Biomedical subjects

Ad F M Snik

Publications and source records attributed to Ad F M Snik.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

Reproducibility of sonotubometry as Eustachian tube ventilatory function test in healthy children.

OBJECTIVES: To devise a simple and reliable diagnostic procedure to test Eustachian tube function routinely in an ENT outpatient setting. One method to measure ET ventilatory function is sonotubometry. The reproducibility of a recently updated sonotubometry set-up was tested in healthy children. METHODS: The test population comprised 61 school children aged from 6 to 8 years. Only otologically healthy children were included. Health state was established by means of a 12-item questionnaire. To test reproducibility, sonotubometric testing took place in two sessions of 10 acts of swallowing each. Spearman's coefficient was used to test the correlation between the two sets of measurements. All testing took place at a primary school in a nearby village. RESULTS: Opening of the ET was recorded in at least one of the two measurement sessions in 82% of the children. The first and second sessions were highly correlated, with a Spearman's coefficient of 0.89. CONCLUSIONS: In otologically healthy children, opening of the ET was recorded frequently using the updated sonotubometry set-up. Measurement results had high reproducibility. Therefore, the test forms a useful method to assess ET ventilatory function in otologically healthy children. The performance of this updated version needs to be established in children with otological diseases.

Acoustic Impedance Tests↗

PubMed2006

Estimated cost-effectiveness of active middle-ear implantation in hearing-impaired patients with severe external otitis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the cost-effectiveness of middle-ear implantations in hearing-impaired patients with severe external otitis in the Netherlands. DESIGN: Cost-effectiveness analysis, using single-subject repeated measures of quality of life and total cost determinations. SETTING: Hospital based. Patients Moderately to severely sensorineurally hearing-impaired patients (n = 21) with severe chronic external otitis, eligible to receive a middle-ear implant. Main Outcome Measure Cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), based on scores of the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health()Survey (SF-36) generic quality of life questionnaire. Only direct costs were included in cost calculation of middle-ear implantation. RESULTS: Mean health utility gain was 0.046 (0.012-0.079) (P = .01) measured at the mental component of the SF-36. With a mean profitable time of 19.4 years and an overall cost of euro 14,354, minimal cost-effectiveness of middle-ear implantation was euro 16,085/QALY. CONCLUSION: Based on the cost per QALY, middle-ear implantation proved to be a cost-effective and justified health care intervention in the Netherlands.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Frequency-specific objective audiometry: tone-evoked brainstem responses and steady-state responses to 40 Hz and 90 Hz amplitude modulated stimuli.

Tone-evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (tone-burst ABRs) and Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) with 40 or 90 Hz amplitude modulation (AM) were compared, using the same equipment and recording parameters, to determine which of these three methods most accurately approached the behavioural hearing thresholds in response to 500 Hz and 2000 Hz stimuli in eleven awake adults with normal hearing. Estimates of the thresholds obtained with the three methods were 10, 18, and 26 dB SL at 500 Hz; and 10, 12, and 22 dB SL at 2000 Hz; using 40 Hz ASSR, 90 Hz ASSR, and tone-burst ABR, respectively. ASSRs with 40 Hz AM stimuli produced significantly better results (lowest thresholds with SD=0), whereas the wave-V analysis on the tone-burst ABR produced the poorest results. In the averaged ABRs, a robust steady-state potential was also visible. Analysis of those steady-state responses showed estimated thresholds of 13 and 14 dB SL (at 500 and 2000 Hz, respectively), thus considerably better than the estimated thresholds from the wave-V analysis. It is concluded that the 40 Hz ASSR showed superior results, especially at 500 Hz.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle.

The performance of the most powerful Bone-Anchored Hearing Aid (BAHA) currently available, the BAHA Cordelle, was evaluated in 25 patients with severe to profound mixed hearing loss. Patients showed bone conduction thresholds at 500, 1000 and 2000 Hz, ranged between 30 and 70 dB HL, and an additional air-bone gap of about at least 30 dB. With the BAHA Cordelle, free-field thresholds improve relative to bone-conduction thresholds with 1.5, 5.0, 17.8, and 4.3 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively, with substantial inter-individual variability. The differences in unaided air conduction thresholds and aided free-field thresholds amount to 45.3, 45.8, 47.5, and 43.5 dB at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. Speech perception, measured both with monosyllables of the consonant-vowel-consonant type and with bisyllables, showed highly similar results. The fitting range of a (linear) hearing aid is determined by its gain characteristics. Requiring aided speech reception thresholds at or better than 65 dB SPL results in an upper limit of the fitting range of the BAHA Cordelle for bone-conduction thresholds of 51, 56, 67, and 58 dB HL at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively. The dynamic range provided by the BAHA Cordelle was estimated from loudness growth functions at 500, 1500, and 3000 Hz employing 7-point categorical scaling. On average, aided loudness growth functions exhibit normal slopes but they level off at input levels of about 80, 70, 65 dB SPL for 500, 1500, and 3000 Hz stimuli, respectively. Measurements with a skull simulator demonstrated that the levelling-off reflects saturation of the output of the Cordelle. The relatively low saturation levels of the device suggest that increasing maximum output levels may be a worthwhile consideration for candidates with more profound sensorineural loss.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2006

