Biomedical subjects

Ahmet Dogrul

Publications and source records attributed to Ahmet Dogrul.

12 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2006

The additive antinociceptive interaction between WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, and ketorolac.

Combinations of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioids are widespread in the management of pain, allowing better analgesia with reduced side effects. Cannabinoids are promising analgesic drugs that have pharmacological properties similar to those of opioids. However, the beneficial effects of cannabinoids for pain treatment are counterbalanced by their psychotomimetic side effects. We designed the present study to evaluate the antinociceptive interaction between cannabinoids and NSAIDs in mice, using the acetic acid-induced writhing test and tail-flick test. Interactions were analyzed using isobolographic analysis. WIN 55,212-2, a cannabinoid agonist, and the NSAID ketorolac, either alone or in combination, produced dose-dependent antinociception in the writhing test. Isobolographic analysis showed additive interactions between WIN 55,212-2 and ketorolac when they were coadministered systemically. Ketorolac is inactive in the radiant heat tail-flick test in which WIN 55,212-2 was active. Ketorolac did not influence WIN 55,212-2-induced antinociception in the tail-flick test. This study demonstrated an additive antinociceptive interaction between WIN 55,212-2 and ketorolac in an inflammatory visceral pain model. The combination of cannabinoids and NSAIDs may have utility in the pharmacotherapy of pain.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2006

The contribution of alpha-1 and alpha-2 adrenoceptors in peripheral imidazoline and adrenoceptor agonist-induced nociception.

We evaluated the effects of activation of peripheral adrenoceptors (AR) and imidazoline receptors on nociception and the contribution of alpha-1 and alpha-2 AR receptors in agonist-induced nociception by using the tail-flick test in mice. Clonidine (alpha-2 AR agonist), agmatine (imidazoline receptor and alpha-2 AR agonist), noradrenaline (mixed alpha-1 and alpha-2 AR agonist), phenylephrine (alpha-1 AR agonist), or 0.9% saline was given by intradermal injection (10 microL) into the tail. The intradermal injection of clonidine (1, 3, and 10 microg) and agmatine (3, 30, and 50 microg) produced dose-dependent antinociception, whereas noradrenaline (1, 10, and 30 microg) and phenylephrine (1, 10 and 30 microg) produced dose-dependent thermal hyperalgesia. Clonidine (10 microg) and agmatine (50 microg)-induced peripheral antinociception were antagonized by pretreatment with yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg IP), a selective alpha-2 AR antagonist, but not by prazosin (1 mg/kg IP), a selective alpha-1 AR antagonist. Noradrenaline (30 microg) and phenylephrine (30 mug)-induced thermal hyperalgesia were antagonized by prazosin (1 mg/kg IP) but not by yohimbine (2.5 mg/kg IP). Our results suggest that local thermal hyperalgesic effects of noradrenaline and phenylephrine are linked to alpha-1 AR and the peripheral antinociceptive action of clonidine and agmatine are linked to alpha-2 AR.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗

PubMed2005

Spinal L-type calcium channel blockade abolishes opioid-induced sensory hypersensitivity and antinociceptive tolerance.

Recent studies have suggested that prolonged exposure to morphine results in the development of paradoxical, abnormal enhanced pain. It has also been suggested that this enhanced pain state may be interpreted as antinociceptive tolerance. Although the precise mechanisms that drive opioid-induced abnormal pain are not well known, considerable evidence suggests that this state may be supported by enhanced, stimulus-evoked excitatory transmission. We hypothesized that blockade of L-type calcium channels, which are critical for excitatory neurotransmitter release, would alter the development of opioid-induced hyperalgesia and antinociceptive tolerance. Male, Swiss-Webster mice received twice-daily intrathecal injections of morphine (10 microg) alone or in combination with amlodipine (10 microg) for 8 days. Mice receiving repeated morphine injections developed enhanced responses to tactile and thermal stimuli. These hypersensitivities were prevented by the coadministration of the putative selective L-type calcium channel blocker amlodipine. Moreover, mice receiving morphine for 8 days demonstrated a significant rightward shift of the morphine antinociceptive dose-response curve, indicative of antinociceptive tolerance, whereas those that also received amlodipine along with morphine did not demonstrate tolerance. These results suggest that blockade of the L-type calcium channels with amlodipine prevented opioid-induced hyperalgesia and the expression of antinociceptive tolerance to spinal morphine, presumably by reducing stimulus-induced excitatory neurotransmitter release.

Amlodipine↗

PubMed2004

Lack of cross-tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of systemic and topical cannabinoids in morphine-tolerant mice.

