Biomedical subjects

A de Graeff

Publications and source records attributed to A de Graeff.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Telephone consultation in palliative care for cancer patients: 5 years of experience in The Netherlands.

GOALS OF WORK: To analyze cancer patient-related consultations of a telephone helpdesk (TH) for palliative care over a period of 5 years in the region of Utrecht, The Netherlands. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A descriptive analysis was performed of consultations over a period of 5 years (2001-2006). The discipline and location of requesting professionals, patient characteristics, reasons for calling, symptoms, palliative care problems and needs for support were registered. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,794 consultations were analyzed. There was an increasing number of consultations during the study period. Of the patients, 51% were male and their median age was 65 years (range 0-104). Eighty-four percent were treated at home by their general practitioner. Two thirds of the patients had a life expectancy <4 weeks. Most questions referred to pain (49%), delirium (20%), nausea and vomiting (16%) and dyspnea (12%). The median number of symptoms was 1 (0-6). Of the questions, 54% were related to pharmacological problems, 19% to psychological problems and 21% to the organization of care. Of the requesting professionals, 17% asked for support for themselves. Of the consultations, 14% were related to end-of-life issues: palliative sedation (11%) and euthanasia (3%). CONCLUSION: After more than 5 years, the 24-h telephone consultation service fulfills a need for general practitioners dealing with daily dilemmas in palliative care treatment for cancer patients at home during the last period of their life.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

The use of differential item functioning analyses to identify cultural differences in responses to the EORTC QLQ-C30.

INTRODUCTION: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 is a widely used health-related quality of life instrument. The main aim of this study is to investigate whether there are international differences in response to the questionnaire that can be explained by cultural factors. METHODS: Analyses involved a database of 106 separate studies including data from over 28,000 respondents. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses using logistic regression were conducted for each item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 with respect to cultural/geographic group. Results were qualitatively compared with previously reported DIF analyses by translation to explore whether the source of the DIF was more likely to be linguistic or cultural in nature. RESULTS: Although most response patterns were similar, there were a number of international differences in how the questionnaire was answered. The largest variations were found in the results for Eastern Europe and East Asia. Results for the UK, the US and Australia tended to be similar. Many of the European results followed patterns that were more clearly explained when grouped by translation than when grouped by geographical region. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that, in general, the EORTC QLQ-C30 is suitable for use in a wide variety of countries and settings. Some response variations that have the potential to affect the results of international studies were identified, but it was not always clear whether the source of the variation was primarily linguistic or cultural.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Comparing translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30 using differential item functioning analyses.

The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 is one of the most widely used quality of life instruments for cancer patients. The aim of this study was to assess whether there were linguistic differences in the way an international sample answered the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Thirteen translations of the EORTC QLQ-C30, representing 22 countries, were investigated using a database of 27,891 respondents, incorporating 103 separate studies. Differential item functioning (DIF) analyses were conducted using logistic regression to identify items which, after controlling for subscale, were answered differently by language of administration. Both uniform and non-uniform DIF were assessed. Although most languages showed similar results to English, at least one instance of statistically significant DIF was identified for each translation, and a few of these differences were large. In some cases, the patterns were supported by the results of qualitative interviews with bilingual people. Although, overall, there appeared to be good linguistic equivalence for most of the EORTC QLQ-C30 items, several scales showed strongly discrepant results for some translations. Some of these effects are large enough to impact on the results of clinical trials. Based on our experience in this study, we suggest that validation of translations of health-related quality of life instruments should include exploration of DIF.

Attitude to Health↗

PubMed2005

[Palliative sedation].

Palliative sedation is the intentional lowering of the level of consciousness ofa patient in the last phase of life by means of the administration of sedatives. The objective of palliative sedation is to relieve severe physical or psychological suffering that is otherwise untreatable. Sedation is used in 12% of all patients dying in the Netherlands. Refractory delirium, dyspnoea or pain are the most common indications. If deep palliative sedation is used, the estimated life expectancy should be a few days to at most one week. Midazolam is used most often for continuous sedation, usually by subcutaneous infusion; if the response is insufficient, a combination of midazolam with levomepromazine or phenobarbital or monotreatment with propofol may be used. If continuous infusion is not desired or feasible, intermittent administration of midazolam, diazepam, lorazepam or chlorpromazine may be considered. Provided that it is used under the right circumstances, palliative sedation does not shorten life.