Rehabilitation of patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation by means of a bone-anchored hearing aid.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) can be applied successfully to patients with conductive hearing loss and moderate mental retardation. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective clinical evaluation. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Twenty-two patients with congenital moderate mental retardation and conductive or mixed hearing loss were selected to receive a BAHA at the University Medical Centre Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Four of them were fitted despite a limited air-bone gap. INTERVENTION: Rehabilitative BAHA application. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Implantation results, skin reactions, and audiological data were evaluated during a mean follow-up of 36 months. RESULTS: All the patients were still using the BAHA 7 days a week and for more than 8 hours a day after a follow-up period between 5 and 96 months. Two implants (9%) were lost due to insufficient integration but were reimplanted successfully. With the BAHA, mean free-field thresholds showed a clear mean improvement of 9 dB compared with the previous hearing aid. Considerable improvements in daily activities were seen in at least five patients. CONCLUSION: Moderate mental retardation should no longer be considered as a contraindication for BAHA application. Although implant loss was low, extra attention may be required from the personal care providers to maintain the percutaneous implant. The BAHA was well-accepted by the patients with moderate mental retardation and was being used for most of the day. Implementation of the BAHA as hearing aid treatment in patients with moderate mental retardation proved to be sufficiently effective and may have strongly positive effects on activities at school or at work.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Quality of life and cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome type I.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this descriptive, retrospective study were to evaluate quality of life, hearing, and vision in patients with Usher syndrome type I with and without cochlear implant. METHODS: Quality of life (QoL) of 14 patients with Usher type I (USH1) with a cochlear implant (CI) (seven adults, seven children) was compared with those of 14 patients with USH1 without a CI (12 adults, two children) by means of three questionnaires: NCIQ, SF12, and the Usher Lifestyle Survey. Additional information on hearing level was obtained by the equivalent hearing loss (EHL) principle and on the visual deterioration by the functional vision score (FVS). RESULTS: A significant benefit of CI was seen in the hearing-specific questionnaire NCIQ. This difference could not be detected in the generic SF12 survey. The Usher Lifestyle Survey indicated that patients with USH1 with a CI tend to be able to live an independent life more easily than the profoundly deaf unimplanted patients with USH1. EHL and FVS scores varied in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Overall QoL can be enhanced by CI in patients with USH1, although effects are mostly seen in hearing-related QoL items.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Audiologic performance and benefit of cochlear implantation in Usher syndrome type I.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate the benefit and performance of cochlear implantation in patients with Usher syndrome type 1 (USH1). METHODS: Fourteen patients with a clinical diagnosis of USH1 were included. Mutation analysis of USH1 genes was performed in all of them. All patients filled in the G(C)BI questionnaire, which measures the benefit of implantation. In addition, equivalent hearing level scores (EHL) were calculated to measure performance. Correlations between the mentioned parameters were studied. RESULTS: One or two pathogenic mutations were identified in seven of the 14 examined patients. Similar to previous studies, it was demonstrated that implantation at an earlier age results in better performance than implantation at higher age. Cochlear implantation performed within the first 2 decades of life was beneficial to 13 of 14 (93%) of the patients with USH1. Finally, the EHL score and the G(C)BI score showed a significant correlation; the benefit of implantation increases with a decreasing EHL score. CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation in patients with USH1 improves the audiologic performance when patients are implanted at an earlier age and is beneficial according to the G(C)BI when performed within the first 2 decades of life.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