Opioids and cannabinoids produce antinociception through activity at spinal, supraspinal and peripheral sites. Tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of both the opioids and the cannabinoids develop when these agents are administered chronically. Although mutual potentiation of antinociceptive effects have been reported between opioids and cannabinoids, the development of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between these systems has not been demonstrated consistently. In the present investigation, we explored the possibility of antinociceptive cross-tolerance between systemic or topical morphine and systemic or topical cannabinoids in mice. Mice were made tolerant to morphine either by the subcutaneous (s.c.) implantation of a morphine pellet or repeated topical administration and then challenged with the mixed CB(1) and CB(2) receptor agonist WIN 55, 212-2 given s.c. or topically. Antinociception was indicated by increased tail-flick latencies to noxious radiant heat. Implantation with morphine pellets did not attenuate the antinociceptive potency of systemic or topical WIN 55,212-2. Moreover, twice-daily topical administration of morphine did not attenuate the antinociceptive potency of WIN 55,212-2 applied topically. These observations suggest that opioids and cannabinoids produce antinociception through mechanisms that are independent of each other at either the systemic or peripheral levels.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2004

Topical clonidine antinociception.

Clonidine, an alpha-2 adrenergic agonist, is an extremely potent antinociceptive agent. However, the therapeutic utility of systemic clonidine for the treatment of pain is limited by centrally mediated side effects including sedation, hypotension and rebound hypertension. Given that alpha-2 adrenoceptors are expressed on the peripheral and central terminals of nociceptive fibers, we administered clonidine topically in order to avoid central effects. Here, we demonstrate that topical administration of clonidine to mice (via tail immersion) elicited antinociception in the radiant heat tail-flick test. The magnitude of antinociception was dependent upon the duration of exposure to the clonidine solution. Further, the antinociceptive activity of clonidine was limited to the portion of the tail exposed to drug solution suggesting that the actions of clonidine were locally mediated. Systemic pretreatment with the alpha-2 receptor antagonist, yohimbine, blocked the antinociceptive activity of topical clonidine. Concentrations of clonidine administered locally that were antinociceptive did not impair motor coordination as measured by the rota-rod test. However, doses of clonidine administered systemically that produced antinociception significantly impaired motor coordination. Repeated daily topical administration of clonidine resulted in antinociceptive tolerance. Tolerance to the antinociceptive actions of clonidine was not blocked by topical administration of the NMDA antagonist, ketamine. In conclusion, topical administration of clonidine elicits antinociception by blocking the emerging pain signals at peripheral terminals via alpha-2 adrenoceptors without producing the undesirable central side effects observed following the systemic administration. The ineffectiveness of topical ketamine to block topical clonidine antinociceptive tolerance suggests that peripheral NMDA receptors do not mediate local clonidine antinociceptive tolerance.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2003

Topical cannabinoid antinociception: synergy with spinal sites.

Analgesic effects of cannabimimetic compounds have been known to be related to their central effects. Cannabinoid receptors also exist in the periphery but their role in pain perception has been remained to be clarified. Therefore, we assessed topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2, a mixed CB(1) and CB(2) receptors agonist, in mice using tail-flick test. Immersion of the tail of mouse into the WIN 55, 212-2 solution produced dose-dependent antinociception. This antinociceptive activity was limited to the portion of the tail exposed to WIN 55, 212-2. The antinociceptive response was dependent on duration of exposure to WIN 55, 212-2 solution. The topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2 were dose dependently blocked by topical pretreatment of CB(1) receptor-selective antagonist, AM 251. Thus, topical antinociceptive action of WIN 55, 212-2 involve CB(1) receptors. Intrathecal (i.th.) administration of WIN 55, 212-2 produced a dose-dependent antinociceptive effect. Interestingly, ineffective i.th. doses of WIN 55, 212-2 produced a marked antinociception when combined with topical application of WIN 55, 212-2 and topical antinociceptive effect was potentiated. The dose-response curve of i.th. WIN 55, 212-2 was shifted to the left 15-fold by topical WIN 55, 212-2. This finding suggests that there is an antinociceptive synergy between peripheral and spinal sites of cannabinoid action and it also implicates that local activation of cannabinoid system may regulate pain initiation in cutaneous tissue. Our findings support that cannabinoid system participates in buffering the emerging pain signals at the peripheral sites in addition to their spinal and supraspinal sites of action. In addition, an antinociceptive synergy between topical and spinal cannabinoid actions exists. These results also indicate that topically administered cannabinoid agonists may reduce pain without the dysphoric side effects and abuse potential of centrally acting cannabimimetic drugs.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2003

Reversal of experimental neuropathic pain by T-type calcium channel blockers.

