PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

A van den Aarssen

Publications and source records attributed to A van den Aarssen.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Auto-ignition hazard of mixtures of ammonia, hydrogen, methane and air in a urea plant.

The auto-ignition of NH(3)/CH(4)/H(2)/air mixtures constitutes a hazard that is of much concern in urea plants. In this study, the auto-ignition behaviour of NH(3)/CH(4)/H(2)/air mixtures is investigated experimentally for pressures up to 7500 kPa. The experiments were carried out in a closed spherical vessel with a volume of 8 dm(3). The concentration and the pressure dependence of the auto-ignition temperature (AIT) were determined for four types of mixtures: NH(3)/air, NH(3)/CH(4)/air, NH(3)/H(2)/air and NH(3)/CH(4)/H(2)/air. The most ignitable NH(3)/air mixtures were situated between stoichiometry and the upper flammability limit. Small amounts of methane and hydrogen decrease the AIT of NH(3)/air mixtures to a large extent. The pressure dependence of the AIT could be correlated by a Semenov relationship. For the multi-fuel mixtures, a distinct deviation from the Semenov correlation was observed at the lowest temperatures. With respect to the explosion hazard in urea plants, the experimental results were used to assess realistic AIT values in the pool reactor and the ammonia scrubber, operating at a pressure of 15,000 kPa.

Ammonia↗

Interference between saccadic eye and goal-directed hand movements.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the nature of the interference effect when the eye is accompanied by a goal-directed hand movement rather than when the eye moves alone. Latencies of eye and hand movements in response to small and large visual target stimuli were measured while employing dual-task methodology. Experiments 1 and 2 were designed to investigate whether the interference effect is related to a specific temporal bottleneck, i.e. the eye and hand motor systems share limited available processes at a specific point in time. The findings of robust interference effects independent of the temporal organization of eye and hand contradicted this notion. The interference effect was not present in experiment 3, where response preparation and target-localization mechanisms were limited by providing subjects with advance information about target position. Experiment 4 employed randomized target positions again and highly salient stimuli, the latter only limiting target-localization processes. The absence of an interference effect adds weight to the argument that visual spatial attentional mechanisms involved in target localization constitute the locus of the interference. Neurophysiological implications of these findings are discussed.

Adult↗