PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Aasef G Shaikh

Publications and source records attributed to Aasef G Shaikh.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

Properties of cerebellar fastigial neurons during translation, rotation, and eye movements.

The most medial of the deep cerebellar nuclei, the fastigial nucleus (FN), receives sensory vestibular information and direct inhibition from the cerebellar vermis. We investigated the signal processing in the primate FN by recording single-unit activities during translational motion, rotational motion, and eye movements. Firing rate modulation during horizontal plane translation in the absence of eye movements was observed in all non-eye-movement-sensitive cells and 26% of the pursuit eye-movement-sensitive neurons in the caudal FN. Many non-eye-movement-sensitive cells recorded in the rostral FN of three fascicularis monkeys exhibited convergence of signals from both the otolith organs and the semicircular canals. At low frequencies of translation, the majority of these rostral FN cells changed their firing rates in phase with head velocity rather than linear acceleration. As frequency increased, FN vestibular neurons exhibited a wide range of response dynamics with most cells being characterized by increasing phase leads as a function of frequency. Unlike cells in the vestibular nuclei, none of the rostral FN cells responded to rotational motion alone, without simultaneously exhibiting sensitivity to translational motion. Modulation during earth-horizontal axis rotation was observed in more than half (77%) of the neurons, although with smaller gains than during translation. In contrast, only 47% of the cells changed their firing rates during earth-vertical axis rotations in the absence of a dynamic linear acceleration stimulus. These response properties suggest that the rostral FN represents a main processing center of otolith-driven information for inertial motion detection and spatial orientation.

Action Potentials↗

Neurons compute internal models of the physical laws of motion.

A critical step in self-motion perception and spatial awareness is the integration of motion cues from multiple sensory organs that individually do not provide an accurate representation of the physical world. One of the best-studied sensory ambiguities is found in visual processing, and arises because of the inherent uncertainty in detecting the motion direction of an untextured contour moving within a small aperture. A similar sensory ambiguity arises in identifying the actual motion associated with linear accelerations sensed by the otolith organs in the inner ear. These internal linear accelerometers respond identically during translational motion (for example, running forward) and gravitational accelerations experienced as we reorient the head relative to gravity (that is, head tilt). Using new stimulus combinations, we identify here cerebellar and brainstem motion-sensitive neurons that compute a solution to the inertial motion detection problem. We show that the firing rates of these populations of neurons reflect the computations necessary to construct an internal model representation of the physical equations of motion.

Animals↗

Multiple reference frames for motion in the primate cerebellum.

Knowledge of body motion through space is necessary for spatial orientation, self-motion perception, and postural control. Yet, sensory afferent signals may not directly provide such information to the brain. Because motion detected by the vestibular end organs is encoded in a head-fixed frame of reference, a coordinate transformation is thus required to encode body motion. In this study, we investigated whether cerebellar motion-sensitive neurons encode the translation of the body through space. We systematically changed both the direction of motion relative to the body and the static orientation of the head relative to the trunk. The activities of motion-sensitive neurons in the most medial of the deep cerebellar nuclei, the rostral fastigial nucleus, were compared with those in the brainstem vestibular nuclei. We found a distributed representation of reference frames for motion in the rostral fastigial nucleus, in contrast to cells in the vestibular nuclei, which primarily encoded motion in a head-fixed reference frame. This differential representation of motion-related information implies potential differences in the functional roles of these areas.

Acceleration↗

Hyperpolarization-activated (I(h)) conductances affect brainstem auditory neuron excitability.

Blockade of the hyperpolarization-activated cyclic-nucleotide-gated mixed-cationic conductance (I(h)) by ZD7288 markedly reduces excitability of neurons in the superior olivary complex (SOC), in vivo. Following pressure ejection application of 100 microM ZD7288, extracellular recorded single unit responses of 47/47 SOC neurons to monaural or binaural pure tone best frequency (BF) stimuli (30 dB above threshold) decreased by 49.7+/-19%, and background activity decreased by 56.3+/-18.1%. Pressure ejection of the vehicle did not affect excitability. The dose- and time-dependence of ZD7288 (10-100 microM) effects are consistent with specific blockade of I(h) currents. SOC neuron responses to pressure-ejected glutamate were also decreased following application of 100 microM ZD7288 by 76.7+/-28.0%, which suggests a predominant direct effect of ZD7288 on auditory cell excitability. The considerable variability in the magnitude of ZD7288 effects between cells was only partially accounted for by greater effects on neurons with BFs greater than 16 kHz. Therefore, I(h) channels significantly contribute to auditory brainstem neuron excitability, affecting their response level to acoustic stimuli. The variability in the ZD7288 reduction in excitability and its variation with the BF of units could be an indication of regulation and plasticity in neuronal encoding of sounds.

Acoustic Stimulation↗