Experimental nerve injury results in exaggerated responses to tactile and thermal stimuli that resemble some aspects of human neuropathic pain. Neuronal hyperexcitability and neurotransmitter release have been suggested to promote such increased responses to sensory stimuli. Enhanced activity of Ca(2+) current is associated with increased neuronal activity and blockade of N- and P-types, but not L-type, calcium channels have been found to block experimental neuropathic pain. While T-type currents are believed to promote neuronal excitability and transmitter release, it is unclear whether these channels may also contribute to the neuropathic state. Rats were prepared with L(5)/L(6) spinal nerve ligation, and tactile and thermal hypersensitivities were established. Mibefradil or ethosuximide was administered either intraperitoneally, intrathecally (i.th.), or locally into the plantar aspect of the injured hindpaw. Systemic mibefradil or ethosuximide produced a dose-dependent blockade of both tactile and thermal hypersensitivities in nerve-injured rats; responses of sham-operated rats were unchanged. Local injection of mibefradil also blocked both end points. Ethosuximide, however, was inactive after local administration, perhaps reflecting its low potency when compared with mibefradil. Neither mibefradil nor ethosuximide given i.th. produced any blockade of neuropathic behaviors. The results presented here suggest that T-type calcium channels may play a role in the expression of the neuropathic state. The data support the view that selective T-type calcium channel blockers may have significant potential in the treatment of neuropathic pain states.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2003

Topical cannabinoid enhances topical morphine antinociception.

Opioids and cannabinoids produce antinociception through both spinal and supraspinal action. Both opioids and cannabinoids also have important peripheral action. Many previous studies indicate that systemically administered cannabinoids enhance antinociceptive properties of opioids. Experiments were conducted to test the hypothesis that topical cannabinoids would enhance the topical antinociceptive effects of morphine. Antinociception was measured in the radiant tail-flick test after immersion of the tail of mice into a solution of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) containing WIN 55, 212-2, a cannabinoid agonist and morphine, an opioid agonist. Morphine and WIN 55, 212-2 produce time dependent topical analgesic effects limited to the portion of the tail exposed to drugs. WIN 55, 212-2 had a potency lower than that of morphine. The topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2 were blocked by systemic pretreatment of cannabinoid CB1 receptor selective antagonist, AM 251. This suggests that topical antinociceptive effects of WIN 55, 212-2 involve CB1 receptors. Combination of topical WIN 55, 212-2 with topical morphine yielded significantly greater analgesic effects than that of topical morphine alone. The ability of the CB1 receptor antagonist AM 251 to antagonize the enhancement of antinociception of morphine by WIN 55, 212-2 indicates that WIN 55, 212-2 acts through a CB1 receptor to enhance the potency of topical morphine. Additionally, spinally administered ineffective doses of WIN 55, 212-2 potentiated the antinociceptive effects of topical morphine. These results demonstrate an antinociceptive interaction between topical opioids with topical, and spinal cannabinoids. These observations are significant in using of topical combination of cannabinoid and morphine in the management of pain.

Administration, Topical↗

PubMed2002

The involvement of nitric oxide in the analgesic effects of ketamine.

We investigated the contribution of NO-cyclic GMP (cGMP) pathway to the antinociceptive effects of ketamine in mice by using the nitric oxide synthase inhibitor, nitro(g)- L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME). Intraperitoneal (i.p.) (1, 5 or 10 mg/kg) or intrathecal (i.th.) (10, 30 or 60 microg/mouse) administration of ketamine produced dose-dependent antinociceptive effects in the acetic acid-induced writhing and formalin tests but not in the tail-flick nor in hot-plate tests. Pretreatment of mice with L-NAME (10 mg/kg, i.p.) which produced no antinociception on its own, significantly inhibited the antinociceptive effect of ketamine (1, 5 or 10 mg/kg, i.p.). However, L-NAME (30 microg/mouse) was given intrathecally, it neither modified the antinociceptive effect of i.th. ketamine (10, 30 or 60 microg/mouse) nor did it produce an antinociceptive effect alone. These data suggest that the activation of the NO-cGMP pathway probably at the supraspinal level, but not spinal level, contributes to the antinociceptive effects of ketamine.

Acetic Acid↗

PubMed2002

The role of T-type calcium channels in morphine analgesia, development of antinociceptive tolerance and dependence to morphine, and morphine abstinence syndrome.

