PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Abimbola Williams

Publications and source records attributed to Abimbola Williams.

7 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

How to repair an anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery: results of a randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare two surgical techniques and two types of suture material for anal sphincter repair after childbirth-related injury. DESIGN: Factorial randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary referral maternity unit. POPULATION: Women with an anal sphincter injury sustained during childbirth. METHOD: Women were randomised into four groups: overlap repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); end-to-end repair with polyglactin (Vicryl); overlap repair with polydioxanone (PDS); and end-to-end repair with PDS. All repairs were completed as a primary procedure by staff trained in both methods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Suture-related morbidity at six weeks. Bowel symptoms at 3, 6 and 12 months. Anorectal physiology at three months. Quality of life scores at 3 and 12 months. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty women (1.5% of deliveries) were eligible and 112 (75%) were randomised. One hundred and three (92%) attended follow up visit at 6 weeks, 89 (80%) at 3 months, 79 (71%) at 6 months and 60 (54%) at 12 months. At six weeks, there was no difference in suture-related morbidity between groups (P=0.11) and 70% patients were completely asymptomatic. Incidence of bowel symptoms and quality of life disturbances were low, with no differences between the four groups. CONCLUSION: Obstetric anal sphincter repair carried out by appropriately trained staff is associated with low morbidity, irrespective of the suture material and repair method used.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Women's experiences after a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: a qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Little qualitative data are available that address the experiences of women who sustain a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear during childbirth. The objective of this study was to explore the views and experiences of women in the postpartum period after sustaining a third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear. METHODS: A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups in a large maternity hospital in the United Kingdom. Two focus groups used a purposive sample of women who had suffered a third-degree tear. One group (n = 6) had a tear in the index pregnancy and the second group (n = 4) had a subsequent pregnancy after the tear. RESULTS: The main themes identified included apprehension about consequences of the injury in terms of continence; body image and sexual functioning; anxiety about and lack of involvement in planning for future pregnancies; poor information exchange and communication (including both content and timing of discussions); poor emotional support from professionals and family members; physical and emotional impact; and unresolved anxieties in partners. Similarities occurred across both groups. CONCLUSIONS: A third-degree tear causes a significant emotional and psychological impact on women's physical and emotional well-being. We recommend that all staff receive adequate training to deal with the issues that may be raised. The provision of a dedicated, multidisciplinary team involved at an early stage to coordinate the repair and follow-up is recommended to allow a sensitive, consistent, evidence-based approach, particularly in terms of decision-making for subsequent births. The experiences and needs of partners require further study.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to begin the process of developing an antenatal risk scoring system, as a first step towards examining whether elective Caesarean section for women at high risk of injury could be an effective and acceptable intervention. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary maternity unit in the UK. POPULATION: One hundred and twenty-three women who sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and 123 controls without OASI. METHODS: Case notes of women with a third or fourth degree tear between 1997 and 1999 were examined for risk factors. Controls matched for age and week of delivery were identified from the maternity record database and case records reviewed for the presence of risk factors. Unweighted and weighted risk scores were produced using odds ratios, and compared between cases and controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of the risk scores was performed to discriminate between cases and controls and to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of each scoring system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor. Sensitivity and specificity from ROC curves for weighted and unweighted risk score. RESULTS: Among the cases there were more nulliparous women (OR 1.77; CI 1.05-2.99) and a trend towards more women with an episiotomy (OR 1.57; CI 0.99-2.47). Among women with sphincter injury, trends towards more epidurals (OR 1.64; CI 0.97-2.75), and more babies weighing more than 4000 g among (OR 1.45; CI 0.85-2.49) were noted. The median unweighted risk score was 2 for cases and 2 for controls (P= 0.05), while the weighted risk score was 2.1 and 1.37 (P= 0.03), respectively. The ROC curves approximated to a straight line demonstrating very poor discrimination between cases and controls. CONCLUSION: The predictive test performed poorly, suggesting that the risk factors identified do not exert a large enough effect in a cohort of this size.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Effect of a new guideline on outcome following third-degree perineal tears: results of a 3-year audit.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a new guideline on the outcome of repair of obstetric anal sphincter tears by examining adherence to the guideline and the effect upon the incidence of symptoms of anal incontinence. An audit of third-degree perineal tears was conducted in 1997. A reaudit was completed in 1998 and 1999 after the introduction of a new guideline. The audits were conducted in a tertiary obstetric unit with 5000 deliveries per annum. Over the 3-year period between 1997 and 1999 124 women with a third-degree tear were identified; 14 381 women who had delivered vaginally without third-degree tears were used as controls. The main outcome measure was the number of cases with adherence to the protocol, and the number of patients with ongoing symptoms. Cases were identified from the hospital database, and case notes were reviewed to obtain clinical data. The incidence of third-degree perineal tears was 0.81% over the 3-year period. Following the introduction of a new guideline there was a significant increase in the number of repairs performed in theatre (70% vs 82% vs 97%, P<0.05), using Prolene (64% vs 76% vs 93%, P< 0.05), with adequate anesthesia (70% vs 82% vs 97%, P<0.05). At follow-up there was a transient improvement in defecatory symptoms in the first year of the protocol only (45% vs 32% vs 50%, P<0.01). More patients had complete follow-up data after introduction of the protocol: 66% vs 86% vs 80% ( P<0.001). There were more cases of Prolene suture migration (7% vs 34% vs 16%, P<0.01). We concluded that the introduction of a new guideline was followed by improved performance of appropriate repair. There was no sustained improvement in fecal symptoms at follow-up.

