10 mg, plus amlodipine, 2.5 mg (BZ10/AML2.5); or (c) benazepril, 10 mg, plus amlodipine, 5 mg (BZ10/AML5). Before the patients were admitted to the trial, at the end of the placebo run-in and the benazepril run-in period and at the end of weeks 4 and 8 of the treatment period, sitting and standing blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and body weight were measured 22-26 h after the intake of the trial medication. Both BZ10/AML2.5 and BZ10/AML5 combinations showed better antihypertensive activity than did BZ10 monotherapy at the terminal visit as demonstrated by (a) the 24-h postdosing sitting and standing systolic BP (SBP) and DBP values, which were statistically lower with combination therapy than with BZ10; (b) the success rate, which was statistically higher with both the combinations (69.2% in the BZ10/AML2.5 and 65.8% in the BZ10/AML5 group) compared with the BZ10 group (40.5%). The tolerability was good in the three treatment groups. No significant abnormal laboratory data were detected. There was no difference in efficacy and safety/tolerability between the BZ10/AML2.5 and BZ10/AML5 groups.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

Effect of bedtime melatonin ingestion on blood pressure of normotensive subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the evening intake of 5 mg melatonin affects 24 h arterial blood pressure and heart-rate profiles. METHODS: Twenty-one young normotensive subjects were administered placebo or melatonin for 4 weeks, according to a cross-over double-blind design, and were subjected to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring on the first and last days of each treatment period. RESULTS: The chronic melatonin intake caused a decrease in systolic blood pressure throughout the 24 h period (109.1+/- 7.2 versus 113.6 +/- 8.15 mmHg, P < 0.05), a decrease in diastolic blood pressure (by 6.4 mmHg, P < 0.05) limited to the second half of the night, a slight lowering of the heart rate during the diurnal hours (78.6 +/- 7.6 versus 81.5 +/- 10.1 beats/min, P < 0.05) and an acceleration of a similar degree during the second half of the night. The slight hypotensive action and the diurnal heart-rate lowering may be explained theoretically in terms of various complex and synergistic mechanisms that so far have been verified only in experimental studies on animals. The etiology of the nocturnal heart-rate acceleration remains unknoiwn. Further controlled studies are needed in order to better understand the cardiovascular effects of melatonin and to evaluate possible pharmacologic interactions. CONCLUSION:

Journal Article↗
PubMed1997

Comparative study of acipimox and pravastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the lipid-lowering effect of acipimox as compared to pravastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. One hundred and six subjects, all males, aged 18-60 years, with total cholesterol (TC) > or = 200 mg/dl, TC/HDL-C ratio > or = 5, triglycerides (TG) > or = 200 and > or = 350 mg/dl were randomized to receive acipimox 250 mg thrice daily or pravastatin 20 mg once daily for 3 months, according to a double-blind, double-dummy design. After a 1-month wash-out period patients were crossed to the alternative regimen for further 3 months. Prior to and at the end of each treatment period, TC, LDL-C, HDL-C, TG, blood glucose, and fibrinogen were evaluated. Both acipimox and pravastatin significantly decreased TC, LDL-C, TC/HDL-C ratio and TG and increased HDL-C, without affecting plasma glucose. However, at the dosages employed in the study acipimox was more effective in reducing TG and increasing HDL-C levels, whereas pravastatin was more efficient in decreasing TC and LDL-C. There was no difference between the 2 treatments in their effects on TC/HDL-C ratio. Unlike pravastatin acipimox caused a slight but significant reduction in fibrinogen plasma levels. No serious adverse event was observed with either drug, but a major incidence of side-effects was reported during treatment with acipimox. Our findings suggest that, although both drugs at the standard dose employed in the study were effective in improving the lipid profile; in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia acipimox might be preferable in the presence of more pronounced hypertriglyceridemia with low levels of HDL-C, whereas pravastatin might be more useful when hypercholesterolemia is predominant.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The epidemiology of resting heart rate in a male working population: association with blood pressure, age, smoking habits and other cardiovascular risk factors.