Humans↗

PubMed2004

The content and amount of information given by medical oncologists when telling patients with advanced cancer what their treatment options are. palliative chemotherapy and watchful-waiting.

This study aimed to determine the content and the amount of information given by medical oncologists when proposing palliative chemotherapy and whether this information given is influenced by patient or physician background characteristics. In a prospective study, 95 patients with incurable cancer were interviewed before they consulted their medical oncologist. Their first consultation was audiotaped, and their eventual decision scored. A coding scheme comprised six categories of information given during the consultation. Medical oncologists mentioned or explained the disease course (53%), symptoms (35%) and prognosis (39%). Most patients were told about the absence of cure (84%). Watchful-waiting was mentioned to only half of the patients, either in one sentence (23%) or explained more extensively (27%). Multilevel analysis revealed that the patients' age, patient's marital status, and consulting in an academic hospital explained 38% of the amount of information given. Most of the physicians' attention is spent on the 'active' treatment option. Older patients, married patients and patients in academic hospitals receive more information.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Quality of life after pelvic exenteration.

OBJECTIVES: Pelvic exenteration, for gynecological and urological cancer, is an extensive and mutilating procedure. The 5-year survival rate is fairly good (40-60%), but little is known about the long-term quality of life. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, the quality of life was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires. RESULTS: Healthy females and those who underwent pelvic exenteration for a gynecological or urological malignancy reported comparable levels of emotional functioning and general quality of life. More physical, sexual, and social problems were, however, noted after exenteration. Younger patients and patients who underwent total pelvic exenteration had the most difficulty in adapting to daily life, disease, and treatment. They also had a worse body image, and the influence of the operation on their sex life was greater compared to other patient groups of this study. CONCLUSION: Despite the immense effect of pelvic exenteration on physical, sexual, and social functioning, women who underwent this procedure reported similar levels of emotional functioning and general quality of life compared to healthy women. Adaptation and the mechanism of response shift presumably play an important role.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Palliative chemotherapy or best supportive care? A prospective study explaining patients' treatment preference and choice.

In palliative cancer treatment, the choice between palliative chemotherapy and best supportive care may be difficult. In the decision-making process, giving information as well as patients' values and preferences become important issues. Patients, however, may have a treatment preference before they even meet their medical oncologist. An insight into the patient's decision-making process can support clinicians having to inform their patients. Patients (n=207) with metastatic cancer, aged 18 years or older, able to speak Dutch, for whom palliative chemotherapy was a treatment option, were eligible for the study. We assessed the following before they consulted their medical oncologist: (1) socio-demographic characteristics, (2) disease-related variables, (3) quality-of-life indices, (4) attitudes and (5) preferences for treatment, information and participation in decision-making. The actual treatment decision, assessed after it had been made, was the main study outcome. Of 207 eligible patients, 140 patients (68%) participated in the study. At baseline, 68% preferred to undergo chemotherapy rather than wait watchfully. Eventually, 78% chose chemotherapy. Treatment preference (odds ratio (OR)=10.3, confidence interval (CI) 2.8-38.0) and a deferring style of decision-making (OR=4.9, CI 1.4-17.2) best predicted the actual treatment choice. Treatment preference (total explained variance=38.2%) was predicted, in turn, by patients' striving for length of life (29.5%), less striving for quality of life (6.1%) and experienced control over the cause of disease (2.6%). Patients' actual treatment choice was most strongly predicted by their preconsultation treatment preference. Since treatment preference is positively explained by striving for length of life, and negatively by striving for quality of life, it is questionable whether the purpose of palliative treatment is made clear. This, paradoxically, emphasises the need for further attention to the process of information giving and shared decision-making.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients.

