Modified abdominoplasty as a functional reconstruction for recurrent hydradenitis suppurativa of the lower abdomen and groin.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to Adam R Greenbaum.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the difference between battery and assault in U.S. law and the concepts of the phrase "child abuse" and "elder abuse." 2. Understand that state statutes vary and can define abuse narrowly or with great specificity, and that either definition has inherent problems for physicians treating victims of abuse and neglect. 3. Know where to find the state-specific legal criteria for child or elder abuse and neglect, along with the corresponding standards for mandatory reporting and physician accountability. 4. Understand the relevant law regarding physician-patient privilege and the repercussions of incorrect but good faith reporting and of failing to report suspected abuse or neglect of children or the elderly. 5. Understand that there are no pathognomic signs for inflicted burn injury. 6. Clinically assess burned pediatric or elderly patients within a framework that will minimize the risk of missing or inappropriately suspecting injuries that stem from abuse or neglect. SUMMARY: This article deals with burns inflicted on children and the elderly, two particularly vulnerable societal groups. Though inflicted burning is a relatively rare method of inflicting physical abuse, failure to diagnose it has far-reaching ramifications. These injuries pose both medical and forensic problems for physicians, along with unique ethical dilemmas. This article is a collaboration between surgeons and lawyers providing a holistic, workable approach to the management of inflicted burn injury. The authors first describe the legal considerations that must be appreciated by U.S. physicians, then they suggest a rational and balanced clinical approach to the assessment of burn injuries that may have been inflicted intentionally or negligently on children and the elderly.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
In the last 25 years, techniques utilising muscle flaps to perform mechanical work have become part of the reconstructive surgeon's repertoire. In this paper, these techniques and the particular physiological challenges faced by active flaps are discussed and a sub-classification of muscle flaps into passive and active is proposed. A series of experiments are described that were designed to compare local pO(2) and gaseous perfusion, at multiple sites in pedicled tibialis anterior muscle flaps and controls, using specially developed dual amperometric microelectrodes, in an in vivo rabbit model. No significant difference in perfusion was found comparing flaps and controls until the flap's vascular pedicles were divided and ligated, and then flap perfusion fell to zero. Flap and control oxygenation varied significantly only during mobilisation and again, after pedicle division and ligation (F[13,55] = 12.3; P < 0.001)]. This absence of functional ischaemia as a consequence of mobilisation in the model used suggests the practice of delaying electrical conditioning of muscle flaps in dynamic cardiomyoplasty and neoanal sphincteroplasty might be unnecessary if these data are reproduced in human latissimus dorsi muscle. The relevance of these findings to free flap oxygen consumption and to the delay phenomenon is discussed.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Burn injury can be inflicted intentionally either by one person to another whenever one has the ability to physically control the other, or it can be self-inflicted. There is scant evidential basis for much that is written about and practiced in the evaluation and care of patients that have sustained intentional burn injuries. Yet this is an area in which medical personnel must necessarily be trained in both the therapeutic and forensic aspects of a complex problem. Failure to appreciate the complexity of medical and forensic interactions may have far reaching effects. A missed diagnosis can result in inappropriate medical care, on-going abuse and future fatality. Inept management can result on the one hand, in blame levelled inappropriately placing incomparable strain on family units and innocent parties, and on the other, allow abusers to continue unchecked. This is the first review on the subject in which lawyers and doctors collaborate to produce a holistic approach to this subject. In it we describe the legal considerations that medical staff must appreciate when approaching patients who may have suffered intentional burns. We analyse the various scenarios in which intentional burning can be found and challenge the clinical dogma with much of the management of paediatric inflicted burns has become imbued. We suggest a rational and balanced approach to all intentional burn injuries-especially when children are involved. In the light of current case law in which dogmatic medical evidence has been implicated in wrongful convictions for child abuse in the UK, it is imperative that medical professionals gather evidence carefully and completely and apply it with logic and impartiality. This paper will aid clinicians who may not be experienced in dealing with burn injuries, but find themselves in the position of seeing a burn acutely, to avoid common mistakes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.