The BAHA Softband. A new treatment for young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) Softband (fitted unilaterally and bilaterally) in young children with bilateral congenital aural atresia. SUBJECTS: Two children with severe bilateral congenital conductive hearing loss, who had been fitted with a transcutaneous BAHA Softband at the age of 3 and 28 months, respectively. The latter child had been fitted with a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid at the age of 3 months; at 28 months, this child had received the BAHA Softband and after 5 months of unilateral application, the BAHA Softband was fitted bilaterally. Follow-up in the two children was 31 and 17 months, respectively. METHODS: Using the artificial mastoid, gain and maximum output were studied in this new transcutaneous application of the BAHA, with the BAHA Classic and the BAHA Compact as sound processor. Results were compared to those obtained with a conventional bone-conduction device (Oticon E 300 P). Aided thresholds and sound lateralization scores were assessed with double visual reinforcement audiometry (VRA). To test the validity of the BAHA Softband, the speech and language development of the children was assessed by means of age-appropriate tests (the preverbal Symbolic play test and the Dutch non-speech test for receptive and expressive language and the Dutch version of the Reynell language test). RESULTS: The electro-acoustic measurements showed minor differences in gain between the three devices. At a reduced volume setting, the mean input level at which the output levelled off was largely comparable between the BAHA Classic and the conventional device, but somewhat poorer with the BAHA Compact. Both children showed speech and language development that was in accordance with their cognitive development. CONCLUSIONS: The BAHA Softband was a valid intervention in children with congenital bilateral aural atresia who were too young for percutaneous BAHA application.

Bone Conduction↗

PubMed2005

Does the bone-anchored hearing aid have a complementary effect on audiological and subjective outcomes in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss?

OBJECTIVES: To study the effect of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective evaluation on 18 subjects. METHODS: Aided and unaided binaural hearing was assessed in the sound field using a sound localization test and a speech recognition in noise test with spatially separated sound and noise sources. The patients also filled out a disability-specific questionnaire. PATIENTS: 13 out of the 18 subjects had normal hearing on one side and acquired conductive hearing loss in the other ear. The remaining 5 patients had a unilateral air-bone gap and mild symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss. RESULTS: Sound localization with the BAHA improved significantly. Speech recognition in noise with spatially separated speech and noise sources also improved with the BAHA. Fitting a BAHA to patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss had a complementary effect on hearing. Questionnaire results showed that the BAHA was of obvious benefit in daily life. CONCLUSIONS: The BAHA proved to be a beneficial means to optimize binaural hearing in patients with severe (40-60 dB) unilateral conductive hearing loss according to audiometric data and patient outcome measures.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Long-term results of bone-anchored hearing aid recipients who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids.

OBJECTIVE: To study the long-term results (use, care, satisfaction, ear infections, and audiometry) of the application of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) to patients with conventional indications who had previously used air-conduction hearing aids. DESIGN: Follow-up study (mean duration, 9 years). SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 27 patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss and who had participated in a previous study (N = 34). Seven could not be included anymore as a result of death, Alzheimer disease, or problems related to the implant. Everyone filled out the questionnaire, and 23 patients underwent audiometric evaluation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The patients filled out the adapted Nijmegen questionnaire. Aided free-field thresholds were measured as well as scores for speech in noise and in quiet. Results were compared with those obtained in the initial study. RESULTS: All 27 patients were still using their BAHA and appreciated it with regard to speech recognition in quiet, sound comfort, and improvements in ear infections. The audiometric results showed that most patients tested had stable bone-conduction thresholds over the years (after correction for age). Despite the treatment with BAHA, a significant deterioration in the cochlear hearing was observed in the other patients in the ear under study (their best hearing ear). CONCLUSIONS: Positive patient outcome measures emphasized the importance of BAHA application to patients with conventional indications. The audiometric data showed fairly stable cochlear function but not for all patients. This underlines that conservative treatment should be chosen (fitting of bone-conduction devices).

Audiometry↗

PubMed2005

EEG derivations providing auditory steady-state responses with high signal-to-noise ratios in infants.

OBJECTIVE: To identify EEG derivations that yield high signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of the auditory steady-state response (ASSR) in infants aged 0 to 5 months. DESIGN: The ASSR was recorded simultaneously from 10 EEG derivations in a monopolar montage in 20 sleeping infants. Stimuli were tones of 0.5 or 2 kHz that were 100% amplitude modulated and 20% frequency modulated, presented at 65 dB SPL for 4.4 minutes in either the right or the left ear. An amplitude modulation frequency of 90 Hz (left ear) or 94 Hz (right ear) was used. From the 10 measured monopolar derivations, all 45 bipolar derivations were calculated mounting up to 55 EEG derivations. EEG derivations were selected in the preferred set if they had the largest SNRs within subjects and if they were obtained significantly more frequently across subjects than was expected by chance (Monte Carlo simulation and Wilcoxon signed ranks test). RESULTS: The preferred derivations are both mastoids ipsilateral to the stimulated ear with Cz as common reference. These derivations improved SNRs compared with each of several conventional EEG derivations (excluding the preferred derivations) between 16 and 69% (500 Hz, left ear), 9 and 132% (500 Hz, right ear), 31 and 193% (2 kHz, left ear), and 3 and 105% (2 kHz, right ear). In contrast to results reported earlier for adults, high SNRs were not found at the inion-Cz derivation in these infants. CONCLUSIONS: High SNRs were obtained in infants aged younger than 6 months if the ASSR was recorded from the mastoids ipsilateral to the ear of stimulation referenced to Cz.