The importance of patient involvement in medical decision making is indisputable. Yet, decision making concerning medical treatment options is a difficult task for most patients. In order to study decision-making processes in health care, O'Connor developed the decisional conflict scale (DCS). The DCS assesses the level of 'decisional conflict' that patients experience while making health care decisions, and encompasses the following three subscales: (1) uncertainty about choosing among alternatives; (2) factors contributing to uncertainty; (3) perceived effectiveness of the decision. The aim of the present study is to investigate the reliability and validity of the Dutch version of the DCS. A written version of the DCS was administered in two samples of Dutch cancer patients. One sample consisted of cancer patients faced with the decision whether or not to undergo palliative chemotherapy (N=29). The other sample included women with early stage breast cancer who had to choose between mastectomy or lumpectomy followed by radiation therapy (N=141). The response rates were 76% and 91%, respectively. The reliability coefficients of the three subscales were 0.52, 0.80, 0.84, and 0.74, 0.83, 0.83 in the two samples, respectively. Construct validity was partly supported. Criterion validity was substantiated. In evaluating the factorial validity, it was found that the original three-factor model had to be rejected (chi(2)(87)=293, root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA)=0.137). A subsequent exploratory factor analysis suggested an alternative four-factor model. The psychometric properties of the DCS were partly confirmed in Dutch cancer patients. Improved 'wording' of certain items, e.g. to avoid double negatives, could further increase the factorial validity of the DCS. Then, this scale may be a valuable tool for studies that address the quality of medical decision making.

Conflict, Psychological↗

PubMed2001

Prediction of depression 6 months to 3 years after treatment of head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer and its treatment can have important psychosocial implications. Many patients become depressed. The aim of this prospective study is to examine whether pretreatment variables can be used to predict depression up to 3 years after treatment. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients (n = 197) treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy completed both before and after treatment a questionnaire including items on social support, coping, depressive symptoms, physical functioning, and physical symptoms. RESULTS: Eight pretreatment variables (tumor stage, sex, depressive symptoms, openness to discuss cancer in the family, available appraisal support, received emotional support, tumor-related symptoms, and size of the informal social network) were used to calculate a risk score to determine which patients were depressed at 6 months to 3 years after treatment (positive predicted value, 58%; negative predicted value, 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Eight pretreatment variables can be used to predict accurately those head and neck cancer patients who are likely to become depressed up to 3 years after treatment.

Depression↗

PubMed2001

Sociodemographic factors and quality of life as prognostic indicators in head and neck cancer.

Pre-treatment quality of life (QOL) has been found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival in cancer patients, in particular in patients with advanced cancer. Sociodemographic factors such as marital and socioeconomic status have also been recognised as prognostic factors. We studied the influence of QOL and mood (measured with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) and the Head and Neck Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-H&N35), and with the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale (CES-D)) as measured before treatment, the use of cigarettes and alcohol and sociodemographic factors (age, gender, marital status, income and occupation) on recurrence and survival in 208 patients with head and neck cancer prior to treatment with surgery and/or radiotherapy, using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Cognitive functioning and, to a lesser degree, marital status were independent predictors of recurrence and survival, along with medical factors (stage and radicality). Patients with less than optimal cognitive functioning and unmarried patients had a relative risk (RR) of recurrence of 1.72 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.01-2.93) and 1.85 (95% CI 1.06-3.33), respectively, and a RR of dying of 1.90 (95% CI 1.10-3.26) and 1.82 (95% CI 1.03-3.23), respectively. Performance status, physical functioning, mood and global QOL and smoking and drinking did not predict for recurrence and survival. The influence of cognitive functioning might be related to the use of alcohol. Marital status may influence prognosis through mechanisms of health behaviour and/or social support mechanisms.

Alcohol Drinking↗

PubMed2000

Pretreatment factors predicting quality of life after treatment for head and neck cancer.