Involvement of T-type voltage dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCCs) on morphine antinociception, in the development of tolerance and dependence to morphine, and naloxone-precipitated abstinence syndrome in morphine dependent mice was examined by using mibefradil, a T-type VDCCs blocker. Mice were rendered tolerant and dependent on morphine by subcutaneous (s.c.) implantation of a morphine pellet containing 75 mg of morphine base for 72 hr. The tail-flick test was used to assess the nociceptive threshold. Coadministration of acute mibefradil (10 mg/kg, i.p.) with morphine enhanced the antinociceptive effects of acute morphine. Repeated mibefradil administration (10 mg/kg, i.p., just before, 24 and 48 hr after morphine pellet implantation) completely blocked the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effect of morphine and even by this effect reached supersensitivity to morphine. However, repeated mibefradil treatment did not alter the development of dependence to morphine assessed by the A(50) values of naloxone (s.c.) required to precipitate withdrawal jumping 72 hr after morphine pellet. But, acute mibefradil (10, 30, and 50 mg/kg, i.p.) dose dependently decreased the expression of morphine abstinence syndrome when given directly 30 min prior to naloxone (0,05 mg/kg, s.c.) 72 hr after morphine pellet. These results indicate a critical role of T-type VDCCs in morphine antinociception, the development of tolerance to the antinociceptive effects of morphine and in morphine abstinence syndrome.

Analgesia↗

PubMed2002

'Knock-down' of spinal CB1 receptors produces abnormal pain and elevates spinal dynorphin content in mice.

Recent studies demonstrate the possible existence of tonic modulatory control of nociceptive input mediated by spinal cannabinoid receptors (CB1). Accordingly, it is predicted that a reduction in the spinal CB1 receptors may enhance sensitivity to sensory stimuli and a decrease in spinal antinociceptive potency to cannabinoid agonists. An antisense oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) specific to the CB1 receptor was used to 'knock-down' CB1 receptors in the lumbar spinal cord and dorsal root ganglia by the local, repeated intrathecal (i.th.) administration of the ODN. This treatment resulted in a decrease in lumbar spinal CB1 receptor expression accompanied by a decrease in the response thresholds to both innocuous tactile and noxious thermal stimuli. The antinociceptive action of the CB1 agonist, WIN 55,212-2, by i.th. administration was also significantly attenuated after treatment with the antisense ODN. Similar treatment using a mismatch control ODN had no effect on receptor protein or on sensory thresholds. The effects of the antisense ODN treatment on sensory thresholds were fully reversed after discontinuation of the ODN injection. The antisense ODN treated rats also showed a significant increase in lumbar spinal dynorphin A. Acute i.th. injection of MK-801 or an antidynorphin antiserum blocked the antisense ODN-induced tactile and thermal hypersensitivity. These data support the possibility of endogenous inhibitory cannabinoid tone to limit spinal afferent input of thermal and tactile stimuli. Lifting of this inhibitory tone through a 'knock-down' of spinal CB1 receptors apparently lowers the thresholds for sensory input, as reflected by the actions of MK-801 to block tactile and thermal hypersensitivity. The increased spinal dynorphin may act to further promote afferent outflow and abnormal pain because sequestration of spinal dynorphin with antiserum also reverses the manifestations of abnormal pain following knock-down of CB1 receptors.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2000

The interaction between IL-1beta and morphine: possible mechanism of the deficiency of morphine-induced analgesia in diabetic mice.

It is known that diabetic mice are less sensitive to the analgesic effect of morphine. Some factor(s) derived from mononuclear cells, e.g. interleukin-1beta (IL-1beta), may be responsible for the diminished analgesic effect of morphine in diabetic mice. Therefore, we examined direct effects of IL-1beta, intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.), on morphine-induced analgesia, subcutaneously (s.c.), in diabetic and control mice by using the tail-flick test. Morphine at doses of 1, 2 and 5 mg/kg (s.c.) produced dose-dependent analgesia in diabetic and control mice but diabetic mice were less sensitive to the analgesic effect of morphine when compared to the controls. IL-1beta at a dose of 0.1 ng/mouse produced analgesia in control mice but not in diabetics, whereas IL-1beta at a dose of 10 ng/mouse produced a hyperalgesic effect both in diabetic and control mice. IL-1beta at a dose of 1 ng/mouse has neither an analgesic nor a hyperalgesic effect in control and diabetic mice. Administration of a neutral (neither analgesic nor hyperalgesic) dose of IL-1beta, 1 ng/mouse (i.c.v.), just prior to administration of morphine (s.c.) abolished the analgesic effect of morphine at doses of 1, 2 and 5 mg/kg in control mice and the analgesic effect of morphine became similar to that in diabetics. The diminished analgesic effect of morphine in diabetes was attenuated further with IL-1beta at a dose of 1 ng/mouse (i.c.v.). These results suggest that the decreased analgesic effect of morphine in diabetes may be related to IL-1beta.

Analgesics, Opioid↗