Anal Canal↗
PubMed2003

Differences in episiotomy technique between midwives and doctors.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the practice of making an episiotomy and to determine any differences in practice between professional groups. DESIGN: A prospective survey. SETTING: A large tertiary referral obstetric hospital and the obstetric department of a district general hospital. POPULATION: All staff routinely involved in the care of women in labour. METHODS: A novel validated pictorial questionnaire was designed, validated and distributed to the study population. Differences in outcome measures were compared by profession and by seniority. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Measurements taken from the questionnaire: the length of episiotomy drawn; the distance from the sagittal plane at which the episiotomy was begun; and the angle of the episiotomy from the sagittal plane. RESULTS: Fifty doctors and 78 midwives completed the forms. Median distance of the episiotomy from the midline was 0 mm (-2 to 11). Episiotomies drawn by doctors were significantly longer and more angled than those drawn by midwives (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001). Sixteen percent of doctors and 1% of midwives drew an episiotomy longer than 20 mm (difference 15%, 95% CI 6 to 24). Twenty-three percent of midwives and 2% of doctors drew an episiotomy angled 30 degrees or less (difference 21%, 95% CI 9 to 34). CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated differences in the reporting of episiotomy practice by doctors and midwives. Theoretically, the differences demonstrated could predispose to a greater risk of anal sphincter injuries. These data need to be confirmed by observational studies of actual practice and by studies to investigate the mechanics of sphincter injury during childbirth.

Episiotomy↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Communication strategy for implementing community IMCI.

In resource-poor developing countries, significant improvements in child survival, growth, and development can be made by: (a) shifting from sectoral programmes (for example, in nutrition or immunization) to holistic strategies such as the Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) and (b) improving household and community care and health-seeking practices as a priority, while concurrently strengthening health systems and the skills of health professionals. This article focuses on household and community learning, and proposes a communication strategy for implementing community IMCI (c-IMCI) that is based on human rights principles such as inclusion, participation, and self-determination. Rather than attempt to change the care practices and health-seeking behaviour of individuals through the design and delivery of messages alone, it proposes an approach that is based on community engagement and discussion to create the social conditions in which individual change is possible. The strategy advocates for the integration of sectoral programmes rather than the development of new holistic programmes, so that integrated programmes are created from "multiple entry points". As integration occurs, the participatory communication processes that are used in sectoral programmes can be enriched and combined, improving the capacity of governments and agencies to engage community members effectively in a process of learning and action related to child health and development.

Child↗