BACKGROUND: Quality of life (QOL) has become an important issue in head and neck cancer. Explanation of factors predicting QOL after treatment has important implications for patient management. METHODS: In this prospective study we analyzed which pretreatment factors predicted QOL after surgery and/or radiotherapy with curative intent in a cohort of 153 patients with cancer of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. The patients completed the EORTC Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later. The influence of gender, age, performance status, and depressive symptoms at baseline, site, stage, and treatment on QOL (and its dimensions) and depressive symptoms after 6 and 12 months was studied, using linear regression analysis. RESULTS: A high level of depressive symptoms and a low performance status at baseline and combination treatment were significant predictors of increased severity of symptoms and poor functioning after treatment. Treatment was a predictor of head and neck symptoms, whereas performance status and depressive symptoms were predictors of general symptoms and functioning. Gender and age had little predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with depressive symptoms or a low performance status who receive combination treatment for cancer of the head and neck are at risk for physical and psychologic morbidity after treatment. Special attention should be given to these patients in rehabilitation programs.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2000

Prediction of depressive symptomatology after treatment of head and neck cancer: the influence of pre-treatment physical and depressive symptoms, coping, and social support.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer and its treatment can have important psychosocial implications, and many patients become depressed. The aim of this prospective study is to examine whether pretreatment variables can be used to predict depression 6 and 12 months later. METHODS: Head and neck cancer patients (155) treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy completed a questionnaire including items on social support, coping, depressive symptoms, physical functioning, and physical symptoms before and after treatment. RESULTS: By using 5 variables (physical symptoms, depressive symptoms, emotional support, extent of the social network, and avoidance coping), it was possible to predict those patients who would have symptoms at 6 (81%) and 12 months (67%) after treatment. Inclusion of actual physical symptoms reported at follow-up increased these percentages to 89% and 82%. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that screening for psychosocial variables and physical symptoms before treatment can be used to determine which patients are at risk of developing depressive symptoms after treatment.

Adaptation, Psychological↗

PubMed2000

A 12 country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (EORTC QLQ-H&N35) in head and neck patients. EORTC Quality of Life Group.

This study tests the reliability and validity of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) head and neck cancer module (QLQ-H&N35) and version 3.0 of the EORTC Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in 622 head and neck cancer patients from 12 countries. The patients completed the QLQ-C30, the QLQ-H&N35 and a debriefing questionnaire before antineoplastic treatment or at a follow-up. 232 patients receiving treatment completed a second questionnaire after treatment. Compliance was high and the questionnaire was well accepted by the patients. Multitrait scaling analysis confirmed the proposed scale structure of the QLQ-H&N35. The QLQ-H&N35 was responsive to differences between disease status, site and patients with different Karnofsky performance status, and to changes over time. The new physical functioning scale (with a four-point response format) of version 3.0 of the QLQ-C30 was shown to be more reliable than previous versions. Thus, the QLQ-H&N35, in conjunction with the QLQ-C30, appears to be reliable, valid and applicable to broad multicultural samples of head and neck cancer patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Long-term quality of life of patients with head and neck cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To describe prospectively the long-term changes of quality of life and mood in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seven patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer Module, and the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale before treatment, and 6, 12, 24, and 36 months later. RESULTS: There was limited deterioration of physical and role functioning and of many head and neck symptoms at 6 months, with improvement thereafter. After 36 months only physical functioning, taste/ smell, dry mouth, and sticky saliva were significantly worse, compared with baseline. Female sex, higher cancer stage, and combination treatment were associated with more symptoms and worse functioning. Despite physical deterioration, there was a gradual improvement of depressive symptomatology and global quality of life. CONCLUSION: Treatment for head and neck cancer results in short-term morbidity, most of which resolves within 1 year. Despite an initially high level of depressive symptomatology, there is gradual improvement of psychological functioning and global quality of life over the course of 3 years. In this prospective study, the impact of the disease and its treatment in long-term survivors seems to be less severe than it is often assumed to be.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

[Sedation in the terminal phase of life].