AIM: To evaluate heart rate and its relationship with some established cardiovascular risk factors in normotensive and hypertensive individuals. METHODS: We studied 881 1 men, 696 with essential hypertension and 8115 with normal blood pressure, stratified in four age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49 and 50-59 years. Clinical evaluation included measures of heart rate (by pulse palpation), blood pressure (by mercury sphygmomanometer), total cholesterol, triglycerides, blood glucose and fibrinogen, and details of medical history and personal habits, with particular regard to smoking habits. RESULTS: Heart rate, which was significantly higher in hypertensive than in normotensive individuals, showed no significant change with age in the normotensive group, but a slight decline with increasing age in those with hypertension. In the normotensive group, heart rate was significantly higher in smokers than in non-smokers and ex-smokers, and showed no significant variation with increasing age, independently of smoking habits. Among those with hypertension, heart rate was not statistically different in smokers, non-smokers and ex-smokers, and showed a moderate decrease with age in non-smokers and ex-smokers, but did not change with age in smokers. CONCLUSIONS: Both ageing and smoking habits have different effects on heart rate in normotensive and hypertensive individuals.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Effects of a restricted sleep regimen on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in normotensive subjects.

The influence of sleep deprivation during the first part of the night on 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was studied in 18 normotensive subjects. They underwent two ABPM, one week apart: during the first, they slept from 11 PM to 7 AM, and during the second, from 2 AM to 7 AM. The main differences were observed at dawn, before awakening, when SBP and DBP significantly decreased (P < .01) in the restricted sleep regimen, and during the morning after the recovery sleep, when SBP and HR significantly increased (P < .05). The explanation for these findings is not obvious. We suppose that the decrease in SBP and DBP at dawn might be due to a reorganization of the sleep phases in the restricted sleep regimen, whereas the increase in SBP and HR after awakening might be due to a greater sympathetic activation, as though sleep deprivation was a stressful condition.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Repeated office blood pressure controls reduce the prevalence of white-coat hypertension and detect a group of white-coat normotensive patients.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether repeated office blood pressure controls may change the prevalence of white-coat hypertension among hypertensive patients. METHODS: We studied 221 newly diagnosed, never-treated hypertensive patients, all men, aged 31-60 years. On the first visit, they underwent sitting blood pressure measurements (two readings were taken by mercury sphygmomanometer and averaged) and non-invasive 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) every 15 min. Thereafter, each patient made four further visits over an 8-week period. On each visit, three sitting readings were taken and averaged. On the last visit, ABPM was performed again. Subjects who had hypertension in the clinic but whose daytime ambulatory blood pressure was less than 134/90 mmHg were considered to have white-coat hypertension. RESULTS: On the first visit, all patients were, by definition, clinically hypertensive and ABPM detected a prevalence of white-coat hypertension of 25.8%. On the following visits, the prevalence of clinical hypertensive patients progressively declined; on the last visit, the 82.3% of all patients resulted yet clinical hypertensive: on ambulatory blood pressure 71.9% were sustained hypertensives, whereas 10.4 had white-coat hypertension. Of the patients originally labelled as hypertensive, 17.7% proved to be clinically normotensive: 13.6% had also daytime ambulatory blood pressure in the normal range, whereas 4.1% showed elevated blood pressure during daytime ABPM (white-coat normotensives). CONCLUSION: These data suggest that repeated office blood pressure controls in newly diagnosed hypertensives reduce the number of office hypertensive patients, reduce the number of white-coat hypertensive patients and detect a small group of white-coat normotensive patients.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

