Biomedical subjects

Aftab A Bhatti

Publications and source records attributed to Aftab A Bhatti.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2005

Routine intraoperative stenting for renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Major urological complications (MUCs) after kidney transplantation contribute to patient morbidity and compromise graft function. Ureteric stents have been successfully used to treat such complications and a number of centers have adopted a policy of universal prophylactic stenting, at the time of graft implantation, to reduce the incidence of urine leaks and ureteric stenosis. METHODS: In conjunction with the Cochrane Renal Group we searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of articles, books and abstracts and contacted companies, authors and experts to identify randomized controlled trials examining the use of stents in renal transplantation. The primary outcome was the incidence of MUCs and data on this statistic was pooled and analyzed using a random effects model. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials (1154 patients) of low or moderate quality were identified. The incidence of MUCs was significantly reduced (relative risk [RR] 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07 - 0.77; P=0.02; number needed to treat = 13) by prophylactic ureteric stenting. Urinary tract infections were more common in stented patients (RR 1.49), unless the patients were prescribed 480 mg cotrimoxazole once daily. With this antibiotic regime the incidence of infection was equivalent between the two groups (RR 0.97). Stents appeared generally well tolerated, although trials using longer stents (> or = 20 cm) for longer periods of time (>6 weeks) reported more problems with encrustation and migration. CONCLUSIONS: Universal prophylactic stenting reduces the incidence of MUCs and should be recommended on the basis of currently available randomized controlled trials.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

The effect of inadequate in situ perfusion in the non heart-beating donor.

In situ aortic perfusion in the nonheart-beating donors (NHBD) is an important procedure to reduce primary warm ischaemic injury prior to formal donor organ retrieval. It allows an interim period to obtain donor family consent and theatre preparation. This study describes our experience of inadequate aortic perfusions resulting from difficult aortic cannulations and associated adverse outcome despite reasonable viability tests. Since 1998, all NHBD in our institution are perfused in situ using a double balloon triple lumen (DBTL) catheter inserted through a femoral artery cut-down procedure. The DBTL catheter is positioned with distal occlusive balloon at the aortic bifurcation using the "pull-back" technique, the proximal occlusive balloon lies above the renal arteries. This provides selective aortic perfusion in particular the kidneys. Venous decompression using a femoral vein catheter enables a "two-way infusion system". Pre-transplant viability status of retrieved kidneys is determined by measuring pressure/resistance characteristics to the flow and biochemical markers for ischaemic injury. There were 90 NHBD renal transplants performed from 72 donors. Three renal transplants were carried out from three donors of ineffective in situ perfusion secondary to cannulation difficulties. Femoral cannulation was difficult as a result of extensive atherosclerosis of donor vessels. The comparison of allograft outcome from effective and ineffective in situ perfusion of donors showed high rate of primary nonfunction (PNF) from ineffective perfusion (chi-squared, P < 0.0001). The cases demonstrated poor outcome from ineffective perfusion related to the cannulation difficulties. Therefore a strict policy should be taken in cases where aortic cannulation and perfusion is inadequate, despite pretransplant assessment. In these circumstances, the primary warm ischaemia time should be extended to include this period of ineffective perfusion.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience.

UNLABELLED: A comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy is presented by authors from the UK. They found that the laparoscopic approach could safely be offered to patients treated in experienced units and after adequate training fo the surgeon, with no increase in complications or decrease in efficacy. OBJECTIVE: To compare our early experience of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) with a contemporary cohort of conventional open donor nephrectomy (ODN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Transperitoneal left-sided LDN was offered to carefully selected potential live kidney donors on the basis of vascular anatomy. The first 20 donors who underwent LDN were compared with a control group of 20 patients who had ODN. Donors and recipients were compared for demographics, intraoperative variables, postoperative complications and allograft function. RESULTS: There was no peri-operative mortality in either group. No laparoscopic procedure required open conversion. The operating time was comparable (165 vs 153 min); LDN was associated with significantly less intraoperative blood loss (200 vs 350 mL; Mann-Whitney U, P = 0.01) and hospital stay (3 vs 5 days; P < 0.001). The graft warm ischaemic time was significantly longer for LDN (5 vs 2 min; P < 0.001) but this did not appear to affect either the delayed graft function rate (5% vs 10%, not significant) or serum creatinine level at discharge (125 vs 126 micromol/L). CONCLUSIONS: UK centres with experience of advanced laparoscopy and ODN can safely offer LDN to potential live donors.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Prospective study comparing three-dimensional computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors.