Acoustic Stimulation↗

PubMed2005

Bone-anchored hearing aids in unilateral inner ear deafness: an evaluation of audiometric and patient outcome measurements.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of a bone-anchored hearing aid contralateral routing of sound hearing aid (BAHA CROS hearing aid) in 29 patients with unilateral inner ear deafness. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective clinical follow-up study. SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty patients were recruited. There were 19 patients with a history of acoustic neuroma surgery and 11 patients with unilateral inner ear deafness due to other causes; 1 patient was excluded. The first 21 patients had also participated in a previous evaluation. INTERVENTION: Audiometric measurements were taken before intervention, when fitted with a conventional CROS, and after BAHA implementation. Patients' subjective benefit was quantified with four different hearing aid-specific instruments: the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit, the Glasgow Hearing Aid Benefit Profile, the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids, and the Single-Sided Deafness questionnaire. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The same instruments were used at a mean long-term follow-up of 1 year after BAHA implantation. RESULTS: Sound localization in an audiologic test setting was no different from chance level. The main effect of the BAHA CROS that was found was the "lift the head shadow" effect in the speech-in-noise measurements. All instruments also showed positive results in favor of the BAHA CROS at long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The poor sound-localization results in an audiologic test setting illustrated the inability of patients with unilateral inner ear deafness to localize sounds. The speech-in-noise measurements demonstrated the efficacy of the BAHA CROS to lift the head shadow. Patients were still satisfied at 1-year follow-up, according to the four instruments.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Three-year follow-up of children with postmeningitic deafness and partial cochlear implant insertion.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term outcome of children with postmeningitic deafness and partial insertion of the Nucleus electrode array, and to compare their speech perception performance with that of children with full insertion of the electrode array. DESIGN: A battery of seven speech perception tests was administered to 25 children with a cochlear implant (CI). Results were reduced into one score: equivalent hearing loss (EHL). SETTING: Tertiary referral centre. PARTICIPANTS: The partial insertion group comprised seven children, mean age at implantation 5.5 years, mean duration of deafness 3.6 years. The full-insertion control group comprised 18 children. Mean age at implantation: 4.4 years; mean duration of deafness: 2.9 years. All the children became deaf between 0 and 3 years of age. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Over a 3-year follow-up period, the children with partial insertion showed continuing progress, although there was wide variation in performance and the rate of progression. Some open-set comprehension could even be achieved with the insertion of only eight electrodes of a nucleus device. RESULTS: Three years after implantation, speech perception in the partial insertion children was poorer than that in the control groups with long (P < 0.01; 95% confidence interval 7-43 dB EHL) and short duration of deafness (P < 0.0001; 95% confidence interval 28-53 dB EHL). They showed slower progress and reached a poorer EHL plateau. Four of the seven children acquired open-set word recognition. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with partial insertion of the electrode array benefit from a CI, although less than patients with complete insertion.

Auditory Threshold↗

PubMed2005

Consensus statements on the BAHA system: where do we stand at present?