Cigarette smoking and blood pressure in a worker population: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Cigarette smoking has been reported to cause an acute increase in blood pressure (BP). Nevertheless, many epidemiological studies have found lower average BP values in smokers than in non-smokers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the possible existence of a systematic difference in BP values between smokers and non-smokers in a worker population. METHODS: We studied 7109 employees of a metallurgical factory, all men, aged 18-60 years, 3237 non-smokers and 3872 smokers; of the latter, 816 smoked less than 10 cigarettes per day (light smokers), the others smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day. Clinical examination included measures of resting BP (by mercury sphygmomanometer), heart rate (HR) (by pulse palpation), body weight and height. Data were adjusted for age and body mass index (BMI). Four age groups (18-30, >30, >40 and >50 years) and 3 BMI groups (< 25, 25-30, >30) were considered. RESULTS: In smokers, the adjusted values of systolic BP (SBP) and HR (127.72 mmHg and 75.16 beats/min, respectively) were slightly but significantly higher than in non-smokers (127.1 mmHg, P < 0.05 and 72.64 beats/min, P < 0.001), whereas diastolic BP (DBP) was significantly lower (83.37 versus 84.31 mmHg, P < 0.001). Considering the amount of cigarettes smoked, the mean BP values of light smokers were not significantly different from those of subjects smoking 10 or more cigarettes per day, whereas HR mean values were significantly higher in the latter. The prevalence of hypertension (WHO criteria) was similar in smokers and non-smokers in each age group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data showed slightly but statistically higher SBP and HR, and lower DBP mean values in smokers than in non-smokers; however, the differences in BP, although significant from the statistical point of view, were not of actual clinical significance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Evaluation of nocturnal blood pressure by the Multi-P Analysis of 24-hour ambulatory monitoring.

Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) is utilized to identify "dippers" and "non dippers" among hypertensives. Such a classification has either prognostic or therapeutical implications. Rigid definitions of nocturnal time period (e.g., from 10 p.m. to 7 a.m.) may not correspond to actual sleep patterns, and thus may lead to faulty interpretations. In our study, we analyzed 32 ABPM; diurnal and nocturnal blood pressure (BP) were assessed by three different ways: the patients' diary method; fixed intervals utilized by Spacelabs software; Multi-P Analysis (MPA) of the data. MPA method proved to be effective to evaluate nocturnal BP values. In comparison with Spacelabs program, it seems to define more precisely nocturnal BP, which differs less from the real sleep-time values. This modifies the percentage of dippers, which is greater than that obtained by Spacelabs program and equal to that calculated by the patients reported nocturnal sleep intervals. These results suggest that MPA method may be a contribution to a better definition of nocturnal BP.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Evaluation by 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring of efficacy of manidipine hydrochloride 10, 20 or 40 mg once daily as compared to placebo in treating mild to moderate essential hypertension: a double-blind, randomized, parallel group, placebo-controlled study.

In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study the ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) and relative tolerability of different doses of manidipine hydrochloride (10, 20 and 40 mg) were compared to placebo in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. After an initial 2-week run-in period on placebo, 52 patients, 32 males and 20 females, aged 40 to 63 years, were randomized to receive manidipine 10 mg, 20 mg, 40 mg or placebo, all administered once daily for 4 weeks. Patients were checked after the initial placebo phase and every 2 weeks thereafter. At each visit, casual BP and HR were measured. At the end of the placebo period and after 4 weeks of active treatment, non-invasive 24-h ABPM was performed. 24-h, day-time and night-time ambulatory BP as well as the area under the curve (AUC) and casual BP were dose-dependently reduced by manidipine 10, 20 and 40 mg, without changes in the normal BP circadian profile. The trough:peak ratio for both SBP and DBP was higher than 50% for all three manidipine dosage regimens. The percentage of abnormal ambulatory SBP and DBP readings was significantly reduced in all manidipine-treated groups versus placebo. The risk/benefit ratio suggests that the intermediate manidipine dosage (20 mg) could be a suitable dose regimen for the majority of patients with mild to moderate hypertension.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Efficacy and tolerability of manidipine hydrochloride in the long-term treatment of mild-moderate hypertension. Manidipine Efficacy in Long-Term Treatment Group.

