Biomedical subjects
Adrian Reuben
Publications and source records attributed to Adrian Reuben.
Autonomic dysfunction and gastroparesis in cirrhosis.
BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis of the liver frequently present with many gastrointestinal complaints that are most likely due to abnormal gastrointestinal motility. The cause of these motility disorders in cirrhotics is unknown, however, underlying autonomic dysfunction may play a role. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between autonomic dysfunction and delayed gastric emptying in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: We prospectively studied 20 patients with cirrhosis of the liver and postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting and 10 asymptomatic patients with Hepatitis C (HCV) and no evidence of cirrhosis. All patients underwent 5 standardized cardiovascular tests to assess autonomic function. Each test was scored on a continuum from 0 (normal) to 5 (severe disease), thus producing a composite score of 0 to 5 for each subject. A composite score of greater than 1.5 was considered abnormal, with 5 representing severe autonomic involvement. A solid phase gastric emptying study was performed in each patient and a gastric retention of greater than 50% at 100 minutes was considered abnormal. RESULTS: The mean percent retention at 100 minutes was 70.7% in the cirrhotic group vs. 26.1% (P < 0.001) in the patients with HCV and no evidence of cirrhosis (controls). The composite autonomic score for the cirrhotic group was 3.4 vs. 1.2 (P < 0.001) in the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that gastroparesis is common in patients with cirrhosis of the liver, and may account for gastrointestinal symptoms of postprandial abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. The presence of autonomic dysfunction correlates positively with underlying motility disorders, such as delayed gastric emptying.
Illustrious, industrious, and perhaps notorious.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The serology of the Addison-Gull syndrome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The sensei of Sendai: correcting the uncorrectable.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The way to a man's heart is through his liver.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The last gasp or Caveat Cenans!
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Now you see it, now you don't.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A sheep in wolf's clothing.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Prospective evaluation of a 3.1-mm battery-powered esophagoscope in screening for esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients.
OBJECTIVE: Standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) is costly and uses conscious sedation that cirrhotic patients may tolerate poorly. This study aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptance of unsedated esophagoscopy with an ultrathin battery-powered endoscope (BPE) in cirrhotic patients for diagnosing esophageal varices (EV). METHODS: We first studied the prevalence of significant gastroduodenal pathology that could be missed if only esophagoscopy were performed in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplant evaluation. A prospective study was then done to evaluate a BPE in EV screening. Unsedated per-oral endoscopy was first done by a single endoscopist using a BPE, followed by EGD by a second endoscopist who was masked to the BPE result. A visual analog score was used to determine patient tolerance. Patients were asked about their preference for endoscopy in the future. A paired Student t test and the kappa statistic were used in the statistical analysis. RESULTS: In the retrospective study, 199 patients were reviewed; three patients (1.5%) had gastric ulcers, and two patients (1%) had duodenal ulcers. In the prospective study, 28 cirrhotic patients (16 women) were evaluated. EV were diagnosed in 14 patients with a BPE, and 13 were confirmed by standard EGD (sensitivity and negative predictive value 100%, specificity and positive predictive value 93%, kappa = 0.93). EV were graded as large in one and small in 13 patients with a BPE, but small varices diagnosed in one patient were not confirmed on EGD. Both procedures were well tolerated by all patients. Twenty-seven of 28 patients preferred unsedated endoscopy with a BPE over EGD. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated endoscopy with a BPE is safe and well tolerated. The diagnostic accuracy of a BPE for diagnosing EV is the same as by EGD. Esophagoscopy with a BPE is a potential alternative to EGD for EV screening.
Not too little, not too much, but just right.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Wine hath drowned more men than the sea.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.