After more than 25 years of clinical experience, the BAHA (bone-anchored hearing aid) system is a well-established treatment for hearing-impaired patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss. Owing to its success, the use of the BAHA system has spread and the indications for application have gradually become broader. New indications, as well as clinical applications, were discussed during scientific roundtable meetings in 2004 by experts in the field, and the outcomes of these discussions are presented in the form of statements. The issues that were discussed concerned BAHA surgery, the fitting range of the BAHA system, the BAHA system compared to conventional devices, bilateral application, the BAHA system in children, the BAHA system in patients with single-sided deafness, and, finally, the BAHA system in patients with unilateral conductive hearing loss.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Bone-anchored hearing aid in unilateral inner ear deafness: a study of 20 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the benefit of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) contralateral routing of sound (CROS) in 20 patients with unilateral inner ear deafness. SUBJECTS: 21 patients were recruited; 15 had undergone acoustic neuroma surgery and 6 patients had unilateral profound hearing loss due to other causes; 1 patient was excluded. Only patients with thresholds of better than 25 dB HL (500-2000 Hz) and an air-bone gap of less than 10 dB in the best ear were included. METHODS: Evaluation involved audiometric measurements before intervention, when fitted with a conventional CROS and after implementation and quantification of the patients' subjective benefit with a hearing aid-specific instrument: the Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB). RESULTS: Lateralization scores were not significantly different from chance (50%) in any of the three conditions. Measurements of speech perception in noise showed an increase in the signal to noise ratio (S/N ratio) with the conventional CROS (p = 0.001) and with the BAHA CROS compared to the unaided condition when speech was presented at the front with noise on the poor hearing side. On the other hand, a lower S/N ratio was seen with the BAHA CROS (p = 0.003) compared to the unaided situation when noise was presented at the front with speech on the poor hearing side. The patient outcome measure (APHAB) showed improvement, particularly with the BAHA CROS. CONCLUSIONS: The poor sound localization results illustrate the inability of patients with unilateral inner ear deafness to localize sounds. The speech-in-noise measurements reflect the benefit of a BAHA CROS in lifting the head shadow while avoiding some of the disadvantages of a conventional CROS. The benefit of the BAHA CROS was most clearly reflected in the patients' opinion measured with the APHAB.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

The bone-anchored hearing aid: quality-of-life assessment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of a bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) on the quality of life (QOL) of adults and to test the hypothesis that a BAHA improves QOL because otorrhea and/or skin irritations decrease. DESIGN: Prospective postal-based questionnaire study using validated health-related QOL instruments, combined with hearing-aid-related questions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 56 consecutive adult patients with acquired conductive or mixed hearing loss who were scheduled for BAHA implantation at the University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. All 56 patients completed the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and the Hearing Handicap and Disability Inventory (HHDI); 36 patients had been using an air-conduction hearing aid (ACHA) and 20 patients a conventional bone-conduction hearing aid (CBHA). Questionnaires were filled out before surgery and after 6 months of experience with the BAHA. RESULTS: In the SF-36 group, there was significant improvement in the scores of the mental health domain (P =.02). When the SF-36 patients were classified according to previous hearing aid, there was no statistically significant change in the scores in any of the domains. In the EQ-5D group and in its ACHA and CBHA subgroups, there were no important differences in the results before and after the patients received their BAHAs. In the HHDI group, the handicap and disability scales showed significant improvement (P<.01) irrespective of the type of previously worn hearing aid. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, generic health-related QOL was not influenced significantly by the use of a BAHA according to the SF-36 and the EQ-5D. The more disease-specific scales (HHDI) did show improved QOL with a BAHA.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Development of auditory processing in 6-12-year-old children: a longitudinal study.

The development of auditory processing in children was investigated in a longitudinal study. A group of 20 children with normal cognitive and language development underwent several auditory tests at the ages of 6, 7, 8, 10 and 12 years. At the age of 10 years, three subjects were lost to follow-up, as was one more subject at the age of 12 years. The auditory performance of the children was compared to the performance of a group of 20 adults. The auditory test battery consisted of a speech-in-noise test, a filtered speech test, a binaural fusion test and two auditory sequencing tests. At the ages of 6, 7 and 8 years, data on the performance on an auditory word discrimination test, an auditory synthesis test, an auditory closure test and a number recall test were also obtained. All auditory tests except the speech-in-noise test showed a clear effect of age on the performance of children. Our data suggest that maturational effects play an important role in auditory processing (at least) up to an age of 12-13 years. Correlations between the tests are in general not indicative of large amounts of overlap between the different tests. Factor analysis shows that three factors account for 68-70% of explained variance, with the three factors contributing equally. A composite score obtained by averaging all (sub)test scores can be used next to the individual test scores to describe the development of auditory processing abilities in children.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Development of an auditory test battery for young children: a pilot study.

This article describes the development and results of a pilot study with a recently developed auditory test battery for 4-6-year-old Dutch children. The test battery consisted of a sustained auditory attention (SAA) test, a dichotic words (DW) test, a binaural masking-level difference (BMLD) test, an auditory word discrimination (AWD) test, a gap detection (GD) test and a test of phonemic awareness, the Lindamood Auditory Conceptualization (LAC) test. Our results show that this test battery can be administered successfully to children aged 4 years and older. Most tests showed a clear effect of chronological age; the strongest age effects were found for the DW test and the LAC test. The BMLD test was the only test for which no significant age effect was found in this group of children. A small, but significant right-ear advantage was found on the DW test, for the 4- and the 6-year-olds. Correlations between subtests were in general rather high, suggesting that several tests in this test battery may be tapping into similar auditory abilities.

Age Factors↗