The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of manidipine hydrochloride, a new calcium-antagonist of the dihydropyridine group, in the long-term treatment of mild to moderate hypertension. After a 2-week run-in period on placebo, 183 patients, 98 males and 85 females, with mean age of 53.8 years, sitting DBP > or = 95 and < or = 115 mmHg and SBP < or = 210 mmHg, were given manidipine 10 mg once daily. Two weeks later, patients whose DBP was > or = 90 mmHg or with a reduction in DBP < 10 mmHg were administered with manidipine 20 mg once daily. Follow-up visits were performed at 6, 10, 14, 26, 38 and 52 weeks after starting manidipine treatment. All BP (by mercury sphygmomanometer, Korotkoff I and V) and heart rate (HR) measures were made 24 h after dosing. Adverse events and laboratory data were recorded. Particular attention was paid to the collection of possible major cardiovascular (angina pectoris, myocardial infarction) and cerebrovascular (IRA, stroke) events, observed during the treatment period. One-hundred-and-fifty-one patients completed the study (79 on a 10 mg dose and 72 on a 20 mg dose), whereas 32 dropped out (11 lost to follow-up, 11 insufficient therapeutic response, 7 ADRs, 3 other causes). Significant reductions of BP values were achieved during the manidipine 10 mg treatment period. Analysis of covariance between doses confirmed a more potent hypotensive effect of manidipine 20 mg as compared to 10 mg on sitting DBP and mean BP and on standing SBP, especially in patients with moderate hypertension. At the end of 1 year of treatment the success rates (defined as sitting DBP > or = 90 mmHg or a reduction of > or = 10 mmHg vs baseline) were similar in the two groups (manidipine 10 mg: 96.1%; manidipine 20 mg: 94.5%). No clinically relevant change in HR was observed. Overall, 28 patients (17 in the manidipine 20 mg and 11 in the manidipine 10 mg treated group) complained of adverse events, the most common being ankle oedema (4.9%), headache (3.8%), palpitation (2.7%) and flushing (2.2%). Neither cardiovascular nor cerebrovascular events or other serious adverse event were reported. In conclusion, a significant and constant reduction of BP values was observed with long-term treatment with manidipine. The reduction in BP was dose-related especially in patients suffering from moderate hypertension. Adverse events were mild and relatively more frequent with the higher manidipine dosage.

Antihypertensive Agents↗
PubMed1995

Community control of hypertension at work-site: epidemiological data of the Agusta project.

In order to set up a program of community control of hypertension at the work site, 8811 employees belonging to 12 factories of the same company (Agusta SpA, Italy) were screened. Seven hundred and seventy-two subjects (8%) were found to be hypertensive; 48% of them were hypercholesterolemic, 44% were smokers, 5% presented with hyperglycemia and 4% had left ventricular hypertrophy. Multiple regression analysis showed a significant correlation between hypertension and age, hypercholesterolemia, body mass index, occupational exposure to noise exceeding 80 dB and, below the age of 40 years, the type of job. Seven hundred and twenty-nine hypertensives were assigned to pharmacological treatment. This group of patients will be followed up for 3 years.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Effects of lisinopril vs hydralazine on left ventricular hypertrophy and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in essential hypertension.

In order to compare the long-term effects on ambulatory blood pressure and left ventricular hypertrophy of hydralazine and lisinopril we studied 30 patients, all males, still hypertensive (diastolic blood pressure > or = 95 mm Hg) despite combined beta-blocker/diuretic therapy and with echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index > or = 1.31 g.m(-1)). They wer randomized to receive hydralazine slow release 50 mg/ chlorthalidone 12.5 mg) for 6 months. Casual blood pressure, non-invasive ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), M-mode echocardiogram, plasma renin activity and plasma catecholamines were evaluated before the randomization and after 6 months of treatment. Both drugs significantly reduced casual as well as daytime systolic and diastolic blood pressure, without statistical differences between the two treatments. Lisinopril was significantly more effective than hydralazine in reducing night-time systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Plasma norepinephrine was significantly reduced by lisinopril and increased by hydralazine. Left ventricular mass was significantly reduced by lisinopril but not by hydralazine. The results of linear regression and multiple regression analysis suggested that the lisinopril-induced decrease in both day- and night-time blood pressure might account for the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy, whereas the lack of left ventricular hypertrophy regression during hydralazine treatment could be due mainly to the reflex sympathetic activation induced by the drug.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1995

Effects of different antihypertensive drugs on plasma fibrinogen in hypertensive patients.

