PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Abid U Ghafoor

Publications and source records attributed to Abid U Ghafoor.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

Caring for the patients with cervical spine injuries: what have we learned?

PURPOSE: Anesthesiologists are often involved in the early management and resuscitation of patients who have sustained cervical spine injuries (CSIs). The most crucial step in managing a patient with suspected CSI is the prevention of further insult to the cervical spine (C-spine). In this review, important factors related to initial management, diagnosis, airway and anesthetic management of patients with CSI are presented. SOURCE: Medline search was performed to seek out the English-language literature using the following phrases and keywords: spine trauma; cervical spine; airway management after CSI. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Cervical spine injury occurs in up to 3% to 6% of all patients with trauma. The initial management of a patient with potential spine injury requires a high degree of suspicion for CSI so that early stabilization of the spine can be used to prevent further neurological damage. Diagnostic radiology has a critical role to play; however, clinical evaluation is equally important in excluding CSI in a conscious and cooperative patient. Although in-line stabilization reduces the movement at C-spine, traction causes clinically significant distraction and should be avoided. CONCLUSION: A high level of suspicion and anticipation are the major components of decision making and management in a patient with CSI. Endotracheal intubation using the Bullard laryngoscope may have some advantages over other techniques as it causes less head and C-spine extension than the conventional laryngoscope, and this results in a better view. However, the current opinion is that oral intubation using a Macintosh blade after intravenous induction of anesthesia and muscle relaxation along with inline stabilization is the safest and quickest way to achieve intubation in a patient with suspected CSI. In summation caution, close care and maintenance of spinal immobilization are more important factors in limiting the risk of secondary neurological injury than any particular technique.

Anesthesia↗

(+)-Methamphetamine-induced spontaneous behavior in rats depends on route of (+)METH administration.

These studies examined the role of (+)-methamphetamine ((+)METH) administration route on spontaneous behavioral activity vs. time relationships, and pharmacokinetic mechanisms for differences in effects. Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n=6 per administration route) received saline and three doses (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 mg/kg) of (+)METH in a mixed-sequence design by intravenous (iv), subcutaneous (sc) or intraperitoneal (ip) administration. Locomotion and stereotypy were quantified by video-tracking analysis. The effects of (+)METH on spontaneous behavior were dose- and route-dependent. In particular, total locomotor activity was greatest following 3.0 mg/kg intraperitoneally (P<0.05) and stereotypy ratings were greatest following 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneously (P<0.05). In addition, the duration of locomotor effects was greatest after 3.0 mg/kg subcutaneously (P<0.05). Serum pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in separate rats given 3.0 mg/kg by subcutaneous and intraperitoneal administration (n=4 per administration route). The (+)METH elimination half-life was not different between the routes, but the (+)METH AUC was greater (P<0.05), and the (+)METH and (+)-amphetamine (AMP) maximum concentrations occurred later following subcutaneous than after intraperitoneal dosing (P<0.05), increasing and prolonging drug exposure. In conclusion, the overall pattern of (+)METH effects on locomotor activity depend on dose and the route of administration, which affects serum concentration and the time course of behavioral effects.

Animals↗

Transpleural subclavian central venous catheter placement in a child with scoliosis discovered during a thoracotomy.

Placement of central venous catheters in dysmorphic children can be difficult because of distortion of normal anatomical landmarks. We present such a case of a 16 year-old child who had a central venous catheter inserted in the left subclavian vein. Although a conventional roentgenogram was consistent with correct placement, the catheter was found to traverse the pleural space before entering the subclavian vein.

Adolescent↗