In 2 patients, a woman aged 38 years and a man aged 48 years, in the terminal phase of life due to metastasized+ malignancy, palliative care failed. They suffered seriously from pain, delirium, restlessness, nausea, and fear. Deep sedation was given to induce almost continuous sleep without the intention of causing death. After one and five quiet days respectively the patients died. Deep sedation is an option when palliative care fails to diminish serious suffering. Midazolam, given by continuous subcutaneous infusion is the drug of choice.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A prospective study on quality of life of laryngeal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to describe prospectively quality of life and mood before and after radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with Tis-T3 laryngeal cancer treated with radiotherapy completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module, and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later. RESULTS: There was a significant but temporary deterioration of physical functioning, fatigue and most head and neck symptoms. Speech was the only symptom which improved. Patients with T2 tumors had significantly worse physical symptoms compared with patients with T1 tumors. There was a high level of depressive symptomatology at baseline, followed by an improvement after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: After radiotherapy for laryngeal cancer, a temporary deterioration of physical functioning and symptoms occurs, mostly caused by side effects of treatment. Despite physical deterioration, there is an improvement of emotional functioning and mood after treatment, probably as a result of psychological adaptation and coping processes.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

A prospective study on quality of life of patients with cancer of the oral cavity or oropharynx treated with surgery with or without radiotherapy.

The aim of this study was to describe prospectively quality of life and mood in patients with oral or oropharyngeal cancer treated with surgery +/- radiotherapy. Seventy-five patients completed the EORTC Core Questionnaire, the EORTC Head and Neck Cancer module and the Center for Epidemiologic Studies' Depression Scale before treatment and 6 and 12 months later. There was a significant deterioration of physical functioning, fatigue and almost all head and neck symptoms except pain, which improved. Patients with stage III/IV and patients receiving combined treatment had significantly worse physical symptoms compared to patients with stage I/II and patients treated with surgery only, respectively. Before and after treatment there was a high level of depressive symptomatology. However, after treatment a gradual improvement in emotional functioning occurred. Surgical treatment for oral or oropharyngeal cancer results in significant deterioration of physical functioning and symptoms during the first year, especially when combined with radiotherapy. Despite this, there is an improvement of emotional functioning after treatment, probably as a result of adaptation and coping processes.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Randomized study of a short course of weekly cisplatin with or without amifostine in advanced head and neck cancer. EORTC Head and Neck Cooperative Group.

BACKGROUND: Cisplatin is one of the most active cytotoxic agents available for the treatment of patients with head and neck cancer. In a previous phase II study with weekly administration of cisplatin, a response rate of 51% was achieved. However, only in a minority of the patients the planned high dose intensity of 80 mg/m2/week could be reached because of toxicity, mainly thrombocytopenia and ototoxicity. Amifostine is a cytoprotective drug that can diminish the toxicity of alkylating agents and platinum compounds. Therefore the effect of amifostine on toxicity and activity of weekly cisplatin was investigated in a randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer were eligible. Patients were randomized to weekly cisplatin 70 mg/m2 for six cycles preceded by amifostine 740 mg/m2, or cisplatin only. Cisplatin was administered in hypertonic saline (3% NaCl) as a one-hour infusion; amifostine was administered as a 15-minute infusion directly before the administration of cisplatin. RESULTS: Seventy-four patients were entered in the study. The median number of cisplatin administrations was 6 (range 2-6), equal in both arms. In both treatment arms the median dose intensity of cisplatin achieved was the planned 70 mg/m2/week. In the cisplatin only arm 6 out of 206 cycles were complicated by thrombocytopenia grade 3 or 4 versus 1 of 184 cycles in the amifostine arm (P = 0.035). Hypomagnesaemia grade 2 + 3 was significantly less observed in the amifostine arm (P = 0.04). Neurotoxicity analyzed by serial vibration perception thresholds (VPT) showed a diminished incidence of subclinical neurotoxicity in the amifostine arm (P = 0.03). No protective effect on renal and ototoxicity could be shown. Hypotension was the main side effect of amifostine but only of relevance in one patient. The antitumor activity of cisplatin was preserved as 63% of the evaluable patients in the amifostine arm responded compared to 50% of the evaluable patients in the cisplatin alone arm. CONCLUSION: Our study indicated that in combination with weekly administered cisplatin amifostine reduced the risk of thrombocytopenia, hypomagnesemia as well as subclinical neurotoxicity, but did not result in a higher dose intensity of cisplatin. Addition of amifostine did not compromise the antitumor effect of cisplatin.

Adult↗