PubMed Health⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

Adrian A Indar

Publications and source records attributed to Adrian A Indar.

5 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

A neoadjuvant/adjuvant randomized trial of colorectal cancer patients vaccinated with an anti-idiotypic antibody, 105AD7, mimicking CD55.

PURPOSE: To assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 105AD7 vaccination in colorectal cancer patients. 105AD7 is a human anti-idiotypic antibody mimicking CD55, a glycoprotein, which is more than expressed on colorectal cancer cells and protects them from attack by complement. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Colorectal cancer patients (n = 67) eligible for primary surgery were randomized to receive the anti-idiotypic antibody 105AD7+/-Bacillus Calmette-Guerin/alum or to no treatment (control group). The immunizations were given i.d./i.m. before surgery and continued for a period of 2 years. The patients were monitored in enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT; gamma-IFN), proliferation assay, and Luminex cytokine assays. RESULTS: No serious adverse events were recorded. Of the 32 investigated immunized patients, 14 (44%) were considered to be responders in the ELISPOT assay. Induced proliferative responses were noted in 17 of 40 (43%) monitored patients. There was no correlation between the ELISPOT and proliferation assays. Luminex analyses revealed tumor necrosis factor-alpha and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor responses not only to the vaccine but also toward the native antigen CD55 in 9 of 13 (69%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Immune responses to vaccination were induced in a majority of monitored patients measured by ELISPOT and proliferation assay. The lack of correlation between the ELISPOT and proliferation assays may reflect the fact that the two methods measure different T-cell responses and highlights the importance of multiple readouts in evaluating a potential cancer vaccine. Responses to both the anti-idiotype and the CD55 antigen were measurable, adding support to the use of CD55 as a target in cancer treatment.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗
PubMed2003

Percutaneous biliary metal wall stenting in malignant obstructive jaundice.

BACKGROUND: Most patients with advanced stage malignant obstructive jaundice will be suitable for palliation only. Metallic stents are safe, effective and minimally invasive. DESIGN: A review of case notes of patients who had Wallstents inserted percutaneously from January 1996 to December 2000. RESULTS: Eighty-nine patients with a median age of 72 years underwent percutaneous insertion of biliary metal stents. The diagnoses were cholangiocarcinoma (41.5%), pancreatic carcinoma (40.5%), nodal metastases at the porta hepatis (14.6%) and gall bladder cancer (3.4%). Ninety-six per cent of patients improved their hyperbilirubinaemia to normal levels by 1 month. The median post-procedure hospital stay was 16 days. Early overall complications (within 30 days of stenting) occurred in 30% of patients (70% of these were disease related). The 30 day mortality rate was 20% (n = 18). Fifty (70%) patients were readmitted to hospital, most commonly because of carcinomatosis (16) or stent obstruction (12). The symptom-free period ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months. Median survival for all patients was 3.5 months. Survival correlated inversely with serum bilirubin at presentation (r = -0.34, P = 0.001), but not with other liver function tests. DISCUSSION: Metal wall stenting for malignant obstructive jaundice provides good palliation with low, procedure-related morbidity and mortality, but poor overall survival from disease-related morbidity. Survival significantly correlates with pre-stenting serum bilirubin levels. There is a need to identify the subgroup of patients in whom stenting has no beneficial effect.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Active specific immunotherapy for colorectal cancer.

With advances in molecular biology and the identification of tumor-associated antigens, a number of new strategies have been developed in an attempt to overcome the limits of chemotherapy and to aid in the fight to cure patients of metastatic and micrometastatic colorectal carcinomas. Biological therapy has now moved into the era of immunotherapy. Nonspecific immunotherapy has been surpassed by modalities that produce a specific and potent immune response against identifiable tumor-associated antigens, so called active specific immunotherapy. Approaches that come under this heading include tumor cell vaccines, anti-idiotypic antibody therapy and dendritic cell vaccines. Cells can be further boosted by the use of immunostimulatory cytokines. This review aims to evaluate current strategies of immunotherapy for colorectal cancer with particular emphasis on the clinical aspects.

Cancer Vaccines↗