PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Adam P Webber

Publications and source records attributed to Adam P Webber.

5 recordsLinked to original sources

Daytime sleeping, sleep disturbance, and circadian rhythms in the nursing home.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the frequency of abnormal daytime sleeping and identifies factors related to daytime sleeping, nighttime sleep disturbance, and circadian rhythm abnormalities among nursing home residents. METHODS: The authors conducted secondary analysis of data collected under usual care conditions within a nonpharmacologic sleep intervention trial. All residents from four Los Angeles nursing homes were screened for daytime sleeping (asleep>or=15% of observations, 9:00 am-5:00 pm). Consenting residents with daytime sleeping had two nights of wrist actigraphy to assess nighttime sleep disturbance (asleep<80%, 10:00 pm-6:00 am). Residents with nighttime sleep disturbance completed an additional 72-hour wrist actigraphy recording to assess circadian activity rhythms and light exposure. RESULTS: Sixty-nine percent of 492 observed residents had daytime sleeping, of whom 60% also had disturbed nighttime sleep. Sleep disturbance and daytime sleeping were rarely documented in medical records. Residents spent one-third of the day in their rooms, typically in bed, and were seldom outdoors or exposed to bright light. More time in bed and less social activity were significant predictors of daytime sleepiness. Ninety-seven percent of residents assessed had abnormal circadian rhythms. More daytime sleeping and less nighttime sleep were associated with weaker circadian activity rhythms. Later circadian rhythm acrophase (peak) was associated with more bright light exposure. CONCLUSION: Daytime sleepiness, nighttime sleep disturbance, and abnormal circadian rhythms were common in nursing home residents. Modifiable factors (e.g., time in bed) are associated with sleep/wake abnormalities. Mental health specialists should consider the complexity of factors causing sleep problems in nursing home residents.

Aged↗

Randomized, controlled trial of a nonpharmacological intervention to improve abnormal sleep/wake patterns in nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES: Abnormal sleep/wake patterns are common in nursing home residents. Lifestyle and environmental factors likely contribute to these poor sleep patterns. The objective of this study was to test a multidimensional, nonpharmacological intervention to improve abnormal sleep/wake patterns in nursing home residents. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Four nursing homes in the Los Angeles area. PARTICIPANTS: Residents were screened for excessive daytime sleeping (asleep > or = 15% of daytime observations) and nighttime sleep disruption (asleep < 80% of nighttime hours, according to wrist actigraphy). Four hundred ninety-two residents were screened; 339 had excessive daytime sleeping. Of these, 133 had nighttime sleep disruption and consented to participate; 120 completed baseline assessments, and 118 (77% female, mean age 86.9, 90% non-Hispanic white) were randomized to intervention versus usual care. INTERVENTION: Five consecutive days and nights of efforts to decrease daytime in-bed time, 30 minutes or more of daily sunlight exposure, increased physical activity, structured bedtime routine, and efforts to decrease nighttime noise and light. MEASUREMENTS: Seventy-two consecutive hours of wrist actigraphy (nighttime sleep) and structured behavioral observations (daytime sleep and participation in social and physical activities and social conversation) at baseline and repeated at follow-up while the intervention or usual care condition was in place. RESULTS: The only effect on nighttime sleep was a modest decrease in mean duration of nighttime awakenings in intervention participants (10.6 minutes at baseline, 9.8 minutes at follow-up) versus an increase in controls (9.8 minutes at baseline, 13.8 minutes at follow-up) (F=4.27, P=.04). There were no significant effects on percentage of nighttime sleep or number of nighttime awakenings. There was a significant decrease in daytime sleeping in intervention participants (32% of daytime observations asleep at baseline, 21% at follow-up), with no change in controls (32% at baseline, 30% at follow-up; F=20.68, P<.001). Intervention participants had increased participation in social (F=22.42, P<.001) and physical (F=12.65, P=.001) activities and social conversation (F=5.04, P=.03). CONCLUSION: A multidimensional, nonpharmacological intervention into lifestyle and environmental factors that likely contribute to abnormal sleep/wake patterns in nursing home residents resulted in decreased daytime sleeping and increased participation in social and physical activities and social conversation. Nonpharmacological interventions should be considered in the management of abnormal sleep/wake patterns in nursing home residents. The main effect may be a significant decrease in daytime sleeping, which may translate to an improvement in quality of life.

Aged↗

Depression in older patients admitted for postacute nursing home rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence, recognition, and persistence of depression in older adults undergoing postacute rehabilitation in a nursing home (NH) setting and to explore the effect of depression on rehabilitation outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: One rehabilitative NH in the Los Angeles area. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-eight patients (aged >/=65) admitted for postacute rehabilitation over a 9-month recruitment period. MEASUREMENTS: Depression was assessed using the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) or the Cornell Scale for Depression (in participants with dementia). Medical records were reviewed for documentation of depression and antidepressant use before and during the rehabilitative NH stay. Rehabilitation process was assessed using total amount of successfully completed therapy (minutes). Rehabilitation outcome was assessed using the motor component of the Functional Independence Measure (mFIM). Measures were performed at admission and 2 months later. RESULTS: Of the 646 potentially eligible patients admitted during the study, 158 consented, and 151 were screened for depression. Forty-two (27.8%) had depressive symptoms (GDS=6 or Cornell=5). Of these, only 15 had a documented diagnosis of depression, and 12 were receiving antidepressants. Depression was associated with longer NH stay but not with discharge mFIM score. Two months later, depression persisted in 24 participants and was associated with worse mFIM (55.5+/-22.7 vs 67.0+/-23.7, depressed vs nondepressed; P=.03). CONCLUSION: Depression was common, underrecognized, and undertreated in these postacute rehabilitation patients. Depression generally persisted and was associated with worse functional status at 2-month follow-up.

Acute Disease↗