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare the accuracy of multislice spiral computed tomographic angiography (CTA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in evaluating the renal vascular anatomy in potential living renal donors. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty-one donors underwent multislice spiral CTA and gadolinium-enhanced MRA. In addition to axial images, multiplanar reconstruction and maximum intensity projections were used to display the renal vascular anatomy. Twenty-four donors had a left laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN), whereas seven had right open donor nephrectomy (ODN); LDN was only considered if the renal vascular anatomy was favourable on the left. CTA and MRA images were analysed by two radiologists independently. The radiological and surgical findings were correlated after the surgery. RESULTS: CTA showed 33 arteries and 32 veins (100% sensitivity) whereas MRA showed 32 arteries and 31 veins (97% sensitivity). CTA detected all five accessory renal arteries whereas MRA only detected one. CTA also identified all three accessory renal veins whereas MRA identified two. CTA had a sensitivity of 97% and 47% for left lumbar and left gonadal veins, whereas MRA had a sensitivity of 74% and 46%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Multislice spiral CTA with three-dimensional reconstruction was more accurate than MRA for both renal arterial and venous anatomy.

Donor Selection↗

PubMed2005

Dual ipsilateral renal transplantation from a non-heart-beating donor.

A case is described where both kidneys from non-heart-beating (expanded criteria) donors were dual transplanted ipsilaterally. Although both kidneys passed viability tests on the Newcastle machine preservation system and biomarkers' evaluation, there were logistical issues where the cold ischaemic time was too protracted necessitating the transplantation of both kidneys into one recipient. The recipient had satisfactory outcome with the Cockcroft-Gault creatinine clearance of 72.47 (36.29 ml/min individual kidney glomerular filtration rate) suggesting beneficial use of sub-optimal organs to improve outcome.

Cadaver↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of perfusate activities of glutathione S-transferase, alanine aminopeptidase and fatty acid binding protein in the assessment of non-heart-beating donor kidneys.

BACKGROUND: With a universal shortage of donor organs, screening and selection of marginal kidneys from non-heart-beating donors (NHBDs) provides a valuable source for transplantation. Pre-transplant viability assessment is based on a combination of flow characteristics and assessment of ischaemic tissue injury during NHBD kidney machine perfusion by measurement of total glutathione S-transferase (GST) activity. Successful viability screening has facilitated 69 renal transplants from 60 NHBDs within our transplant centre since 1998, with a first-year graft survival of 90.5%. METHODS: We have investigated alanine aminopeptidase (Ala-AP) and fatty acid binding protein (FABP) as alternative biochemical markers to GST for pre-transplantation viability assessment. They were measured, together with GST, in tissue perfusate samples from machine-perfused kidneys from controlled and uncontrolled NHBDs. RESULTS: During machine perfusion, a parallel response was seen for each of the three markers in the perfusates of controlled and uncontrolled NHBD kidneys over the 4-h perfusion. A highly significant correlation was obtained between GST and Ala-AP activities (P<0.0001) and between GST activity and FABP concentration (P<0.0001) in corresponding samples. CONCLUSION: In this study, GST, Ala-AP and FABP represent equivalent biochemical markers in terms of their ability to quantitate renal tissue injury in human NHBD kidneys. However, there may be some advantage in using all three analytes to provide complementary information on kidney allograft viability.

Biomarkers↗