Biomedical subjects

Abba M Krieger

Publications and source records attributed to Abba M Krieger.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

A stochastic framework for evaluating seizure prediction algorithms using hidden Markov models.

Responsive, implantable stimulation devices to treat epilepsy are now in clinical trials. New evidence suggests that these devices may be more effective when they deliver therapy before seizure onset. Despite years of effort, prospective seizure prediction, which could improve device performance, remains elusive. In large part, this is explained by lack of agreement on a statistical framework for modeling seizure generation and a method for validating algorithm performance. We present a novel stochastic framework based on a three-state hidden Markov model (HMM) (representing interictal, preictal, and seizure states) with the feature that periods of increased seizure probability can transition back to the interictal state. This notion reflects clinical experience and may enhance interpretation of published seizure prediction studies. Our model accommodates clipped EEG segments and formalizes intuitive notions regarding statistical validation. We derive equations for type I and type II errors as a function of the number of seizures, duration of interictal data, and prediction horizon length and we demonstrate the model's utility with a novel seizure detection algorithm that appeared to predicted seizure onset. We propose this framework as a vital tool for designing and validating prediction algorithms and for facilitating collaborative research in this area.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2006

Causal conclusions are most sensitive to unobserved binary covariates.

There is a rich literature that considers whether an observed relation between treatment and response is due to an unobserved covariate. In order to quantify this unmeasured bias, an assumption is made about the distribution of this unobserved covariate; typically that it is either binary or at least confined to the unit interval. In this paper, this assumption is relaxed in the context of matched pairs with binary treatment and response. One might think that a long-tailed unobserved covariate could do more damage. Remarkably that is not the case: the most harm is done by a binary covariate, so the case commonly considered in the literature is most conservative. This has two practical consequences: (i) it is always safe to assume that an unobserved covariate is binary, if one is content to make a conservative statement; (ii) when another assumption seems more appropriate, say normal covariate, there will be less sensitivity than with a binary covariate. This assumption implies that it is possible that a relation between treatment and response that is sensitive to unmeasured bias (if the unobserved covariate is dichotomous), ceases to be sensitive if the unobserved covariate is normally distributed. These ideas are illustrated by three examples. It is important to note that the claim in this paper applies to our specific setting of matched pairs with binary treatment and response. Whether the same conclusion holds in other settings is an open question.

Bias↗