1. In order to evaluate whether treatment with different antihypertensive drugs would affect plasma fibrinogen levels, 118 mild to moderate essential hypertensive subjects, all males, aged 18 to 65 years, were randomly treated with amlodipine 10 mg, atenolol 100 mg, hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg or lisinopril 20 mg, all given once daily for 8 weeks. 2. Before and after 8 weeks' treatment, blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), fibrinogen, total cholesterol (TC), HDL-C, LDL-C, triglycerides (TG), plasma glucose, plasma uric acid, serum creatinine and serum potassium were evaluated. 3. All four medications significantly reduced BP values, although the BP lowering effect of lisinopril, amlodipine and atenolol was significantly greater compared with that of hydrochlorothiazide. 4. Plasma fibrinogen levels were unaffected by atenolol, hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine, whereas they were significantly decreased by lisinopril (-11.2%, P = 0.002). This fibrinogen lowering effect was more evident in smokers (-17.7%) than in non smokers (-7.4%). 5. Atenolol and amlodipine did not significantly affect plasma lipids, hydrochlorothiazide increased TC, LDL-C and TG and reduced HDL-C; lisinopril increased HDL-C and decreased TC and LDL-C. 6. Hydrochlorothiazide increased plasma glucose and uric acid concentrations, which were unaffected by the other drugs. The diuretic also reduced serum potassium. 7. The results of this study indicate that lisinopril reduces levels of plasma fibrinogen and confirm that different antihypertensive drugs may elicit different metabolic effects, which may variously influence the overall risk profile of the hypertensive patients.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Comparative effects of ramipril and nitrendipine on albuminuria in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and impaired renal function.

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of ramipril and nitrendipine on urinary albumin excretion (UAE) in hypertensive patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and impaired renal function. Forty patients with mild hypertension with NIDDM and persistent albuminuria (> 300 mg/24h) were studied. After a 3-week run-in period on placebo, patients were randomly treated with ramipril 5 mg once daily or nitrendipine 20 mg once daily for 6 months, according to a double-blind design. Blood pressure (BP), UAE, creatinine clearance and glycosilated haemoglobin were evaluated at the end of the placebo period and after 1,3 and 6 months of active treatment. Both ramipril and nitrendipine significantly lowered BP values without affecting glucose homeostasis and renal function. Despite equivalent BP control, only ramipril afforded a significant reduction in UAE, thus suggesting that the antiproteinuric effect of ramipril is at least partially independent of its anti-hypertensive effect.

Aged↗
PubMed1995

Ketanserin effects on insulin sensitivity in nonobese, nondiabetic hypertensive patients: an evaluation by the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp technique.

The aim of this study was to assess the effects of ketanserin on insulin resistance in nondiabetic hypertensive patients. Eleven nonobese, nondiabetic mild to moderate hypertensives (6 males, 5 females, aged 39-59 years), after a 4 week run-in period on placebo, were treated with ketanserin 40 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. Blood pressure (BP) (by standard mercury sphygmomanometer) and insulin sensitivity (by the euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp technique) were evaluated at the end of the placebo period and at the end of the treatment period. Ketanserin produced a significant decrease in BP (from 160 +/- 13/100 +/- 4 mmHg to 146 +/- 10/89 +/- 5 mmHg p < 0.01). The amounts of exogenous glucose required to hold glucose levels constant during clamp were not changed by ketanserin as compared to placebo 34.5 +/- 3.5 g vs 33.8 +/- 3.1 g). The rate of glucose infusion required during the last 60 minutes of the clamp, used as an indicator of insulin sensitivity, was not different before and after treatment (5.52 +/- 0.41 mg/min/ kg vs 5.21 +/- 0.39mg/min/kg). These results suggest that in nonobese, nondiabetic hypertensive patients ketanserin monotherapy is effective in reducing BP values without affecting insulin sensitivity.

Adult↗